The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Conference Center > Law and Civil Rights

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old November 13, 2011, 02:17 AM   #1
fzammetti
Member
 
Join Date: May 4, 2011
Posts: 19
Purchasing a handgun for someone else

Hi folks... I've been searching for over an hour now trying to get an answer myself but haven't been able to find it... any guidance would be appreciated.

I'm a current CCW holder in Pennsylvania and my wife is in the process of getting hers. I'd like to go to a gun show tomorrow and surprise her with the carry gun she liked when we check them out today, but I'm unclear on whether I can purchase it and give it to her.

To be clear, there's no issue with *me* purchasing it... I in fact passed a background check just this Monday to purchase a new carbine And I've purchased at shows before... in fact, my intention is to purchase from the same vendor I bought my own carry gun from.

But, I'm unclear whether its legal for me to purchase it, which would make it registered to me, and give it to her to carry. I *think* the answer is yes, since during my research I haven't turned up anything that would seem to say otherwise, but I also haven't been able to find anything that explicitly seems to cover this situation, which is usually what I like to see to be sure my legal bases are covered

Thanks all,
Frank
fzammetti is offline  
Old November 13, 2011, 02:33 AM   #2
docnyt
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 23, 2011
Location: HeArT of DiXiE
Posts: 154
Are guns even registered in PA?

If you look at ATF guidelines, purchasing a firearm as a gift is allowed.
docnyt is offline  
Old November 13, 2011, 02:36 AM   #3
ligonierbill
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 20, 2007
Posts: 2,458
No. No gun registration in PA. The OP may be thinking it's his name on the background check form.
ligonierbill is offline  
Old November 13, 2011, 08:01 AM   #4
Uncle Buck
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 21, 2009
Location: West Central Missouri
Posts: 2,592
I thought that PA had a rule that even a private transfer of a handgun required a background check?

If this rule does not apply to PA, then you should be good to go under the gifting portion of the application. (If I remember correctly, it is on the back of the form.)

I had almost the same question a few months ago when my sister tried to buy a shotgun for her son.
__________________
Inside Every Bright Idea Is The 50% Probability Of A Disaster Waiting To Happen.
Uncle Buck is offline  
Old November 13, 2011, 09:43 AM   #5
Aguila Blanca
Staff
 
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,470
Whether or not Pennsylvania requires a background check to transfer a handgun has nothing to do with whether or not it's legal for a husband to purchase a firearm and then give it to his wife. As long as the wife is not a prohibited person, that is legal under both Federal and Pennsylvania law.

The gift to the wife may require a second transfer through an FFL -- I'm not that "up" on PA state law. I do know that the wife does not require a concealed carry license to own a handgun in PA. Except for residents of Philadelphia, in fact, unlicensed open carry is legal (on foot, but not in a motor vehicle).
Aguila Blanca is online now  
Old November 13, 2011, 10:30 AM   #6
fzammetti
Member
 
Join Date: May 4, 2011
Posts: 19
Right, I know there's no permit for ownership or even open carry, just for concealed carry... which of course is really the goal here

Its funny, I knew as I typed the word "register" initially that I probably wasn't using the right term... I didn't think we have a registration requirement here... but, I was unsure because as ligonierbill said, my name is on the background check at the time of purchase and I was thinking that in a sense "registered" the gun to me... that's where my concern was... and I guess still is a little, but...

...it seems like what everyone is saying essentially is that the background check is meant to ensure the purchaser is ok to own the gun, but there's nothing that says they can't turn around and give the gun to someone that would themselves fail the background check, is that right? My wife could certainly pass with no problem of course, I'm just talking generally. And if that understanding is correct, although it would seem to be a big hole in the law to me, then I should be fine to buy it and give it to her to carry (once she has her CCW of course). That sound right?

Thanks guys,
Frank
fzammetti is offline  
Old November 13, 2011, 11:38 AM   #7
publius42
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 9, 2002
Posts: 1,936
You can't sell or give a firearm to a person known to you to be prohibited from owning firearms.

Quote:
(d) It shall be unlawful for any person to sell or otherwise dispose of any firearm or ammunition to any person knowing or having reasonable cause to believe that such person—
(1) is under indictment for, or has been convicted in any court of, a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year;
(2) is a fugitive from justice;
(3) is an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance (as defined in section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 802));
(4) has been adjudicated as a mental defective or has been committed to any mental institution;
(5) who, being an alien—

...
Blah, blah, blah. It goes on and on like that, and is very thorough, even excluding extraterrestrials, as you can see.
publius42 is offline  
Old November 13, 2011, 01:20 PM   #8
brickeyee
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 29, 2004
Posts: 3,351
As long as YOU USE YOUR money ad it is actually gift you should be GTG.

Check if their is any state requirement to transfer it to your wife.

The back of the 4473 is pretty clear.
brickeyee is offline  
Old November 13, 2011, 02:30 PM   #9
fzammetti
Member
 
Join Date: May 4, 2011
Posts: 19
Well, its done: my wife has a brand-spankin' new Ruger LC9 to play with As it turns out she just came to the gun show with me (the kids wanted MREs anyway!) so she just did the background check herself anyway. I talked to the dealer a bit though... two things... first, apparently there's a specific exception to any other regulations specifically for husband and wives, there's no issues there, I can buy and give to her regardless of anything else... kinda makes sense, I guess its considered shared property anyway, what's mine is hers and whatnot. Second, and I wasn't totally clear on this even after talking to bim, but it seems like the paperrwork at the time of purchase does, effectively, "register" the weapon to the purchaser. Sounded like he was describing a de facto registration law basically. This is for PA at least where I am. We have pretty good gun laws around here though so its possible I just wasn't understanding him correctly. Oh yeah, and it IS a big no-no to purchase for someone that couldn't themselves pass a background check... but that's not a surprise to anyone I hope
fzammetti is offline  
Old November 13, 2011, 03:47 PM   #10
publius42
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 9, 2002
Posts: 1,936
I'm not so sure about the "shared property" part. I have heard (convicted felon) G. Gordon Liddy talk about how he has no guns, but Mrs. Liddy has a nice collection. The clear implication was that those are his guns, but can't officially be his guns.
publius42 is offline  
Old November 13, 2011, 04:03 PM   #11
Webleymkv
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 20, 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 10,446
As far as I understand it, it is perfectly legal under federal law to purchase a gun with your own money and give it to another person as a gift so long as you have no reason to believe that the person recieving the gun would be prohibited from posessing it (age, felony conviction, etc.).

It is not, however, legal to purchase a gun for someone else with money given to you by the person who will be recieving the gun, that's called a "straw purchase" or "strawman purchase". According to federal law, the presence or absence of prohibiting circumstances makes no difference in a straw purchase, the only legal way to purchase a gun for someone else is as a gift. The intent of the strawman law is to prevent prohibited persons from getting guns through non-prohibited third parties although the actual letter of the law is a touch more restrictive. Realistically, the strawman law is notoriously difficult to enforce unless a prohibited person gets caught with a gun acquired through a strawman purchase. While techincally illegal, strawman purchases are still relatively common, particularly between parents and children, though we here at TFL neither advocate nor condone the practice as it is indeed a federal crime.

Likewise, even when a handgun is purchased as a gift, the person recieving the gun must be a resident of the same state in which the gun was purchased. If the person recieving the handgun is a resident of a different state, the only legal way for them to recieve it is to have the handgun shipped to an FFL in their home state at which point they will have to fill out the 4473 and undergo the background check in accordance with federal law and the laws of their home state.

The above is my understanding of federal law. As is always my disclaimer, I am not a lawyer, I do not play one on television, and I did not stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night. Anytime you are considering doing something but are unsure of the legalities involved, the best idea is to pose the question to a lawyer, district attorney, ore state attorney general before taking any other action. I am not at all familiar with PA state law nor any local ordinances in your jurisdiction so I'm afraid that I can offer no guidance in that particular area.
Webleymkv is offline  
Old November 13, 2011, 05:56 PM   #12
fzammetti
Member
 
Join Date: May 4, 2011
Posts: 19
Publius42, just to make sure I'm clear, that part about shared property was nothing but my guess as to how the law might view the situation. I wasn't told that by anyone, nor did I read it anywhere... but I did think it made some sense since as far as I'm aware, all property acquired while married is jointly owned... otherwise, why would divorces be so difficult? LOL. I can't see why guns would be any different.

Just wanted to say that so no one gets the idea I know what I'm talking about Its nothing but what seems to me to be a reasonable guess.
fzammetti is offline  
Old November 13, 2011, 07:37 PM   #13
publius42
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 9, 2002
Posts: 1,936
Seems reasonable to me, too. My wife always says that everything mine is hers, and I'm pretty sure the law is on her side on that one. I don't know the real answer either, just what Mr. Liddy said and seemed to be implying.

If your husband has a felony conviction, that can't mean you are a prohibited person, can it? Yet if you own a gun, that also means a felon owns the gun. Weird catch 22.
publius42 is offline  
Old November 14, 2011, 01:01 AM   #14
divil
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 11, 2009
Posts: 506
Quote:
Seems reasonable to me, too. My wife always says that everything mine is hers, and I'm pretty sure the law is on her side on that one. I don't know the real answer either, just what Mr. Liddy said and seemed to be implying.

If your husband has a felony conviction, that can't mean you are a prohibited person, can it? Yet if you own a gun, that also means a felon owns the gun. Weird catch 22.
Possession here is the real issue, not "ownership". If you live with a prohibited person, and you have firearms in your possession, you have to keep them inaccessible to that person. Otherwise, they have what's called "constructive possession" which is the same thing.

I only "know" this from internet anecdotes and previous threads on TFL...so take it with a grain of salt - but I have heard of prohibited people being in violation of the law because they traveled as a passenger in a car which contained a gun, and I have also heard of the ATF insisting that a husband or wife had to keep all guns under lock and key because the spouse was a felon! Crazy, but there you go.
divil is offline  
Old November 14, 2011, 01:01 AM   #15
hermannr
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 24, 2011
Posts: 730
Why is everyone making something so simple, difficult?

Yes, you can purchase a handgun as a gift for your wife federal law, and PA (and 90% of the other states) with no extra paperwork.

PA does not require a Nanny permission slip.
hermannr is offline  
Old November 14, 2011, 05:57 AM   #16
publius42
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 9, 2002
Posts: 1,936
Quote:
Possession here is the real issue, not "ownership". If you live with a prohibited person, and you have firearms in your possession, you have to keep them inaccessible to that person. Otherwise, they have what's called "constructive possession" which is the same thing.
With apologies for continuing to complicate a simple question, that would seem to raise another issue:

If I had a felony conviction, my wife would be required to keep her guns inaccessible to me. Suppose she did not do so. Proving the crime in court would seem to involve getting one spouse to testify against the other. Can't do that.
publius42 is offline  
Old November 14, 2011, 09:44 AM   #17
ChuckS
Member
 
Join Date: March 4, 2009
Location: Albion, PA
Posts: 93
Quote:
I'm a current CCW holder in Pennsylvania and my wife is in the process of getting hers. I'd like to go to a gun show tomorrow and surprise her with the carry gun she liked when we check them out today, but I'm unclear on whether I can purchase it and give it to her…..

But, I'm unclear whether its legal for me to purchase it, which would make it registered to me, and give it to her to carry. ….

Pennsylvania does not require “registration” of firearms. In fact registration is forbidden by PA statute. The PA State Police do maintain a database of sales though and “some” LEO’s treat it as a “registration.” Further, the PA Supreme Court has allowed this database because it is not registration as it does not include ALL firearm transfers. For instance, people from another state, having purchased their firearms elsewhere, that have moved to PA would not have their firearms in the database, nor should they have too.

As for your situation fzammetti; transfers not requiring a FFL are as follows:

Quote:
18 Pa.C.S. § 6111: Sale or transfer of firearms
(c) Duty of other persons.--Any person who is not a licensed importer, manufacturer or dealer and who desires to sell or transfer a firearm to another unlicensed person shall do so only upon the place of business of a licensed importer, manufacturer, dealer or county sheriff's office, the latter of whom shall follow the procedure set forth in this section as if he were the seller of the firearm. The provisions of this section shall not apply to transfers between spouses or to transfers between a parent and child or to transfers between grandparent and grandchild.
So transfers between spouses do not require a FFL.

Last edited by ChuckS; November 14, 2011 at 09:56 AM.
ChuckS is offline  
Old November 14, 2011, 09:50 AM   #18
divil
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 11, 2009
Posts: 506
Quote:
If I had a felony conviction, my wife would be required to keep her guns inaccessible to me. Suppose she did not do so. Proving the crime in court would seem to involve getting one spouse to testify against the other. Can't do that.
I'm afraid you're wrong on both counts! Proving the crime would be easy: apply for a warrant, search the house, establish that the felon had access to the firearm. No need for the people involved to even make a statement, let alone testify in court.

But anyway, why do people think that one spouse cannot testify against another? I find it incredible that people believe that!
divil is offline  
Old November 14, 2011, 10:28 AM   #19
mehavey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 17, 2010
Location: Virginia
Posts: 6,896
This is not rocket science....

It's your firearm
You let your wife--not a prohibited person--carry it.

It's still your firearm




.
mehavey is offline  
Old November 14, 2011, 11:37 AM   #20
brickeyee
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 29, 2004
Posts: 3,351
Quote:
why do people think that one spouse cannot testify against another?
The issue is FORCING a spouse to testify against the other.

It is not allowed in some cases.

They can WILLINGLY testify, but cannot be compelled to testify.
brickeyee is offline  
Old November 14, 2011, 01:45 PM   #21
Aguila Blanca
Staff
 
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,470
Quote:
Originally Posted by fzammetti
...it seems like what everyone is saying essentially is that the background check is meant to ensure the purchaser is ok to own the gun, but there's nothing that says they can't turn around and give the gun to someone that would themselves fail the background check, is that right?
No, that's wrong.

Irrespective of whether or not PA state law allows you to transfer a handgun within PA without going through an FFL, you may NOT ever transfer a firearm to a person whom you know or have reason to believe is not allowed to possess a firearm. (That would mean someone who would fail a background check.)
Aguila Blanca is online now  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.09751 seconds with 8 queries