The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Hunt

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old September 25, 2008, 02:30 PM   #26
UniversalFrost
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 20, 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,300
3.5 is only for long range geese and duck work with the proper choke (like a pattern master) or for when you really want a sore shoulder

also, like others have stated better to have one and not need it than to need it and not have it.

I got a smoking deal on my 835 with a pattern master choke and that is the reason I own a 3.5" 12ga. the choke is what makes this gun a super long range waterfowl gun, otherwise with a normal full or x-full choke it is just as good shooting 3" as it is with 3.5" .

at the least get a gun that can handle up to 3" since you never know when you will be in the boonies and run out of ammo and the local gas station might only have 3" (highly unlikely, but never know). If you own a 3.5" then you have no worries at all.


JOE
__________________
Lifetime member VFW and NRA

"Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati" (when all else fails play dead) -Red Green

UniversalFrost is offline  
Old September 25, 2008, 03:38 PM   #27
cat9x
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 17, 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 212
I did not state before that a 3.5" alone will not solve any problems. Chokes are far more important. Here are some examples of 3.5" performance with various chokes at 40 yards. I like the 3.5" and hunt with it often, but a 3" will do everything a 3.5" can do...it just throws a little less lead.





Factory Benelli Full


Carlson's Extended Full


Comp-N-Choke XXX Full
cat9x is offline  
Old September 25, 2008, 07:32 PM   #28
Webleymkv
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 20, 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 10,446
I don't typically think of myself as recoil sensitive, but the only 3.5" 12ga I ever shot (Mossberg 835) was downright painful. Personally, if I need more than a 3" 12ga has to offer, I'll go straight to my 10ga (it's reciol is much more manageable than the 835 was).
Webleymkv is offline  
Old September 25, 2008, 07:40 PM   #29
publius
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 25, 2005
Location: Mississippi/Texas
Posts: 2,505
the only thing I really want a 3.5 is for turkeys. I use them for waterfowl b/c my dad gives me a case for christmas each year. Never had any problems w/a regular 3" before I got the 3.5 two years ago though. I sure wouldn't pass a good deal on a 3" 870.
__________________
"Suppose you were an idiot, and suppose you were a member of Congress, but I repeat myself." Mark Twain
publius is offline  
Old September 26, 2008, 09:30 AM   #30
Bowhunter57
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 23, 2002
Location: N.W. Ohio
Posts: 301
A 3" 12 gauge will cover most game hunting. However, with steel shot I use a 3 1/2" 12 gauge for waterfowl.

Mossberg 835s are stocked differently than most shotguns and therefore the increased felt recoil. I owned one, sold it and purchased a Russian Baikal MP-153 with a 24" barrel (now called the Remington/Spartan 453). The MP-153 is a gas operated and gas a relieved semi-auto and that makes it much easier to handle full house loads of 3 1/2" ammo.

Using Kent 3 1/2" Fast Steel with BBBs at 1550 f.p.s. and an extended Terror choke tube in .675" restriction, I can get a 91% pattern inside a 30" circle at 40 yards. I've dropped geese at 55+ yards and when I pick them up there's holes in their back where the pellets had passed through.

For all other hunting with a shotgun I use a Mossberg 500 Turkey Special (20" barrel) and choke it according to what I intend to hunt. Outstanding patterns with the factory turkey choke of .650" restriction.

Good hunting, Bowhunter57
__________________
If God didn't want us to eat animals, he wouldn't have made them out of meat.
Bowhunter57 is offline  
Old September 26, 2008, 09:38 AM   #31
ISC
Junior member
 
Join Date: August 5, 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,982
the 3 1/2 doesn't recoil that much if you know how to hold it right.

Just hold it an inch or two away from your shoulder when you shoot it so that the recoil is absorbed by the time it touches your shoulder.

Let me know how that works out for you.
ISC is offline  
Old September 26, 2008, 11:27 AM   #32
cat9x
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 17, 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 212
Quote:
the 3 1/2 doesn't recoil that much if you know how to hold it right.

Just hold it an inch or two away from your shoulder when you shoot it so that the recoil is absorbed by the time it touches your shoulder.
I'll consider that a joke. If you can't shoot a shotgun/rifle from your shoulder you dont need to be shooting it at all.
cat9x is offline  
Old September 26, 2008, 12:06 PM   #33
ISC
Junior member
 
Join Date: August 5, 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,982
yes it's a joke. If anyone tries it they'll get a nice bruise for their effort.
ISC is offline  
Old September 26, 2008, 12:18 PM   #34
cat9x
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 17, 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 212
haha oh man, i get a bruise everytime I shoot the thing from the shoulder!
cat9x is offline  
Old September 28, 2008, 12:18 PM   #35
UniversalFrost
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 20, 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,300
my 835 waterfowl model does not recoil that much. by the way the averager 835 wears the same wood as a 500, the waterfowl and deluxe 835's have better wood and some have different ergonomics (stock design). My waterfowl 835 came with high grade walnut and the buttstock which is factory mossberg has a slightly "european" styling that differes greatly from the average stocks.

I added a knoxx comp stock set for use when I am turkey hunting with full power 3.5" and I am resting against a tree and have to make a shot. the comp stock reduce recoil that is felt down to about what a 20ga with light trap loads feels like.

JOE
__________________
Lifetime member VFW and NRA

"Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati" (when all else fails play dead) -Red Green

UniversalFrost is offline  
Old September 28, 2008, 08:05 PM   #36
RevDerb
Member
 
Join Date: July 25, 2008
Location: Northern Michigan
Posts: 46
Please, NO! I just got my shotgun re-bored from 2-1/2". Too much education for an old man.
__________________
"... and if you don't have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one." (Luke 22:36b)
Ruger GP100 .357 , Ruger SR9, Ruger SR40c, Ruger LC9, Ruger LCP, S&W 22a, Marlins, Henry .22 and a shotty.
NRA, USN, Viet Nam Era Vet
RevDerb is offline  
Old October 4, 2008, 09:10 PM   #37
sc928porsche
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 29, 2008
Location: now living in alabama
Posts: 2,433
I suppose 3 1/2" 12GA. has a purpose. I am not quite sure what. For Geese, I use 3 1/2" 10 GA. For Ducks and Pheasant I have a 3" 12 GA. and for quail and dove I use a 2 3/4" 16 Ga. To be truthful, the 16 GA would work on all of them. Shooting a Turkey that is pretty much standing at 35 yds with a shotgun seems a bit much to me, but what do I know. I like to use a 22-250 on them.
sc928porsche is offline  
Old October 4, 2008, 09:54 PM   #38
Swampghost
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 18, 2008
Location: Florida, east coast
Posts: 2,106
2-3/4" worked well for generations of my family and I see no reason to change up. I shoot SbS's (personal preference) and have a .410, a couple of 16's and 12's plus a 10. My 16 Fox gets the heaviest workout followed by my 12 Stevens. Don't get on my Stevens, it was my first shotgun and has put in 46 yrs. of triumphant service.
__________________
NRA Patron Member
Swampghost is offline  
Old October 5, 2008, 05:22 AM   #39
rem870hunter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 12, 2007
Location: N.J. and trying to decide what state to move to.
Posts: 973
needed, probably not. wanted would be better. especially if(from the sounds of it) you don't like your shoulder. i've fired enough 3" buckshot to know that the 3" shells hurt me enough. the 3.5" would really be a kicker.

i've thought about getting a 3.5" chambered shotgun. but i don't do enough goose or turkey hunting to need one. the few extra pellets above the 3" in the 3.5" buckshot loads aren't enough to make me get one for deer use. 3" #1 buck with 24 pellets and 3" 00 buck with 15 pellets are enough for me. i haven't seen any 3.5" #1 buck shells. or 3.5" slugs much less a 3.5" chamber slug barrel. if i was going to need a 3" or 3.5" slug gun. i would use my marlin in .35 rem or a 30-06 (mauser rifle).
__________________
BEAR Bows,Remington shotguns,Marlin rifles
rem870hunter is offline  
Old October 5, 2008, 02:45 PM   #40
elrod
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 19, 2007
Location: Heart of the heart of Dixie
Posts: 234
Ran across a new 835 "Ulti-Mag" at a gun show for $225 OTD. I'd not been looking for a 3 1/2 gun, but for that price, why not? You don't have to shoot the long shells, anyway. I do some deer hunting with dogs, and use that gun. Killed one 4-point last year with it and 3 1/2" 00 buck. Does a good job with 3" and 2 3/4", as well. To each his own, I suppose.
__________________
Freedom ain't free!
elrod is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.05494 seconds with 10 queries