The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Art of the Rifle: Bolt, Lever, and Pump Action

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old June 25, 2015, 11:24 AM   #1
stillborn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 30, 2005
Location: North Texas
Posts: 125
new rifle

I don't really need a new rifle, but I want one anyway. I was looking at the Remington 783 and the Mossberg Patriot. I was wondering if anyone had any experience with these rifles? I was leaning towards the Patriot, but cabela's put the 783 on sale for $259 with a mail in rebate. They both seem to have good features, what do yal think?
stillborn is offline  
Old June 25, 2015, 12:57 PM   #2
Pathfinder45
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 7, 2008
Posts: 3,224
Since you say you don't need it, then don't do it. I would rather have one or two nicer rifles than a dozen cheapo rifles. If you just want another rifle, then buy a better one than you already have. Sometimes, less is more, and more is less. The luster on the cheap rifle is that it's NEW and CHEAP. That luster wears off quickly. Go buy a pre-war Winchester with the blueing worn away. That rifle will have qualities that never wear off. Get something that's worthy of a Walnut stock. Plastic has no soul, no class to it. The last thing we need in this world is more cheap junk. I would rather buy an old classic that needs fixing, but is a worthy project. That's my viewpoint.
Pathfinder45 is offline  
Old June 25, 2015, 01:45 PM   #3
Doyle
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 20, 2007
Location: Rainbow City, Alabama
Posts: 7,167
I agree with Pathfinder. If you really need a cheap rifle right now, then OK. However, there are MUCH better rifles out there - they will just cost you a bit more. I'd rather be patient and buy the right used rifle than one of those poorly designed cheap ones.
Doyle is offline  
Old June 25, 2015, 10:30 PM   #4
upstate81
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 20, 2011
Location: NY
Posts: 801
Too bad those cheap guns are outshooting the classics these days. Who woulda thought?? Anyways, buy whichever feels right in your hands and shoulders nice. Those 783s are nothing to sneeze at people are getting great accuracy out of them. Pass on the mossberg you will be glad you did! This is all coming from a purist im a wood and blue man myself.
upstate81 is offline  
Old June 25, 2015, 10:54 PM   #5
mxsailor803
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 8, 2010
Location: SC
Posts: 1,344
I'm hoping the 783 does turn out like the old 788's. A lot of people saw them as cheap rifles and what happened? Remington dropped the line because they have a faster lock up time compared to the more expensive 700's. I know its completely off topic but many people knock older "cheaper model" rifles even today. On topic though, I've considered getting a 783 in .243 as a carry predator rifle. Its quite a bit lighter than either of my 788's.
mxsailor803 is offline  
Old June 26, 2015, 12:46 PM   #6
Pathfinder45
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 7, 2008
Posts: 3,224
If you have to buy a NEW rifle, just go buy a Winchester model 70, either the Sporter, Featherweight, or perhaps the Alaskan, with genuine Walnut, of course. If the price is too steep, remember, you didn't need it, so forget the whole thing and go fishing instead.
Pathfinder45 is offline  
Old June 26, 2015, 12:50 PM   #7
Mobuck
Junior member
 
Join Date: February 2, 2010
Posts: 6,846
The ONLY reason to buy one of those is because you simply can't afford a better choice. Those rifles are made for the "low end" user. Low cost. Low quality. And marginal performance/useful life.
Mobuck is offline  
Old June 27, 2015, 05:51 PM   #8
Drm50
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 10, 2014
Posts: 1,371
Amen, couldn't have said it better myself. Besides having no class and character
a used one will have very little resale value. There is a big difference when it
comes to durability. Somebody who has one can't bring their self to admit
they are junk. If one out shoots a m70 or m700 it is a fluke not the norm.
For $275 there is a lot of good b/a rifles on the used market. Buy good older
gun and take care of it and you will never lose your investment. A good example
of this is Rem. 788, 600, 660 and even the lowly Savage 340 series. Find one
of these for 275 and you will be lucky. Medium bore cals in 700 and 70 are
cheaper. There are also a raft of rifles made on 98 Mauser type actions to be
had at reasonable price used.
Drm50 is offline  
Old June 27, 2015, 09:15 PM   #9
tahoe2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 13, 2011
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 661
budget guns have a purpose!

I have purchased mauser rifles as low as $99 bucks, all the way up to $400, I've also received a couple for free (best price ever). They have not been the prettiest I've seen, but they are shooters non the less, not as accurate as those budget rifles, but 2"-3" @ 100 and 4"-6" @ 200 with iron sights is good enough for venison. I've had sub "MOA" rifles and they were great, but a lot less interesting then working up a load for a 100+ year old gun. I realize new shooters/hunters may only shoot a few times during the off season, and want something they can throw in the closet until hunting season, for them, the budget rifle is the perfect tool. Personally I like to shoot several times a month finding the best load for each gun, so I can choose the correct gun/load for the task and terrain. The budget rifles sell like crazy, and that's good for business, if somebody who can't afford that $600-$1000 dollar rifle, but can afford a budget gun, than that's good for them.

Last edited by tahoe2; June 28, 2015 at 11:30 AM.
tahoe2 is offline  
Old June 27, 2015, 11:12 PM   #10
Colorado Redneck
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 6, 2008
Location: Northeast Colorado
Posts: 1,993
The 783 would probably b e a good truck gun and hunting rifle. Having a higher quality rifle is good for the ego, I suppose, until you scratch that high dollar wood stock or ding the bluing. I use my guns to hunt and shoot with, and having a really nice rifle is paramount to taking a new Vette to the WallyWorld and parking in a tight spot. When all is said and done, a "budget" rifle that shoots good and is easy to use can be a really good tool for some shooters.

I traded a Win 70 push feed for a Marlin XZ and part of the reason was, the Marlin has a composite stock that I could care less if I ding it. And guess what? It shoots way good.
Just my $0.02
Colorado Redneck is offline  
Old June 27, 2015, 11:30 PM   #11
Mosin-Marauder
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 18, 2014
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,320
My Savage Axis with a Tasco 3-9x40 in stock configuration out shoots my dad's Model 12 LRP and Remington 700 with Leopold target scopes.

Check mate.
__________________
Proud owner of three (four-ish) pieces of history!
K-31, Mosin-Nagant M91/30, M24/47 Mauser, Norinco SKS.
"You might as well appeal against a thunderstorm..."
William Tecumseh Sherman
Mosin-Marauder is offline  
Old June 28, 2015, 12:46 AM   #12
skizzums
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 1, 2013
Location: Douglasville, Ga
Posts: 4,615
I think the new line of budgets from TC, Remington, ruger and marlin are all great and well worth their value. I will probably end up getting one someday(likely the American or the TC) just because.....why the heck not? they are said to be shooting MOA or less and extremely reliable. I have many cheap guns that I absolutely love and will never get rid of because the fit a role. I haven't quite warmed up to the mossbergs yet, buy haven't shot the bare bones budget yet, just read reviews. the savage axis is an accurate rifle with a somewhat sloppy bolt, but the reviews are pretty outstanding. nothing wrong with some cheap rifles if you have a few nice ones to balance it out, and most people shooting levels aren't going to tell an accuracy difference anyway, just the feel and the finish, you want it, go get it. seems every manufacture is running the "budget" rifles, and they must be successful for a reason. I don't hear complaints on accuracy or reliability, just finish and the cheap stocks.

I don't know why people think there is no value in low priced guns, some of my lowest priced guns are the best shooters I have. look at the canik/tristar series or my 500$ Omni ar15(a superbly accurate rifle that has proven half dozen thpusand times that it's reliable.) do what you want and have no regrets. just make sure it's a company that stands by their products and check with the big box online stores to read over the thousands of reviews to know what your getting. check out "the truth about guns" reviews on these rifles and pick whats best for you. they will likely be great shooters in the long run ad will be well worth their low cost. not saying you shouldn't also save and grab a coupe higher end bolts in the future if you don't have any already(I don't yet, still waiting on a model 10 or 700 to fall in my lap one of these days.)

good luck brother.
__________________
My head is bloody, but unbowed
skizzums is offline  
Old June 28, 2015, 05:25 AM   #13
Picher
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 14, 2004
Location: Maine
Posts: 3,694
I have nice rifles that shoot well and have shot some of the new inexpensive rifles and wouldn't be ashamed to take a Rem 783 to the range. I also wouldn't be afraid to shoot it out, like I am my nice rifles.

The 783 costs about half of what I paid for having my venerable Rem 700 rebarreled! You also don't have a 3-month wait to have the work done.
Picher is offline  
Old June 28, 2015, 12:04 PM   #14
Palmetto-Pride
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 31, 2009
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 2,071
I had a 30-06 783 I bought for a backup or guest rifle. It would shoot right at one MOA or better. I loaned it to my brother last season when he fell on some hard times and had to pawn is really nice rifle SAKO A7 with a S&B scope on it. Well he killed just as many deer with my $400.00 set up as he did with his $2000+ set up. Cheap rifles are like mopeds they are fun to ride, but you don't want your friends to see you on them
__________________
“The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.”

-Margaret Thatcher-
Palmetto-Pride is offline  
Old June 28, 2015, 03:34 PM   #15
Doyle
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 20, 2007
Location: Rainbow City, Alabama
Posts: 7,167
Skizzums, the Marlin budget rifle was the best of all. Sadly, some genius at Remlin decided to drop the XL/XS series in favor of whatever Remington is passing off as a budget rifle these days.
Doyle is offline  
Old June 28, 2015, 09:58 PM   #16
skizzums
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 1, 2013
Location: Douglasville, Ga
Posts: 4,615
I had to go out tomorrow and buy one of these budget rifles, without researching anymore or test shooting, I would grab the Ruger American. I like the axis and I know they are accurate rifles, but the sloppiness of the bolt just makes me cringe. The Ruger, ay least from fondling at the store, feels like a pretty solid setup.

OP, if you buy one, keep us updated
__________________
My head is bloody, but unbowed
skizzums is offline  
Old July 5, 2015, 04:56 PM   #17
Four80delta
Junior Member
 
Join Date: July 5, 2015
Posts: 1
Budget rifles

+1 for Ruger American

I know, and I understand the difference between the new budget rifles and the 'legacy' rifles that so many of us inherited and want to pass down. The new budget rifles may or may not last as long as the wood stocked blued steel rifles. That said;
For no particularly good reason, I bought a Ruger American in 30-06 yesterday. Decent price marked 370 before 10% 4th of July discount. Took it to the range today, and got (2) 3 shot groups that can be covered by a quarter at 100 yards with regular old Remington CoreLokt 150 grain. Pressed for time, I did not use 10 shot groups or press my luck at the 200 yard range.
This kind of accuracy for that kind of money is worth it, to me. When the time comes and the purchase of a sweet legacy rifle is the right thing to do, I know I'll find an X-Bolt or Weatherby, or whatever they are making at that time. For now, I've got a good shooting backup or guest gun that I can practice reloading with. Topped it with an old Nikon Prostaff 3-9. Nothing fancy.
Sorry, apparently the file size is 80 mb too large to upload. The final (3 shot) group measures 1/2" centers...
Four80delta is offline  
Old July 7, 2015, 11:37 AM   #18
Pathfinder45
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 7, 2008
Posts: 3,224
Ruger American vs Winchester M-70 Classic.....

Was out last Saturday with my buddy and two bolt guns: His 308 RAR vs my 270 Classic sporter. I dunno, maybe it was the Leupold on the Winchester vs the Bushnell on the Ruger, or him vs me...... But, to my surprise, the Winchester with the wood stock shot better than the Ruger with the plastic stock. I know it proves nothing, but to me, the Winchester looks better, feels better, and performs well. I can't see spending thousands of dollars on a rifle in my world, and I appreciate a bargain as much as anyone; but better quality has always been worth paying extra for. And, since I can only use one rifle at a time, I have no need to collect dozens of rifles in every color and flavor because their cheap enough to buy one every week, when a few really good ones will cover the bases. Need is one thing, but desire is another. I'm not immune to it, but I have no desire to be unto guns as Imelda is to shoes. I am, though, quite immune to the dubious charms of plastic stocks. My buddy likes them. To each their own, I suppose. Have a nice day.
Pathfinder45 is offline  
Old July 7, 2015, 12:27 PM   #19
natman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 24, 2008
Posts: 2,604
Quote:
A good example of this is Rem. 788, 600, 660 and even the lowly Savage 340 series. Find one of these for 275 and you will be lucky.
I have no issue with this recommendation except for the part about the Savage 340. The 783 seems to be the current incarnation of the late lamented Marlin X7 guns and it's a lot better rifle than the 340. For starters you can get them in chamberings more powerful than 30-30 and you can easily mount a scope on them.
natman is offline  
Old July 7, 2015, 02:06 PM   #20
CowTowner
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 17, 2007
Location: Cowtown of course!
Posts: 1,747
Quote:
and you can easily mount a scope on them.
All but the very first versions of the 340 are factory drilled and tapped for a scope mount. And the mounts are still available.
https://www.gunpartscorp.com/ad/540380.htm
__________________
NRA Chief Range Safety Officer, Home Firearms Safety, Pistol and Rifle Instructor
“Today, we need a nation of Minutemen, citizens who are not only prepared to take arms, but citizens who regard the preservation of freedom as the basic purpose of their daily life......” President John F. Kennedy
CowTowner is offline  
Old July 7, 2015, 02:14 PM   #21
jmr40
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 15, 2008
Location: Georgia
Posts: 10,792
If you want a budget gun that shoots my vote is the Ruger American, especially the Predator version if it is in a cartridge you like. I have 2, one in 308 and a 2nd in 223. They are amazing little guns that tend to put 3 shots into tiny groups.

I have several much nicer rifles that are better built, but none shoot any more accurately even costing 3X as much.
jmr40 is offline  
Old July 7, 2015, 03:07 PM   #22
4runnerman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 16, 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,577
Just a FYI for some- Those Cheap rifles are now showing up in F Class & Bench rest Comps. They are holding their own at it also. We have one guy shooting the Savage Axis at 1000 yards and doing very well with it. The money is in the barrel not the stock people. A stock can be replaced very easy and for much less than a high dollar rifle. In the end-It will shoot as good as your high dollar rifle will. This compromise has allowed a lot of people that could not afford to shoot matches now compete and do well.
__________________
NRA Certified RSO
NwCP- Performance Isn't Optional
4runnerman is offline  
Old July 7, 2015, 03:17 PM   #23
William T. Watts
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 20, 2010
Location: Central Arkansas
Posts: 1,074
A cheap rifle is what it is!

I don't have a cheapo rifle in my gun cabinent, I have never purchased a cheapo plus don't intend too. I do like quality firearms, I will bring a stainless syn stock rifle home (Ruger Hawkeye) just not a cheap one. I'm quite sure when I pass my Son/Grand son and Son in law will share and will remember me when they use them. I just can't get excited about all the cheap rifles now available, I started with a 30/30 which was adequate for deer hunting until I could afford the rifle I wanted.. William
William T. Watts is offline  
Old July 8, 2015, 07:48 PM   #24
natman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 24, 2008
Posts: 2,604
Quote:
All but the very first versions of the 340 are factory drilled and tapped for a scope mount. And the mounts are still available.
https://www.gunpartscorp.com/ad/540380.htm
You're quite right, but the key word was "easily". I can get scope mounts for a Savage Axis or Rem 783 at any decent gun shop as opposed to ordering one from New York.

Besides the main issue with the 340 is that while the 783 is an inexpensive gun the 340 is a cheap gun. I had a couple when I first started out, I outgrew them and I'm not going back.
natman is offline  
Old August 25, 2015, 05:48 PM   #25
Darn wind
Member
 
Join Date: August 24, 2015
Posts: 16
4runnerman-

Where are you going to these 1000 yard matches? I'm in your area and would like to attend. Sorry, not trying to hijack and thanks in advance
Darn wind is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.10915 seconds with 10 queries