The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Hunt

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old November 8, 2009, 08:08 PM   #26
Double Naught Spy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 8, 2001
Location: Forestburg, Montague Cnty, TX
Posts: 12,715
Quote:
While it wouldn't be my first choice, it beats heck out of having nothing
e
Is 'nothing' now the standard against which we gauge self defense choices? I think more often than not, the issue isn't whether something is better than nothing but whether something is better than some other viable choice.

Quote:
The state of Alaska looked at statistics compiled by ADF&G over a number of years. They looked at all cases of reported bear attacks, and what weapons were used to stop each. Even in considerable opposing wind, the sprays were effective.
I can't find the report on this. Got a link?

I did see where ADF&G thinks carrying a gun is more dangerous to the carrier than being attacked by a bear...

Quote:
You are allowed to carry a gun for protection in state parks. Remember, though, that more people are hurt by the guns they carry than are hurt by bears.
http://dnr.alaska.gov/parks/safety/bears.htm

This Ph.D. in Alaska cited Herrera's work, but noted of the Alaska cases he studied, pepper spray was only effective 87% of the time.
http://www.absc.usgs.gov/research/br...epperspray.htm
__________________
"If you look through your scope and see your shoe, aim higher." -- said to me by my 11 year old daughter before going out for hogs 8/13/2011
My Hunting Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/HornHillRange
Double Naught Spy is offline  
Old November 9, 2009, 01:06 AM   #27
jgcoastie
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 15, 2009
Location: Kodiak, Alaska
Posts: 2,118
Ask and ye shall receive...

http://gf.state.wy.us/downloads/pdf/...ar%20spray.pdf

"Of all persons carrying sprays, 98% were uninjured by bears in close-range encounters. All bear inflicted
injuries (n¼3) associated with defensive spraying involved brown bears and were relatively minor (i.e., no hospitalization required). In 7% (5 of 71) of bear spray incidents, wind was reported to have interfered with spray accuracy, although it reached the bear in all cases."

This isn't the study I referred to in my initial post, but it brings up some of the points... I'll have to find the good one, I read it over a year ago...
__________________
"To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them." -Richard Henry Lee, Virginia delegate to the Continental Congress, initiator of the Declaration of Independence, and member of the first Senate, which passed the Bill of Rights.
jgcoastie is offline  
Old November 9, 2009, 07:49 AM   #28
Double Naught Spy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 8, 2001
Location: Forestburg, Montague Cnty, TX
Posts: 12,715
Excellent, and thank you. However, no wonder I could not find it. While the data are from Alaska, the % was off (which befuddles search engines) the report isn't by the ADF&G, but by several scholars not part of the ADF&G and jointly published in JWM.


It should be pointed out that residue from the spray can have negative effects and be an attractant. In the cited study in JWM, there were folks who reported everything from minor irritation from the spray to near incapacitation. So after using pepper spray in an attack, a thorough washing might be in order.
http://books.google.com/books?id=gFl...actant&f=false

Still, pepper spray seems to be a very good way to go against bears.
__________________
"If you look through your scope and see your shoe, aim higher." -- said to me by my 11 year old daughter before going out for hogs 8/13/2011
My Hunting Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/HornHillRange
Double Naught Spy is offline  
Old November 9, 2009, 11:36 AM   #29
Brasscatcher84
Junior member
 
Join Date: April 14, 2009
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 128
So now we know without a doubt that a .45 acp either will or will not work on bear. Glad I read this thread.
Brasscatcher84 is offline  
Old November 9, 2009, 12:04 PM   #30
Buzzcook
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 29, 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 6,126
If you use the search function you can find a story of an Oregon man killing a bear with a 1911.

The only problem I've heard of with bear spray is that bears find the smell attractive. So make sure there's no residue or leaks from the sprayer, or you'll smell like a taco with hot sauce.
Buzzcook is offline  
Old November 9, 2009, 07:44 PM   #31
jgcoastie
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 15, 2009
Location: Kodiak, Alaska
Posts: 2,118
Quote:
Excellent, and thank you. However, no wonder I could not find it. While the data are from Alaska, the % was off (which befuddles search engines) the report isn't by the ADF&G, but by several scholars not part of the ADF&G and jointly published in JWM.
I noted this in my response:

Quote:
This isn't the study I referred to in my initial post, but it brings up some of the points... I'll have to find the good one, I read it over a year ago...
__________________
"To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them." -Richard Henry Lee, Virginia delegate to the Continental Congress, initiator of the Declaration of Independence, and member of the first Senate, which passed the Bill of Rights.
jgcoastie is offline  
Old December 31, 2009, 11:01 PM   #32
RMcL
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 7, 2006
Location: Alabama
Posts: 273
230 FMJ/FP @ 1050fps

For the best in 45acp impact and penetration:

http://www.doubletapammo.com/php/cat...roducts_id=156
RMcL is offline  
Old December 31, 2009, 11:38 PM   #33
9Para
Member
 
Join Date: December 31, 2009
Posts: 25
As far as a pistol goes, a .45 is dammm good. Especially for the big critters. If you're seriously treading in wild bear country, consider a carbine. You'd have better aim, less recoil, and more firepower. Even a little .223 carbine, like a mini or an AR, would suit you better. Wouldn't be able to carry it on your hip though! That's the thing with pistols vs. carbines.
9Para is offline  
Old January 1, 2010, 07:28 PM   #34
longrange08
Member
 
Join Date: May 12, 2007
Location: dayton oh
Posts: 54
huh

i know little about bears however i have had alot of experience with armed people in defensive situations and people are not even CLOSE to 87% accurate in a situation like that. and when in doubt listen to the man who live on KODIAK ISLAND!!!!! isnt that like bear attack headquarters
i say take both and use the pistol as backup due to legality issues.



oh my two sense btw yes it would kill the bear as it was walking away from your cooling corpse
__________________
am i the only one who actually wishes zombies do exist, so one day i can actually justify to my girl the crap i buy
longrange08 is offline  
Old January 1, 2010, 08:01 PM   #35
W. C. Quantrill
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 11, 2008
Location: No Man's Land
Posts: 354
In answering your question, I have killed one black bear and one whitetail buck with my .45 ACP. First off, the whitetail. I had been hunting, walking, and was totally tired out, having walked all day and had seen nothing. I was in a big deep canyon, that had a little dry creek in the bottom that was washed out about 4 feet deep. I had been walking that canyon when I decided to rest, and had sat down and leaned back against a big hackberry tree about 10 feet from the little dry creek. I dozed off then woke up to see the head and rack of this white tail buck ***** footing towards me in that little creek, and not being able to get my rifle, I pulled my .45 out of my shoulder holster and popped him in the neck when he passed by me. Grave yard dead right there.

The bear. About 20 years ago I had taken a youth group into the Sangre de Cristo Mountains of Southern Colorado. From previous experience, I knew that area had bears, and I took my .45. One full moon night, I awoke to find Yogi with his head in my tent. I reached under my pillow and got my .45 and pointed it up at him and he took it in his mouth, and I pulled the trigger. I must say that it did the job.

There wasnt time to get scared in that situation, however the next half hour was traumatic. God and I had a personal visit. Technically, the .45 ACP will work. However, it is not a legal cartridge in many states. You need to contact the different states and get their advice. If I were to do that again I would certainly take my .45 Colt.

It is better to be judged by 12 than to be carried by 6.
__________________
NRA Life
Whittington Center Life
W. C. Quantrill is offline  
Old January 4, 2010, 07:58 PM   #36
alaskaman94
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 29, 2009
Location: wasilla alaska
Posts: 196
Quote:
Bear spray is between 99%-100% effective at stopping bear attacks, regardless of wind conditions.
hahahahahahahahaha im gona go ahead and disegree with that the last bear that tried to eat me did it though a glass door!
alaskaman94 is offline  
Old January 9, 2010, 09:12 AM   #37
N.H. Yankee
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 17, 2004
Location: Rural N.H.
Posts: 1,586
We have quite few large black bears in N.H. and the last bear attack was well over 100 years ago. Many people run into then picking berries, not that it couldn't happen but the 2 legged would be my greater concern. As far as the 45acp, I would rather have a Ruger GP100 357 with 180gr Nosler partitions for bear. The GP100 is rugged, accurate and small and light enough for easy carry. If I were set on the 45acp I am not sure if I would opt for ball ammo for bear, but then again a good bonded 230 grain may be the answer. As far as 2 legged predators I would want a good hollow-point.
__________________
The real danger to America is not abroad but within..
Having an open mind is a good thing, but not so open that your brains fall out!
Save America, abort liberalism.
N.H. Yankee is offline  
Old January 11, 2010, 10:43 PM   #38
turbotype87
Member
 
Join Date: March 2, 2009
Posts: 99
mountain gun

a .45acp in my opinion is not enough gun for large game like a bear. I would take my ruger chambered in .454 casull that will take care of any game in the woods.
turbotype87 is offline  
Old January 11, 2010, 11:35 PM   #39
Havamal
Member
 
Join Date: January 11, 2010
Posts: 19
kill or stop? (using only a handgun)

Want to kill the bear in 2 hours+ or stop the bear from closing the last 2'?

At minimum, I'd want a hand-loaded 180grain "hard" cast alloy bullet full charged in a 357 revolver, but I'd feel safer with a 44RM, 454 Casul, or S&W 460 revolver if I wanted to stop a bruin.

My all-steel 44RM revolver's bear-load I buy from Garrett Cartridges.
garrettcartridges.com/products.aspl
Havamal is offline  
Old January 12, 2010, 04:56 PM   #40
hardluk1
Junior member
 
Join Date: March 27, 2009
Posts: 600
357magfan You do know as a 357 fan you can get 200 gr and 180 gr rounds that are hotter than the baddest 10mm and out of a rifle,, better yet, If you can access it when needed. Good to have a gun but do by a bear spray, one of those big bottles just for them bears. And rely on a pistol/rifle only as a last chance or personal protection. A 12gauge with remington buck hammers in it would also be tough on anything and would keep people away. !8" barrel and folding stock would carry in top of pack with little notice. Just keep the spray handy.
hardluk1 is offline  
Old January 12, 2010, 05:38 PM   #41
Daryl
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 11, 2008
Posts: 2,350
Quote:
Technically, the .45 ACP will work. However, it is not a legal cartridge in many states. You need to contact the different states and get their advice. If I were to do that again I would certainly take my .45 Colt.
Every state I'm aware of only sets spec's for hunting. I've never known one to specify restrictions for self-defensive use against bears. It's usually a matter of "use what you have".

But I agree; I'd prefer a heavy loaded .45 Colt, and in fact that's usually what I carry outdoors.

Daryl
Daryl is offline  
Old January 13, 2010, 08:39 PM   #42
hardluk1
Junior member
 
Join Date: March 27, 2009
Posts: 600
daryl , We have to have a 357 power level and a barrel of 6 inch's but this would be a last resort weapon and not a hunting gun.. To think that these 2" short barreled s&w 460's and 500's would not be legal here. But how far can it hit a target with it if it's running and grawling? Take a buddy you can out run, then you have less to worry about.
hardluk1 is offline  
Old January 13, 2010, 09:28 PM   #43
Daryl
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 11, 2008
Posts: 2,350
Hardluk,

Here our reg's just say, "centerfire rifle" and "centerfire handgun".

According to the law, a 2" barreled .25 acp would be legal for bear hunting. I reckon they expect Arizona hunters to use common sense.

I mostly carry a SA .45 Colt with a 4 5/8ths inch barrel, and I don't have much trouble hitting what I aim at with it.

Daryl
Daryl is offline  
Old January 13, 2010, 10:23 PM   #44
youp
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 15, 2005
Location: south of Canada, eh?
Posts: 438
Black bears I know a little about. I have a hunting partner that tried to whack one with a 45. I cannot begin to tell you what his load was. I can tell you he now carries a 44 Ruger. He did kill the bear, with my 308. An agitated bear with hounds etc is harder to kill than a relaxed bear. I would guess a bear looking to eat you would also be somewhat agitated.

I did have a she bear with cubs charge me, twice. She came at me, ran away, then came back again, then went up a tree with her babies. I didn't feel much fear at that time. I do remember reaching for the bolt snap on the hounds, thinking she ain't gonna get us all tied together.

Had a bear charge me once, turned him with a 308 under the chin, through everything that he needed to function and stopped under his hide by the hip. Knocked him down, but he got up. He was under 200 pounds dressed. A bear is a tough animal.

IMO a 45 is far superior to a sharp stick.

I have no experience with the Appalachian trail. Are there that many bad guys out there? Few will call a 45 under gunned for a BG.

I know about bears that have been trained to take food packs from hikers in the Porcupine Mountains. They are destroyed by the Rangers. Hikers train the bear. Goes like this see a bear, drop food pack and split. Yogi likes picinic baskets. Some become very insistent about the packs. It makes it easier for the Rangers to figure out which one to neutralize.

!0 years ago or so a black bear tried to make off with a boy scout in NW Wisconsin. The lad had a brave leader that ran the bear off. A houndman was called out the next day and he neutralized the bear.

I would say you have a better chance of being hit by lightning than have a bear try to eat you. However, should a bear be trying to eat you, a 45 would be better than nothing. It won't do you any good in your pack, that's for sure.
__________________
Use enough gun.
youp is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.10205 seconds with 8 queries