|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 12, 2013, 05:52 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 29, 2009
Location: NW Ohio
Posts: 569
|
Thinking about getting Quickload
Kind of on the fence about it. From the distance it seems like it would be fun to toy around with but is it practical?
|
November 13, 2013, 01:15 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 29, 2008
Location: Oregon
Posts: 2,346
|
Thinking about getting Quickload
If you load a lot of different calibers and components combinations, or want to be able to do so, it is very practical. If you are looking for just a couple of good loads and then stick with them it may be overkill compared to a couple of manuals.
It is calculated load data versus pressure tested data so always sanity check against published tested data. I use it first to explore a new cartridge or powder or bullet weight for good candidate combinations to test. Then if I have a combination that isn't listed in published tables I work up a test plan with QL and doublecheck with most similar published data I can find. When component selection is sparse I have had to work up many alternate test loads depending on which bullets and powders I could find or had on hand. For me, QL has been very worthwhile investment. |
November 13, 2013, 01:33 AM | #3 |
Staff
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,063
|
Where it shines is relative performance. It has a feature that will show the velocities produced by every powder in the database without exceeding your specified maximum pressure or compression level. It's very useful for selecting appropriate powders in that way. You can also experiment with the effect of changes in case volume or bullet weight, calculate recoil energy, recoil experienced by a rifle scope and a number of other details.
I also find the 3 DOF exterior ballistics program that comes with it, QuickLOAD Unlimited, very useful. You basically provide a very detailed set of zeroing conditions, including not only atmospheric conditions, but longitude and latitude and firing direction (to correct for Coriolis effect), and a very detailed set of firing conditions and it works everything out to compensate inbetween. In addition to the usual G#n BRL drag functions, it includes individual drag functions for a number of popular bullets and the Lapua line of bullets, for which Lapua has made Doppler RADAR drag measurements. It's a program for those interested in the details and in having a way to see how much effect changing them actually has.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor NRA Certified Rifle Instructor NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle |
November 13, 2013, 10:19 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 4, 1999
Location: WA, the ever blue state
Posts: 4,678
|
I bought Quickload over 12 years ago:
http://thefiringline.com/forums/show...ight=quickload If I had to pay that much, it would be worth >$2000 / year to me. I handload over 60 different cartridges, mostly just doing handloading experiments. Last year I bought Quickload and put it on my brother's computer. He has not figured out how to use it. He has other people do his reloading for him. So it all depends on what kind of reloading you do.
__________________
The word 'forum" does not mean "not criticizing books." "Ad hominem fallacy" is not the same as point by point criticism of books. If you bought the book, and believe it all, it may FEEL like an ad hominem attack, but you might strive to accept other points of view may exist. Are we a nation of competing ideas, or a nation of forced conformity of thought? |
November 13, 2013, 10:29 AM | #5 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
|
Thinking about getting Quickload
Worth every penny and 3x more.
Caveat on UncleNick's point about being detail oriented and inquisitive. If you're content with published data and never using other combinations, QuickLoad will serve no purpose. However, if you want to know what powder is best for any given combination, QuickLoad is nearly magical. |
November 13, 2013, 11:28 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 3, 1999
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 2,991
|
I have to agree with Brian. Quickload (used in context of its capabilities) is truly magical. I love the program and use it a lot.
__________________
10mm and 357sig, the best things to come along since the 38 super! |
November 13, 2013, 01:54 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 10, 2012
Posts: 6,165
|
I have been thinking about purchasing it as well. My main use would be wildcat development. Can you enter cartridge dimensions, or manipulate the volume of the parent case by a certain percentage, or something like that? Do you strictly have to work with cartridges that it has listed in the program?
|
November 13, 2013, 02:57 PM | #8 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
|
Yes, you can enter any cartridge dimensions you'd like.
I'd used it to develop the (still in concept only) .243Pfleuger I will get it made some day.
__________________
Nobody plans to screw up their lives... ...they just don't plan not to. -Andy Stanley |
November 13, 2013, 03:41 PM | #9 |
Staff
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,063
|
Also, there's a companion program available called QuickDESIGN that is specifically for wildcatters. It will let you choose a parent case to work from or start a case from scratch. It will estimate case capacity and ballistic coefficients for your own bullet designs, should you chose to go that route (wildcat your case and wildcat a custom bullet mold). When your design is completed, the program will generate cartridge drawings and also generates chamber reamer drawings for it. It will also export the design to QuickLOAD for load development preliminaries.
__________________
Gunsite Orange Hat Family Member CMP Certified GSM Master Instructor NRA Certified Rifle Instructor NRA Benefactor Member and Golden Eagle |
November 13, 2013, 04:09 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 10, 2012
Posts: 6,165
|
I think I will order quick load in the next few days. Sound like what I need. Might get the design software as well. I thought I had finished wildcatting, then the bug bit me again.
|
November 13, 2013, 04:46 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 29, 2009
Location: NW Ohio
Posts: 569
|
So some people are using the data provided by the program instead of published manuals without issue?
|
November 13, 2013, 05:38 PM | #12 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
|
QuickLoad specifically tells you that it is not a substitute for official data. However, it is remarkably accurate, within the confines of the system, with properly adjusted variables and according to the user's own competence. It's known to be less accurate with straight-walled (or nearly so) cartridges than with traditional bottle-neck rifles cartridges.
As with so many things in reloading, it seems to be part art, part science and part voodoo magic but it sure is awesome. I have no qualms about working up to what it says is a max load once I've made the necessary adjustments, watching for pressure signs and checking that velocity is consistent.
__________________
Nobody plans to screw up their lives... ...they just don't plan not to. -Andy Stanley |
November 13, 2013, 06:33 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 12, 2013
Posts: 669
|
I bought it to play with and it's fun for that alone. I'd never trust it without at least a ballpark load in a manual or manufacturer's website to back it up, but the QuickTarget program it comes with is good for a basic ballistic solution, and I do have an earlier iteration of QuickDESIGN that was even more fun to play with.
Get quickLOAD and QuickDESIGN together and you won't regret it. If you're going to spend the money on the one, might as well go the extra distance. |
November 19, 2013, 05:12 AM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 29, 2009
Location: NW Ohio
Posts: 569
|
OK, so Quickload arrived yesterday, got it installed and played around with it for a little bit. It is actually leaving me a little puzzled.
I load .223 in LC brass with CCI400, 22.9 of XBR-8208, 77gr SMK to 2.26 in. Hodgdon shows 23.2 as max load with with 55,000 PSI pressure. Quickload shows what I am loading as having 62,402 PSI which is over max. I know they use test barrels and all that in a lab but that seems like a pretty big jump in pressure, and I am a bit under what Hodgdon shows as being the max load at that. I have chronoed these loads and they average about come in about 2650-2675, Quickload shows them as 2785. I watch these brass like a hawk and have not seen any pressure signs. What am I missing here? |
November 19, 2013, 07:24 AM | #15 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 23, 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,955
|
Quote:
My version of QL default case capacity is 28.80gr of H20. My LC fired brass has an average case capacity of 30.3gr H20. Plugging that into QL I get the following. Code:
Cartridge : .223 Rem. Bullet : .224, 77, Sierra HPBT MatchK 9377 Cartridge O.A.L. L6: 2.260 inch or 57.40 mm Barrel Length : 24.0 inch or 609.6 mm Powder : IMR 8208 XBR Predicted data by increasing and decreasing the given charge, incremented in steps of 2.0% of nominal charge. CAUTION: Figures exceed maximum and minimum recommended loads ! Step Fill. Charge Vel. Energy Pmax Pmuz Prop.Burnt B_Time % % Grains fps ft.lbs psi psi % ms -20.0 79 18.56 2329 928 30920 5625 92.0 1.467 -18.0 81 19.02 2382 971 32890 5783 93.0 1.429 -16.0 83 19.49 2435 1014 34982 5936 94.0 1.392 -14.0 85 19.95 2488 1059 37203 6082 94.9 1.356 -12.0 87 20.42 2541 1104 39562 6222 95.7 1.319 -10.0 89 20.88 2593 1150 42068 6354 96.5 1.282 -08.0 91 21.34 2645 1196 44730 6479 97.2 1.248 -06.0 93 21.81 2697 1243 47558 6596 97.8 1.214 -04.0 95 22.27 2748 1291 50565 6705 98.3 1.182 -02.0 97 22.74 2799 1340 53763 6805 98.8 1.151 ! Near Maximum ! +00.0 98 23.20 2850 1389 57166 6896 99.2 1.121 ! Near Maximum ! +02.0 100 23.66 2900 1438 60790 6977 99.5 1.093 ! Near Maximum ! +04.0 102 24.13 2951 1489 64652 7049 99.7 1.065 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE! +06.0 104 24.59 3000 1539 68771 7110 99.9 1.038 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE! +08.0 106 25.06 3049 1590 73168 7160 100.0 1.012 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE! +10.0 108 25.52 3098 1641 77868 7200 100.0 0.987 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE! Results caused by ± 10% powder lot-to-lot burning rate variation using nominal charge Data for burning rate increased by 10% relative to nominal value: +Ba 98 23.20 2958 1496 67318 6664 100.0 1.050 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE! Data for burning rate decreased by 10% relative to nominal value: -Ba 98 23.20 2699 1246 47287 6826 94.7 1.215 |
|
November 19, 2013, 07:42 AM | #16 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
|
Thinking about getting Quickload
I have found QuickLoad's default case capacity to be low by 2-5% in most cases. Also, the bullet lengths are not always accurate. I've seen bullet lengths off by as much as 0.10.
Accurate output requires accurate input. You must adjust the variables. Case capacity, bullet length, case length, etc. |
November 19, 2013, 07:57 AM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 23, 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,955
|
Thanks Brian, for as long as I have had QL, I have never check actual bullet length. I will check my bullets against QL from now on.
|
November 19, 2013, 08:07 AM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 17, 2010
Location: Virginia
Posts: 6,894
|
The beauty of QuickLoad is that you can calibrate/set ALL of the parameters to match
your particular problem -- and save those default settings for each instance where you will re-use similar components for different performance. I would not be without it. Last edited by mehavey; November 19, 2013 at 08:15 AM. |
November 19, 2013, 01:53 PM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 3, 2013
Location: Western New York
Posts: 454
|
Once I added in all the values for my gun and cases Quickload calculated a speed that was within the variation of my chrono. This was for 9mm.
|
November 19, 2013, 03:14 PM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 29, 2009
Location: NW Ohio
Posts: 569
|
I was wondering if the H20 part was a big factor in that. I am still reading though the manual so please bear with me. You take a fired case, fill it with water, then weigh just the water to get the case capacity?
I was also going through and did not see a section where you can identify/adjust primers. Is that in there somewhere or is the program just assuming you are using the standard primer for that caliber? |
November 19, 2013, 03:28 PM | #21 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
|
For high-pressure cartridges (over about 30,000psi) you use a fired UNSIZED case. Weigh the case and zero your scale. Use approximately room temperature water and add a tiny, tiny drop of dish soap (no suds, just enough to break the surface tension). Fill the case up to the neck and then tap the sides solidly to get any air bubbles off the insides. Fill the case the rest of the way, flat to the top of the mouth, no meniscus ("bump" up or down) on the water. Weigh the filled case. That's your water capacity.
You can also go to the menu "Data: Add, Change, Load, Save" and choose "Case/Caliber Data" and then choose "Change Data Records in Active File" and then Click the "Case Capacity Overflow (Cal c)" Button and carefully take and enter the case measurements. QuickLoad will calculate the case capacity, very accurately in most instances.
__________________
Nobody plans to screw up their lives... ...they just don't plan not to. -Andy Stanley |
November 19, 2013, 04:07 PM | #22 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 17, 2010
Location: Virginia
Posts: 6,894
|
Quote:
|
|
November 19, 2013, 04:15 PM | #23 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
|
Water is quicker and easier for sure but I've found the calculation to be so remarkably close to my averages that I actually trust QuickLoad's calculation more than any single water sample I take.
__________________
Nobody plans to screw up their lives... ...they just don't plan not to. -Andy Stanley |
November 19, 2013, 06:50 PM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 29, 2009
Location: NW Ohio
Posts: 569
|
Interesting....very interesting. Once I got some H20 numbers and bullet length numbers and plugged them in, pretty much showed the velocity numbers to my loads.
|
November 19, 2013, 08:01 PM | #25 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
|
Neat how that works, eh?
QuickLoad predicts my .204Ruger within about 25fps of reality, at over 4,000fps and the .22-250 I load for within about 50fps at over 4,435fps. That's an error of about 0.62%
__________________
Nobody plans to screw up their lives... ...they just don't plan not to. -Andy Stanley |
|
|