November 26, 2011, 09:47 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 24, 2010
Posts: 364
|
Chrony sample size
What's the minimum sample size (number of rounds fired thru) do you consider brings significant data to the table when using your chronograph?
|
November 26, 2011, 10:00 AM | #2 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
|
"Statistically valid" would be around 30, I think....
Real world, I use 3 or 5. That tells me all I need to know. The numbers are either very close and consistent or they're not. The odds of getting 3 close velocities in a row with a load that would not be consistent over-all are small (enough for me).
__________________
Nobody plans to screw up their lives... ...they just don't plan not to. -Andy Stanley |
November 26, 2011, 10:00 AM | #3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 11, 2008
Posts: 1,931
|
Sometimes 3 or 4 rounds is enough info for me to move to the next step in charge weight or whatever. I mean, if I shoot some 230 grain .45acp working up a new powder from a start load, and they chrono at 620 fps that's about all I need to know about that.
Closer to the final load I usually sample about 10 rounds. Guess it depends on what I'm doing, and how accurate I am trying to be, tried some Powerbond projectiles at cast data once....620fps. They use jacketed data.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
November 26, 2011, 04:57 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 7, 2011
Location: Southern NM
Posts: 141
|
The larger the sample size, the better the statistical inference. My Chrony will remember up to ten shots in a string then will overwrite beginning at the first. Not sure it is really critical on pistols, but with rifles a larger sample size will provide a better estimate of the mean and standard deviation. Smaller samples tend to skew the data. At least that is what I can recollect from more than 20 credit hours in statistics but that was a few years ago
__________________
"Emergencies have always been the pretext on which the safeguards of individual liberty have been eroded" - F.A. Hayek |
November 26, 2011, 09:34 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 14, 1999
Posts: 1,573
|
It depends on what I am trying to accomplish.
If I am working up a load from a wildcat and all I have is my QuickLoad predictions, then I will shoot one across it and see if I am in the ballpark. Of course there is variability and we are trying to minimize that, but if I want to see if I am "in the ballpark" then I don't need a lot of precision. Now ... if I am going to use the data to develop a ballistics table for one of my long range loads, I need to eliminate all the errors that I can, so I will run at least 10 and maybe 15 over it. And then I will reload another batch and run 10-15 of THOSE over it as well. That way I can take into account my own batch to batch variation. The standard error is a measure of the difference between your sample mean and the actual mean of your whole population. The standard error goes down with the square root of the sample size ... so your error will be 1/10 as large for a sample of 100 as it will for a sample of just 1. Likewise, a sample of 9 will give you 1/3 as much error as a sample of 1. As you can see, adding more samples goes a LOOONG way in the beginning, but is pretty worthless after you already have several samples. Saands |
November 26, 2011, 09:44 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 12, 2009
Location: Butte, MT
Posts: 2,622
|
For quick velocity, accuracy, POA check 10-15 is what I use. For what goes into my books, I like to shoot ~30 to get the SD and ES. Talking revolver cartridges here.
__________________
A clinger and deplorable, MAGA, and life NRA member. When guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns. Single Action .45 Colt (Sometimes colloquially referred to by its alias as the .45 'Long' Colt or .45LC). Don't leave home without it. That said, the .44Spec is right up their too... but the .45 Colt is still the king. |
|
|