|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
July 30, 2015, 09:46 AM | #1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: July 4, 2015
Posts: 3
|
Attention ruger revolver fans
I just got off the phone with a guy at Ruger headquarters about using the same principles they did with the new .45acp/.45colt Redhawk, with the SP101 and GP100 to shoot 9mm along with .38spec and .357mag. The guy said he would mention that at a meeting tonight. The guy also said that if enough fellow Ruger fans would email Ruger customer service and drop in a word about making the GPs and SPs able to shoot the 9mm round using moon clips, that it would probably happen. I would greatly urge whoever reads this and thinks "hmm, a GP or SP more versatile... Sounds good!" to immediately email Ruger and tell them that you would be on the market and know those that would be for one of these.
|
July 30, 2015, 03:02 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 12, 1999
Posts: 1,278
|
Off the top of my head, I believe the 9mm cartridge is bigger at the base than the .38 or .357. If that is so, you could not fire both cartridges from the same cylinder because there would be too much room at the base for the 38/357 and the case would swell too much. In a S/A you are using two cylinders so problem avoided.
Base diameter 38 special 0.379 9mm 0.391 in At the very least, it would seem you would ruin the brass on every .38 or .357 you fired. Perhaps someone can elucidate.
__________________
Laz I’m just a nobody, trying to tell everybody, about Somebody, who can save anybody. Last edited by Laz; July 30, 2015 at 03:11 PM. |
July 30, 2015, 03:19 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 30, 2010
Posts: 3,513
|
It really is a smart idea on their part to do this across the board. I plan on picking up one of those .45 Colt/.45acp revolvers in the near future. I would also like to see the same Redhawk in an 8 shot .357/9mm.
|
July 30, 2015, 03:25 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 24, 2011
Location: Monroe,NC
Posts: 669
|
If you reload with a carbide die it makes the case straight so .380 may work. I would rather shoot 38's not have to worry with the moon clips. But I'm not a big 9mm fan .
__________________
The man that die's with the most stuff win's! |
July 30, 2015, 04:18 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 16, 2014
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,634
|
I think the dimensions are close enough that it would be possible, however dimensions are far enough apart that it wouldn't work out very well.
Like Laz mentioned the base of the 9mm is to large. You can start to push a 9mm into a .357 chamber but it will only make it halfway IIRC. If you remove material form the cylinder so 9mm cases would fit it will cause problems with the 38 and .357 brass. 45 ACP and 45 Colt have closer diameters then 9mm and 38 You might be able to make .380 ACP work, but what's the point? It cost the same or more than 38 special and isn't as versatile. Bore diameter is close enough that it could work but 9mm bullets are smaller in diameter than .357 and accuracy would suffer. |
July 30, 2015, 05:17 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 19, 2009
Posts: 3,287
|
Are they thinking "interchangeable cylinders"?
9mm is usually .356 Of course 38/357 is .357. If a person reloads and shoots cast . . it could work bullet wise. In my 9mm I often load with .357 to .358 cast just as they drop from my mold. I don't see how it would work with the same cylinder and with factory loaded 9mm . . the accuracy is going to suffer. But . . . maybe Ruger has a "magic wand"?
__________________
If a pair of '51 Navies were good enough for Billy Hickok, then a single Navy on my right hip is good enough for me . . . besides . . . I'm probably only half as good as he was anyways. Hiram's Rangers Badge #63 |
July 30, 2015, 09:52 PM | #7 |
Member Emeritus
Join Date: August 19, 2004
Posts: 7,133
|
I don't know who you talked to, but the 9mm is a tapered case & the .38/.357 is a straight-walled case.
Different deal than with a pair of straight-walled .45-caliber cases. If you try to shoot the 9 in a .357 chamber, you'll get case expansion through fire-forming & POSSIBLY some case cracking. You'd need to really resize what would be straight-walled 9mm brass after firing back down to original taper if you handload. I doubt Ruger'll try it. Denis |
July 30, 2015, 11:47 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 17, 2015
Location: South Central MO / Africa
Posts: 1,111
|
I'd like GP100 Match that uses 357 moon clips. Heck of a lot faster to reload when compared to speed loaders.
|
July 31, 2015, 12:15 AM | #9 |
Junior Member
Join Date: July 4, 2015
Posts: 3
|
I just figured the 9mm/.357 case and bullet comparison would be comparable to the .45acp/.45colt. I figured that if slight changes happened to the size of the cylinder, and moon clips were incorporated, it would be possible to have a reliably shooting 9mm/ .357
|
July 31, 2015, 12:27 AM | #10 |
Member Emeritus
Join Date: August 19, 2004
Posts: 7,133
|
Not comparable, because of the straight-wall case vs the tapered wall case.
If you cut a chamber for the 9, it'll cause problems with the .357. If you cut a chamber for a .357, it'll cause problems with the 9. That's why you get TWO different cylinders with Ruger convertible Blackhawks. Denis |
July 31, 2015, 01:26 AM | #11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,424
|
Quote:
It's called, "Just use the larger diameter." It's not the best option, but that's what they've always done in the past for Single Sixes and Blackhawks (.224" barrels, rather than .222"; .357" rather than .355", .402" barrels, rather than .400" barrels [10mm/.38-40]; etc). Even if you buy the ".22 LR only" Single Six or "9mm only" Blackhawk (Talo exclusive, I think?) ... You still get the wrong barrel. It's cheaper to keep the supply chain uncomplicated by multiple bore specifications for nearly-identical products. ---I don't know what bore specifications Ruger uses for .45 caliber. That's territory I've never dealt with or even really discussed with anyone.
__________________
Don't even try it. It's even worse than the internet would lead you to believe. |
|
July 31, 2015, 01:27 AM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 4, 2008
Location: WI
Posts: 3,656
|
Thats gonna be one hell of a meeting.
__________________
E-Shock rounds are engineered to expend maximum energy into soft targets, turning the density mass into an expanding rotational cone of NyTrilium matrix particles, causing neurological collapse to the central nervous system.- Yeah I can do that. I guarantee you will know it if a bicyclist hits your house going 1000 mph. -Smaug |
July 31, 2015, 03:36 AM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 16, 2005
Location: AZ
Posts: 3,113
|
Ruger currently makes Blackhawks with an interchangeable 9mm cylinder.
I don't see why they couldn't make a double action revolver with one. I'd be interested in one for cheap ammo. |
July 31, 2015, 06:56 AM | #14 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: May 19, 2004
Location: SC
Posts: 2,743
|
Quote:
Unless a qualified armorer, an owner has no business removing a side plate to swap cylinders. It is a simpler matter with a single action. Quote:
|
||
July 31, 2015, 07:06 AM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 17, 2015
Location: South Central MO / Africa
Posts: 1,111
|
^^^When did Ruger start putting side plates on their revolvers?
|
July 31, 2015, 08:59 AM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 16, 2014
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,634
|
No side plate on a Ruger and what revolvers do you have to remove the whole side plate to remove the cylinder?
|
July 31, 2015, 10:42 AM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 19, 2004
Location: SC
Posts: 2,743
|
Which raises the question, how does one remove a cylinder from a Ruger double action?
I checked the manual of one of my SP101s, and it indicates removal of the mainspring and the trigger assembly to get to the cylinder. That is way too much for any convertible concept. Last edited by Real Gun; July 31, 2015 at 11:16 AM. |
July 31, 2015, 11:05 AM | #18 |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,804
|
The Ruger SA's use different cylinders, for each different caliber. There is a reason for that. The main reason is the difference in the size of the cases.
In .45acp / .45 Colt the dimensions are very close, but not identical. Specs call for the .45 Colt to be .480" from case head to mouth. The .45acp is .476" at the case head, and .473" at the mouth. The .357Mag is .379" at the head and mouth, the 9mm Luger is .391" at the head and .380" at the mouth. Swapping cylinders on a Ruger SA is simple. Fitting them is simpler than doing so on a DA. I'm sure multiple cylinders could be fitted to a DA revolver, BUT, no factory I know does this. Probably due to the additional costs & complexity of fitting, vs market demand. The clearances needed for moon clips add to the cost of fitting the DA cylinder as well. Think about the typical DA revolver, and swapping cylinders. With an SA, you only swap the cylinder. Pull the base pin, cylinder drops out, put in the other one, replace the base pin. Simple. With a DA cylinder, you have to get it off the crane, and you have the extractor assy to deal with. No one is interested in having to swap the extractor assy between cylinders, (and the potential for damage if done regularly by the user is very high), so to make a DA practical with an additional cylinder, you need the entire assembly to swap out. This makes for much more complex fitting of the cylinder and costs go way up. And, this is separate from the clearance issues needed to run moon clips. It can be done, but is not done outside of commissioned custom work, simply because the market will not support the cost. Essentially, the auto pistol rounds don't fit the revolver round's chambers (.45acp is slightly too small, and 9mm is too large), so shooting them in the same chambers is a non starter, even with moon clips to headspace from. SO, one cylinder just won't do it. And two cylinders while fairly simple in an SA becomes much more complex in a DA. Too complex to be viable on the market.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
July 31, 2015, 11:21 AM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 29, 2006
Location: Montana (Montucky?)
Posts: 1,273
|
The OP never mentioned doing it from the same cylinder. It would be a spare cylinder situation. I carry a 6" GP on the job, and full magnums are frowned on heavily while +p and +p+ 9mm, and even .357Sig are allowed for the guys who choose autos. This would allow me to vastly bump up my performance, but at the cost of tactical reload/topping off ability.
Truly, for me, a .357 Sig cylinder would make more sense. I'll bet those bottleneck rounds would drop in pretty easily in a hurry. But then, why not both?
__________________
You'll probably never NEED a gun. I hope you never do. But IF you do, you will need it worse than anything you've ever needed in your life. IF we're not supposed to eat animals, howcome God made 'em outta meat? |
July 31, 2015, 11:57 AM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 16, 2014
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,634
|
The Redhawk mentioned in the OP uses 1 cylinder for both calibers.
|
July 31, 2015, 12:29 PM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 6, 2000
Location: BLACK HILLS
Posts: 1,322
|
IN THE PAST FORTY YEARS, I've owned at least one version of every centerfire convertible revolver SR&CO ever made [ and one they did not offer...]. In no time at all convertible revolvers turn into a regular PITA when you forget to change cylinders, take the wrong one with you, bring the wrong ammunition, and you find out MOST of those convertible 357/9MM sixguns shoot worse than a new WHAMO slingshot and are a damnsite louder with their secondary cylinder. In that time I saw one[1!] that shot the 9MM cartridge quite well indeed.
My Blackhawk 45COLT/45ACP sixguns all shot like a million bucks with the secondary cylinder, so much so i just bought a second one in 45COLT and left the 45ACP cylinder in the original OM 45/45 Blackhawk. PS: I've owned several 9MM revolvers over the years and the S&W M940's were the pick of the litter shooting like little itty bitty J-frame target guns, AMAZINGINGLY so! And the 3" M940 cranks numbers you'd not believe. And so it goes... |
July 31, 2015, 12:31 PM | #22 |
Member Emeritus
Join Date: August 19, 2004
Posts: 7,133
|
The similarities between .45 Colt & .45 ACP are close enough, as mentioned above, to allow both calibers in the same chambers of one cylinder.
The .45 ACP sizing die CAN be used for .45 Colt cases, if you need to. The differences between the .357 & the 9, as mentioned above, create a new ballgame. As far as Ruger (or anybody else) making a true .357/9mm convertible DA revolver goes, it'd really be necessary to fit two entire crane/cylinder assemblies to each gun. Which would raise the price of the gun. If you can break the GP down to components for cleaning (remove grips, remove mainspring/strut, remove trigger assembly, remove crane/cylinder assembly), you can easily swap full crane/cylinder assemblies around between the two calibers. Obviously no sideplate involved, and knowing how to take the gun down that far is merely a matter of knowing your gun & how to maintain it. It would not be unreasonable to expect a GP owner to be able to do that. The actual process of swapping assemblies would not be difficult, but it would be time-consuming, and more than a matter of merely changing ammo in the same cylinder. Also much more involved than fitting a pair of cylinders to a Blackhawk, and/or swapping them around in a single-action design. Denis |
July 31, 2015, 01:20 PM | #23 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 11, 2014
Posts: 754
|
Quote:
|
|
July 31, 2015, 01:57 PM | #24 |
Member Emeritus
Join Date: August 19, 2004
Posts: 7,133
|
Headspacing on the 9mm would be controlled by the clips.
Cartridge length is only a side issue, in the amount of distance a 9mm bullet would "jump" before reaching the chamber's front constriction in a .357-length chamber. Denis |
July 31, 2015, 02:33 PM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 16, 2014
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,634
|
What size throats would you even use? You couldn't use .355 because that cause problems with .357 and .358 bullets. A .357 throat wouldn't work very well on a 9mm and would potentially allow the bullet to fly freely from the middle of the cylinder all the way to the forcing cone. I can only imagine the amount of crud that would build up in the cylinder after shooting 100 rounds of 9mm through a cylinder that also chambers .357 Magnum.
I like the idea, but the more I think about it the less appealing it becomes. |
Tags |
.357 magnum/ .38 special , gp100 , moon clip , redhawk , versatility |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|