The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Conference Center > Law and Civil Rights

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old March 9, 2011, 11:36 PM   #1
TXAZ
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 5, 2010
Location: McMurdo Sound Texas
Posts: 4,322
Dirty Harry may be moving to Arizona.... :D

The Arizona Senate, (the guys that started the SB 1070 movement that 1/2 the states are now considering adopting) just unanimously passed SB 1469, Which greatly strengthens the Arizona Castle Doctrine / "Make my day" law.

http://e-lobbyist.com/gaits/text/206257

This will be interesting to watch it progress, where many observers expect it to pass and be signed quickly.
__________________

Cave illos in guns et backhoes
TXAZ is offline  
Old March 9, 2011, 11:57 PM   #2
Davey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 2, 2010
Location: Not far enough from Chicago
Posts: 394
What does Castle Doctrine give citizens that they don't have without it? I mean here in IL I can still shoot a guy if I have to in my own house.
Davey is offline  
Old March 10, 2011, 12:10 AM   #3
youngunz4life
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 15, 2010
Location: United States of America
Posts: 1,877
davey

Quote:
What does Castle Doctrine give citizens that they don't have without it? I mean here in IL I can still shoot a guy if I have to in my own house.
the family member of a victim(badguy) does not have the right to sue when one is protected by a castle doctrine. It also finely defines one's right to use deadly force, so the person exercising his/her right to use deadly force is better protected.
__________________
"Damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead!" -Admiral Farragut @ Battle of Mobile Bay 05AUG1864
youngunz4life is offline  
Old March 12, 2011, 02:22 AM   #4
thrgunsmith
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 28, 2007
Location: Reno, Nevada
Posts: 196
ianal but most make my day laws also mean you're under NO obligation to retreat before defending your self, recently a ccw'er in FL shot two young thugs who attacked as he was jogging. (I think they were looking to bash gays but that's conjecture) under old law he would have had to retreat first then shoot if pursued-he shot after the attack & wasn't prosecuted.
IANAL

ETA I highlighted my typo
__________________
R.I.P Sam "Trout" Barbetta
82nd Airborne, S.F biker, friend.
http://www.ahalenia.com/memorial/sbarbetta.html

Last edited by thrgunsmith; March 12, 2011 at 03:06 PM. Reason: TYPO!
thrgunsmith is offline  
Old March 12, 2011, 02:56 AM   #5
Wildalaska
Junior member
 
Join Date: November 25, 2002
Location: In my own little weird world in Anchorage, Alaska
Posts: 14,172
So called Make My Day Laws make sense in a legal context, and little in a moral one.


WildbutidontpretendtohavealltheanswersAlaska ™©2002-2011
Wildalaska is offline  
Old March 12, 2011, 03:13 AM   #6
Edward429451
Junior member
 
Join Date: November 12, 2000
Location: Colorado Springs, Colorado
Posts: 9,494
We have no duty to retreat in Colorado.
Edward429451 is offline  
Old March 12, 2011, 08:21 AM   #7
Double Naught Spy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 8, 2001
Location: Forestburg, Montague Cnty, TX
Posts: 12,717
It is a good law, but labeling it with the name of a fictional cop who operated on some less than legal motives isn't really what the law concerns. It isn't about vigilante justice. It is about being able to legally employ lethal self defense in a situation where it would be appropriate to use it, usually in defense of life, without needless conditions such as the need to retreat.

Hero figure or not, Dirty Harry didn't exactly follow the law and his catch phrase isn't well associated here.
__________________
"If you look through your scope and see your shoe, aim higher." -- said to me by my 11 year old daughter before going out for hogs 8/13/2011
My Hunting Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/HornHillRange
Double Naught Spy is offline  
Old March 12, 2011, 11:17 AM   #8
ltc444
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 3, 2011
Location: Vernon AZ
Posts: 1,195
AZ home defense law

The importantance of the AZ law and its expansion is this.

1. The law presumes that if you shoot someone on your property it is self defense.
2. Unfortunately, certain police agencies, Pima County SO, and a number of county attorneys found ways to avoide the intent of the law and have charged and convicted persons who should not have been convicted or even charged. The modification to the existing law is to protect us from the abuse.
3. Your best course, after a shooting incident, is to call 911 and report the event, call an experienced attorney, and keep your mouth shut.

A man is serving a sentence now because, despite doing everything right, he opened his mouth and made statements which an over zealous DA used against him.
ltc444 is offline  
Old March 12, 2011, 12:35 PM   #9
thallub
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 20, 2007
Location: South Western OK
Posts: 3,112
Quote:
ianal but most make my day laws also mean you're under obligation to retreat before defending your self,
Huh?

The OK "make my day" law does not require one to retreat before using deadly force. The OK "make my day" was passed in 1987, since then no person has been successfully sued in civil court for a righteous home defense shooting.
thallub is offline  
Old March 12, 2011, 03:04 PM   #10
thrgunsmith
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 28, 2007
Location: Reno, Nevada
Posts: 196
^^^ oops! typo!! ^^^ thanks!!
__________________
R.I.P Sam "Trout" Barbetta
82nd Airborne, S.F biker, friend.
http://www.ahalenia.com/memorial/sbarbetta.html
thrgunsmith is offline  
Old March 13, 2011, 10:21 AM   #11
Musketeer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 12, 2005
Posts: 3,733
Calling these "make my day" laws is really a poor way for us to make our case to the uninformed public. Call it "lawful defense" or another positive phrase. "Make my day" immediately brings vigilante justice to the general public's mind and hurts our position.
__________________
"Religions are all alike - founded upon fables and mythologies." Thomas Jefferson

"The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason." Benjamin Franklin
Musketeer is offline  
Old March 13, 2011, 02:47 PM   #12
Glenn E. Meyer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 17, 2000
Posts: 20,064
I agree. The link says nothing about Dirty Harry or promoting killing folks. Using that terminology is troublesome. You might look for the thread I started about the castle doctrine in TX. I think that Dirty Harry would have been better off staying in his house.

Closed.
__________________
NRA, TSRA, IDPA, NTI, Polite Soc. - Aux Armes, Citoyens
Glenn E. Meyer is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.08259 seconds with 8 queries