|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 19, 2013, 08:43 AM | #1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: November 4, 2008
Location: Reedsville, WV
Posts: 13
|
Identify rifles from old photos
I have several photographs from around 1901 with rifles in them. I would like to be able to identify the rifles for a book I'm doing. Any help would be appreciated.
|
November 19, 2013, 09:05 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 18,541
|
That is a better picture than the usual old album.
Clearly an 1873 Winchester rifle (as in not a carbine.) It has an octagonal barrel which was an extra cost option ($.95) but was so popular that there are probably more octagon than round except for carbines. The magazine tube looks small, I think it is a .32-20. Price, $12.50 in 1901. But this one has a lot of finish wear and was not a new rifle in 1901. |
November 19, 2013, 10:16 AM | #3 |
Junior Member
Join Date: November 4, 2008
Location: Reedsville, WV
Posts: 13
|
Thanks a lot! More photos to come!
|
November 19, 2013, 10:27 AM | #4 |
Junior Member
Join Date: November 4, 2008
Location: Reedsville, WV
Posts: 13
|
Here is another
|
November 19, 2013, 10:28 AM | #5 |
Junior Member
Join Date: November 4, 2008
Location: Reedsville, WV
Posts: 13
|
One more
|
November 19, 2013, 10:56 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 18,541
|
Post 4. I THINK the shotgun on the left is a Parker, but not certain. Not shown in my 1901 Sears catalog, but competitive L.C. Smith and Ithaca shotguns were $26 and up. Way up if you wanted to squander a hundred bucks on a shotgun.
The rifle in the middle is a Marlin, probably an 1893, caliber .30-30 or similar. Price $13.25 which is actually more than the '94 Winchester at the time. The rifle on the right is another Winchester 1873. Note that the guy with it has a revolver on his belt. If I cross my eyes and squint, I can imagine it is a large frame Smith & Wesson topbreak. He is wearing a belt full of shotgun shells. Wonder why. Post 5. I think the rifle is an 1886. An 1892 is similar but smaller. I believe it has a pistol grip Caliber .45-70 or any of a number of calibers of somewhat similar size and power. Price was $14.97 for the straight grip, I don't know if the pistol grip was an extra cost option. The revolver is a nickel plated top break, maybe Smith & Wesson but there were a number of lesser brands of similar appearance, Iver Johnson and Harrington & Richardson the best known. |
November 19, 2013, 12:26 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 30, 2009
Location: Northern AZ
Posts: 7,172
|
Just a theory, but the Marlin in post 4 looks more likely to be a .32-20, based on the size of the mag tube.
|
November 19, 2013, 02:05 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 18,541
|
Maybe so, but I thought the receiver looked longer than an 1894.
Marlin Safety for sure, though. |
November 19, 2013, 03:01 PM | #9 |
Junior Member
Join Date: November 4, 2008
Location: Reedsville, WV
Posts: 13
|
Am I seeing things or does the Marlin appear to have a Vernier sight?
|
November 19, 2013, 03:51 PM | #10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 5, 2012
Location: Memphis
Posts: 468
|
Quote:
|
|
November 19, 2013, 08:14 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 8, 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 16,189
|
I believe the rifle in post #1 is a short rifle. The Marlin on post #4 does indeed have a small mag tube and if you look at the contour of the barrel lug on the revolver in post #5 it does appear to be a S&W.
|
|
|