January 11, 2013, 06:38 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 10, 2012
Posts: 3,881
|
2400 powder ?
Is there a newer and better powder for loading 357 mag than the 2400 powder ?
|
January 11, 2013, 08:11 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 18, 2010
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 131
|
What level of load are you looking for? Mid to upper end loads? What bullet weight and the gun will you use these in?
Cary
__________________
Shooters. We are a community. United we stand divided we fall. |
January 11, 2013, 08:15 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 1, 2009
Location: MN
Posts: 656
|
2400 is still one of the best for magnum loads. Aliant did come out with that 300-MP not too long ago. It is designed for magnum handgun loads. But it is not in any of the reloading manuals yet so we'll have to wait until the next editions to see it there. Unfortunately, Aliant's reloading data on their website is pretty much useless. So I'm waiting to try it until the data shows up elsewhere.
H110/Win 296 is another good choice as well. |
January 11, 2013, 09:42 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 2, 2007
Location: Iowa
Posts: 2,676
|
I've tried 2400 but prefer BlueDot. By the book, you'll get within 50-100 fps and it uses less powder (As much as 33% less). Accuracy has shown to be better with magnum loads and I've also been known to use BlueDot in reduced rifle loads.
No BD is not one of the new supper duper powders that turns handguns into dragon slayers but it's a great replacement for 2400. |
January 11, 2013, 09:46 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 27, 2010
Location: AR
Posts: 1,401
|
I have been using 2400 for over 40 years now when I first read about it in various gun mags. IMHO there is none better for the magnums. 2400 has been around for many years now.
I have tried my share of the new powders, however as accuracy and performance have always been important to me, I returned to 2400. Unique is another powder that has been around forever. I have tried the new similar powders but returned to Unique. Unique performs well in 357. Agree, 296 & 110 would be my second choice. |
January 11, 2013, 09:52 AM | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 16, 2008
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 11,061
|
Quote:
Why do people think that if a powder has been around a long time its no good any more? Look at Unique and Bullseye they still work pretty dern good. New isn't always better.
__________________
Kraig Stuart CPT USAR Ret USAMU Sniper School Distinguished Rifle Badge 1071 |
|
January 11, 2013, 10:02 AM | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 2, 2011
Location: Illinois
Posts: 178
|
Quote:
|
|
January 11, 2013, 10:59 AM | #8 |
Staff
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 41,379
|
My preferred powder for full magnum loads in .357 is WW 296.
AA 7 also does a very good job.
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower. |
January 11, 2013, 11:04 AM | #9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 9, 2011
Location: Just outside Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 722
|
Quote:
I am also waiting for more info for 300-MP, hard to believe what is claimed about it. Till then I will stick with 2400.
__________________
The private ownership of firearms is an American Heritage. Anyone who disputes that is Anti-American and unpatriotic. NRA Life Member |
|
January 11, 2013, 11:08 AM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 10, 2009
Location: SW Idaho
Posts: 1,289
|
AA#9, Enforcer, H110/296
|
January 11, 2013, 11:18 AM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 15, 2005
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,033
|
Another vote for H110 (W296) but there's nothing wrong with 2400 either. I just love me some H110 for full strength magnum loads.
|
January 11, 2013, 11:55 AM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 11, 2011
Location: Colorado
Posts: 218
|
I like the performance and accuracy I get with 296 under 158g JHPs.
|
January 11, 2013, 12:01 PM | #13 |
Junior member
Join Date: January 1, 2007
Location: Idaho
Posts: 2,282
|
I've used 2400 for 40 years. I have a 20 yr old can of 296 and 4 cans of 2400 on the shelf and will be replacing the 2400 before the 296
|
January 11, 2013, 01:28 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 26, 2005
Posts: 941
|
I did a lot of experimentation with H110/296 in my 4" S&W model 28, and it does produce great velocity. My problem with it is that in the 4" barrel it makes for a really sharp, obnoxious muzzle blast.
I ended up going back to 2400. I can get so close to the same velocity that the difference is irrelevant. While I tend to favor the newer powders, 2400 is one that I just keep coming back to. Mike |
January 11, 2013, 01:37 PM | #15 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 2, 2007
Location: Iowa
Posts: 2,676
|
Quote:
|
|
January 11, 2013, 01:47 PM | #16 | ||
Junior member
Join Date: October 4, 2007
Location: All the way to NEBRASKA
Posts: 8,722
|
Quote:
Quote:
H110 at max loads wrecked cases quickly, and threw 2 foot flames ..... and that muzzle blast that will blow all the pasters off an IDPA target at that close range .... pretty serious powder burns! Reducing loads even slighty caused velocity to fall precipitously...... add that to the fact that it has the textrue of fine sand- it will wreck a Lee PPM...... H110 was the second most disappointing powder I ever purchased. |
||
January 11, 2013, 01:56 PM | #17 |
Staff
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 41,379
|
"it will wreck a Lee PPM"
Hum... Someone forgot to tell my Lees that they should be wrecked by now from using WW 296, which is the same as H110... "H110 at max loads wrecked cases quickly" Define "wrecked." I've got as many as full-power reloads through some of my .357 Mag. brass and I see no signs of it being wrecked. "Reducing loads even slighty caused velocity to fall precipitously" Uhm... Define "precipitiously"... You're either doing something wrong, or you've got some bizarro situation cropping up. I've never had velocities fall off much more than what I expect as long as I load to within the powder's book range.
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower. |
January 11, 2013, 02:49 PM | #18 | |||
Junior member
Join Date: October 4, 2007
Location: All the way to NEBRASKA
Posts: 8,722
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
14.5 gr of 2400 with a standard small pistol primer gave a velocity that averaged just under 1250, with less flash/blast, a lower SD, and did not bulge the base of the case at all. Same bullet (158gr XTP), same gun (Colt Trooper MkIII, 6"), same chronograph on the same day .... same everthing but the powder and the primer. I did load up 100 rounds with 15.3gr of H110 just for giggles and took them to an IDPA mini-match ..... stage started with first target 6" from the shooter ..... on the signal, shooter was to step back and draw and shoot from retention ..... 1 arrived late and there were 20+ shooters that had holed the center of the target pretty good, such that the thing was held together as much by pasters as by cardboard ...... at the beep, I stepped back and to the side and fired twice, blowing 2 fist sized holes in the -0 area, and a shower of smoking cardboard-and-paster confetti out behind the target. The front half of the stage was poorly lit, so the muzzle flashes were dazzling, and the gun was loud enough to cause onlookers to ask what caliber of hand cannon I was carting around..... most of the "serious" competitors were using wonder nines or 1911's with mouse fart loads ..... |
|||
January 11, 2013, 02:53 PM | #19 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 26, 2005
Posts: 941
|
L_Killkenny wrote:
Quote:
Yes, I use hearing protection too, and yes, the H110/296 loads were still objectionably "blasty". |
|
January 11, 2013, 05:07 PM | #20 |
Staff
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 41,379
|
"In the work-up, 14.5 gr was the last point that did not cause the cases to bulge at the base, and gave around 1100f/sec with a 158gr XTP. 15.0 gr bulged the case heads slightly, 15.6 such that extraction was difficult."
OK, a couple of problems with that, I think... 1. I think you have a gun issue, not a powder issue. 2. Your powder charges with H110 are too light. Hodgdon's website shows, for 158-gr. XTPs, a MINIMUM load of 15 grains and a maximum load of 16.7. The warnings with H110/WW296 has, for many years, been that you should never drop below Winchester's (or Hodgdon since they took it over) recommendations. I routinely use use 22 grains (MAX LOAD!) of WW 296 behind a 125-gr. bullet, and 16.5 grains of 296 behind a 158-gr. bullet in my two N frame .357s and I have never had anything even remotely resembling what you're describing. I'm thinking that you've got a revolver with oversized chambers. Regarding the muzzle blast, yes, that will happen with heavy charges of just about any slow burning powder. Regarding your measure, my bad, I didn't realize you were talking about the rotary drum measure -- I was thinking one of the Auto Disk models. Yes, a fine-grain powder like 296/H110 can do that. If you think H110 is fine, I'd suggest that you never try AA 7... It's like talc.
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower. |
January 11, 2013, 08:54 PM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 10, 2012
Posts: 3,881
|
I am loading 158 gr lswc's in a S&W model 19 with 4" barrel. Loading medium to medium heavy loads. Nothing super hot.
|
January 11, 2013, 09:54 PM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 16, 2008
Location: Transplanted to Ridgeland,SC
Posts: 606
|
powders
Vihtavuori N-110 is a good powder as well.It doesn't flash as bad as H-110/W296 and it works better than they do when loading less than max loads.On the burn chart it is a little slower than 2400.I use it in 357 and 44 mag loads.It burns very clean as well.
|
January 11, 2013, 10:04 PM | #23 | ||
Junior member
Join Date: October 4, 2007
Location: All the way to NEBRASKA
Posts: 8,722
|
Quote:
... and on the line right above it, they have a start load of 12.4 to max of 16.0 for WIN296, though everybody here seems to know that these are the same powder...... Quote:
|
||
January 11, 2013, 10:41 PM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 1, 2007
Location: Tabor City , NC.
Posts: 1,969
|
If I could only have 1 powder for all my reloading it would be 2400 !!
Do I have other powders YES. Another powder that`ll perform superb but can be hard to measure is IMR 800X IMR 4227 HERCO No exp with 300MP BUT 2400 was the factory powder for yrs. in the 357 Magnum. H-110 performs well , but just to blasty & flashy for my hunting loads .
__________________
GP100man |
January 12, 2013, 12:14 AM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 2, 2012
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,876
|
For a hot load. I like IMR 4227 myself. Little more forgiving and has a little less barrel flash than Win-296-H110 and even Blue Dot. In high intensity applications it's a hard one to beat.
On the mild side. I prefer Win 231. I've always considered it to be one of the best Mid Range powders ever made. Versatile and very clean burning. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|