The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Tactics and Training

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old May 8, 2013, 11:50 PM   #1
nhbmaing
Member
 
Join Date: May 8, 2013
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 15
Am I wrong??

I was having a discussion about why I carry a handgun. I was asked "oh, so if some crazy person starts shooting in a mall, you can take him out?" My answer was no. My gun is there to protect me and my family, not the general public. That is the job of police officers, which I am not. My first goal would be to get out unharmed and only use my weapon if absolutely necessary. I was told this is a selfish attitude, but with chaos going on in an active shooter situation, I could be ID'ed as another attacker and taken out by another CCW holder or the police. It's a complicated situation but at the end of the day the goal is survival, not being a hero. Maybe I'm not getting it.
__________________
The pen is mightier than the sword. I keep the sword for the day I run out of ink.
nhbmaing is offline  
Old May 9, 2013, 12:12 AM   #2
RBid
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 10, 2012
Posts: 1,059
Am I wrong??

You're right, but someone making the choice to intercede on behalf of others is also right. This is a VERY personal decision, because it boils down to the individual identifying what they are or are not willing to risk their physical, emotional, financial, legal, and moral well being on. Nobody has the right to tell another person what they should die for.

What is actually selfish is one person acting entitled to have another person risk life and limb for them.
RBid is offline  
Old May 9, 2013, 12:26 AM   #3
silvermane_1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 6, 2011
Location: Burien,WA
Posts: 897
i agree with RBid statement, even though it is complex issue.
__________________
Rugers:SR1911 CMD,MK 3 .22lr 6",Sec. Six '76 liberty .357 4",SRH .480 Ruger 7.5",Mini-14 188 5.56/.233 18.5", Marlins: 795 .22lr 16.5",30aw 30-30 20",Mossberg:Mav. 88 Tact. 12 ga, 18.5",ATR 100 .270 Win. 22",S&W:SW9VE
9mm 4",Springfield:XD .357sig 4", AKs:CAI PSL-54C, WASR 10/63, WW74,SLR-106c
silvermane_1 is offline  
Old May 9, 2013, 12:31 AM   #4
pax
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 16, 2000
Location: In a state of flux
Posts: 7,520
It's a case of damned if you do, damned if you don't -- which means it's just something to square with your own conscience without trying to please the world at large.

On the one hand, if you would intervene to stop a mass murder event such as a mall shooting, you're plainly a wannabe ninja warrior dude who should not be allowed to own or carry weapons.

On the other hand, if you would not intervene to stop a mass murder event such as a mall shooting, you're plainly a selfish coward who should not be allowed to own or carry weapons.

Me? I've made my choice, and done the homework necessary to make my decisions stick. Don't too much care what either camp has to say about it.

pax
__________________
Kathy Jackson
My personal website: Cornered Cat
pax is offline  
Old May 9, 2013, 12:55 AM   #5
nhbmaing
Member
 
Join Date: May 8, 2013
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 15
Sounds about right. Hopefully nothing ever happens but I practice and train like it could. The responsibility of carrying is mind blowing.


Glad to find a decent bunch of individuals on TFL. It's nice to hear other opinions!
__________________
The pen is mightier than the sword. I keep the sword for the day I run out of ink.
nhbmaing is offline  
Old May 9, 2013, 12:56 AM   #6
JimmyR
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 4, 2012
Posts: 1,273
Quote:
Originally Posted by nhbmaing
I was having a discussion about why I carry a handgun. I was asked "oh, so if some crazy person starts shooting in a mall, you can take him out?" My answer was no. My gun is there to protect me and my family, not the general public. That is the job of police officers, which I am not. My first goal would be to get out unharmed and only use my weapon if absolutely necessary. I was told this is a selfish attitude, but with chaos going on in an active shooter situation, I could be ID'ed as another attacker and taken out by another CCW holder or the police. It's a complicated situation but at the end of the day the goal is survival, not being a hero. Maybe I'm not getting it.

Your friend should consider if running/hiding in an active shooter enviornment would be a selfish attitude as well.
JimmyR is offline  
Old May 9, 2013, 09:48 AM   #7
Tactical Jackalope
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 5, 2010
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 6,429
Quote:
I was having a discussion about why I carry a handgun. I was asked "oh, so if some crazy person starts shooting in a mall, you can take him out?" My answer was no. My gun is there to protect me and my family, not the general public.
Wow...really?

What has the world come to...That upsets me tremendously that people have that type of mentality.
Tactical Jackalope is offline  
Old May 9, 2013, 10:01 AM   #8
kraigwy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 16, 2008
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 11,061
Rob Pincus, Personal Defense Network ( I also think he hangs our here but don't remember his user name), put out an excellent DVD on "Active Shooter Response".

I highly recommend this DVD to anyone who plans on getting to a place where you might encounter an active shooter, which means basically stepping out your door.

Besides avoiding being shot by the active shooter, it covers protecting your self from responding LE and other CCW holders who may or may not be in the area.

I'm not going to go over what he says, you can find that by googling PDN on the internet and find the advertisement for the DVD.

Get the DVD, its informative and just might save your life or keep you out of trouble.

Duh......His user name is "Rob Pincus"..........who didn't know that.
__________________
Kraig Stuart
CPT USAR Ret
USAMU Sniper School
Distinguished Rifle Badge 1071

Last edited by kraigwy; May 9, 2013 at 10:11 AM.
kraigwy is offline  
Old May 9, 2013, 10:16 AM   #9
Ben Dover
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 11, 2013
Location: High up in the Rocky Moun
Posts: 665
There are far too many variables in your question.

This is a situational question, with no right or wrong answer to fit all conditions.

If you will recall, the individual in Arizona who was armed chose to physically intervene rather than use his firearm.

He assessed the situation, and reacted correctly. Other situations must be individuall assessed and response based on that assessment.
__________________
The soldier's pack is not so heavy a burden as the prisoner's chains. Dwight Eisenhower

It is very important what a man stands for.
But it is far more important what a man refuses to stand for.
Ben Dover is offline  
Old May 9, 2013, 10:17 AM   #10
Wreck-n-Crew
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 8, 2013
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,820
Quote:
The responsibility of carrying is mind blowing.
The reality of knowing that carrying alone makes me realize that by having it, my whole world of decisions in a what to do cases change dramatically because of my responsibility and i can see how scary that can be.

Furthermore to the op, I know a woman personally who owned a gun, became a victim of a home invasion, failed to shoot and her own gun was taken and she was shot as a result, with her own gun.

Seriously consider your choice to carry if you have to think about using it even if to defend someone else. The last thing you would want to happen is for one of your own to have died in a situation you described and that the stranger that was carrying never fired. Even more, say he only fired and saved the life of himself and his family while he allowed your son or daughter to die first.

I can't sugar coat this any more than i already have and no one can make you put your life on the line for a stranger, but in my eyes if you think you are better than a stranger when you value yourself more and that is something that none of us can change .....character.
__________________
If you ever have to use a firearm, you don't get to pick the scenario!

Last edited by Wreck-n-Crew; May 9, 2013 at 10:31 AM.
Wreck-n-Crew is offline  
Old May 9, 2013, 10:44 AM   #11
Grizz12
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 11, 2012
Posts: 527
Quote:
Wow...really?

What has the world come to...That upsets me tremendously that people have that type of mentality.
I agree
Grizz12 is offline  
Old May 9, 2013, 10:56 AM   #12
Wreck-n-Crew
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 8, 2013
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,820
I just have to add to that, how do you think the ani-gun people will handle this publicly?

Headlines reading something to the effect Pro gun rights failed to save lives?

That all the more would support their belief that guns should only be in the hands of police and government and not in the hands of a citizen.

I believe it would reflect worse than if no one there had a weapon!

Furthermore these questions should have been answered for anyone before you started carrying. Makes no since to walk into the world having doubts about what to do in a case like this.

Recognizing if the situation calls for your predetermined causes to use your weapon are different...this is something you should have already decided on.
__________________
If you ever have to use a firearm, you don't get to pick the scenario!
Wreck-n-Crew is offline  
Old May 9, 2013, 10:57 AM   #13
nhbmaing
Member
 
Join Date: May 8, 2013
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 15
I think I need to do some research into the legal aspects of self defense shooting. I've been taking a tactical rifle/pistol class for about a year (two weekends a month) and I'm always striving to get better. But my only worry is that I get arrested for using my firearm to end a threat.

kraigwy, I'm definitely going to check out that Rob Pincus DVD. Sounds like it will be very helpful. As far as I'm concerned information is just as powerful as the gun I carry.
__________________
The pen is mightier than the sword. I keep the sword for the day I run out of ink.
nhbmaing is offline  
Old May 9, 2013, 11:05 AM   #14
Gaerek
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 3, 2012
Location: Arizona
Posts: 939
In my opinion, there's no right or wrong answer. Assuming a mall mass shooting/murder situation, how I would handle it would depend completely on the circumstances. If I were alone, by myself, and assuming I had a clear shot, I would likely take it. If I were with my family, I would draw my gun, but my #1 priority would be getting my family out of harms way, even if I had a clear shot at the crazy person. If I had an escape route in this situation, I would take that, regardless if I had a clear shot. Of course, if we were cornered, I'd do what I would have to do.
Gaerek is offline  
Old May 9, 2013, 11:14 AM   #15
zincwarrior
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 1, 2011
Location: Texas, land of Tex-Mex
Posts: 2,259
You're only wrong in having a discussion about it. If you're CCing, no one should know you're CCing.
zincwarrior is offline  
Old May 9, 2013, 11:18 AM   #16
Gaerek
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 3, 2012
Location: Arizona
Posts: 939
Quote:
You're only wrong in having a discussion about it. If you're CCing, no one should know you're CCing.
That depends. If it's a trusted friend or family member, I don't see the problem. A stranger? Different story altogether. It really depends on who you're discussing it with.
Gaerek is offline  
Old May 9, 2013, 11:24 AM   #17
spacemanspiff
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 16, 2002
Location: alaska
Posts: 3,498
Quote:
That upsets me tremendously that people have that type of mentality.
Its as personal and individual a decision as it is for a person to even arm themselves. We might like to think that everyone can be armed and everyone can make decisions about the use of deadly force that fits in with their conscience, but the reality of the issue will not match our fantasies.

The reasons people go out into the world armed vary. I admit, my first duty is to defend my loved ones.
__________________
"Every man alone is sincere; at the entrance of a second person hypocrisy begins." - Ralph Waldo Emerson
"People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of thought which they seldom use." - Soren Kierkegaard
spacemanspiff is offline  
Old May 9, 2013, 11:25 AM   #18
MLeake
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 15, 2007
Location: Outside KC, MO
Posts: 10,128
To those who are criticizing the OP, bear in mind the Clint Eastwood line, "A man's gotta know his limitations."

A CCW type who chooses to engage an active shooter can easily put others at risk.

1) He could misinterpret a situation, and engage a victim who was already engaged in lawful self-defense;

2) She could misinterpret the situation, and engage another armed Samaritan or a plainclothes cop;

3) He could engage a valid target, but miss and end up shooting innocents;

4) She could engage a valid target, lose the gunfight, and draw the shooter's attention and wrath to her own family.

So, as Pax and others have noted, the correct answer will vary. The nature of the scenario, and the perceptions and abilities of the CCW carrier, should affect each decision.
MLeake is offline  
Old May 9, 2013, 11:25 AM   #19
tahunua001
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 21, 2011
Location: Idaho
Posts: 7,839
protecting myself and my family takes precedence but if I were to find myself in a situation where I could stop the blood shed myself then I would not hesitate to do so. even if I got my family outside and the shooting was still going on inside I would probably have a hard time sitting outside and waiting for the cops....

the idea of getting a CCW license so you can play off duty cop every time you leave is stupid and probably speaks volumes about a persons EGO and delusions but if you have the ability to help others and don't take it because your first obligation is to get yourself out then that's your perogative, I personally don't think I could do it.
__________________
ignore my complete lack of capitalization. I still have no problem correcting your grammar.
I never said half the stuff people said I did-Albert Einstein
You can't believe everything you read on the internet-Benjamin Franklin
tahunua001 is offline  
Old May 9, 2013, 11:46 AM   #20
Wreck-n-Crew
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 8, 2013
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,820
Somehow i think the OP's post was misinterpreted between what was written as to what was meant. Correct me if i am wrong....

Op clearly stated he/she would not shoot to defend someone else...gave the reason why and asked if they were wrong.

They did not ask if they should or should not shoot given any situation or scenario....it was clearly stated that they would not shoot period to defend anyone other than themselves or their family.

No scenario was covered or suggested that they ever would shoot after stating i would not shoot period. Big difference from never would given a scenario.


Just so that everyone is clear, in my posts I am not trying to trap the op in their words, i am just responding to them as clearly written.
__________________
If you ever have to use a firearm, you don't get to pick the scenario!
Wreck-n-Crew is offline  
Old May 9, 2013, 11:51 AM   #21
Tactical Jackalope
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 5, 2010
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 6,429
Am I wrong??

So let me get this right, to automatically say you'd do whatever you can to stop it. Is wrong. But to say right off the the bat that you will do nothing nor would you care is fine?

Morals today are lacking.

MLeake makes awesome points.

But my first question needs an answer.
Tactical Jackalope is offline  
Old May 9, 2013, 11:52 AM   #22
geetarman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 18, 2009
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,157
Quote:
Wow...really?

What has the world come to...That upsets me tremendously that people have that type of mentality.
This is a very sticky wicket. Being trained is one thing. Being an off duty LEO is another and attempting to help in a situation you might not understand might have you attempting to subdue the good guy as opposed to the bad guy. I don't know that there is a good answer for this question or not.

It is a troubling scenario for sure.
__________________
Geetarman

Carpe Cerveza
geetarman is offline  
Old May 9, 2013, 12:04 PM   #23
Gaerek
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 3, 2012
Location: Arizona
Posts: 939
I want to clarify my original statement. This is not a black or white issue. I overly simplified an active mass murder situation. The actions I would take would be directly based on the situation. I wouldn't automatically shoot on an active shooter just because I have a clear shot. I wouldn't automatically run for the exit with my family in the same situation. There are so many complex issues when it comes to this. I carry a gun, not because I'm afraid of a mass shooting and I want to be some kind of hero. I carry a gun as protection for myself and my family. That's the #1 thing. How that would actually play out in a shooting situation would depend on the situation.

Would I be against taking a shot at the shooter if I could? No. But that doesn't mean I would. Not shooting doesn't mean I don't care about others, it just means that it would be the right thing to do for the situation.

Running doesn't make me a coward either. It just means that it was the right thing to do for the situation.
Gaerek is offline  
Old May 9, 2013, 12:07 PM   #24
grizz223
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 19, 2013
Location: Fl
Posts: 204
In my opinion it is better to die trying to save others than to run away and live to fight another day. I could not live with myself if innocent people were killed because I did nothing. Just my Two cents but I am required to act Regardless.
__________________
NRA Life member. Deputy Sheriff.
grizz223 is offline  
Old May 9, 2013, 12:13 PM   #25
Wreck-n-Crew
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 8, 2013
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,820
Quote:
This is a very sticky wicket. Being trained is one thing. Being an off duty LEO is another and attempting to help in a situation you might not understand might have you attempting to subdue the good guy as opposed to the bad guy. I don't know that there is a good answer for this question or not.
He was only responding to fact that the op stated he clearly would not use his weapon to save someone else in any scenario.

The op wrote his post to state that in no situation would he do so. The scenario was for reasons not to, but he made a final mental determination to never engage except to save him or his family.

I understand that he may not have meant it that way but the op stated his and his only so the response by Constantine was a response to the am i wrong question.

Given what was clearly stated and asked it was a proper and justified response to the statement and the question that followed.
__________________
If you ever have to use a firearm, you don't get to pick the scenario!
Wreck-n-Crew is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.11768 seconds with 10 queries