|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
September 19, 2011, 10:31 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 16, 2006
Location: IOWA
Posts: 8,783
|
Be sure of your target and backstop!
During a recent Hunter Safety Cass, I went into a hunting scenerio. We were standing at the bottom of a small rise and I explained that a Rooster just flushed up in front of me and was flying up, toward the top of the rise. I then asked, Good shot or Bad shot? I got about a 60 to 40 answer on Bad shot. We then got into a discussion as to why it was not so good. I then asked; What is our target? Answer; Rooster. Question; what is our backstop? No answer !! .....
Question from Female student; Why would you want to shoot a rooster?? Answer; I should have said; Rooster-Pheasant. Question; Well, make up your mind, which is it, a Rooster or a Pheasant? ... Answer; It's a Rooster Pheasant or male, as opposed to a Hen. .. Question; Well, why would anyone want to shoot a Hen? Another student then said; Well, you had to go there didn't you?? I answered ; Yep !! Be Safe !!!
__________________
'Fundamental truths' are easy to recognize because they are verified daily through simple observation and thus, require no testing. |
September 19, 2011, 04:14 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 27, 2005
Location: Crescent Iowa
Posts: 2,971
|
On a pheasdant the sky should be yer backstop or dont shoot. Seen a dog get hit that way.
|
September 19, 2011, 04:24 PM | #3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 8, 2001
Location: Forestburg, Montague Cnty, TX
Posts: 12,714
|
Quote:
__________________
"If you look through your scope and see your shoe, aim higher." -- said to me by my 11 year old daughter before going out for hogs 8/13/2011 My Hunting Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/HornHillRange |
|
September 19, 2011, 05:52 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 12, 2008
Location: Between Dallas and Shreveport, LA
Posts: 569
|
I learned about backstop at age 8,
when I shot my new Daisy Red Ryder BB gun at a clothspin on a cloths line. The backstop, in my case, was the kitchen window. My father was eating his bowl of cereal and reading the morning newspaper when my BB showered window pane glass into his newspaper, barely missing his face.
The rest of the story is too painful to relate. Did you know a Daisy Red Ryder can be thrown a good 40 or 50 yards?!!
__________________
Artillery lends dignity to what would otherwise be but a vulgar brawl. |
September 20, 2011, 03:58 PM | #5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 27, 2005
Location: Crescent Iowa
Posts: 2,971
|
Quote:
|
|
September 20, 2011, 04:11 PM | #6 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
|
Maybe I'm misunderstanding the use of the word... but how is the sky not a backstop when you're shooting at flying animals?
I mean, yeah, you've got to be careful where your shot lands, but there essentially ISN'T a backstop, except the air. The ground certainly isn't a "back stop", it isn't "back" of your shot. You're just raining down BBs on the ground. Actually, I would say that unless you're shooting at a range type environment that LITERALLY has a backstop, safe shooting doesn't even require the concept. Be sure of your target and what is beyond. "Beyond" doesn't imply "backstop" to me. It implies that I'm not going to hit anything important. It might be the ground, or a tree, or mostly air until it rains back down, but it's not a "backstop". A backstop is something intentionally hit to stop the bullet intentionally, not a random safe place that it ends up. Last edited by Brian Pfleuger; September 20, 2011 at 04:18 PM. |
September 20, 2011, 05:51 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 4, 2006
Location: NE FL.......
Posts: 1,081
|
I am reading this one with intrest..........
Being kind of a safety nerd I have to admit that I was left confused by the word "backstop" in relation to a flying bird. Knowing to be careful of what is behind the shot that might be landed on I get.......are we just hung up on semantics or have I missed something......? |
September 20, 2011, 05:58 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 3, 2010
Posts: 2,016
|
... I'm thinkin'.... 'toward the top of the rise'... is the key phrase. It's not good to shoot pointing uphill in such a situation because we can't see whether or not someone simply out for a hike, for instance, might be just coming up, exposing their head, on the other side of the rise just at the moment we shoot...
Did I get it right?
__________________
What did Mrs. Bullet say to Mr. Bullet? ... "We're having a BeeBee!"... IF THE SHOE FITS, WEAR IT!... IF THE GUN FITS, SHOOT IT! "Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it." |
September 20, 2011, 06:05 PM | #9 |
Junior member
Join Date: October 4, 2007
Location: All the way to NEBRASKA
Posts: 8,722
|
peetza, you are splitting hairs..... the point is the shooter does not know what is beyond his target, as in where the pellets will end up: there could be a herd of cows, a boy scout troop, or Barnum and Baily's Circus just over that rise..... a bit of scouting beforehand could have answered that question, though. Plan your hunt, people.
|
September 20, 2011, 06:18 PM | #10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 27, 2006
Location: Lane County Oregon
Posts: 2,547
|
Quote:
__________________
U.S Army, Retired Ethics is knowing the difference between what you have a right to do and what is right to do. -Potter Stewart |
|
September 20, 2011, 06:19 PM | #11 | |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
|
Quote:
Splitting hairs, maybe, but the real difference is that I was where you're at with the assumptions about previous scouting. I picture that the shooter in the scenario is familiar with his/her surroundings. Safety doesn't start with not taking a shot. It starts with KNOWING whether or not to take a shot. You can cost yourself a lot of good opportunities because lack of knowledge of the area you're hunting prevents you from taking shots that would be perfectly safe. Not taking that shot is the right thing, at that moment. The "righter" thing is to KNOW if it's safe or not. Still though, I don't consider "the ground over yonder" to be a "backstop". A backstop is something specific that you hit on purpose to stop the projectile. |
|
September 20, 2011, 07:04 PM | #12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 8, 2001
Location: Forestburg, Montague Cnty, TX
Posts: 12,714
|
Quote:
The sky is not where the shot stops. Hence, it is not the backstop. The sky may be behind your target, but only for part of the trajectory of the shot. On open terrain, sky starts at the horizon and continues upward. Your sky "backstop" may be a perfectly level shot as a bird rises into the air. Or, it may be a slightly elevated shot where all you see is sky behind the bird, but the shot is returning to earth and certainly may hit things other than the sky which has failed to stop the shot.
__________________
"If you look through your scope and see your shoe, aim higher." -- said to me by my 11 year old daughter before going out for hogs 8/13/2011 My Hunting Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/HornHillRange |
|
September 20, 2011, 11:19 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,401
|
Not all states have laws against shooting pheasants on the ground. Some states even allow rifles to be used*.
*In some cases, this should read "...used to allow rifles to be used."
__________________
Don't even try it. It's even worse than the internet would lead you to believe. |
September 21, 2011, 09:35 AM | #14 |
Staff in Memoriam
Join Date: November 13, 1998
Location: Terlingua, TX; Thomasville, GA
Posts: 24,798
|
To get back to the OP and away from all this extraneous noise: "We were standing at the bottom of a small rise and I explained that a Rooster just flushed up in front of me and was flying up, toward the top of the rise."
That says to me that it's a low-flying bird and there is the possibility of some person or livestock which is out of sight but could be hit by pellets which still have enough force to cause injury. From the hunt shows on TV, it appears that pheasants tend to be low-flying birds, generally, so more care is called for. IOW, don't take chances when you're unsure of what is or might be downrange. That's easy enough. This sort of situation is not at all common when hunting waterfowl, dove or quail. Those shots are commonly taken at rather high angles, and by the time the shot falls back to the ground they're harmless. I know from experience that the logical reaction to #8 or #7-1/2 shot falling on a person from shots fired a hundred yards away should be to sing, "Listen to the murmur of the falling rain..." |
September 21, 2011, 10:36 AM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 1, 2010
Posts: 393
|
What's a safe range for shotgun shots?
Since we're on the topic of safety, what would be considered a safe distance for shotgun backstop (for pheasant hunting, #5 shot)?
|
September 21, 2011, 10:44 AM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 16, 2006
Location: IOWA
Posts: 8,783
|
Hunting enviroment is not a controlled enviroment.
When I first posted this, it was to show the funnier side of working with students on an unfamiliar subject. In this case, it was the lady that was confused over what we were shooting at. I did not expect many replies but then the "backstop" issue kicked in and so it progressed.
More Detail; At our M/L station, we present the four major gun safety rules, as written. At the end of each one, we present an example or scenario to further explain what we want to get across. Prior to the Pheasant example, I'm standing between the the students and targets behing me. I ask the strudent; What is our Target? Answer; those targets behind you. I then ask, what is our backstop; Answer; the wall of wooden ties that the targets are mounted on and berm. ... I then explain that this is a controlled enviroment but that in hunting, it is not a controlled enviroment and you have to think beyond just taking the shot. In short, there probably won't be a backstop but a safe zone that we have seconds to define. Most of the class replied that it was a bad shot for the reasons that Art has posted as we had no idea of what was behind or just over the rise. We further explain that in a hunting enviroment, you clearly identify what you are shooting at, what is beyond as well as what is happening around you. One student even commented that his Grandfather owned the farm behind the hill and he could be out in the field. Be Safe!!!
__________________
'Fundamental truths' are easy to recognize because they are verified daily through simple observation and thus, require no testing. Last edited by Pahoo; September 21, 2011 at 01:27 PM. |
September 21, 2011, 01:23 PM | #17 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 20, 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,084
|
Well put Pahoo,
It is getting harder all the time to communicate with the students. Your loose term of Rooster is a very good example being you are in Pheasant habitat. I have to be careful when referring to Ruffed Grouse as most commonly call them Partridge around here. Quote:
So sometimes the safest shot for a young shooter may very well be a ground shot.
__________________
Gbro CGVS For the message of the Cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, But to us who are being saved, It Is The Power Of God. 1Corinthians 1-18 |
|
September 21, 2011, 01:47 PM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 16, 2006
Location: IOWA
Posts: 8,783
|
Easy to say but not always to do.
Our classes usually runs about 50/50 adult to young folks ratio. We have a pretty good mix of shooters that you can spot right off. Lately about 25% female. Seems that more females are getting into shooting sports. ....
We also "Try" to explain the primative condition of Tunnel-Vision, where we are so focussed on the target, that we naturally ingnore everythng else in view. Like trying to take a good picture of your dog and then notice that your cat's behind is walking out of the frame. ..... Be Safe !!!
__________________
'Fundamental truths' are easy to recognize because they are verified daily through simple observation and thus, require no testing. |
September 21, 2011, 03:11 PM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 3, 2011
Posts: 145
|
I'm in my first Hunter Safety class this week as an apprentice instructor. I'm assuming that the OP is using the same or similar IHEA-based materials. In our materials, "skylined" game is specifically addressed as an unsafe shot. A bit of my evil side may come out this evening and I may pose a question about "skylined" game and birds in the air.
|
September 21, 2011, 03:39 PM | #20 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: February 16, 2006
Location: IOWA
Posts: 8,783
|
Great Question !!
Quote:
Quote:
Be Safe !!!
__________________
'Fundamental truths' are easy to recognize because they are verified daily through simple observation and thus, require no testing. Last edited by Pahoo; September 21, 2011 at 03:49 PM. |
||
September 21, 2011, 04:00 PM | #21 |
Staff in Memoriam
Join Date: November 13, 1998
Location: Terlingua, TX; Thomasville, GA
Posts: 24,798
|
Critter nomenclature can be a problem in fishing as well as hunting. The reason a seafood menu has "mahi-mahi" is because so few people know that there is a fish called a dolphin. Not all dolphin are Flipper.
You can get an interesting reaction by pointing at the mahi-mahi on the menu and telling the waitress, "I'll have the dolphin." Deer. Headlights. |
September 21, 2011, 11:06 PM | #22 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,401
|
Quote:
It's like we westerners referring to our Sharp-tailed and Ruffed Grouse as "Prairie Chickens" in the wrong company. Since there are, in fact, two species of protected (or "vulnerable") birds with variations of the name "Prairie Chicken", the wrong impression (or even a call to wildlife officers) could be made. We use "Pine Chicken" and "Prairie Chicken" quite frequently, but it doesn't make it right. Quote:
A couple years ago, I saw a fairly decent selection of seafood on the menu of a restaurant in Wyoming. The selection was good enough, and pricing high enough, to make me wonder if they were actually flying in the product (versus the standard 'it's been frozen since 1997, but we're still calling it "fresh"'.). I asked the waitress if they had any mahi-mahi. Her reply: "I don't think we got any ahi, but I think we have some all-white-meat albacore." ...... I ordered the Reuben.
__________________
Don't even try it. It's even worse than the internet would lead you to believe. |
||
September 22, 2011, 07:36 AM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 3, 2011
Posts: 145
|
Pahoo, yes, I would most certainly keep it positive. Since I'm not leading the class - I'm an apprentice - I didn't have the chance to bring up the question, but I think it's a good one nonetheless.
|
September 22, 2011, 03:26 PM | #24 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 27, 2005
Location: Crescent Iowa
Posts: 2,971
|
Quote:
I was in a situation like the OP posted I saw a pheasant fly up to the top of the ridge and fold. I went up and found a dead pheas, the group shot it was headed in the other direction so I added it to my bag and bird count. Was hunting a field, saw a buck come into it lagging he was hit low in the gut. I was in Nebr so I didnt have avalid deer permit but I did show the guys come after it the blood trail it left, they got into the truck and drove off without trying to track it. Never saw this in the 60s, 70s, or 80s just recently last 5 years or so. Made me want to puke. Came out of a field 3 years ago to find my truck shot. |
|
September 22, 2011, 04:27 PM | #25 |
Junior member
Join Date: November 12, 2000
Location: Colorado Springs, Colorado
Posts: 9,494
|
Its sad they don't teach critical thinking anymore. A good cheese eater could make the case that no safe shot is possible in the hunting fields. I would not agree with him, I would go on to make the case that where the written rules end, a responsible man with common sense stands up.
That shot at the pheasant was a bad shot because you were downrange even if the bird was going up. I think its a given that the hunters would have already scanned their respective fields of fire and seen you inside the fof, precluding the shot. but they grade on the curve now, hmm. No wonder you got the responses you did. I hope you don't grade on the curve, Mr. Instructor! Fail the bums that aren't safe! |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|