|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 21, 2013, 12:59 AM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: December 23, 2012
Posts: 21
|
Can I get an ID on this mystery S&W?
Found this in the barter section on craigslist and got an e-mail off before the ad was flagged down. Guy doesn't seem to be a "gun person" or know much about the thing, so all I have is some cell phone pics to go on.
I can make out that it's a Smith and Wesson from the grips and the only part of the lettering I can see, but after that I'm at a loss as I'm not well versed in the handgun world. It would appear to my untrained eye that it's some manner of j-frame but I'd like to know just what I'm looking at before i make the guy an offer. |
February 21, 2013, 01:30 AM | #2 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
Not the greatest picture but the marking seems to read ".32 LONG CTG" which would make the gun a .32 Hand Ejector. The .32 frame, beefed up and lengthened, became the J frame of today. If my reading is correct, that gun is chambered for .32 S&W Long, which some folks feel is not powerful enough for serious work, though I would not want to be shot with one.
It appears to be nickel plated, a common finish at that time. The gun is definitely pre-WWII, probably around 1920, but a serial number would be needed for better dating. If it is in good working condition, it would be fine with .32 S&W or .32 S&W Long ammunition. They made a lot of those guns, and value depends almost totally on condition, so I won't do any guessing on value until I see better pictures. Jim |
February 21, 2013, 07:27 AM | #3 |
Staff
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 41,390
|
The grips don't appear to be correct. They don't seem to fit well at all.
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower. |
February 21, 2013, 10:43 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 20, 2007
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 7,523
|
I have a few things to add:
This gun MAY be a Spanish copy. Many of these were sold in the USA prior to WWII. A bona fide S&W will usually have an intertwined S&W trademark on the LH side of the frame behind the cylinder, and "MADE IN U.S.A." lettering on the RH side above the trigger guard; this area is washed out by glare in the picture. Spanish copies of S&W .32's have very little value- typically in the $50-$100 range- and are sometimes unsafe to shoot, or wear out very quickly if you do so. The serial number is on the butt. This number, or the last few digits of it, should be repeated on the underside of the barrel above the ejector rod, and on the rear cylinder face OR under the ejector star on some older versions. If the numbers do not match, these parts are not original. Ignore any numbers on the frame under the cylinder yoke; these are meaningless assembly numbers. I've seen a few of these guns that had damage to the ejector star, ejector rod, or cylinder as a result of trying to eject stuck .32ACP aka .32 Auto cases. This ammo is much more widely available than .32 S&W and .32 Long, and some shooters unfortunately believe that it's interchangeable, but it has a much smaller rim than the correct cartridges and can get stuck in the chambers when it gets whacked by the firing pin. Some of the prewar versions of the .32HE are not safe to carry with a live round under the hammer, and/or are very hard to get parts for. As James K said, a serial number is needed to correctly determine its age.
__________________
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam. This is bowling. There are rules... MARK IT ZERO!!" - Walter Sobchak |
February 21, 2013, 10:56 AM | #5 |
Staff
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 41,390
|
""MADE IN U.S.A."
Off the top of my head, I don't think that marking was added until after WW I, when the Spanish revolver flood REALLY started in earnest. Also, unlike a LOT of the Spanish copies, it appears that all of the screws are in the correct places, with no extras, and the proportions appear to be correct. I think this one has a pretty good chance of being the real deal.
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower. |
February 21, 2013, 11:53 AM | #6 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: October 20, 2007
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 7,523
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam. This is bowling. There are rules... MARK IT ZERO!!" - Walter Sobchak |
||
February 21, 2013, 07:32 PM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: December 23, 2012
Posts: 21
|
Any ideas on a value? Not something that holds much interest for me outside of possibly being cheap but for the right price I'm always buyin.
|
February 21, 2013, 10:31 PM | #8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 20, 2008
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 2,863
|
Quote:
__________________
Winchester 73, the TFL user that won the west |
|
February 22, 2013, 02:10 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 4, 2012
Location: Northern Missouri
Posts: 480
|
Ditto Win 73. It would appear to be a Hand Ejector model from the early 1900s, but we need more info to identify an S&W. First, is a .32 or a .38? I am guessing it is a .38 (chambered for the .38 S&W cartridge). The original was intoduced in 1905 and here were four changes in years following, which brings about the need for a serial number.
|
February 22, 2013, 03:52 PM | #10 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
As I said, the picture is poor, but the lettering on the barrel appears to be ".32 LONG CTG." which would be correct for an S&W and quite unusual for a Spanish copy, most of which were in .38 or .32-20. It is an S&W.
Beyond that, it is not possible to say much about it, or assess a value, without better pictures. Jim |
|
|