November 4, 2012, 09:29 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 10, 2011
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 110
|
7.62x25 for Defense?
What do you guys think of the 7.62 Tokarev round for defensive use in a pistol? In the home or CCW, pro's and cons of the round, ammo availability so on and so forth. I would like to hear facts and opinions on this one. Thanks guys!
__________________
"If you carry a gun, people will call you paranoid. That's ridiculous. If I have a gun, what in the hell do I have to be paranoid for." - Clint Smith |
November 4, 2012, 09:34 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 18, 2004
Posts: 1,944
|
Definitely works from the small and fast perspective. Would be more promising if there were more guns and defensive ammunition available for it.
|
November 4, 2012, 09:37 PM | #3 |
Staff
Join Date: February 12, 2001
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 24,932
|
It's similar to, but hotter than the old 7.63 Mauser round which had a reputation for being a pretty good stopper IF the bullet hit bone on the way in. If that happened, the resulting secondary fragments of bone, together with the bullet did a real number on the target. Otherwise, it's like any other FMJ round. In & out, not much of a wound channel to speak of.
With good quality hollowpoints, it should be a reasonably good stopper but there's not a lot of applicable information to go from...
__________________
Do you know about the TEXAS State Rifle Association?
|
November 4, 2012, 10:07 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 9, 2009
Posts: 718
|
i think it's too small and too fast. if everyone i was going to encounter had on kevlar, well then, yes i suppose so. i've shot enough of this to say what i have seen it do. i'm talking about the surplus stuff here. it will go through 1/4" steel, not every time, but most of the time. i've shot it through solid pine also. it went through 6 3x6's. that's roughly 15 inches of wood and didn't start to tumble. i realize that this isn't real world scenarios and not flesh or bone. but that's some good penetration in my book. it sure is a fun cartridge though. not as easy to come by as it once was. and that's a shame too.
|
November 4, 2012, 11:09 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 7, 2009
Posts: 995
|
Penetration is over-rated. Yah. Right.
In a a world of urban BGs hiding behind Imported automobiles and make-shift body armor, the 7.62x25 sounds good to me. |
November 5, 2012, 04:41 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 28, 2006
Posts: 211
|
Load it with Wolf JHP's, and you've got a pretty good candidate. Would hate to have to deal w/ the hearing loss indoors, though!!
|
November 5, 2012, 04:46 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 26, 2004
Location: Louisville KY
Posts: 13,805
|
...except when the round goes through the BG and hits an innocent bystander.
At the very least you'd want a jhp of some sort for the x25. The FMJ round was the only autoloader tested that would penetrate a kevlar helmet. |
November 5, 2012, 07:53 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 22, 2007
Posts: 1,996
|
When I carried my Wz48 (Polish Tok) it was loaded with Wolf or Prvi 85gr JHP and felt very well armed.
|
November 5, 2012, 09:54 PM | #9 |
Staff
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 41,374
|
It is extremely loud and, as others have noted, can have a pretty blinding flash.
The Germans called it the Russian Icepick during WW II because it tended to make straight through and through wounds, as if the person had been stabbed. I wouldn't depend on it unless I had to.
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower. |
November 5, 2012, 10:53 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 2, 2007
Location: Missouri
Posts: 8,306
|
Lack of quality, reliable self defense ammunition is a big negative. Although the TT33's M57's, and CZ 52's are all fun on the range ( I have examples of all three) I don't think they compare with a modern self defense pistol. Nothing available for the 7.62X25 is easily compatible with CCW. I'm not sure that there is even a good quality concealable holster available.
I have thought that a shortened, cut down TT33 with a decent safety would make an interesting CCW weapon. Powerful round, and slim profile. But no such thing exists, and quality ammunition would still be a problem.
__________________
Cheapshooter's rules of gun ownership #1: NEVER SELL OR TRADE ANYTHING! |
November 5, 2012, 11:36 PM | #11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 17, 2012
Posts: 1,085
|
Quote:
If a CCW came up chambered for it (I'm looking at you, CZ, or Glock conversion companies), the bullet offerings would undoubtedly improve, and defense legitimacy would finally be bestowed. But there's a lot of steps and moving parts before that ever comes to pass... TCB
__________________
"I don't believe that the men of the distant past were any wiser than we are today. But it does seem that their science and technology were able to accomplish much grander things." -- Alex Rosewater |
|
November 6, 2012, 01:06 AM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 25, 2008
Location: OK
Posts: 109
|
Pretty much what Mike said. I'm afraid it would just go straight through a BG without doing enough damage to stop the fight. I sure wouldn't want to shoot it inside a house either because of it's ability to penetrate all sorts of things. If it was between that and no gun of course I'd take it. There's just too many better choices out there for self defense. I sure would like to have one for a fun range gun though!
__________________
"I have sworn upon the altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man." ~Thomas Jefferson |
November 6, 2012, 01:34 AM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 2, 2007
Location: Missouri
Posts: 8,306
|
Wolf hollowpoints are pretty good.
I think that's what they call an oxymoron! Ya know, like Jumbo shrimp. Even if true, "pretty good" doesn't cut it for me when it comes to my CCW guns!!!
__________________
Cheapshooter's rules of gun ownership #1: NEVER SELL OR TRADE ANYTHING! |
November 6, 2012, 01:45 AM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 2, 2007
Location: Missouri
Posts: 8,306
|
The OP never stated if he was asking because he wanted to buy a surplus tok for SD, or he was just curious about the round. If the latter, and he is looking for a super high velocity, small bullet round for SD/CCW there is always the Glock 29 (10MM) with a conversion barrel to chamber the 9X25 Dillon round. Double Tap lists a 95 GR. JHP @ 2000 fps. Don't think it would get there in a 29 sized barrel, but it's still a scorcher!
__________________
Cheapshooter's rules of gun ownership #1: NEVER SELL OR TRADE ANYTHING! |
November 6, 2012, 02:07 AM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 10, 2011
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 110
|
Wow, I've gotten a lot more from this than I expected. Keep it coming guys!
Just so you know, I won't be using cheap-o surplus ammo for SD purposes, and if I can't find a good SD ammo I trust I might just roll my own. Handloading is useful that way. I would love to give the 9x25 Dillon a run, but I can't afford the pistol and conversion barrel right now. 17K a year for a married man with a child makes for a measly shooting budget. Thanks guys, look forward to hearing more!
__________________
"If you carry a gun, people will call you paranoid. That's ridiculous. If I have a gun, what in the hell do I have to be paranoid for." - Clint Smith |
November 6, 2012, 02:29 AM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 2, 2007
Location: Missouri
Posts: 8,306
|
So do you have a Tokarev, or CZ52 Or are you just considering one?
If you are considering one by all means try to get the Yugoslavian M57. A bit longer in the grip due to the additional one round in the magazine. But the much better safety similar to a 1911 is a big advantage over the add-on trigger blocking thingy on the other imports!
__________________
Cheapshooter's rules of gun ownership #1: NEVER SELL OR TRADE ANYTHING! |
November 6, 2012, 02:34 AM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 10, 2011
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 110
|
Just considering one at the moment. Looking at the Yugo specifically. I am curious as to its merits, since I would want to be able to use it defensively if the need ever arose.
I get the feeling that finding a good CCW holster for it is going to be a hassle unless I have one custom made.
__________________
"If you carry a gun, people will call you paranoid. That's ridiculous. If I have a gun, what in the hell do I have to be paranoid for." - Clint Smith |
November 6, 2012, 03:09 AM | #18 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: December 2, 2007
Location: Missouri
Posts: 8,306
|
Quote:
Quote:
I know you seem bent on a ultra high velocity round, but may I suggest a CZ82. they sell in the same price range as the M57, but are chambered in 9X18 Makarov. Very similar, in fact the ballistics of most rounds are equal to 380ACP. The CZ 82 is a much more modern design with DA/SA capability, drop-hammer safety, and a 12+1 round capacity. Hornady even offers a 9X18 Critical Defense round. Another choice for something a little more concealable is a Polish P64. Again in 8X18, but with a single stack magazine holding 6 rounds. the double action trigger pull is atrocious, but lighter mainsprings are available, and easy to install. Mine works great, with no reliability problems after changing the spring. There is a commercial, new gun oprion in 380, 9MM, 40 S&W, and 45 ACP. But I'm NOT going to open that can of worms on this thread. I'm sure if you have been looking into handguns, and reading many threads on TFL, you know what I am talking about.
__________________
Cheapshooter's rules of gun ownership #1: NEVER SELL OR TRADE ANYTHING! |
|||
November 6, 2012, 09:33 AM | #19 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 3, 2010
Posts: 2,016
|
Just for the record, I've shot a couple thousand rounds of 7.62x25 through my CZ52 and Zastava M57 and I've NEVER had even one misfire or dud of any kind... That includes new-production Sellior & Bellot ordered online and delivered to my door which is available through many companies... just google for a bunch. So, to me, neither reliability or availability is a problem whatsoever.
Quote:
PS: As mentioned above, the CZ82 in 9x18 is a great alternative and was a next step in the evolutionary design process.
__________________
What did Mrs. Bullet say to Mr. Bullet? ... "We're having a BeeBee!"... IF THE SHOE FITS, WEAR IT!... IF THE GUN FITS, SHOOT IT! "Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it." Last edited by CWKahrFan; November 6, 2012 at 10:57 AM. |
|
November 6, 2012, 10:20 AM | #20 |
Staff
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 41,374
|
"Well, jeepers creepers, thousands of commie-bloc uniformed personnel carried 7.62x25 weapons during many decades."
Yeah, they did. Because they were ISSUED to them. It wasn't exactly a case of their choosing those guns based on a list of options. As I noted above, the Germans called it the Russian Ice Pick. The round wasn't know for doing a lot of damage to its target. The Germans felt their 9mm round was a much better stopper as it tended to do a lot more damage. The major benefit the Soviet soldier had was that, if he was armed with a 7.62x25, it was most likely a PPSh that fired 900 rounds a minute. What a single round lacks in wounding ability is more than compensated for when you have that much lead flying.
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower. Last edited by Mike Irwin; November 6, 2012 at 10:28 AM. |
November 6, 2012, 10:35 AM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 18, 2011
Posts: 540
|
If the 7.62Tok were available loaded with a quality JHP, I'd consider it as an inexpensive option.
For the OP, some data using Hornady JHPs- http://www.brassfetcher.com/7.62x25m...ry%20Table.pdf I think that the Wolf 85 gr. all-copper JHP looks awfully promising with expansion to ~1.5x caliber.
__________________
QUANTITATIVE AMMUNITION SELECTION |
November 7, 2012, 06:37 PM | #22 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 24, 2011
Posts: 1,427
|
Quote:
|
|
November 7, 2012, 07:56 PM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 17, 2012
Posts: 1,085
|
^
Not to mention significant (and more importantly) consistent expansion. Granted, if you need a bigger bullet than even an expanded tok round (I think it was around .5") then you'll need a bigger bullet. If not for the lack of bullet development (because everyone was distracted by cheap surplus and developing the 5.7x28), the tok would be as effective as the 327 Federal Magnum (and not limited to 6 shots) From Wiki: Tok: 85g JHP 1700ft/sec, 4.75" barrel 100g JHP 1874ft/sec, 5.75" barrel At any rate, the tok is well within the class of "effective" SD rounds, it just needs someone to bother developing its potential (which mainly involves designing guns chambered for it) TCB
__________________
"I don't believe that the men of the distant past were any wiser than we are today. But it does seem that their science and technology were able to accomplish much grander things." -- Alex Rosewater |
November 7, 2012, 08:45 PM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 20, 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 10,435
|
Reed's offers 7.62x25 ammo loaded with premium bullets like Hornady XTP and Speer Gold Dot. The 90 and 100gr XTP loadings look like they might be somewhat promising.
http://shop.reedsammo.com/category.sc?categoryId=14 |
November 7, 2012, 09:09 PM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 17, 2012
Posts: 1,085
|
I'd be particularly interested in how the Tok performs with heavier bullets like the 100gr in comparison to the 327 (kinda hard to do apples-apples when .30 cal pistol bullets aren't common in other chamberings ). A thin-jacketed varmint-type bullet like a Vmax or something would blow apart at Tok speeds, I'd think (I wonder if the 110gr Vmax .308 would be too long for the magazine...?)
TCB
__________________
"I don't believe that the men of the distant past were any wiser than we are today. But it does seem that their science and technology were able to accomplish much grander things." -- Alex Rosewater |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|