January 10, 2012, 03:35 AM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: January 8, 2012
Location: Washington State
Posts: 36
|
New S&W 686 pricing?
Hey guys,
Looking at a 686, new, with all the stuff a new comes with. They have it marked at my local gun store for $740 I believe it was. I am new to guns, so am hesitant to buy used. I live in Washington State, Seattle area. Not sure about how this price looks for a new 686, but I have heard they are great guns, so the price did not surprise me. Anyone have some more info about these for me before I shoot myself in the foot and pay too much? Har har. Thanks for your help, everyone. |
January 10, 2012, 07:30 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 31, 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 2,614
|
I've not priced them in a while. I paid approx $640 for mine 6 years ago from a LGS, so $16/year seems a reasonable 2.5% inflation.
You can buy one from Bud's for $655, so $740 sounds high, but once you include shipping and the FFL fee, you're not too far off $740. BTW, is this 686 the 6- or 7-shot? |
January 10, 2012, 07:40 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 11, 2009
Posts: 228
|
Budsgunshop.com is where he is talking about and its a good place to price check guns. They have free shipping so if its $655 + a transfer fee of around $25 that is way lower than $740 + tax. Take your local gun shop a quote from Buds and ask them if they want to match it or if you should just order from Buds. If they start telling you they can't match and you'll have to pay a transfer fee so the price isn't really that low, just remind them the transfer fee is lower than the tax so you are actually giving up a few dollars to buy it from them. Its possible they'll make more money off the transfer fee than price matching the gun though.
Last edited by JonathanZ; January 10, 2012 at 07:47 AM. |
January 10, 2012, 07:49 AM | #4 |
Junior member
Join Date: June 27, 2011
Location: Memphis TN
Posts: 694
|
i paid 685 for my 686Plus from buds 6"
after the transfer and all that hassel I was over well 700 now its for sale for 600 bucks however check your local shops if you have to have a new one,me persoanlly prefer used older models now,which is why im selling mine |
January 10, 2012, 09:06 AM | #5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 28, 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 11,756
|
Quote:
You'll end up with a better revolver and you will spend less dough to get it.
__________________
Attention Brass rats and other reloaders: I really need .327 Federal Magnum brass, no lot size too small. Tell me what caliber you need and I'll see what I have to swap. PM me and we'll discuss. |
|
January 10, 2012, 09:39 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 30, 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 2,156
|
I agree with Sevens advice. You will get more gun for less money with a pre lock, pre MIM 686.
Read the "revolver check out" sticky at the top of the page. Lots of good info available for the person who is new to revolvers. Good luck! Regards 18DAI
__________________
S&W Model 19 Combat Magnum. Everything you need in a revolver, and nothing you don't. |
January 10, 2012, 09:53 AM | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 31, 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 2,614
|
Quote:
Plus, I really hate adding to a thread veer, particularly when it's in the context of the hackneyed "old/new" debate, but since the OP's new when it comes to revos, I'll add my $0.02 for some balance: Don't sweat "new vs old", since "better" is very subjective. The newer guns may not have the fit and finish of the older ones, but they shoot every bit as good, maybe better. And functionally, the lock really is a non-issue. FWIW, my MIM- and lock-infested 686 took me to the IDPA World Championships last September (where we did well, thank you very much), and I'll be using it this year at 2 National Championships. It's held up very well to the abuse of competitive action shooting, and it's still at least as accurate as my 1952 6" K-38 Masterpiece target revolver. |
|
January 10, 2012, 01:06 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 28, 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 11,756
|
I hear you, MrB, but the OP stated specifically that he was new to guns and worried about a purchase. I figured that gave us license to discuss the matter. Lord help us when we can no longer discuss these things on a discussion forum.
FWIW, while your experience is interesting... it doesn't prove a whole lot. Tell us what ALL the other competitors are using in revolvers, and please leave out those who are sponsored by a manufacturer. Or better yet... that's probably as relevant as my comments & yours as well.
__________________
Attention Brass rats and other reloaders: I really need .327 Federal Magnum brass, no lot size too small. Tell me what caliber you need and I'll see what I have to swap. PM me and we'll discuss. |
January 10, 2012, 01:45 PM | #9 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: May 31, 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 2,614
|
Quote:
Quote:
FWIW, I'm really no fan Lock & MIM fanboy. I do have older blued guns. But the newer ones are what they are, yet they shoot. As well as they older ones. And they tune well, hold up well, and are easy to repair if something does go amiss. And I haven't yet heard any Master-level competitive revolver shooter say otherwise, sponsored or not. * In the interest of full disclosure, I'll recognize that some USPSA shooters, myself included, have removed The Lock. It's generally a simple case of KISS, so in that regard, the hammer spur and the hammer block are often removed as well. In my case, I radically bobbed the hammer to the point where it wouldn't hold the locking flag. Once the locking flag's removed, The Lock is no longer "as designed", so prudence told me to take the rest of it out. |
||
January 10, 2012, 02:08 PM | #10 |
Staff
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,059
|
In areas with competing dealers and no weird state-level restrictions, a new 686 should run ~$700.
If you can find a good used one under $600, all the better. Keep an eye out for old K-Frame 66's as well.
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change. --Randall Munroe |
January 10, 2012, 02:48 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 28, 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 11,756
|
I set to work looking for a 686 similar to the one that I have owned since it was new in 1989... mine is a 686-3. A buddy told me that he wanted one and when I asked him precisely what he was looking for, he told me that he wanted MINE.
That was certainly not going to happen, so that's when I started keeping a sharp eye open at gun shows for a pre-lock 686. I've seen prices between $500 and $600 for guns that I would absolutely have purchased if I were in the market. Sure, there were some over priced... and there were some beat up ones, too, neither of which I would have considered. (FWIW, last time I found one of these was an outdoor show on Labor Day weekend... and I found THREE of them) But I'm in the definite habit of checking prices on pre-lock 686's and I know that if I look for it and pounce when I find it, I can definitely bring one home for under $600, no tax, no shipping and no FFL. Given that I believe it's a better revolver (my opinion, of course), and it costs significantly less than a new one, that was my thought process here. And my buddy who wanted MY 686? He bought a new GP-100 shortly thereafter. Seems to be a fine revolver. (I like my 686 more, but...) He later bought a new 686-plus from Bud's. This one is a nice revolver, but it's got a definite "hitch" in it's double action and in a different thread, I'd love to describe it and ask for opinions. But I wouldn't take this for my 686 if he included a lot of money in the deal. For each of these, he paid more out the door than I can find a pre-lock 686-3 or earlier. Would be quite difficult to convince me otherwise, but I do enjoy the discussion of it either way! I can't help but think that the chatter in our OP's thread isn't likely to be a bad thing... for him or for others who might be reading it. I really don't think any of it is "off topic" or drifted any further than it naturally ought to. But then, I'm not a moderator. I'm simply an enthusiast with opinions!
__________________
Attention Brass rats and other reloaders: I really need .327 Federal Magnum brass, no lot size too small. Tell me what caliber you need and I'll see what I have to swap. PM me and we'll discuss. |
January 10, 2012, 02:55 PM | #12 |
Junior member
Join Date: May 16, 2008
Posts: 9,995
|
On one gun I tried to give my local shop a $25 for the transfer, 10% extra to support them and ignored the 7% tax difference with Buds. They still can't compete. They even showed me their distributor page where they were paying slightly more than buds price for the gun. I suggested they order it from buds and resell it to me and take the 10% and they looked at me dumbfounded. They still got the transfer.
As far as pricing, a whole lot more than a GP100. I admit the 686s are a little smaller and the finish is nicer. I was considering a used one to carry. |
January 10, 2012, 03:07 PM | #13 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 31, 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 2,614
|
Quote:
I agree, too, that I hope the OP finds value in this discussion. Otherwise, it's a highjacked thread |
|
January 10, 2012, 03:24 PM | #14 |
Member
Join Date: January 8, 2012
Location: Washington State
Posts: 36
|
Oh man, thank you for all of the input. Appreciate hearing both sides of the argument, so thanks for that guys. But, I am afraid I do not really know too much about the lock and MIW (spelling?) thing with new 686s. By the way, it is a 686 6, not a 7. I saw a 7 online, but I read on the forum I believe that some competitions don't allow 7s, and that it takes a while to get used to shooting 7 shots instead of 6 or vice versa. Not saying that I am going to compete any time soon of course lol, but just for habit. I can be a habitual person so that extra round might screw me up haha...anyway. I have no problem with a used gun, but I had someone tell me not to buy used until I am knowledgeable. They said I might buy a gun without knowing the condition (I think it goes by percentage, right?), or buy a lemon, or things like that. So they thought I should just buck up and buy new so I don't have to worry about condition or buying something that is flawed without me knowing. I am all for buying a gun for less money, as I don't exactly have money flowing out of my pockets haha, but that is just what I have been told. Is that good advice or do people often buy used guns for their first handgun?
|
January 10, 2012, 03:25 PM | #15 |
Member
Join Date: January 8, 2012
Location: Washington State
Posts: 36
|
No no, definitely find all of this valuable. Learning a lot of new stuff here, so thank you for having this discussion guys
|
January 11, 2012, 12:26 AM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 20, 2005
Posts: 2,474
|
Others can flame me but I will state definitively that the old pre mim smith k and l frames have better triggers than new guns. And I have looked at a lot of them. They may "tune up" the same but then that is not quite the point is it? Many things can be "tuned up" big difference with what you get out of the box.
Frankly priced right a good used 686 pre lock / mim will be a better gun and rise in value where the new one will only fall. Finding a good one is not that hard and learning to inspect a revolver us a good didactic exercise for any shooter. |
January 11, 2012, 12:34 AM | #17 |
Member
Join Date: January 8, 2012
Location: Washington State
Posts: 36
|
Ah, hm...so you would recommend me to get a used 686? I am trying to find info about the pre-lock pre-mim stuff on these revolvers, but if you don't mind, think you could give me a bit of info about what difference this stuff makes? I see it all over the forum but am not too keen on the jargon as of yet. I did find the revolver buying tips that is stickied, so I am going to read that through so I can do this whenever I end up hopefully looking at a nice used 686.
|
January 11, 2012, 12:57 AM | #18 |
Staff
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,059
|
"Pre Lock" means a revolver made before Saf-T-Hammer started installing internal key locks in S&W revolvers. That would be around 2000. There have been a couple of scattered reports of the locks causing malfunctions, but many of us see them as statistically irrelevant. The lock is, however, a bit on the unsightly side.
"MIM" stands for Metal Injection Molding, a casting process S&W uses to fabricate some parts, such as the trigger and hammer. MIM is a cost-cutting measure about which some opinions are divided. Again, I consider it a non-issue. Nonetheless, revolvers without those two factors tend to fetch a bit of a premium. Is it worth it? To some.
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change. --Randall Munroe |
January 11, 2012, 02:00 AM | #19 |
Member
Join Date: January 8, 2012
Location: Washington State
Posts: 36
|
Hm, so, based on that though, it doesn't sound as if they really should affect the firing of the weapon? Unless I am mistaken. It sounds from that as if it is more of an aesthetic thing than a functional thing?...again, I don't know much, that is just what I took from that description haha. Thank you for your help with those terms. I might try looking for a used one if the price is right, but if I can't find one I'll probably just end up going with a new 686. Let me know if I am mistaken between the new/old functionality stuff. Thanks again!
|
January 11, 2012, 07:11 AM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 11, 2001
Location: chandler,az
Posts: 929
|
Have them throw in a box of ammo and try to get a good deal on a holster while your there. Its a great gun your going to like it.
|
January 11, 2012, 08:33 AM | #21 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 31, 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 2,614
|
Quote:
The lock & MIM parts seem to get all the discussion, but if the gun's going to get shot a lot (i.e. be a match gun), there are other design elements I have stronger personal preference for, e.g. pinned front sight (the factory red ramp must go, IMO), frame mounted firing pin, new style cylinder release, and a non-pinned ejector. Only the 686-5 has all these without the lock (my backup 686 is a -5), so if I ever need to buy another 686, I'd have to wait for a -5, or just buy new. One more word about a new S&W: While you'd avoid potentially buying someone else's problem, there's no guarantee a new gun will be perfect from the factory, either. S&W still makes a terrific revolver. Between design elements and modern CNC machinery, they are able to produce very accurate & reliable guns with much less hand fitting. The thing is, I'll occasionally read about a lemon that managed to get through their QA/QC. The good news is that S&W's customer service is very good, and any issues are quickly addressed once they are contacted. Keep us posted. We'll expect a range report soon. |
|
January 11, 2012, 09:40 AM | #22 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 20, 2007
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 7,523
|
Quote:
Although firing pin problems are not commonplace, the fact that the floating firing pin can be replaced without special tools by a non-gunsmith is a plus is my book. Decent mechanical skills and an ability to work with small parts are still required, but the job isn't difficult overall. *Rimfire S&W revolvers have had floating firing pins since about 1930, although the pin retention system was slightly different than the one used today.
__________________
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam. This is bowling. There are rules... MARK IT ZERO!!" - Walter Sobchak |
|
January 11, 2012, 10:41 AM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 28, 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 11,756
|
I'm obviously on the side of pre-lock and pre-MIM. But for the purpose of the OP, my thought was that you could save money and get a better gun buy looking for an older model.
If the money isn't as big a deal as the looking, waiting, and obvious bit of risk involved in checking out and purchasing a used revolver, you will likely be well served by a new one even with the lock and the MIM. Truth be told, someone who is quite new to handguns will simply have NO IDEA about the differences and I've met a number of people who can't even feel the difference in trigger pull and smoothness that I can easily feel... but then, I'm a hardcore hobbyist and enthusiast and I've been doing this for some time now. If I ever gave you the idea that a new 686 is junk, I apologize- I don't mean that and I don't believe that. And for a new shooter, we don't have any idea how much shooting you'll end up doing with this revolver. Could be that it ends up filling a role and not getting shot a whole lot anyhow. (not saying anything about you or your habits, I just know what kind of life the "average" gun lives, when bought by the "average" new-to-guns person) It does sound like you might be best served to simply purchase new. For me however, you couldn't force me in to it. No way. And for more money? Sounds like a practical joke to me.
__________________
Attention Brass rats and other reloaders: I really need .327 Federal Magnum brass, no lot size too small. Tell me what caliber you need and I'll see what I have to swap. PM me and we'll discuss. |
January 11, 2012, 12:00 PM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 22, 2011
Posts: 256
|
I have 7 S&W revolvers so far, one more on the way. None of them were purchased new. In fact, only one of them is post-lock, the rest of them are from the 1980's are are still in perfect condition.
I have a friend that was afraid to buy a used revolver, but after seeing and shooting my "old" stuff he bit the bullet and bought a 686-3 from Gunbroker. Lots of good used stuff out there, but someone needs to buy new stuff from time to time to keep S&W's doors open. So, buy new or used, whatever you prefer. Get a new one now, but be warned, once you do buy a S&W revolver get ready to see your bank account decline. I am up to 7 now, #8 very soon, and already know what #9 and possibly #10 will be. It's an addiction............ |
January 11, 2012, 12:00 PM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 27, 2008
Location: western WA
Posts: 691
|
Ctrain-you're getting a lot of good information as well as the sense of who values what in a SW.
I'm local, I own one and I shop all the time. PM me for some local intel. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|