The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old April 3, 2014, 07:32 PM   #1
Millet
Member
 
Join Date: March 27, 2014
Posts: 17
Seating depth test question

Hi Guy,
I'm getting ready to reload for a seating depth test I want to do for my .243 win. I tested and found my OCW which is 44.7 gr H414. Should I load on the lower end or is it safe to do my test loading 44.7 gr when 45 gr is max? Any help would b appreciated!
Millet is offline  
Old April 3, 2014, 08:09 PM   #2
mikld
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 7, 2009
Location: Southern Oregon!
Posts: 2,891
Common reloading safety practices include starting at or near the starting load when reloading for any new firearm, new round, or new/different combination of components. Nope, don't start .3 below max...
__________________
My Anchor is holding fast!
I've learned how to stand on my own two knees...
mikld is offline  
Old April 3, 2014, 08:31 PM   #3
Millet
Member
 
Join Date: March 27, 2014
Posts: 17
Right.......so at .3 grains below max if i go from .015" off lands to touching land will pressure be too high?
Millet is offline  
Old April 3, 2014, 09:27 PM   #4
kilotanker22
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 14, 2012
Location: North Central, PA
Posts: 2,117
millet

if this load at 44.7 gr is a load that was worked up in the rifle you are shooting with the same bullet. then you should be ok to start to play with the depth a little.

i would start about .050 off of the lands and work outward in .005 increments
and stop when best accuracy is found. i have found that in my 243 with 105 grain amax bullets they like to be seated .050 off of the lands.
kilotanker22 is offline  
Old April 3, 2014, 09:27 PM   #5
Ifishsum
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 15, 2005
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,033
Touching the lands can raise pressure significantly, I probably wouldn't try that without dropping the charge back and working back up. Other than that, I have tried varying the seating depth with an already confirmed load.
Ifishsum is offline  
Old April 3, 2014, 09:34 PM   #6
ColColt
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 24, 2010
Posts: 354
I always start at .015" off the lands and progressively go as far as .030" in maybe .005" increments till accuracy improves or degrades. I've never "jammed" any bullet into the lands and just don't think that's a good idea unless you're into hard chambering and pressure.
__________________
Kids are for people that can't have dogs
ColColt is offline  
Old April 4, 2014, 06:33 AM   #7
Millet
Member
 
Join Date: March 27, 2014
Posts: 17
Ok thanks for the reply guys. Yes this is a confirmed load in my rifle. I'll go ahead a run a test and let you know how it turns out....thanks again!
Millet is offline  
Old April 4, 2014, 07:33 AM   #8
steve4102
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 23, 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,952
Quote:
Right.......so at .3 grains below max if i go from .015" off lands to touching land will pressure be too high?

Increasing OAL will increase Pressures with jammed into the lands being the highest.

If you are going to experiment with OAL, Start with the Longest OAL you plan to use then decrease OAL your desired amounts. By decreasing oAL you will not be in increasing pressures with each reduction in length.
steve4102 is offline  
Old April 4, 2014, 05:15 PM   #9
cdoc42
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 13, 2005
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,687
Just a thought. As you increase the distance from the lands, you're seating the bullet deeper into the case. Does that reduced internal case volume also increase pressure? Let me assume the answer is yes. Is it possible that the best accuracy is not really related to the seating depth or the distance from the lands, but the actual pressure generated?

For example, a bullet seated 0.01" from the lands might generate 53,000 CUP and be extremely accurate. But if seated 0.05" away, the deeper case seat generates 53,000 CUP and is just as accurate. No?
cdoc42 is offline  
Old April 4, 2014, 05:31 PM   #10
AllenJ
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 11, 2009
Location: Northern California
Posts: 1,766
Quote:
Should I load on the lower end or is it safe to do my test loading 44.7 gr when 45 gr is max?
If you found your rifles node at 44.7 that is where I'd start. Seat bullets in increments of .010 in lots of 3 (5 would be better) both longer and shorter to see if your groups tighten up. Watch for excessive pressure signs the same as if you were increasing the powder charge.

Are you measuring cartridge base to bullet tip or cartridge base to bullet ogive?
AllenJ is offline  
Old April 4, 2014, 06:04 PM   #11
nemesiss45
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 6, 2014
Posts: 526
Quote:
Originally Posted by cdoc42 View Post
Just a thought. As you increase the distance from the lands, you're seating the bullet deeper into the case. Does that reduced internal case volume also increase pressure? Let me assume the answer is yes. Is it possible that the best accuracy is not really related to the seating depth or the distance from the lands, but the actual pressure generated?

For example, a bullet seated 0.01" from the lands might generate 53,000 CUP and be extremely accurate. But if seated 0.05" away, the deeper case seat generates 53,000 CUP and is just as accurate. No?
As you seat the buller deeper, pressure is decreased. I believe the pressure continues to decrease until you begin compressing the powder.... but I could be wrong about that last bit
nemesiss45 is offline  
Old April 4, 2014, 06:24 PM   #12
steve4102
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 23, 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,952
Quote:
Originally Posted by cdoc42
Just a thought. As you increase the distance from the lands, you're seating the bullet deeper into the case. Does that reduced internal case volume also increase pressure? Let me assume the answer is yes
In a Straight walled pistol round your assumption would be correct.

In a bottle necked rifle round your assumption would be incorrect.
steve4102 is offline  
Old April 4, 2014, 07:53 PM   #13
kilotanker22
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 14, 2012
Location: North Central, PA
Posts: 2,117
Be sure to let us know how you make out
kilotanker22 is offline  
Old April 4, 2014, 08:07 PM   #14
4runnerman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 16, 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,577
Lots of different answers here. If as you say you did the OCW test. My 2 cents. By seating bullet deeper does not increase pressure and you have more distance between bullet and lands ( pressure change – not much ). As you seat the bullet farther out- more case is left empty for powder to expand when burned- ( pressure change- Not much ). When you follow the test- It does not say back off on powder charge after you find your sweet spot. I do not mean to tell you to disregard what the book tells you, but remember- The books have a safety margin built into them. Watch your brass after each shot looking for pressure signs, I bet you see none.
__________________
NRA Certified RSO
NwCP- Performance Isn't Optional
4runnerman is offline  
Old April 4, 2014, 08:27 PM   #15
Millet
Member
 
Join Date: March 27, 2014
Posts: 17
Wow... that's some interesting info! Today I loaded 6 sets of 4 of each length in .010" increments starting from .010" off lands to .060" off lands. I'll probably fine tune both ways in smaller increments later. So hopefully I can shoot tomorrow and I'll try and keep you updated.
Millet is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.06969 seconds with 10 queries