The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: The Semi-automatic Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old January 10, 2013, 11:59 PM   #1
timd
Junior Member
 
Join Date: January 25, 2009
Posts: 8
Glock magazine capacity

What is the internal difference between a 10 round magazine and a standard capacity magazine. Is capacity limited by the follower, or some insert like a plug in a shotgun? Or is it limited by some permanent difference in the mag body?
timd is offline  
Old January 11, 2013, 02:37 PM   #2
bull bob
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 29, 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 114
Something like that. The ones I have seen had a portion of the metal magazine dimpled in to prevent the follower from going any further. The spring wire was also stacked solid near the bottom. This was a S&W mag. Not sure how Glock does it, but probably similar. They have to make it difficult to "undo".
bull bob is offline  
Old January 12, 2013, 12:26 AM   #3
Josh17
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 26, 2012
Location: Colorado
Posts: 196
Are you asking if a Glock can hold higher cap mags? If so yes. There is nothing in a Glock that prevents larger magazines (as long as they are Glock) from working in them.

A Glock 26 can use its standard mag (10 rounds) or it can hold a Glock 19 mag (15 rounds) or it can hold a Glock 17 mag (17 rounds). Of course the mag will stick out the bottom a lot. It can even hold the 30 or 33 round mag.

If your question was something different sorry I mis-understood it then.
Josh17 is offline  
Old January 12, 2013, 02:44 AM   #4
JohnKSa
Staff
 
Join Date: February 12, 2001
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 24,971
Different companies take different approaches to limiting magazine capacity.

The Glock factory limited-capacity magazines I've seen have a modified magazine body that prevents the follower from traveling down far enough to allow more than 10 rounds into the mag.
__________________
Do you know about the TEXAS State Rifle Association?

Last edited by JohnKSa; January 12, 2013 at 01:17 PM. Reason: Wrong.
JohnKSa is offline  
Old January 12, 2013, 03:30 AM   #5
Slopemeno
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 19, 2007
Posts: 2,663
The difference? About $25.00....
Slopemeno is offline  
Old January 12, 2013, 06:30 AM   #6
m&p45acp10+1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 3, 2009
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 3,930
The taller 10 round or less mags for restricted states are supposed to be made so that a person can not modify them to hold more rounds if my memory serves me correctly. I took apart a couple Baretta mags from the 94 AWB days. They were filled in so that one could not make them hold more by changing a couple of parts out. The AR mags I saw like that were solid in the bottom as well.

It may different now for all I know.
__________________
No matter how many times you do it and nothing happens it only takes something going wrong one time to kill you.
m&p45acp10+1 is offline  
Old January 12, 2013, 09:59 AM   #7
P-990
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2, 2002
Location: Only1/2WayThere
Posts: 1,316
The 10-rd Glock 17 magazines I have are a completely different body than the 17-rd versions. I've never gutted one but first suspicion is they use a thicker body and have a limited internal volume. They are definitely not the standard body with a block in place. The 10th round goes in hard, they seem to be designed so you can't gorilla #11 in there accidentally. And they are 'ell for stout; I'll keep using them for practicing reload drills over concrete and spare the "high caps" the abuse.

(Yes, I've had my Glock 17 since the AWB was in place. I also have 2 police-trade in "pre-ban" mags I think I paid $45-50ea 11-12 years ago. They've never given me a lick of trouble either.)
__________________
NRA Master, Highpower Rifle, Across-the-Course
NRA Expert, Highpower Rifle, Mid-Range Prone
P-990 is offline  
Old January 12, 2013, 01:16 PM   #8
JohnKSa
Staff
 
Join Date: February 12, 2001
Location: DFW Area
Posts: 24,971
Quote:
They are definitely not the standard body with a block in place.
That is correct. They are basically single-stack magazines internally. I'm not sure what I was thinking when I posted earlier.
__________________
Do you know about the TEXAS State Rifle Association?
JohnKSa is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.04177 seconds with 10 queries