The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: The Revolver Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old March 24, 2015, 10:40 PM   #51
J.E.Walker
Junior member
 
Join Date: March 19, 2015
Posts: 14
Quote:
I am holding one in my hand right now. Colt police positive 0.38 NP. Groove diameter 0.354".

-TL
J.E.Walker is offline  
Old March 24, 2015, 11:12 PM   #52
James K
Member In Memoriam
 
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
I have to apologize and withdraw my comments. I just slugged a PP chambered for the .38 Colt NP and the barrel dimensions are just as Tangolima (and W.H.B. Smith) say. I find it hard to believe Colt was so far off with its barrel dimensions, but then they were around before SAAMI and maybe either the results worked or they just didn't care. (At the low pressures involved, the latter might not be far from the case.)

Anyway, this whole thread has been a valuable lesson in not taking anything for granted!

Jim
James K is offline  
Old March 24, 2015, 11:17 PM   #53
tangolima
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 28, 2013
Posts: 3,813
Quote:
Originally Posted by James K View Post
I have to apologize and withdraw my comments. I just slugged a PP chambered for the .38 Colt NP and the barrel dimensions are just as Tangolima (and W.H.B. Smith) say. I find it hard to believe Colt was so far off with its barrel dimensions, but then they were around before SAAMI and maybe either the results worked or they just didn't care. (At the low pressures involved, the latter might not be far from the case.)

Anyway, this whole thread has been a valuable lesson in not taking anything for granted!

Jim
It is quite alright. Different pieces complete a big jigsaw puzzle. I thank you, and everyone who has responded, for your input.

-TL
tangolima is online now  
Old March 24, 2015, 11:42 PM   #54
Gaucho Gringo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 17, 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 366
.38 short Colt ammo is available here:

https://www.targetsportsusa.com/remi...sc-p-4108.aspx
__________________
357 Taurus Gaucho, 22 Heritage RR, 2-Pietta 1858 44 NMA Remingtons, Pietta, Euroarms & ASM 36 1851 Navies, 31 Uberti 1849, 12 ga H&R Topper, 16 Ga Western Field, 43 Spanish Remington Rolling Block, 44 ASM Colt Walker, High Point C9 9mm, Winchester 1906 22, Rossi 62 22 rifle, Uberti 1860, H&A & IJ 32 S&W BreakTop, 36 Euroarms 1858, 32 H&R 04, 22mag NAA SS BP revolver, .44 Rodgers & Spencer, IJ 38 S&W BreakTop, IJ 22 Sealed 8
Gaucho Gringo is offline  
Old March 25, 2015, 07:01 PM   #55
James K
Member In Memoriam
 
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
When I get a chance, I'll check a Colt Model 1877 and a Model 1892, and see what the groove and land diameters are. I have long thought that when Colt changed the New Army/New Navy to use .38 Special, they changed the barrel dimensions also, but now I wonder if they did and what the dimensions were before the conversion.

Jim
James K is offline  
Old March 26, 2015, 05:39 AM   #56
Mike Irwin
Staff
 
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 41,380
As I noted in my post earlier in this thread, I've seen a Colt .38 NP with a groove diameter of .352.

As I also noted, it's not that big a deal, really.

The .38 New Police/.38 S&W is a low pressure round and the bullets were traditionally all lead.

They would easily swage down to the tighter Colt dimensions.

By adopting a common barrel dimension they didn't have to keep a separate set of tooling in stock for .38 NP barrels.
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza

Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower.
Mike Irwin is offline  
Old March 28, 2015, 04:33 AM   #57
tangolima
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 28, 2013
Posts: 3,813
Colt 38 revolvers tend to have tight bores, <0.357" groove diameter. I guess this is well established. It doesn't matter much to use as big as 0.361" cast bullets. This is also accepted.

But knowing what I know, it would be silly for me to keep on using 0.361" bullets as there is no advantage to do so. Normal 0.358" bullets work better.

I was about to slug my enfield revolver. That I had this idea. Instead I just pin gauged the throat. It was 0.358". There no point using 0.361" bullets foe this gun either. The throat will just size it down to 0.358". I am going to apply the same principle for all revolvers.

-TL
tangolima is online now  
Old April 20, 2015, 11:44 PM   #58
tangolima
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 28, 2013
Posts: 3,813
Tried using 0.356" (9mm) cast bullets today. It worked great. It is the best accuracy result I have gotten so far, better than 0.358" (38 spl), and kicking the butt of 0.361" (38 s&w). It will be the bullet of choice in my future loads. Thanks gentlemen for your inputs.

-TL
tangolima is online now  
Old April 21, 2015, 06:32 AM   #59
Salmoneye
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 31, 2011
Location: Vermont
Posts: 2,076
Thanks for the update!
Salmoneye is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.05429 seconds with 11 queries