The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > The Smithy

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old May 9, 2010, 05:55 PM   #1
afp
Member
 
Join Date: May 9, 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 21
Unusual Smithing on a pre 64 M-70

I recently acquired a pre 64 M-70, most likely an original 30-06, that had been rebarreled to 338 Win mag (Douglas barrel). I got it for 1/3 of the cost of an original pre 64 in 338 Winny.

The rifle had a muzzle break on it, and I detest muzzle brakes so immediately after I received the rifle I took the barrel off and took it to my Smith. I needed the threads cut off the muzzle and the barrel recrowned.

We noticed the breech was not coned. The rifle had been rebarreled like a Rem 700, with the bolt nose fitting snugly into a barrel recess. We reassembled the rifle and I noticed the bolt was a little hard to close. My smith looked and saw a rub mark in the barrel recess where the bolt was slighlty touching. So we took it back apart, put it back in the lathe, and he opened up the recess another .002." The bolt now feels as free as any other pre 64 and it feeds perfectly.

I have had Rem 700s set up very similar to this pre 64: tight belt headspace and tight clearance around the bolt nose. This is the first time I have seen anyone do that with a pre 64 M-70.

Since a picture says a thousand words, here is a picture of the bolt from the 338 on the left, and a bolt from a typical pre 64 M-70 on the right. If you look carefully, you can see that the right most lug on the standard Pre 64 bolt has a tapered face, where the 338 bolt has had the taper removed on it's right side lug. That creates a protrusion on the bolt that fits into a matching recess on the barrel.



One of the accuracy tricks with a Rem 700 is to machine the protrusion on the nose of the bolt to tightly fit into the recess of the barrel. As you can see, with a typical M-70 coned breech that isn't possible. However, this smith managed to modify the M-70 bolt so it had a protrusion that could be tighly fit into a barrel recess. He just had it a bit tight, so we had to enlarge this recess by about .002." This will still allow the accuracy trick to work, though pre 64s usually don't need such tricks to shoot well.

I don't know if the bolt protrusion is the reason, but this 338 Winny is the most accurate 338 I have ever owned.
afp is offline  
Old May 10, 2010, 09:39 AM   #2
Clark
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 4, 1999
Location: WA, the ever blue state
Posts: 4,678
Some old guy died and I bought a pre 64 M70 that was rebarrelled from 30-06 to 30-06 with counterbore
The history of this gun sounds like it shot two of everything, like a passenger list of an Alaskan Noah's Ark.... + 128 Sitka black tailed deer.

I put a 270 barrel, a Bordon rimrock stock, a different scope, and a bi-pod on it, and it is my go to rifle. I have killed 8 deer in the last two years with it.

I would like to say great things about the Pre 64 M70, but that might start a buying frenzy..... heck, the secret is out.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg M70 in 270.jpg (72.7 KB, 38 views)
Clark is offline  
Old May 10, 2010, 11:05 AM   #3
afp
Member
 
Join Date: May 9, 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 21
Oops!!! You are right! I should have kept quiet........

Maybe this counterbore thing on CRF M-70s isn't that unusual. I don't think a Pre 64 needs it, but some of the New Haven Classics could use some help.
afp is offline  
Old May 10, 2010, 09:19 PM   #4
Clark
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 4, 1999
Location: WA, the ever blue state
Posts: 4,678
I have >100 "deer rifles" and I have only seen counterboring on VZ24s and that gunsmith in Alaska.

Maybe I have seen counter boring on Turkish Mauser barrels too.

I have never seen a counter bored rifle that shot worth a toot.

Last edited by Clark; May 10, 2010 at 11:33 PM.
Clark is offline  
Old May 11, 2010, 12:37 AM   #5
afp
Member
 
Join Date: May 9, 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 21
I guess I need to post a pic of mine then--after I paint it. It is ugly right now. However, the 5/8" group followed by the .162" group qualifies as "shooting worth a toot."

However, I certainly won't do it to any of my other pre 64s....................
afp is offline  
Old May 13, 2010, 04:02 PM   #6
Jim Watson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 18,453
Never saw it on a Winchester before, but "safety breeching" was a gunsmith option back when you could have a Springfield nicely sporterized without breaking a collector's heart.
Jim Watson is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.06906 seconds with 11 queries