|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 3, 2014, 07:32 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: March 27, 2014
Posts: 17
|
Seating depth test question
Hi Guy,
I'm getting ready to reload for a seating depth test I want to do for my .243 win. I tested and found my OCW which is 44.7 gr H414. Should I load on the lower end or is it safe to do my test loading 44.7 gr when 45 gr is max? Any help would b appreciated! |
April 3, 2014, 08:09 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 7, 2009
Location: Southern Oregon!
Posts: 2,891
|
Common reloading safety practices include starting at or near the starting load when reloading for any new firearm, new round, or new/different combination of components. Nope, don't start .3 below max...
__________________
My Anchor is holding fast! I've learned how to stand on my own two knees... |
April 3, 2014, 08:31 PM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: March 27, 2014
Posts: 17
|
Right.......so at .3 grains below max if i go from .015" off lands to touching land will pressure be too high?
|
April 3, 2014, 09:27 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 14, 2012
Location: North Central, PA
Posts: 2,117
|
millet
if this load at 44.7 gr is a load that was worked up in the rifle you are shooting with the same bullet. then you should be ok to start to play with the depth a little.
i would start about .050 off of the lands and work outward in .005 increments and stop when best accuracy is found. i have found that in my 243 with 105 grain amax bullets they like to be seated .050 off of the lands. |
April 3, 2014, 09:27 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 15, 2005
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,033
|
Touching the lands can raise pressure significantly, I probably wouldn't try that without dropping the charge back and working back up. Other than that, I have tried varying the seating depth with an already confirmed load.
|
April 3, 2014, 09:34 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 24, 2010
Posts: 354
|
I always start at .015" off the lands and progressively go as far as .030" in maybe .005" increments till accuracy improves or degrades. I've never "jammed" any bullet into the lands and just don't think that's a good idea unless you're into hard chambering and pressure.
__________________
Kids are for people that can't have dogs |
April 4, 2014, 06:33 AM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: March 27, 2014
Posts: 17
|
Ok thanks for the reply guys. Yes this is a confirmed load in my rifle. I'll go ahead a run a test and let you know how it turns out....thanks again!
|
April 4, 2014, 07:33 AM | #8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 23, 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,952
|
Quote:
Increasing OAL will increase Pressures with jammed into the lands being the highest. If you are going to experiment with OAL, Start with the Longest OAL you plan to use then decrease OAL your desired amounts. By decreasing oAL you will not be in increasing pressures with each reduction in length. |
|
April 4, 2014, 05:15 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 13, 2005
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,687
|
Just a thought. As you increase the distance from the lands, you're seating the bullet deeper into the case. Does that reduced internal case volume also increase pressure? Let me assume the answer is yes. Is it possible that the best accuracy is not really related to the seating depth or the distance from the lands, but the actual pressure generated?
For example, a bullet seated 0.01" from the lands might generate 53,000 CUP and be extremely accurate. But if seated 0.05" away, the deeper case seat generates 53,000 CUP and is just as accurate. No? |
April 4, 2014, 05:31 PM | #10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 11, 2009
Location: Northern California
Posts: 1,766
|
Quote:
Are you measuring cartridge base to bullet tip or cartridge base to bullet ogive? |
|
April 4, 2014, 06:04 PM | #11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 6, 2014
Posts: 526
|
Quote:
|
|
April 4, 2014, 06:24 PM | #12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 23, 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,952
|
Quote:
In a bottle necked rifle round your assumption would be incorrect. |
|
April 4, 2014, 07:53 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 14, 2012
Location: North Central, PA
Posts: 2,117
|
Be sure to let us know how you make out
|
April 4, 2014, 08:07 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 16, 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,577
|
Lots of different answers here. If as you say you did the OCW test. My 2 cents. By seating bullet deeper does not increase pressure and you have more distance between bullet and lands ( pressure change – not much ). As you seat the bullet farther out- more case is left empty for powder to expand when burned- ( pressure change- Not much ). When you follow the test- It does not say back off on powder charge after you find your sweet spot. I do not mean to tell you to disregard what the book tells you, but remember- The books have a safety margin built into them. Watch your brass after each shot looking for pressure signs, I bet you see none.
__________________
NRA Certified RSO NwCP- Performance Isn't Optional |
April 4, 2014, 08:27 PM | #15 |
Member
Join Date: March 27, 2014
Posts: 17
|
Wow... that's some interesting info! Today I loaded 6 sets of 4 of each length in .010" increments starting from .010" off lands to .060" off lands. I'll probably fine tune both ways in smaller increments later. So hopefully I can shoot tomorrow and I'll try and keep you updated.
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|