|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 21, 2012, 04:58 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 29, 2010
Posts: 311
|
Traveling Through Anti-Gun States
Sometimes we have to drive through an anti-gun state such as Illinois, New Jersey, New York or California while going somewhere else (or just to visit someone there). In the past, I have avoided carrying for the entire trip because of just one state.
Is there a practice that could get the handgun through an anti-gun state that is likely to be universally legal, such as disassembling the handgun and keeping it in a locked container in the trunk, or some such other method? If so, then I might be able to carry legally in the surrounding states and then stop, disassemble and store while in the anti-gun state, then re-assemble once into a gun friendly state where my state's Concealed Carry Permit is honored.
__________________
JustThisGuy Mediocrity dominates over excellence in all things... except excellence. |
March 21, 2012, 07:55 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 27, 2010
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 2,905
|
For interstate travel, "unloaded and locked in the trunk" is fine. If you stop for longer than it takes to get gas or have a meal, you may become subject to some additional state & local laws since at that point you'll no longer be simply transiting through the state.
|
March 21, 2012, 09:11 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 20, 2009
Location: Overlooking the Baker River Valley
Posts: 1,723
|
ScottRiqui's synopsis is correct. The applicable statute is the Firearm Owners' Protection Act of 1986, specifically the so-called "safe passage" provision. If you'd like more details you can Google those terms and get lots of hits.
__________________
NRA Benefactor Life Member NRA Certified Instructor: Rifle, Pistol, Shotgun, PPIH, Metallic & Shotgun Shell Reloading; RSO Pemigewasset Valley Fish & Game Club |
March 21, 2012, 09:23 AM | #4 |
Staff
Join Date: November 28, 2005
Location: Montana
Posts: 9,443
|
I think even when you stop to eat or fuel up you're still covered under the "safe-passage" issue. I believe it's the ultimate intended destination that keeps you blanketed under the Act...
__________________
If it were up to me, the word "got" would be deleted from the English language. Posting and YOU: http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/posting |
March 21, 2012, 09:38 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 29, 2010
Posts: 311
|
I understand that if you are only stopping for gas or food you are ok, but when crossing a state like California from Arizona to Oregon you will have to stay overnight. Additionally, there may be times when one wants to visit relatives for a day or two.
Is it ok to have a handgun broken down and locked in the trunk or is that a violation? I understand that it may be considered so in NJ or NY for example.
__________________
JustThisGuy Mediocrity dominates over excellence in all things... except excellence. |
March 21, 2012, 09:43 AM | #6 |
Staff
Join Date: April 13, 2000
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 41,390
|
Unfortunately, there have been numerous, egregious violations of the Safe Passage act by states like New Jersey over the years.
You should be OK, but if you encounter someone who decides to make your life hell, the act isn't as strong as it could be, unfortunately.
__________________
"The gift which I am sending you is called a dog, and is in fact the most precious and valuable possession of mankind" -Theodorus Gaza Baby Jesus cries when the fat redneck doesn't have military-grade firepower. |
March 21, 2012, 11:47 AM | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 27, 2010
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 2,905
|
Quote:
|
|
March 21, 2012, 12:04 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 29, 2010
Posts: 311
|
Thanks very much for the excellent help.
__________________
JustThisGuy Mediocrity dominates over excellence in all things... except excellence. |
March 22, 2012, 12:00 AM | #9 | ||
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,468
|
Quote:
Quote:
My view is that, if I'm driving from Maine to California, I'm going to have to stop for sleep at least three to five times, and those overnights are in the normal course of the trip -- as long as I just stop at a motel at or near a highway interchange. On the other hand, if my route is I-40 and I take a 2-day detour 75 miles north of the highway to visit great aunt Milicent -- that ends one "trip" and starts a second one when I depart Aunt Milicent's house to continue on to California. |
||
March 22, 2012, 12:46 AM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 27, 2010
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 2,905
|
I already said that the FOPA doesn't define "extended stop", but that doesn't mean that the concept doesn't need to be addressed when discussing the "safe passage" provision.
I don't think anyone would claim that you don't retain your safe passage protections during a food or gas stop. Further, I don't think that anyone can seriously claim that you would retain your safe passage protections during a three-week stopover in a non gun-friendly state. Without a firm definition, there's a gray area where you have to tread carefully, and any decisions by a court are going to be based on case law rather than the statute itself. Personally, I agree with you that an overnight stop for rest probably doesn't strip you of your protections. Since you can only safely travel so far in a day, periodic rest stops (just like stops for food and fuel) are an integral part of interstate travel. |
March 22, 2012, 08:34 AM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 25, 2010
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 3,309
|
I hate that we even have to worry about matters like this.
Bottom line, as I see it, is to not do anything that might attract the attention of local law enforcement. |
March 22, 2012, 10:07 AM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 17, 2005
Location: Swamp dweller
Posts: 6,187
|
Personally I would not venture into NJ, or NY with a handgun or long gun.
NJ has been known to confiscate firearms during traffic stops and you will need much time and money to retrieve your property plus jail time Remember NYC has the Sullivan Law. Just my opinion and growing up in NYC I have no desire to return to the northeast.
__________________
NRA Life Member, NRA Chief Range Safety Officer, NRA Certified Pistol Instructor,, USPSA & Steel Challange NROI Range Officer, ICORE Range Officer, ,MAG 40 Graduate As you are, I once was, As I am, You will be. |
March 23, 2012, 01:04 AM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 24, 2011
Posts: 730
|
Think about this: When we go on a trip our ultimate destination is to get back home...everywhere in between we are traveling. We may stop for a day or two here or there, or even a week..we have friends and relatives all over the US and Canada but the whole time we are "traveling". As was stated, it really is not safe to run the length of California or width of Montana, in one day (though I have done so). IMHO, if you are visiting at an intermedate stop, you are still "traveling" per the federal law.
I know, I do the same thing...If we expect to stay with my wifes relatives in NY for a week, I just leave my carry at home, even though I can get to 30 miles of their house legally. I also make sure that our visits to the Canadian relatives take place on the same unarmed trip, Going armed into Canada is just not going to happen without a whole lot of paperwork and planning that I won't put up with. |
March 23, 2012, 06:10 AM | #14 |
Junior member
Join Date: February 5, 2012
Posts: 73
|
Thr best advice is to leave the firearm at home. There have been quite a few cases of well intentioned firearms owners in the same situation arrested and prosecuted. Although there is the Safe Passage Act it is practically ignored in those states. If you are stopped in those states and they find a firearm they will find a way to arrest you and let the judge figure out the rest.
|
March 23, 2012, 10:18 AM | #15 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,468
|
Quote:
The nursing student who was arrested in NYC? Not covered by FOPA because her possession of the gun in NYC wasn't legal. The Tea Party lawyer from CA who was arrested at the airport when leaving NY to return to CA? Also not covered, because he had spent several days in NYC illegally possessing a handgun. Let's face it -- New York state is a complete barrier between the states west of NY and all of the New England states. If you want to visit New England, you somehow have to traverse NY state. My brother is in CT and my sister is in NH. I have carry permits from both states. I transport up the NJ Turnpike in strict accord with the FOPA (with one exception-- see below), and I skirt around NYC into CT. I haven't been stopped so the waters have not been tested, but I don't think I would be arrested if stopped. FWIW, NJ state law echoes the FOPA language almost exactly, so if you are traveling through NJ by car I doubt there would be any problem, especially on the Turnpike, which is patrolled by the State Police. The language of the NJ version is right on the NJSP web site. The caveat is that NJ changed one important word: Where the FOPA says the firearm "OR" the ammunition must be in a locked container, NJ says "AND." So I transport any firearms in their own locked cases, and I put ammo in an old Craftsman mechanic's tool box and padlock the hasp. (I drive an SUV, so I don't have a separate trunk.) |
|
March 23, 2012, 02:12 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 2, 2012
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,876
|
Traveling Through Anti-Gun States
How I would handle on my own: I'd call the States Attorneys Office in each State I planned on traveling thru. before making the actual trip
1. Ask if my C.C.W. Permit is Valid in that State? 2. Ask for proper procedure recognized by their Law Enforcement for a non-Residents weapons storage. In his/her vehicle? (mention: hand gun) 3. Ask for documentation on this subject to be sent to my address Via: US Mail, Email, or Fax. 4. Note the time, date, and contact persons (full) name if possible.) 5. I personally would not rely on any Blanket Agreement for protection. 6. If not allowed to cross a States Border with weapon secured or not. I would leave the weapon at home. Or find a different route around that State. >Let Common Sense prevail.< This is the way I would handle this subject in my own behalf. SSMcG |
March 24, 2012, 08:31 AM | #17 |
Junior member
Join Date: February 5, 2012
Posts: 73
|
I know its technically legal to transport firearms through NJ and NY but I also know in those states they will give you trouble for doing so. Lets say you absolutely have to do it then I would partially disassemble them, put them in two seperate locked steel boxes and then lock them down further in another container placed in the trunk. An Army duffel with a padlock comes to mind as a good second container. I would make sure there was no doubt in anyones mind the firearms were being transported. Then I would set the cruise control right on the speed limit and if anyone ever asked if they could search my vehicle the answer would be no. Otherwise I would avoid hose states entirely.
|
March 25, 2012, 10:26 AM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 2, 2009
Posts: 438
|
Unloaded locked in a case in fine for CA. The ammo CAN be in the same locked case.
Dispite what some people (not in this thread...yet) want to spew... CA does not randomly pull people over and ask about guns. In fact, Ive never ever been asked if there is ANY type of weapon in my truck (no trunk) when ive been pulled over even when clocked at 92 (stupid me) on a desert road that only comes from AZ with AZ license plate and DL. |
March 25, 2012, 03:31 PM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 28, 2011
Location: Danville, Pa
Posts: 520
|
Its stupid that your CC permit isn't good for every state, which hopefully someday that will change. For me, if im traveling a far distance going through unknown areas, thats when i would want to have a gun with me for protection more than ever.
|
March 25, 2012, 09:59 PM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 19, 2007
Location: Montmorency Co, MI
Posts: 1,551
|
I have had to traverse ILLinois.. A safe passage is 'not having to set foot on ILLinois concrete. Gas up, use rest room and get going.
Notify travelers bureaus that you made it and why.. Would like to visit, with pickup camper, New England one day but I guess it will never happen. |
March 25, 2012, 10:02 PM | #21 |
Member
Join Date: March 23, 2012
Location: Midwest
Posts: 56
|
My opinion: If you have the handgun slide locked open and carry the ammunition in an entirely different area of the vehicle. Such as your pistol in the trrunk and your ammo in a locked container in the console (Which has been defined in some court cases as being a case all by itself) you should be fine. Unless the policeman just feels like writing a ticket and assigning a court date, in which case, nothing will save you.
__________________
Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And when you look long into an abyss, the abyss also looks into you. - Friedrich Nietzsche |
March 26, 2012, 04:10 AM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 28, 2011
Posts: 182
|
I seem to recall hollowpoints being illegal in NJ. Not sure how FOPA addresses this, but I've heard some horror stories. I suppose I could look them up if it's important to anyone.
|
March 26, 2012, 05:12 AM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 15, 2010
Location: United States of America
Posts: 1,877
|
sortof makes the anti national carryers think (@ least a little).
to quote above(paraphrase): "I have left gun home during trip because of some of these states" some of these states' government workers, officers of the state, etc answer to their state and this can make the states differ greatly. It allows a federal transport law to be abused because there is a great lack of federal law within their state to begin with. An accepted(forced to be recognized national carry law which would be tested and upheld in court cases)Natinal CCW would put an end to this nonsense. The bottom line is you're a sitting duck...you don't hear of as many atrocities because you just usually don't run into trouble.
__________________
"Damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead!" -Admiral Farragut @ Battle of Mobile Bay 05AUG1864 |
March 26, 2012, 05:19 AM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 15, 2010
Location: United States of America
Posts: 1,877
|
I admit my post needs 'ightening up' but I feel it at least holds some water. I know someone that went thru a nightmare going thru NJ legally as only one example might change their opinion real quick about National CCW. It usually takes an eye-opener like that.
__________________
"Damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead!" -Admiral Farragut @ Battle of Mobile Bay 05AUG1864 |
March 27, 2012, 06:22 AM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 29, 2010
Posts: 311
|
Very good discussion. Lots of useful information.
And it certainly drives home the need for national reciprocal CCW.
__________________
JustThisGuy Mediocrity dominates over excellence in all things... except excellence. |
|
|