|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 26, 2012, 12:03 PM | #26 |
Junior member
Join Date: July 13, 2012
Posts: 179
|
Whoa.. Ok. Thanx for the headsup. Ill back it down to 9.0-9.1gr of the Titegroup Powder. Thanx for the tip, I thought the brass expanded slightly to jam up a bit.
Btw, I only put 250-300 rounds through the gun but of a lower charge. 18 of the rounds were the hotte load so im pretty sure there was no damage. |
November 26, 2012, 06:01 PM | #27 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 10, 2009
Location: SW Idaho
Posts: 1,295
|
Leave the Titegroup on the shelf. Much too easy to turn your revolver into metal origami.
Use AA#9, Enforcer, or H110/296 - 300gr XTP's are too expensive for lets-pretend loads. |
November 26, 2012, 06:25 PM | #28 |
Junior member
Join Date: July 13, 2012
Posts: 179
|
I have some 2400 on the shelf I can use. That has a larger window. But like anything, you just gotta be careful is all. Ive always liked Titegroup, like the saying goes, "a little goes a long way". Ill just back the load down to safer results and then build up a load with the 2400 I currently have as well and then Ill take your advise and build up a load with your choice of powders. Its pretty hard to destroy a gun unless you just totally disregard common sense or have a lack thereof as well!
DASHZNT |
November 27, 2012, 10:25 AM | #29 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 20, 2009
Location: Helena, AL
Posts: 4,424
|
Using Mag primers with Titegroup and 2400 is unnecessary and dangerous with top loads. The Hodgdon manual lists 9.6 grains with that bullet and standard primers at 39,800psi. 19 grains of 2400 is 40,200. The 4 Smiths (dash 1,2, and 3) that I've owned all stuck cases long before my SBH Rugers in top loads. Use fast powders for moderate loads.
|
November 27, 2012, 10:36 AM | #30 |
Junior member
Join Date: July 13, 2012
Posts: 179
|
Ok.. so are you saying if I go with regukar primers I can stay at my current load of 9.5gr or is there gonna be an entirely new workup plan here.
DASHZNT |
November 27, 2012, 04:35 PM | #31 |
Staff
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,063
|
removed duplicate information
DASHZNT,
No. There's no free lunch. If the velocity is higher so is the pressure. If the standard primer lets you use more powder before there's a pressure sign, then it's because the portion of the powder ignited initially is lower. What a magnum primer does is increase the starting pressure in the case. The reason it's called "magnum" is that magnum cases are more likely to have the extra space in them that needs their extra pressurizing gas quantity. So as long as a load was developed with magnum primers to be operating at safe pressures, then it will be safe. A good article on the topic by a former CCI employee is here. There are a couple of things to be aware of with magnum primers. One is that the larger gas volume they make can sometimes unseat bullets in handgun rounds before the powder burn gets well enough under way. That can actually lead to lower pressure and velocity, and the consistency of it is usually poor. As a result, a chronograph shows higher velocity standard deviation. On the other hand, if the charge volume leaves a lot of empty space and the powder has trouble getting up to starting pressure, the higher pressurization by a magnum primer can then improve velocity consistency over the standard primer. To find out, you just have to work loads up from a starting level with both types. I usually knock an extra 5% off a starting load for a magnum primer if the load data was developed with a standard primer. In the case of the Tightgroup loads with the 300 grain XTP on Hodgdon's site, the primer used is a Remington 2½, which is not a magnum primer. On the Hodgdon site, when you look at load data, click on the "Print" button to see what the brass and primer were. Hodgdon's listed pressures for Tightgroup are pretty reasonable up to 9.6 grains and if they are correct, they should not cause sticking cases. Hodgdon claims 38,400 CUP for 9.6 grains, which has no exact equivalent to psi, but is probably in the 40,000 psi range. It's hard to tell though, as copper crushers can err by substantial margins. QuickLOAD, on the other hand, thinks that same load would be closer to 50,000 psi. QuickLOAD is not great with straight wall cases, but your experience with sticky extraction suggests reality for your lot of Tightgroup lies somewhere in between QuickLOAD's numbers and Hodgdon's numbers. QuickLOAD thinks you'd have to go all the way down to 8 grains to stay inside SAAMI pressures, but without velocity measurements from you and the length of your barrel, I can only tell you what the defaults suggest. The rule I gave you about the sticky extraction point is the basic method used by Elmer Keith and others to develop revolver loads above rated pressures. You can do it, but there's no need to stress the gun with higher-than-standard pressures when slower powders will get you the velocities you want with lower peak pressures. They will give you more muzzle blast because they keep the pressure up longer in the bullet's travel down the bore than fast powders do. That's how they can get to the same velocity with a lower peak pressure.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor NRA Certified Rifle Instructor NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle Last edited by Unclenick; November 29, 2012 at 10:33 AM. |
November 27, 2012, 04:44 PM | #32 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 16, 2009
Location: I live in the foot of the Green Mountains of Vermont
Posts: 1,602
|
If I may offer a word of caution here , max loads will shorten the life of your S&W M29 ! If you want to shoot gnarly loads on a regular basis , get yourself a Ruger SRH . Especially if there's a pistol scope in your future . I have been shooting the 300 XTP over 20 Gr. of W-296 for years as a hunting load , it smacks stuff down with authority . My ammo won't even chamber in a Smith (too long)
|
November 27, 2012, 05:35 PM | #33 |
Junior Member
Join Date: January 26, 2011
Posts: 5
|
I load my 300 grain XPTs over 20.4 grains of H110 on the bottom cannelure but that is for my SuperRedHawk.
I am probably being captain obvious here but a 300 XPT is going to penetrate any BG you are defending against and probably kill anyone standing behind them innocent or otherwise. In my humble opinion, this might make an OK bear load and I use mine for deer but as a SD load I think you are way off base. |
November 28, 2012, 10:46 AM | #34 |
Junior member
Join Date: July 13, 2012
Posts: 179
|
Wow.. Thats a mouthful! I appreciate the input. Im using a 6 1/2" barrel 629 if that changes anything for you.
DASHZNT |
November 29, 2012, 10:37 AM | #35 |
Staff
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,063
|
No, it doesn't change anything by itself. You'd need that and chronograph readings both. Then a pressure estimate can be derived via QuickLOAD. If you don't have a chronograph the estimate of it lying between Hodgdon and QuickLOAD based on your sticky extraction is about a good as we can do. Probably on the order of 45,000 psi.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor NRA Certified Rifle Instructor NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle |
November 29, 2012, 02:40 PM | #36 |
Junior member
Join Date: July 13, 2012
Posts: 179
|
Ok.. I made up some new rounds to test out later today, schedule permitting of course. These two loads seem to be a little more on the tame side and I am hoping to not get the sticky cases I had with my first load. As long as these dont stick, I think Ill have found my load for these projectiles.
6 Rounds 8.9 Titegroup CCI #350 Magnum Primer Hornady XTP 300gr HP 6 Rounds 8.4gr Titegroup CCI #350 Magnum Primer Hornady XTP 300gr HP |
November 29, 2012, 07:50 PM | #37 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 13, 2011
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 890
|
There is a terrific chance that your accuracy will be much better with standard primers and Titegroup than with the magnum primers you listed. Try both if you have them.
|
November 29, 2012, 10:33 PM | #38 | |
Junior member
Join Date: July 13, 2012
Posts: 179
|
Quote:
DASHZNT |
|
November 30, 2012, 07:34 AM | #39 |
Staff
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,063
|
It won't necessarily. In handgun cartridges it mainly depends on whether the space in the case can take the pressure of the extra gas made by a magnum primer without it unseating the bullet before the powder burn gets underway. Sometimes, when there is a lot of empty space in the case and the magnum primers are not unseating the bullets, they are actually better for accuracy by increasing start pressure. That's explained in the article I linked to in my earlier post.
Also, don't just change to a different primer without knocking the charge weight down another 5% and working back up. Ironically, under some circumstances a standard primer can cause higher pressure than a magnum primer does. This is mainly when the magnum primer is unseating the bullet but the standard one is not, so the powder fired by the standard primer starts building pressure in a smaller space.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor NRA Certified Rifle Instructor NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle |
November 30, 2012, 12:17 PM | #40 | |
Junior member
Join Date: July 13, 2012
Posts: 179
|
Quote:
DASHZNT |
|
November 30, 2012, 02:05 PM | #41 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 26, 2005
Posts: 941
|
I may have missed it when reading this thread, but since you're using the upper cannelure have you verified that the data you're using was generated using the same cannelure?
If you use near-max load data generated using the lower cannelure (longer OAL) and then seat your bullet deeper to the top cannelure, pressure will be much higher. If they don't mention which cannelure was used in the load data, they almost always include the OAL. You may already be aware of this, but I thought it was worth bringing up since I hadn't seen it mentioned. Lots of new handloaders scour these forums so it's good to specifically mention these issues. Mike |
December 1, 2012, 01:57 AM | #42 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 13, 2011
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 890
|
DASHZNT, it has just been my experience that unless using hard to ignite heavy charges of ball powder, that standard primers give better accuracy. I think the smart method is to try both and see which works better for you.
|
December 1, 2012, 07:49 PM | #43 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 16, 2009
Location: I live in the foot of the Green Mountains of Vermont
Posts: 1,602
|
300 Gr. Hornadys seated in the first (bottom) cannelure , won't allow the cylinder to close on a M29 .
|
December 1, 2012, 07:57 PM | #44 |
Junior member
Join Date: July 13, 2012
Posts: 179
|
Affirmative.. and the Hornady Manual has the OAL at the top Cannelure anyways. I go by their manual as its their projectile.
DASHZNT |
December 1, 2012, 11:14 PM | #45 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: July 15, 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 3,746
|
Quote:
Quote:
cartridges and projectiles are, from the left: 250 grain Nosler Partiton HG with 24 grains of H-110/Win 296 CCI magnum pistol primer, 250 grain hard cast Keith type 22 grains 2400 with Win large pistol primer, 300 grain XTP 20 grains H-110 CCI magnum large pistol primer and the projectiles, 300 grain XTP, 240 grain Gold Dot, 240 grain XTP, 210 grain Gold Dot. Revolver is my S&W .44 Magnum, 6.5" blue, shipped in July, 1956, the first year of production, so I'd hate to shoot it loose. I have my S&W 29-2 stoked with them as well. It was shipped in 1976 and I've had it since 1985, so I don't want to blow out its cylinder walls either. I've got a blue 5.5" .44 Ruger Super Black Hawk and if I want even heavier projectiles a 7.5" .45 Colt Ruger SBH, pictured below with some hot loaded 250 grain XTPs. I can't remember the load right now, but its very warm.
__________________
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms."- Thomas Jefferson ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ (>_<) Last edited by nate45; December 1, 2012 at 11:19 PM. Reason: spelling, 48 and I still make mistakes. :) |
||
December 2, 2012, 08:34 AM | #46 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 25, 2010
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 3,309
|
Back when the NRA had it's Dope Bag service I wrote about this issue of magnum primers. The response said there is never any reason to use magnum primers in a handgun/pistol.
The letter was written by one of the famous names in the firearms game. I still have the letter but am too lazy at the moment to retreive it. |
December 2, 2012, 08:13 PM | #47 |
Junior member
Join Date: July 13, 2012
Posts: 179
|
Well I fired off the rounds I made to test and they ran absolutely perfect!!!
The first 6 were the 8.9gr of Titegroup and then the 8.4gr of Titgroup thereafter. I probably should have done it the other way around but ai was anxious to blast the stronger stuff. All went well in both loads. There was signs of extreme pressure at all. They were also dead on accurate, my groups were nice and tight. And most importantly, the effictiveness of the XTP 300gr HP projectile speaks for itself!!! Im pretty sure I can bump the load up to 9.2, but I say why bother?! I was very pleased with the results and I think im gonna stick with these. The primer situation is not an issue in my humble, yet extremely accurate opinion!! If they hurt the gun, they wouldnt make them. Secondly, I like them and am gonna stick with them for now but plan on working up a load with normal primers to reduce the amount of different components on my bench. Following is the "magic" load that has worked for me.. I appreciate the input from everyone that has chimed in here and I have learned alot as well as was confused by some too, worth it all though... Thank You. 8.9 - 9.0gr Titegroup CCI #350 Magnum Primer Hornady XTP 300gr HP OAL - 1.595" & Roll Crimp DASHZNT |
December 2, 2012, 09:35 PM | #48 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 3, 2011
Posts: 325
|
not to hijack, but i've got a H&R handi rifle in 44 mag and I like the 300gr XTP. will there be a load difference between whats run through a pistol and a rifle?
|
December 2, 2012, 09:47 PM | #49 |
Junior member
Join Date: July 13, 2012
Posts: 179
|
I couldnt answer that question for you cuz I dont own nor have I shot one of those ever. I would recommend to get a manual, theyre priceless with the knowledge you acquire from them and important to cross reference what you hear anywhere else.
DASHZNT |
December 3, 2012, 09:03 AM | #50 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 25, 2010
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 3,309
|
Quote:
Then you thank the posters for what you have learned. Sorry, I don't think you have learned anything. Keep your insurance paid up and, please, don't shoot near me. I'm allergic to flying metal parts. |
|
|
|