|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
October 11, 2013, 04:43 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 15, 2011
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 317
|
CA Gov Brown vetoes a pile of anti-gun bills today
http://gov.ca.gov/news.php?id=18265 (second half of page has the vetoed bills)
Included was the biggie...SB374, which would have pretty much ended semi-auto centerfire rifles in CA. Thanks to everyone who helped encourage these vetoes from Gov Brown. I believe the vetoing of this many anti-gun bills in one sitting is a CA record. I don't represent this to be a complete list: AB 169 by Assemblymember Roger Dickinson (D-Sacramento) – Unsafe handguns. A veto message can be found here. • AB 180 by Assemblymember Rob Bonta (D-Alameda) – Registration and licensing of firearms: City of Oakland. A veto message can be found here. • SB 299 by Senator Mark DeSaulnier (D-Concord) – Firearms: lost or stolen: reports. A veto message can be found here. • SB 374 by Senator Darrell Steinberg (D-Sacramento) – Firearms: assault weapons. A veto message can be found here. • SB 567 by Senator Hannah-Beth Jackson (D-Santa Barbara) – Firearms: shotguns. A veto message can be found here. • SB 755 by Senator Lois Wolk (D-Davis) – Firearms: prohibited persons. A veto message can be found here. |
October 11, 2013, 04:48 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 15, 2011
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 317
|
Unfortunately, he did sign some as well. However, given expectations (most thought he would veto no more than one bill, maaaaaaybe 2), things are about as good as can be expected for the California.
• SB 683 by Senator Marty Block (D-San Diego) – Firearms: firearm safety certificate. • SB 363 by Senator Roderick D. Wright (D-Los Angeles) – Firearms: criminal storage: unsafe handguns: fees. • SB 127 by Senator Ted Gaines (R-Rocklin) – Firearms: mentally disordered persons. • AB 1131 by Assemblymember Nancy Skinner (D-Berkeley) – Firearms. • AB 711 by Assemblymember Anthony Rendon (D-Lakewood) – Hunting: nonlead ammunition. A signing message can be found here. • AB 500 by Assemblymember Tom Ammiano (D-San Francisco) – Firearms. • AB 538 by Assemblymember Richard Pan (D-Sacramento) – Firearms. • AB 539 by Assemblymember Richard Pan (D-Sacramento) – Firearm possession: prohibitions: transfer to licensed dealer. • AB 48 by Assemblymember Nancy Skinner (D-Berkeley) – Firearms: large-capacity magazines. • AB 170 by Assemblymember Steven Bradford (D-Gardena) – Assault weapons and .50 BMG rifles. • AB 231 by Assemblymember Philip Y. Ting (D-San Francisco) – Firearms: criminal storage. Last edited by Frank Ettin; October 12, 2013 at 11:13 AM. Reason: snark |
October 11, 2013, 06:03 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 25, 2008
Location: California
Posts: 1,951
|
It is not quite what I wanted but all in all I count it as a win.
__________________
http://www.armsmaster.net-a.googlepages.com http://s239.photobucket.com/albums/f...aster270/Guns/ Retired LE, M.P., Sr. M.P. Investigator F.B.I. Trained Rangemaster/Firearms Instructor & Armorer, Presently Forensic Document Examiner for D.H.S. |
October 11, 2013, 07:12 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 24, 2011
Posts: 990
|
Can't shoot Bambi with lead
http://gov.ca.gov/docs/AB_711_2013_Signing_Message.pdf
Appears it only pertains to hunting, I know it's been tried before in general use but always gets "shot down" This is just one more step in the wrong direction. |
October 11, 2013, 07:28 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 5, 2010
Location: McMurdo Sound Texas
Posts: 4,322
|
Several states have banned lead shot, and hunting continues there.
After growing up across town fron a lead acid battery smelter and reading about well above average developmental problems in the nearby neighborhood kids, I'm not sure that's a terrible idea to ban, reduce or restrict it.
__________________
Cave illos in guns et backhoes |
October 11, 2013, 07:33 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 24, 2011
Posts: 990
|
I can see lead shot, quail hunters will blast 100 rounds in a morning hunt and the majority of the shot doesn't stay in the animal so it gets scattered throughout the environment.
When I go out hunting I bring 5 rounds, just in case I see a 16pt buck after I take my 12 pointer |
October 11, 2013, 08:37 PM | #7 |
Staff
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,059
|
For those just tuning in to this legislative session, here's a descriptive list of what was on the block.
I'm glad to see SB 374 vetoed, but the lead ban is going to be a real problem going forward.
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change. --Randall Munroe |
October 11, 2013, 11:16 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 10, 2011
Location: West Miami,Florida
Posts: 118
|
Yes, the lead ban is quite problematic.
__________________
"It is terrible to contemplate how few politicians are hanged." G.K. Chesterton From The Cleveland Press, March 1, 1921 |
October 12, 2013, 12:46 AM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 1, 2011
Posts: 356
|
Brown doesn't seem to think so, and full implementation is a long way away (2019). Further, there are ready alternatives to lead for hunting ammo, and posts on other fora state that it is cost competitive. Further, the ban applies only to hunting, not otherwise. Patch and ball muzzleloaders may have issues, but handgun hunters have plenty of copper solids to choose from. SASS will be unaffected, as will your favorite flavor of SD ammo.
|
October 12, 2013, 10:21 AM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 10, 1999
Location: California
Posts: 2,716
|
Where does it say that lead inside a copper jacket will be okay?
And thinking of 2019 as a "long way off" is playing right into their hands. |
October 12, 2013, 01:49 PM | #11 | ||
Staff
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,059
|
Quote:
Quote:
When the lead ban goes into effect, voters will blame whoever is unfortunate enough to occupy the office then.
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change. --Randall Munroe |
||
October 12, 2013, 05:17 PM | #12 |
Member
Join Date: May 2, 2013
Posts: 30
|
I personally want to thank all who helped us during this fight either with donations or sending a letter. Thank you for supporting us.
-Cisco |
October 13, 2013, 10:03 AM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 21, 2000
Location: Minnesota, Twin Cities
Posts: 1,076
|
There's a difference between "shot" and bullets and what the intention is for each. With shot, you don't care about rapid expansion, you worry more about density to carry energy to a target (eg. game birds). With a bullet, you want to maintain energy for longer shots, however, you also want rapid expansion to increase the tissue damage and kill the target more efficiently. Lead is great for both shot and bullets in those regards.
It's easier to substitute a hard material with good density for shot, such as bismuth. Again, you are not worried about the ability of an individual pellet to expand rapidly once it hits its target. You mostly want penetration into vital areas by a number of those pellets. With a bullet, you have one projectile, instead of many. It needs to do more work at the target than a single pellet in a group of pellets. Thus, if you go with the "we ban lead shot, why not lead bullets" argument, you are handing the anti gun folks an ace in their hand as they push for more "infringements" on our right to keep and bear arms, which includes for hunting purposes, but is not limited to hunting and sporting purposes.
__________________
"If you love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen." Samuel Adams. |
Tags |
lead free bullets |
|
|