|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
May 6, 2009, 01:17 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 20, 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,300
|
1916 Mauser help needed
Ok, I just picked up a 1916 Spanish Mauser.
I have owned several in the past and all were marked identically, but this one doesn't have the crest or any other markings. the receiver looks like it was never stamped with the crest and is very clean with only the serial. All the other 1916 mausers had the crest and also had the 7.62 stamp if they had been converted from the original 7mm mauser. This gun is in great shape (still has cosmo on it) not import marked and is numbers matching on everything (cleaning rod doesn't have a number at all, but I don't count that anyway ). Only thing that says it is a 1916 mauser and 7.62 NATO is the very inventory old hang tag that came with the gun. Anyone else have any input on this gun and why no markings on the receiver (like it is a blank and has not been scrubbed). on a side note. I am gonna get a chamber casting to verify whether it was converted to 7.62 or if it is still 7mm mauser, just to be safe, especially since it is not marked as such. here is the link to the auction for the gun and has some pics, but they are kinda bad. The gun actually looks 100% better in person and not all dinged up like it does in the pics. also note the picture of the receiver where it doesn't have the crest or the 7.62 stamp http://www.auctionarms.com/Closed/Di...mNum=9090249.0
__________________
Lifetime member VFW and NRA "Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati" (when all else fails play dead) -Red Green |
May 6, 2009, 05:56 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 20, 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,300
|
also, just reread the ad and noticed he said the barrel was import marked, but I can't find any markings on this gun other than the serial. I am gonna refield strip it tonight and see if i can find the import mark on the barrel that the guy is talking about
__________________
Lifetime member VFW and NRA "Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati" (when all else fails play dead) -Red Green |
May 8, 2009, 11:46 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 13, 2006
Location: Washington state
Posts: 15,248
|
Look under the barrel near the muzzle.
I believe that receiver has been refinished, judging by the photos. Compare the metal condition and finish on the receiver with the condition of the magazine floorplate. Either way, enjoy it, they're a great rifle. I'm sorry I got rid of mine when I got divorced.
__________________
Never try to educate someone who resists knowledge at all costs. But what do I know? Summit Arms Services |
May 9, 2009, 06:06 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 3, 2009
Posts: 266
|
Ok call me out here if I don't know what I'm talking about (don't have 7mm experience), but you shouldn't need a chamber casting.
The 7mm and .308 are very different in size, so it should be readily apparent which barrel is on there. |
May 9, 2009, 05:55 PM | #5 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
Use caution when dealing with 7mm rifles converted to 7.62 NATO. Not only were the guns not made for the higher pressure of the 7.62, but some were converted by using a chamber inset, OK for light use or for an emergency weapon, but not IMHO, desireable for a rifle to be used for much shooting.
Jim Last edited by James K; May 9, 2009 at 06:03 PM. |
May 9, 2009, 08:25 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 23, 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 5,676
|
OK what about handloads downloaded to starting charges or something?
__________________
Your gun is like your nose, it is just wrong for someone else to pick it for you! |
May 9, 2009, 08:53 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 531
|
There are many unmarked ones. Mine is unmarked. More info here:
http://www.geocities.com/fritz125541/Unmarked1916 It also has a good discussion about the 308 conversion and how it is done on 1916 rifles. Last edited by HankC1; May 9, 2009 at 09:04 PM. |
May 10, 2009, 05:23 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 28, 2004
Location: Flint Hills of Kansas
Posts: 316
|
7.62 NATO is fine in these firearms. That is what they were converted for. I have one and it is a handy rifle and pretty accurate too. The arguments are generally as to whether they can handle .308. .308 Win. is higher pressure and not recommended.
|
May 10, 2009, 06:00 PM | #9 |
Member
Join Date: December 8, 2006
Location: central florida
Posts: 51
|
Spanish 1916s' were not for OUR 7.62 Nato
Kyrie Ellis on another list pointed out the 7.62 Cetme developmental cartridge (for the CETMES as they were being conceived postwar by their German designers) that had a long skinny 130 grain bullet and they werent powered as hot as the NATO round designed for the early CETME rifles which were delayed blowback. Those 7.62 marked 1916s were designed for the puny CETME cartridge and not NATO. Used with the lighter CETME cartridge the 1916 Mauser rifles gave good service till the FR-8 came into being.
OH by the way, iirc they 1916's were 1893's and made with SPANISH steels from Oviedo and not the tougher Oberndorf Mauser steels. That CETME was re-engineered into the G-3 service rifle by HK, but the Spanish Cetme's were a special breed 7.62 Nato was never intended for those 1916's which were trainers for that proprietary 7.62 ammo made specially for the Cetme's Kyrie sent me reams of printouts on the history of the rifle and cartridge and the behavior of that Mauser species when used with 7.62 Nato ammo. As a gunsmith, he had to take back a number of them that in use demonstrated traits that were precursors to failing. The rifle with NATO ammo is destined to fail and it was a crapshoot when it would fail. For the average 20 rounds a year hunter perhapsd not for his lifetime, some of us serious crufflers would shoot ten times that in a day . yodar
__________________
Yodar Words MEAN things Homebrewing in Central Florida |
May 12, 2009, 05:09 AM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 23, 2008
Posts: 165
|
I have an unmarked "OT" series. I have used 308s with 150 grain Hornady Interlocks loaded to 300 Savage levels. Fairly accurate results Commercial 308s will "stretch" the receiver making the bolt difficult to operate, remember receiver was made for 7mm Mauser pressures.
__________________
To Err is human, To Forgive divine, But to forget is foolish. |
May 12, 2009, 09:49 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 20, 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,300
|
guys and gals thanks for the links.
I am familiar with these rifles (have owned 5 so far) and this was the only one with a scrubbed receiver. turns out it is the OT model of serials as well. already have some light loaded 308 ammo that I put through it and working on some more light loads for it. I got lots of 150gr hornady sp's so working on some light loads with those, cci 200 primers and imr4895. the little gun is handy and holds good groups from a rest and sights are spot on. still got a lot of cleaning to do as the stock absorbed a lot of cosmo and even after letting sit in the sun in a blag trash sack with paper towels soaking up the cosmo it still has some. will hit with a heat gun later on. and then a good kerosene dip if needed. already steamed out the dings and also steamed the area on the stock near the lower band that had some fit issues and swelled the wood enough that it now has a tight fit . all in all am happy I got another of these little rifles. this one I won't sell (I said that for the last 4 but this time I mean it). JOE
__________________
Lifetime member VFW and NRA "Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati" (when all else fails play dead) -Red Green |
May 15, 2009, 05:38 AM | #12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 23, 2008
Posts: 165
|
Quote:
__________________
To Err is human, To Forgive divine, But to forget is foolish. |
|
May 15, 2009, 10:50 AM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 20, 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,300
|
no, but you would need to do a scout scope mount on the rear sight, otherwise with drilling a tapping the receiver for a scope mount you would have to rebend the bolt handle and also put in a different safety (2 position or a side mount).
__________________
Lifetime member VFW and NRA "Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati" (when all else fails play dead) -Red Green |
May 16, 2009, 08:54 AM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 23, 2008
Posts: 165
|
Tap the receiver ! Heresy I say :barf:
No, a mount in place of the rear sight would be the only responsible way to go, just wondering if anyone knew where to get a suitable mount.
__________________
To Err is human, To Forgive divine, But to forget is foolish. |
May 16, 2009, 10:32 AM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 20, 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,300
|
i agree with you flipper.
I only sporterize really bad guns and not any that are serviceable.
__________________
Lifetime member VFW and NRA "Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati" (when all else fails play dead) -Red Green |
May 16, 2009, 04:44 PM | #16 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: April 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 531
|
Quote:
http://i76.photobucket.com/albums/j1...916762NATO.jpg Quote:
Last edited by HankC1; May 16, 2009 at 04:54 PM. |
||
May 17, 2009, 03:06 AM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 23, 2008
Posts: 165
|
It looks more like 7 (comma) 62 than 7 (decimal) 62
46,000 psi CUP - 7mm Mauser (SAAMI maximum) 46,800 psi CUP - 7.62 CETME (from the manual) 49,700 psi CUP - 7.62 NATO (from the manual) 52,000 psi CUP - 308 Winchester (SAAMI maximum) A little disparity between the numbers....eh? How much of a "Built-In?" safety margin is enough?!?!?!?!
__________________
To Err is human, To Forgive divine, But to forget is foolish. |
May 17, 2009, 09:52 AM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 20, 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,300
|
for me I load light .308 loads to begin with on this rifle.
if you do shoot 308 or nato loads, keep an eye out for signs on the brass and the gun that are precursors to failure. I would bet to say that you could get by shooting 308 commercial loads for a long time as long as you pay attention to the gun and ammo. if the bolt is hard to lift or the brass shows stretching, etc... then you over did it. militaries will always load way past max to proof test actions to see exactly that their limits are. if the nato loads were close to the max for these guns then they would have never converted them.
__________________
Lifetime member VFW and NRA "Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati" (when all else fails play dead) -Red Green |
May 17, 2009, 06:43 PM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 3, 2009
Posts: 266
|
Uh, "7,62" is just how those weird Europeans would write "7.62". Just like they write 1.000 for 1,000.
And if you look underneath is says "Transformado de 7mm" -- converted from 7mm. |
May 21, 2009, 04:39 AM | #20 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 23, 2008
Posts: 165
|
Quote:
Which in the U.S.A. means DONE RIGHT I would stick with mild loads (300 savage levels) and not push yer luck
__________________
To Err is human, To Forgive divine, But to forget is foolish. |
|
May 27, 2009, 04:25 PM | #21 |
Member
Join Date: May 26, 2009
Posts: 35
|
Uhhhh....
A Mauser (sworn enemy of the Mosin) firing 7.62...hmmmmmm
|
June 5, 2009, 12:46 PM | #22 |
Junior Member
Join Date: November 25, 2008
Location: New Haven,CT
Posts: 8
|
Mauser 1916 spanish
Hello. I just bought one and am waiting for it to arrive. I did my home work first and found every article i could find simply by putting Spanish Mauser, 1916 Mauser, Mauser 1916 Spanish & FR & FR. I then put it into a search bar,(GOGGLE) and pushed enter. One of the best articles and most informative was what i got from this site which i am including with this post. This is the man's name and site.
Mark Trope Field Editor g-owner.net This si a copy of an e-mail i wrote to him and his answer. Hope it helps. Hi Rick, I'm glad you enjoyed the article. Q. I have some military ammo which is head stamped, LC 05 with a O and a + sign in the middle. I am aware that this is Lake City and the 05 means Mfg. Date. Do you know what the pressure is for this particular load and is it safe to shoot in that rifle being it checks out for being sound by a competent gunsmith etc. A. The pressure for that load is 50,000 PSI. Yes it is safe to shoot in a checked-out FR-8 Q. What would be considered good enough for shooting in military bolt action shoots which my club has from time to time. A. Try 40.0 grains of IMR 4895 and a 150 grain bullet. This is a good, all around, mild pressure load. Have fun with your FR-8. They are still around, just getting a bit pricier now for the cleanest ones. Best Regards, Mark Trope |
June 5, 2009, 01:16 PM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,190
|
I had one of the 1916's and it was marked .308 near the muzzle, not 7.62
I used .308 Winchester in it for several years. Had it fully sporterized(against my gunsmith's objections). I never had any trouble with it and fired several thousand rounds through it. |
June 5, 2009, 02:01 PM | #24 |
Member
Join Date: June 5, 2009
Location: Modesto, Califonria
Posts: 50
|
I would say go for it, i know people that shoot 5.56 from a .223 actioned weapon.
__________________
If I owned those, my life would be set! <img src=http://www.panzergrenadier.net/images/g43/badass.jpg> |
June 5, 2009, 10:02 PM | #25 | |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: March 11, 2000
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 16,002
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|