The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old July 21, 2015, 11:59 AM   #1
Dr Killdeer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 22, 2009
Location: Newburgh, NY
Posts: 127
Beyond SAAMI Specs?

I need some feedback about SAAMI Specifications. I'm loading for A Browning Medallion in 300 Winchester Magnum caliber with a 26 inch barrel. I'm loading a 165 grain Nosler AccuBond bullet. The actual load specs don't apply to my question, so I ommitted them.

I use the Hornady Lock n Load OAL gauge to determine the exact OAL from the bullet ogive to the base of the brass. Today I decided to move the bullet to within .020 of the rifling to reduce the distance it has to jump into the lands. The rounds chamber properly and cycle through the magazine without any issues. I haven't tested them yet, but here's my concern.

In all the reloading manuals the MAXIMUM OAL for the 300 Win Mag is 3.340. That's the SAAMI SPEC number. The actual OAL on mine, from bullet tip to the base of the brass is 3.563. That's a difference of .223, which is pretty substantial. So, I guess my question is; is that normal? Somehow, I can't believe the throat in that rifle could be that long! And since I'm a half a mile beyond the SAMMI specs, what are the evils that I need to know about, if any?
__________________
Man is the only animal on the planet that is capable of saying "I'm sorry." Further, he's the only one who creates the need to say it.
Dr Killdeer is offline  
Old July 21, 2015, 01:11 PM   #2
Clark
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 4, 1999
Location: WA, the ever blue state
Posts: 4,678
SAAMI specs are how we can stagger into a store, buy a gun, buy ammo, stagger out, and it works.
In the 1974 movie Towering Inferno, Paul Newman is a grumpy architect:
Roger Simmons: Every piece of wire I put in that building is strictly up to code, inspected and approved.
Doug Roberts: The code's not enough for that building. And you know it. That's why I asked for installations that were way, way above standard!

I make some chambers bigger and some smaller than SAAMI spec. But usually per SAAMI spec.
I load some ammo longer and some shorter than SAAMI spec. But usually per SAAMI spec.
I load some ammo higher and some lower pressure than SAAMI spec. But usually per SAAMI spec.
It is ok when I deviate on purpose for MY stuff. I would not like it if I bought something and it was deviate. I don't think anyone would like it if I gave them something that deviated.
__________________
The word 'forum" does not mean "not criticizing books."
"Ad hominem fallacy" is not the same as point by point criticism of books. If you bought the book, and believe it all, it may FEEL like an ad hominem attack, but you might strive to accept other points of view may exist.
Are we a nation of competing ideas, or a nation of forced conformity of thought?
Clark is offline  
Old July 21, 2015, 03:18 PM   #3
F. Guffey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 18, 2008
Posts: 7,249
I want to know the length of the chamber from the rifling to the bolt face. I make transfers, I transfer the dimensions of the chamber to the seating die, then I zero the seating die with a height gage. After that I save the transfer because? Above all I do not like starting over every day like it was a new day.

Off the lands, I am the fan of the running start, I want my bullets to have 'that jump'. For me there is nothing interesting about a bullet setting at the lands trying to make up its little mind if it going down the barrel.

F. Guffey
F. Guffey is offline  
Old July 21, 2015, 04:44 PM   #4
higgite
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 21, 2010
Posts: 1,025
SAAMI specs are a firearms industry standard, not a personal standard... unless you want them to be.
higgite is offline  
Old July 21, 2015, 05:42 PM   #5
jmr40
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 15, 2008
Location: Georgia
Posts: 10,809
I load my rifle rounds to fit inside the magazine. I load 1, then test it for function. If it bumps the lands I seat it deeper until it chambers easily. I rarely have to go any deeper. I'll then load a few and head to the range. If they do what I want I go home and load a bunch. If not I'll seat a touch deeper and go back to the range. This rarely happens.

I also watch the chronograph. If they are shooting at the expected speed that is my concern. Faster than expected means they are over pressure for some reason. Only had that happen one time with one rifle and one powder. Stopped using that powder and the problem went away.

I rarely measure OAL or how far from the lands. The ones I have measured are usually pretty close. But as long as the speed is not too fast and if feeding and ejection is working I'm good to go.
jmr40 is offline  
Old July 22, 2015, 05:52 PM   #6
Dr Killdeer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 22, 2009
Location: Newburgh, NY
Posts: 127
I benched the rifle today and tested my out of spec rounds. No complaints! They printed tighter than I expected them to and there were no signs of any pressure problems with the brass after firing. The Chrony told me that they were close to book specs. No flyers either. I'm a happy camper.
I like jmr40's method, but higgite, you nailed it. SAAMI didn't use my rifle for their tests, so I'm not using their standards.
Thanks for the feedback guys.
__________________
Man is the only animal on the planet that is capable of saying "I'm sorry." Further, he's the only one who creates the need to say it.
Dr Killdeer is offline  
Old July 22, 2015, 06:25 PM   #7
Jim243
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 5, 2009
Location: Just off Route 66
Posts: 5,067
Quote:
In all the reloading manuals the MAXIMUM OAL for the 300 Win Mag is 3.340. That's the SAAMI SPEC number. The actual OAL on mine, from bullet tip to the base of the brass is 3.563. That's a difference of .223, which is pretty substantial. So, I guess my question is; is that normal?
If your measurements are correct, then no it is not normal. What you are doing is extending the life of that barrel somewhat. Both you and I know you are beyond the useful life of that barrel and the gun needs to be re-barreled.

You may be a happy camper right now but that will change with time and continued firing of that rifle as accuracy keeps falling off.

To use a pun, bite the bullet and re-barrel the rifle for proper specks.

Stay safe and be well.
Jim
__________________
Si vis pacem, para bellum
Jim243 is offline  
Old July 23, 2015, 07:26 AM   #8
steve4102
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 23, 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,955
Quote:
Originally Posted by higgite
SAAMI specs are a firearms industry standard, not a personal standard... unless you want them to be.
This is the correct answer.

Here is what Accurate Powders has to say about SAAMI OAL/COAL and handloading.

Quote:
SPECIAL NOTE ON CARTRIDGE OVERALL LENGTH “COL”
It is important to note that the SAAMI “COL” values are for the firearms and ammunition manufacturers industry and must be seen as a
guideline only.
The individual reloader is free to adjust this dimension to suit their particular firearm-component-weapon combination.
This parameter is determined by various dimensions such as 1) magazine length (space), 2) freebore-lead dimensions of the barrel, 3)
ogive or profile of the projectile and 4) position of cannelure or crimp groove.
http://www.accuratepowder.com/wp-con...d_data_3.5.pdf
steve4102 is offline  
Old July 23, 2015, 12:07 PM   #9
PA-Joe
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 9, 2010
Location: NEPA
Posts: 909
What does your Hornady Manual say the COL should be?
PA-Joe is offline  
Old July 23, 2015, 12:17 PM   #10
Jim Watson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 18,543
If your longer than book number rounds fit the magazine, feed from magazine to chamber, and don't jam into the rifling, I see nothing to worry about.

I don't know how Jim243 concludes that the long throat is a sign you are "beyond the useful life." Have you shot it so much as to advance the throat like that? Or did Browning just ream it long? I have read many Internet Complaints about Remingtons being throated so long that you cannot have both short jump and magazine fit. You are better off than that.
Jim Watson is offline  
Old July 24, 2015, 05:48 AM   #11
Dr Killdeer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 22, 2009
Location: Newburgh, NY
Posts: 127
I bought the rifle from a friend. It belonged to his father who was an avid hunter for many years. The rifle is pristine and it sat in my gun safe for a few years before I decided to work up a good load for it and use it as a back up to my Sako 7mm Mag.
The previous owner had several hunting rifles and he only shot factory ammo. And besides, the 300 Win Mag is not the kind of rifle that you plink with, so I suspect it didn't see a lot of use.

Every reloading source, from Nosler to Lee states the COL as 3.340, but Steve 4102 posted the amendment to the SAAMI specs and it makes sense. I adjusted my COL to fit my chamber and it works. I'm just surprised at the length of the throat. The rounds feed and chamber flawlessly and the 165 grain Nosler bullet gave me sub MOA at 100 yards with the initial test. I still going to tweak the load, but at least I'm off to a good start.
I inspected the rifling and the chamber and everything looks fine, but I don't have a bore scope and the truth is, I wouldn't know an eroded throat from shinola if it sent me a text message!
I'm happy with the way it shoots and the only change I'm going to make is to the trigger pull. Beyond that, if I can work up a good 300 yard load that prints, it will be my backup Montana rifle.

As an FYI, I use Forster dies. I bump the shoulder to .0002 headspace on the fire formed brass. I anneal the necks and use a .334 collet size for minimum bullet pull. I turn any out of spec necks to .0005 for uniform thickness. I reduce bullet runout to absolute zero on the digital concentricity gauge. I ream the primer pockets and flash holes for uniformity as well. I decided to put the bullet .0020 off the rifling to start and that's when I realized how long the throat is in that rifle.
__________________
Man is the only animal on the planet that is capable of saying "I'm sorry." Further, he's the only one who creates the need to say it.
Dr Killdeer is offline  
Old July 26, 2015, 09:29 AM   #12
steve4102
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 23, 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,955
Quote:
As an FYI, I use Forster dies. I bump the shoulder to .0002 headspace on the fire formed brass.
Typo, or are you actually sizing to ten thousands of and inch?
steve4102 is offline  
Old July 26, 2015, 09:40 AM   #13
Dave P
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 16, 1999
Location: North Florida
Posts: 1,346
Dr K: be advised that if you load long (which is fine), your velocity will probably be lower because of the greater volume in the cartridge.
__________________
I think this country is screwed.
Dave P is offline  
Old July 26, 2015, 10:56 AM   #14
Jim243
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 5, 2009
Location: Just off Route 66
Posts: 5,067
Quote:
I don't know how Jim243 concludes that the long throat is a sign you are "beyond the useful life."
Because 1/4 inch is way beyond spec and either the barrel was cut (reamed) wrong or has been fire cut to those dimensions. This is a 300 Win Mag people not a 22 LR and you will not be adding any additional metal to the barrel by additional firing but fire cutting it more.

If you are happy with it's current accuracy, fine, if not then re-barrel it.

Jim

Useful life (accuracy) will depend on what you shoot and how often

http://www.accurateshooter.com/techn...l-barrel-life/
__________________
Si vis pacem, para bellum

Last edited by Jim243; July 26, 2015 at 11:09 AM.
Jim243 is offline  
Old July 26, 2015, 11:16 AM   #15
Unclenick
Staff
 
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,063
Jim243,

I understand your reasoning, but its a tough call to make accurately these days. Lots of reports of Remington chambers with longer-than-SAAMI-spec freebores. Weatherby used to make pretty long ones, too. And with bullet makers now frequently using secant ogives to get higher BC's, longer COL's are bound to result¹. We don't know what his rifle is or what bullet design he's using.



¹Secant ogives typically contact the throat closer to the bullet's ogive shoulder than tangent ogives do. Thus, for two same-length ogives, one of each type, a secant ogive will need a longer COL to have the same jump to the lands as a tangent ogive bullet does. Plastic tips, with their small meplat radii, typically extend ogive length and thus COL even further, and they are increasingly common, too.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member
CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor
NRA Certified Rifle Instructor
NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle
Unclenick is offline  
Old July 26, 2015, 11:26 AM   #16
steve4102
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 23, 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,955
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave P
Dr K: be advised that if you load long (which is fine), your velocity will probably be lower because of the greater volume in the cartridge.
Actually Pressures will prolly be higher as the closer to the lands the pressure is often times increased. With increased pressure increased velocity may follow.
steve4102 is offline  
Old July 26, 2015, 02:02 PM   #17
Unclenick
Staff
 
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,063
Yes. Here's a plot of pressure vs. seating depth for a round nose bullet. It will have the greatest change in seating depth to see a pressure change. Pointed bullets will see pressure change more for a given change in seating depth, but they, too, will have a pressure minimum.

__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member
CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor
NRA Certified Rifle Instructor
NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle
Unclenick is offline  
Old July 27, 2015, 07:04 AM   #18
Dr Killdeer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 22, 2009
Location: Newburgh, NY
Posts: 127
You guys aroused my curiosity, especially since Unclenick mentioned Weatherby. A friend has a 300 Weatherby mag, so I called him and I'm going to test the freebore in his rifle by pushing the bullet right onto the lands and and then measuring the OAL.

He only shoots factory ammo and I know his Weatherby is more of a show piece than a hunting rifle. I doubt if he's put more than 100 rounds through it. ( I wish I had his money.) Thereafter, I'll post the results. I don't know anybody else that has a Browning 300 Win Mag for me to test, so for now, the Weatherby will have to do.
__________________
Man is the only animal on the planet that is capable of saying "I'm sorry." Further, he's the only one who creates the need to say it.
Dr Killdeer is offline  
Old July 27, 2015, 08:25 AM   #19
Gunplummer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 11, 2010
Location: South East Pa.
Posts: 3,364
In the last couple years most tool shops have gone over to CNC grinders. The OP makes it sound as if the rifle in question is an older model. 20-25 years ago I was using a well known reamer maker for the gun industry and had so many problems I started making my own. The newer CNC grinders repeat better on different set ups. Some of the older grinders it was a crap shoot.
Gunplummer is offline  
Old July 27, 2015, 08:47 AM   #20
F. Guffey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 18, 2008
Posts: 7,249
Quote:
You guys aroused my curiosity, especially since Unclenick mentioned Weatherby. A friend has a 300 Weatherby mag, so I called him and I'm going to test the freebore in his rifle by pushing the bullet right onto the lands and and then measuring the OAL.
Whatherby published their free bore and the rational. I have pushed bullets out of the case whole the bullet skidded along until it stopped against the rifling. And then? The owner asked me "How could that happen?" And I respond with "I do not know". He was the builder and he made the reamer.

F. Guffey
F. Guffey is offline  
Old July 31, 2015, 02:34 AM   #21
Will-j
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 16, 2014
Location: SW Ga. Near Ft. Benning
Posts: 251
.300 W'by OAL

Dr. Killdeer:
Can't expound on any other Max OAL or anyone else's W'by Max OAL, but MY Vanguard in .300 W'by measures 3.900" on the nose kissin' the rifling with 165 SPEER FB SP. MOAL w/SPEER's 190gr HPM #2080 is 3.935". Max OAL w/HORNADY's 190gr BTHPM bullets (Old style- probably now discontinued) is even longer. WHY current Max OAL is held to only 3.560" is beyond me. That is close to max in the magazine, though.

I load most rounds for the W'by to -.020" MOAL and with one chambered and two fitting in the mag at the longer length on top of two empty cases, I don't feel shorted on available ammo.

BTW: With the extended OAL, I do go up on the load a few grains on powder with corresponding higher velocity over book figures, and so far have not run into any pressure issues. That's just for me and my W'by. I am not advocating that anyone else follow this avenue.

WILL
__________________
Life's too short to worry about the small stuff.......
IT'S ALL SMALL STUFF.
D@MN, I really miss my meds.
THE WINDS OF CHANGE ARE BLOWING FROM OUR OWN CAPITOL.
Will-j is offline  
Old August 1, 2015, 08:04 AM   #22
Dr Killdeer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 22, 2009
Location: Newburgh, NY
Posts: 127
I had every intention of measuring the throat in my friend's 300 Weatherby Mag, but I don't have the blank for it and he didn't a single piece of spent brass that I could modify.

Will, if your measurements are correct, that puts me at ease. I'm loading the 165 grain Nosler AccuBond .020 off the lands. I use a Forster micrometer seating die and it's dead nuts every time. I check every round, measuring from the ogive to verify the consistency. I too am bewildered by the book specs for MOAL.
I guess a factory round has to jump a country mile before the pill engages the rifling. I don't know if that's good or bad, since I've never shot factory ammo, but so far, I'm happy with the way my load prints.

Thanks for the scoop Will.
__________________
Man is the only animal on the planet that is capable of saying "I'm sorry." Further, he's the only one who creates the need to say it.
Dr Killdeer is offline  
Old August 1, 2015, 08:27 AM   #23
Unclenick
Staff
 
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,063
You don't need the official case adapter to get fairly close. Just take a retired case, size it or at least the neck, split the neck with a Dremel cutoff disc or a hack saw. Seat the bullet long, chamber it, remove the bolt and with the muzzle up and your free hand at the back of the receiver, tap on the gun or slowly press a cleaning rod in through the muzzle until the dummy falls out into your hand. Use a single edge razor blade or a scratch awl to mark the bullet at the case mouth. This allows you to return it to position if you accidentally nudge it one way or the other. Apply the comparator.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member
CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor
NRA Certified Rifle Instructor
NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle
Unclenick is offline  
Old August 1, 2015, 09:17 AM   #24
F. Guffey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 18, 2008
Posts: 7,249
Then there is the other way. Drill out the flash hole/primer pocket of a fired case then neck size the case. After neck sizing seat a bullet, after seating a bullet remove the bolt and then chamber the case. After chambering the case push the bullet out of the case until it contacts the rifling. Once the bullet contacts the rifling, STOP! pushing.

Remove the case with the bullet then use it as a transfer. TRANSFER Transfer the dimensions of the chamber to the seating die. Meaning adjust the seating die to the transfer making sure the die is not adjusted to crimp.

Then save the transfer to zero the seating die, as in zero off the lands. There is nothing entertaining about seating bullets off the lands for me. I want my bullet to have 'the jump', I want my bullets to have the 'running start' and I want all the bullet hold I can get. Bullet hold? In the scheme of things, bullet hold is a low priority, wouldn't I be something if I somehow managed 60 pounds of bullet hold.

And then there is tension, I do not have neck tension, I have bullet hold, I can measure bullet hold, tension? I do not have a gage that measures tensions, pounds only.

F. Guffey
F. Guffey is offline  
Old August 1, 2015, 03:34 PM   #25
Will-j
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 16, 2014
Location: SW Ga. Near Ft. Benning
Posts: 251
.300 W'by MOAL

U.NICK; F. G:

I've done my MOAL checking somewhat similar to the both of you. I've drilled and tapped the primer hole of a fired case with a slightly crimped mouth--just enough to hold the bullet but not so tight as to restrict the bullet from sliding into the case easily or to engrave the bullet too much into the rifling. I prefer for the bullet to touch the rifling just enough to leave a mark on the bullet through the permanent marker film, and you can readily see if the bullet has been pulled from the case mouth upon exiting the chamber.

With a #10 or #12 threaded rod about 12" long locked into the case with a locknut and the bolt removed, I insert/remove the case into/from the rear of the action. I do this 5 times with the same case, but with different bullets from the same box/lot and average the MOAL. Usually, I'm within .001". I also lock the caliper jaws at .300", mark a slight ring on the ogive through the permanent marker and take a reading of each round from the case's base to the ring. Again, within .001". Close enough for me, as I gave up trying to do Bench-Rest-Precision-Work long ago, and I still achieve MOA to sub-MOA with my more-accurate rifles.

If I am in somewhat of a hurry.... I just chamber a marked round with the bolt, very slowly and easily extract the round ensuring that the bullet is not allowed to beat against the chamber mouth or inside of the action by holding it with my fingers, and follow through with the measuring procedure.

I generally load a dummy round for each rifle w/the different bullets used and have dedicated dies for each rifle. I just adjust the seater die for each rifle when loading different/new bullets. A little more expensive, yes, but once I find the right figures, I don't like to keep changing back and forth, and taking forever to get things set up right again.

Just the way I've gotten used to doing things over the years. And it works well for me.. Everyone has their own preferred way which works best for them.

WILL.
__________________
Life's too short to worry about the small stuff.......
IT'S ALL SMALL STUFF.
D@MN, I really miss my meds.
THE WINDS OF CHANGE ARE BLOWING FROM OUR OWN CAPITOL.
Will-j is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.09441 seconds with 8 queries