The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Art of the Rifle: Bolt, Lever, and Pump Action

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old March 11, 2016, 06:55 AM   #1
Pond, James Pond
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 12, 2011
Location: Top of the Baltic stack
Posts: 6,079
No lever/bolt actions in .460 S&W?

I see lever actions in .44Mag/Spl, .357Mag, 45-70, even 500S&W, but not the .460...

I base this purely on the fact that I've never seen them discussed, but it seems that there are no such guns around.

True?
If so, why do you think that is, given its near rifle performance out of a revolver?
__________________
When the right to effective self-defence is denied, that right to self-defence which remains is essentially symbolic.
Freedom: Please enjoy responsibly.
Pond, James Pond is offline  
Old March 11, 2016, 07:01 AM   #2
Mobuck
Junior member
 
Join Date: February 2, 2010
Posts: 6,846
Do you know what pressures the 460 runs? Takes a strong action to handle that much-far more than the cartridges you mentioned.
Mobuck is offline  
Old March 11, 2016, 07:09 AM   #3
Pond, James Pond
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 12, 2011
Location: Top of the Baltic stack
Posts: 6,079
OK, but is it more than .308, 30-06 or other common rifle cartridges?

The title mentions bolt-actions too and those exist for the .44 and .357 mags....
__________________
When the right to effective self-defence is denied, that right to self-defence which remains is essentially symbolic.
Freedom: Please enjoy responsibly.
Pond, James Pond is offline  
Old March 11, 2016, 07:28 AM   #4
jmr40
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 15, 2008
Location: Georgia
Posts: 10,792
308, 30-06 are more powerful, but generate less pressure on the action. It is possible, but not really practical. The 500 S&W is in a similar pressure range and they do make rifles for it so a 460 could be done. But why?

You can load 45-70, 375 magnum and most any round made for a rifle to be more powerful with less pressure. Those rounds are best left in handguns where they were designed to be used.
jmr40 is offline  
Old March 11, 2016, 07:50 AM   #5
brasscollector
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 26, 2015
Posts: 526
Here's a link to a thread about a 454 casull levergun from a few days back
sledgehammer
You will likely never need more levergun than that.
__________________
He may look dumb, but that's just a disguise.
-Charlie Daniels
brasscollector is offline  
Old March 11, 2016, 08:03 AM   #6
Pond, James Pond
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 12, 2011
Location: Top of the Baltic stack
Posts: 6,079
Quote:
You will likely never need more levergun than that.
I doubt I'd need more than .44Mag.

This is not about filling a need. I'm just wondering why they've not come out with one and it seems to be an engineering challenge coupled to an unsure marketing outcome...
__________________
When the right to effective self-defence is denied, that right to self-defence which remains is essentially symbolic.
Freedom: Please enjoy responsibly.
Pond, James Pond is offline  
Old March 11, 2016, 02:20 PM   #7
BoogieMan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 4, 2012
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 2,217
PJP- I think its less about making a rifle that can handle the pressure and more about making a rifle that they can sell. Big Horn Armory makes a very nice 460s&w lever gun starting is $3500ish. Most rotating bolt style levers should be able to handle the pressure, think Win 88 or BLR style. As far as bolt guns, the rimmed cartridge is challenging to feed, certainly can be done. Think Mosin Nagant.
I have a 460xvr that I love. Would be nice to have a rifle with matching cartridge. It is a beast of a cartridge.
On a side note there is a cartridge called 450 Raptor. Exact same as 460s&w except it has a rebated rim. Barrels available for AR308 and can easily be made for almost any 308 / 30-06 rifle. Dont quote me on this- 308 and 460 are max 62k psi.
__________________
Concentrated power is not rendered harmless by the good intentions of those who create it.
Milton Freidman
"If you find yourself in a fair fight,,,
Your tactics suck"
- Unknown
BoogieMan is offline  
Old March 11, 2016, 02:50 PM   #8
handlerer2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 26, 2010
Location: Yellowstone Co, MT
Posts: 489
Mr. Pond,

Boogieman beat me to it. Big Horn Armory is not that far from my location. I have seen them in Scheels in Billings and drooled over the fit and finish. The price is too much for me. The model 90 is 460SW, the Model 91 is 500SW.

If you get one we must have pics.
handlerer2 is offline  
Old March 11, 2016, 03:04 PM   #9
reddog81
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 16, 2014
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,633
Not enough demand would be my guess.

The 460 is a large handgun round that develops rifle type power. If your going to be shooting a rifle why not just go with a rifle cartridge?

I want to get a .357 lever action, but only because I cast and reload for 38 special and .357. I doubt any one is going to be purchasing a .460 S&W because of easy/cheap ammo availability.
reddog81 is offline  
Old March 11, 2016, 03:10 PM   #10
johnwilliamson062
Junior member
 
Join Date: May 16, 2008
Posts: 9,995
Lever GUN:
http://www.bighornarmory.com/catalog...-454-casull-6/

There is a gunsmith who had converted several Marlin Guide guns. You send him the factory 45-70 gun + about $750( a few years ago).

I believe there have been conversions of Mosin Nagants also.

The conversions involve some heat treating work and obviously exceed those firearms design limits.
johnwilliamson062 is offline  
Old March 11, 2016, 05:15 PM   #11
Guv
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 24, 2012
Location: South Texas
Posts: 2,126
A Ruger No.3 would be pretty sweet in 500 or 460.
__________________
Walnut and Gloss Blue, mostly!
Guv is offline  
Old March 12, 2016, 10:14 AM   #12
Wyosmith
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 29, 2010
Location: Shoshoni Wyoming
Posts: 2,713
Once you get a brass case that long and that wide you now are competing for a piece of the 45-70 market and the 460 will not outperform the 45-70, so I expect that gun makers will not invest in a market that is filled with something that covers the bases well, and does everything as well and better then the 460 would.

Anyway, that's my guess.
Wyosmith is offline  
Old March 12, 2016, 06:02 PM   #13
44 AMP
Staff
 
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,677
Quote:
A Ruger No.3 would be pretty sweet in 500 or 460.
A Ruger No.3 in .460 would kick butt! Literally, the butt would KICK!! It would kick my butt to shoot it. My .45-70 No.3 sure does when loaded hot!

The .460S&W (running at 65,000psi) could be done in a No.3, but begs the question, why??

The case is .3" shorter than the .45-70 (of no concern in the single shot), and I don't see any real performance increase over what the .45-70 can do in the No.3, IF you load the .45-70 up to the max that the rifle and the brass will take.

Plus the .460 uses .452" pistol bullets while the .45-70 uses .458 rifle bullets.

A quick look shows the .460 heaviest bullet running 350-400gr, while this is about the middle of the .458 bullet weight range.

Quite simply, there isn't enough demand for any major levergun maker to adapt a model for the .460.

Compared to the standard Marlins and Winchesters the Big Horn Armory guns are virtually handmade custom pieces. Not quite, but they are a small shop, who's guns are excellently made by pretty skilled folk, making a niche product and their prices reflect that.
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better.
44 AMP is offline  
Old March 12, 2016, 06:36 PM   #14
seeker_two
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 31, 2002
Location: Deep in the Heart of the Lone Star State (TX)
Posts: 2,169
Not sure about a levergun, but a bolt-action rifle that could handle everything from .45Colt to .460S&W would be a nifty gun to have....
seeker_two is offline  
Old March 13, 2016, 02:39 AM   #15
Pond, James Pond
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 12, 2011
Location: Top of the Baltic stack
Posts: 6,079
Quote:
Quite simply, there isn't enough demand for any major levergun maker to adapt a model for the .460.
That would seem to be the case, but ignoring the market forces, people say the .460 is flat shooting, whereas the 45-70 is not.

As you say 300gn bullets at 2400fps (2250 being the velocity from the XVR revolvers) would kick, but less than a 450gn bullet in the 45-70. On top of that there is the added tendency for people to have long-guns and handguns in matching calibres.

So, perhaps the advantages would be cross-over calibres with revolvers and a flatter trajectory than 45-70 but still with a big-hole-maker bullet.

Not all together insignificant, though clearly not significant enough for anyone to develop....
__________________
When the right to effective self-defence is denied, that right to self-defence which remains is essentially symbolic.
Freedom: Please enjoy responsibly.
Pond, James Pond is offline  
Old March 13, 2016, 03:53 AM   #16
TMD
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 9, 2011
Posts: 1,293
I think what some are failing to realize is the .460 mags max pressure is 65k. This is as much or more than some magnum rifle calibers. When I had my .460PC with a 10.5" barrel I was able to push 300gn bullets to 2100fps. That equates to almost 2900lbs of muzzle energy which is more than a .30-06. Thankfully the gun with scope, 3 rings, and bi-pod was pushing 9 lbs which helped absorb some of the recoil. I couldn't imagine how it would feel in a 7lb lever gun.
TMD is offline  
Old March 13, 2016, 04:05 AM   #17
Pond, James Pond
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 12, 2011
Location: Top of the Baltic stack
Posts: 6,079
Quote:
I think what some are failing to realize is the .460 mags max pressure is 65k.
Max psi has been covered in a number of posts so far.
__________________
When the right to effective self-defence is denied, that right to self-defence which remains is essentially symbolic.
Freedom: Please enjoy responsibly.
Pond, James Pond is offline  
Old March 13, 2016, 12:09 PM   #18
44 AMP
Staff
 
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,677
Quote:
people say the .460 is flat shooting, whereas the 45-70 is not.
Probably because they are comparing the .460 in its natural state, as a "hyper" velocity PISTOL cartridge (2200fps+) and the .45-70 in its standard 1873 blackpowder velocity loading (1300fps).

If you compare bullets of identical weight at the same velocities, one a .452" (.460S&W) and the other a .458" (.45-70) there is no significant different in their trajectories, other than the small amount created by differences in their BC due to their nose profiles.

The .460 shoots "very flat" for a PISTOL ROUND, by current standards.
The .45-70 does not shoot "very flat" for a RIFLE ROUND, by current standards.

Quote:
As you say 300gn bullets at 2400fps (2250 being the velocity from the XVR revolvers) would kick, but less than a 450gn bullet in the 45-70.
Recoil energy is a straight computation. There is a point where the 300gr and the 450gr bullets produce exactly the same amount of recoil energy. However, at that point, the lighter bullet is moving much faster than the heavier one. Move them both at the same speed, the heavier slug will always have the higher recoil energy.

How we each perceive that energy is called "felt recoil" and is entirely subjective, a matter of what each different shooter "feels" when they fire the gun. This involves numerous "shooter" factors beyond the gun and the ammo themselves. How the gun "fits" the shooter, how the shooter "fits the gun" (meaning how they hold and fire it) and other factors make a difference in the feel for each individual.

For example, a friend of mine thinks my Ruger No.3 .45-70 "kicks like a mule" shooting the standard 405gr load, and refuses to shoot it with anything hotter.
(He shoots Sharps & Winchester .45-70s, considerably heavier rifles with different stock dimensions.

I think the recoil from my No.3 with standard loads is a moderate shove, and not at all disagreeable. Raise that same bullet to 1800+fps and the recoil changes HUGELY! And the lighter the rifle, the more...noticeable it gets!

Quote:
When I had my .460PC with a 10.5" barrel I was able to push 300gn bullets to 2100fps. That equates to almost 2900lbs of muzzle energy which is more than a .30-06. Thankfully the gun with scope, 3 rings, and bi-pod was pushing 9 lbs which helped absorb some of the recoil. I couldn't imagine how it would feel in a 7lb lever gun.
A "pushing" 9lb handgun! WOW!!
I realize how it gets there, and how the weight helps with the recoil, I just can't see how a handgun that heavy is any real advantage to a rifle, other than being shorter.

I have a 350gr load that clocks 2200fps from my Ruger No.3, which is a 6lb rifle! This load is a "walk you back one step to keep from falling" level beast when fired offhand, and in the never, never, NEVER fire from the prone position group in my book. So is the 400gr at 1800fps from this light carbine.

AND these loads are much lower pressure than the 65K psi of the .460 S&W!
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better.
44 AMP is offline  
Old March 13, 2016, 01:47 PM   #19
BoogieMan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 4, 2012
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 2,217
Something to consider. I mentioned the 450 raptor. Any 308 rifle should be able to be rechambered and barreled for that round. It will feed with little problems from a 308 mag.
I have considered cutting my xvr for moon clips and running that round in both the xvr and a matching rifle. If you Google 450 raptor you will see rifles available for the cartridge. It would also make for one nasty ar308. Lots of firepower in a sa rifle with a 10 round mag.
__________________
Concentrated power is not rendered harmless by the good intentions of those who create it.
Milton Freidman
"If you find yourself in a fair fight,,,
Your tactics suck"
- Unknown
BoogieMan is offline  
Old March 13, 2016, 01:58 PM   #20
johnwilliamson062
Junior member
 
Join Date: May 16, 2008
Posts: 9,995
Quote:
I just can't see how a handgun that heavy is any real advantage to a rifle, other than being shorter.
In many cases the advantage is it is legal. It can also be easier to carry in a holster than a slung rifle over the shoulder, especially over rough terrain where both hands free is a blessing. I find any sort of climbing with a slung rifle to be a real pain. My opinion of course, and neither is perfect.

The 460 is generally factory loaded with relatively fast burning powders for relatively short barreled pistols. The 45-70p often relatively slow burning powders for relatively long barrels. That can make a big difference on how the recoil feels.
johnwilliamson062 is offline  
Old March 13, 2016, 11:15 PM   #21
44 AMP
Staff
 
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,677
Quote:
In many cases the advantage is it is legal. It can also be easier to carry in a holster than a slung rifle over the shoulder, especially over rough terrain where both hands free is a blessing. I find any sort of climbing with a slung rifle to be a real pain. My opinion of course, and neither is perfect.
I have to admit the legal advantage had not occurred to me. In my area there is no separate season for handguns, just modern & primitive firearms. (and of course, a bow season).

I'm well aware of the advantages of even a large handgun over a short rifle for carrying, I have scoped 10" and 14" Contender set ups, so yes, I get that.

What got me was the weight. "pushing 9lbs" just seems extreme if not ridiculous to me. As he owner of several magnum semi auto pistols, which run between 4 and 5lbs loaded, I have heard endlessly from some folks about how they are too big and too heavy to be practical, etc., I can see the irony of me saying that about someone else's big pistol.

Seriously if it works for you then its practical enough, right?

A friend of mine I visited today has some personal experience with the Big Horn Armory guns, and says they are extremely well made and worth the price. Also, they hold 6. I believe the big S&W .460 revolver is a 5 shooter??
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better.
44 AMP is offline  
Old March 14, 2016, 12:17 AM   #22
Pond, James Pond
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 12, 2011
Location: Top of the Baltic stack
Posts: 6,079
Quote:
Probably because they are comparing the .460 in its natural state, as a "hyper" velocity PISTOL cartridge (2200fps+) and the .45-70 in its standard 1873 blackpowder velocity loading (1300fps).
Fair point.
__________________
When the right to effective self-defence is denied, that right to self-defence which remains is essentially symbolic.
Freedom: Please enjoy responsibly.
Pond, James Pond is offline  
Old March 14, 2016, 08:14 AM   #23
Road_Clam
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 21, 2013
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 1,691
I've owned my 12" 460 XVR for over a year and done quite a bit of varied bullet weight handloading and the problem with the 45 Cal bullets is the relative low BC. The Hornady 200 gr FTX is the benchmark standard "hyper" velocity bullet for the 460. Factory loads are about 2200 fps. If you run the ballistics the 200 FTX shoots incredibly flat out to about 175 yds but then really starts to drop like a rock thereafter. I really don't see any market advantage by offering a 460 MAG levergun. I'm sure there is those unique levergun shooters that would want that particular type but for the masses it just doesn't seem practical. With a Burris 3-12x optic I can hold about 4 moa shooting off a nice sturdy rest at 200 meters with my XVR.
__________________
"To be old an wise you must have been young and stupid"
Road_Clam is offline  
Old March 14, 2016, 07:28 PM   #24
johnwilliamson062
Junior member
 
Join Date: May 16, 2008
Posts: 9,995
Nine pounds is s bit more than any of mine and I thought about that. Once my encore went into the holster I didn't notice the weight. I think my heavies set-up was about 6-7 pounds though. I decided to give the benefit of the doubt that the extra two pounds in a good holster wouldn't make a difference. I would probably avoid being able to give a definitive answer from personal experience though.
johnwilliamson062 is offline  
Old March 14, 2016, 07:36 PM   #25
TMD
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 9, 2011
Posts: 1,293
The reason mine weighted in close 9lbs is because of how it was set up. It was a 10.5" Performance model with 3 steel Warn scope rings a Burris 3x12 scope and a steel Bi-pod. Great bench gun but shooting off hand was questionable at best.
TMD is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.11408 seconds with 8 queries