|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 24, 2015, 10:40 PM | #51 | |
Junior member
Join Date: March 19, 2015
Posts: 14
|
Quote:
|
|
March 24, 2015, 11:12 PM | #52 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
I have to apologize and withdraw my comments. I just slugged a PP chambered for the .38 Colt NP and the barrel dimensions are just as Tangolima (and W.H.B. Smith) say. I find it hard to believe Colt was so far off with its barrel dimensions, but then they were around before SAAMI and maybe either the results worked or they just didn't care. (At the low pressures involved, the latter might not be far from the case.)
Anyway, this whole thread has been a valuable lesson in not taking anything for granted! Jim |
March 24, 2015, 11:17 PM | #53 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 28, 2013
Posts: 3,813
|
Quote:
-TL |
|
March 24, 2015, 11:42 PM | #54 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 17, 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 366
|
__________________
357 Taurus Gaucho, 22 Heritage RR, 2-Pietta 1858 44 NMA Remingtons, Pietta, Euroarms & ASM 36 1851 Navies, 31 Uberti 1849, 12 ga H&R Topper, 16 Ga Western Field, 43 Spanish Remington Rolling Block, 44 ASM Colt Walker, High Point C9 9mm, Winchester 1906 22, Rossi 62 22 rifle, Uberti 1860, H&A & IJ 32 S&W BreakTop, 36 Euroarms 1858, 32 H&R 04, 22mag NAA SS BP revolver, .44 Rodgers & Spencer, IJ 38 S&W BreakTop, IJ 22 Sealed 8 |
March 25, 2015, 07:01 PM | #55 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
When I get a chance, I'll check a Colt Model 1877 and a Model 1892, and see what the groove and land diameters are. I have long thought that when Colt changed the New Army/New Navy to use .38 Special, they changed the barrel dimensions also, but now I wonder if they did and what the dimensions were before the conversion.
Jim |
March 26, 2015, 05:39 AM | #56 |
Staff
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 41,380
|
As I noted in my post earlier in this thread, I've seen a Colt .38 NP with a groove diameter of .352.
As I also noted, it's not that big a deal, really. The .38 New Police/.38 S&W is a low pressure round and the bullets were traditionally all lead. They would easily swage down to the tighter Colt dimensions. By adopting a common barrel dimension they didn't have to keep a separate set of tooling in stock for .38 NP barrels.
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower. |
March 28, 2015, 04:33 AM | #57 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 28, 2013
Posts: 3,813
|
Colt 38 revolvers tend to have tight bores, <0.357" groove diameter. I guess this is well established. It doesn't matter much to use as big as 0.361" cast bullets. This is also accepted.
But knowing what I know, it would be silly for me to keep on using 0.361" bullets as there is no advantage to do so. Normal 0.358" bullets work better. I was about to slug my enfield revolver. That I had this idea. Instead I just pin gauged the throat. It was 0.358". There no point using 0.361" bullets foe this gun either. The throat will just size it down to 0.358". I am going to apply the same principle for all revolvers. -TL |
April 20, 2015, 11:44 PM | #58 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 28, 2013
Posts: 3,813
|
Tried using 0.356" (9mm) cast bullets today. It worked great. It is the best accuracy result I have gotten so far, better than 0.358" (38 spl), and kicking the butt of 0.361" (38 s&w). It will be the bullet of choice in my future loads. Thanks gentlemen for your inputs.
-TL |
April 21, 2015, 06:32 AM | #59 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 31, 2011
Location: Vermont
Posts: 2,076
|
Thanks for the update!
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|