The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old December 11, 2004, 12:21 PM   #1
brokenfeather
Member
 
Join Date: November 23, 2004
Location: Fox River Dells
Posts: 21
223 reduced loads

I have found a few of the reduced load posts on TFL but was wondering if I could get you good folks to Maybe once again post your favorite 223 reduced loads one more time. I would appreciate as much information about your load as possible.

I'm not writeing a book, just wanting to get as many workable loads as possible located in one place to look over and see what I should or shouldn't do.

Any and all help will be appreciated.

Using these loads in an NEF.

Thanks
Don
brokenfeather is offline  
Old December 12, 2004, 08:24 AM   #2
griz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 31, 2000
Location: Middle Peninsula, VA
Posts: 1,588
I used to use 21.7 grains of 4895 and a 45 grain bullet to duplicate 22 hornet ballistics, and 3.3 grains of Red Dot with a 40 grain bullet that was around 22 mag performance.
griz is offline  
Old December 12, 2004, 11:12 AM   #3
MADISON
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 1, 2000
Location: Roanoke, Virginia
Posts: 2,678
My SQUIB [Reduced] load for .223 Remmington

My SQUIB [Reduced] load for .223 Remmington is:
55 grain Jacketed bullet is 5.6 grains of UNIQUE. I estimate it's velocity as about 1850 feet per second.

The Lee computer program allows you to take the powder you normally use for full power loads and down-size it to the velocity you want. It works well for 22 caliber but, is questionable with larger calibers.
MADISON is offline  
Old December 12, 2004, 06:48 PM   #4
brokenfeather
Member
 
Join Date: November 23, 2004
Location: Fox River Dells
Posts: 21
Thanks for input

Thanks for the input so far.
I'm sending off the Lee program this month. I was hoping to find more stuff at the Gun Show today. Didn't, but still had a lot of fun looking at other toys.
brokenfeather is offline  
Old December 14, 2004, 04:56 PM   #5
pearson1662
Member
 
Join Date: June 4, 2004
Posts: 52
223 reduced loads

You might consider H4895. Hodgdon has an "Annual Manual" that gives a 60% rule for 4895, that I believe applies to any of the max loadings that they list. I use it as a starting point for working up loads for my son to shoot in 6.5mm swede, 260 Remington and 270 Win. Don't take my word for it though, consult the manual. I'm curious about the effect of ambient temperature on the performance of H4895.
pearson1662 is offline  
Old December 21, 2004, 09:44 PM   #6
GRC
Junior Member
 
Join Date: December 21, 2004
Posts: 2
Temperature effects on H4895

I did a compilation from my log book for the temp effects on I4895 (I note weather and temps for each session). Works our to 1.6 foot per second change for every 1 degree f change in temp, up or down the scale.

The H4895, if memory serves, comes in the temperature stable version now - no? I would expect the normal H4895 to have near identical changes as the I4895.

Good luck

GRC
GRC is offline  
Old December 23, 2004, 08:09 PM   #7
Tacoma
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 27, 2004
Location: SE New England
Posts: 620
Go to www.jamescalhoon.com and look under his artical section for "Bee" loads. Basicly you use 4-14 gr of blue dot under 50-35 gr bullets (with pistol primers) to get loads in the 22 long rifle to .218 bee range. Very sweet and quiet loads. Many shoot very close to full house 223 POI too.
Tacoma is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.03761 seconds with 8 queries