The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old May 9, 2013, 10:45 PM   #26
Fire_Moose
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 16, 2013
Posts: 211
Re: Priority of Rifle Reloading Factors

I do .308 with the Lee 3 piece set. I replaced the FL sizer with an RCSB.

I have had no noticeable runout on the 200 rounds I have done. I don't have a gauge to check, but rolling them on the flat benchtop they look nice and straight.
Fire_Moose is offline  
Old May 9, 2013, 10:49 PM   #27
BumbleBug
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 11, 2013
Location: Near Heart of Texas
Posts: 870
Maybe instead of worrying about spending money on "premium dies" consider getting a dial & fixture that measures run out. Cartridge necks are never to short, too long, too dainty, too stout or whatever to hold a bullet straight. All I'll say to that is if you are handling loaded rounds so roughly that they get "crooked" you are wayyyyyyy too rough. Use cheap dies (Lee) if you prefer & use the gauge to sort them. As a matter of fact, some shooters mark their ammo as to the "high-side" with a marker & make sure the mark goes into the chamber at 12 o'clock every time for target shooting. Sometimes, the difference between what you can do with $20 dies vs $200 dies is not significant. The gauge tells all.

FWIW...

...bug
BumbleBug is offline  
Old May 9, 2013, 11:14 PM   #28
FLChinook
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 9, 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 378
Quote:
if you are handling loaded rounds so roughly that they get "crooked" you are wayyyyyyy too rough.
Actually, my rounds reside in plastic boxes and are treated with the greatest of care (those that are destined for the target range, that is ). I'm just wondering if premium dies would produce a more concentric product and which of these two cartridges might benefit the most from them...
FLChinook is offline  
Old May 10, 2013, 06:55 AM   #29
Bart B.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 15, 2009
Posts: 8,927
If good lots of Federal's Gold Medal Match ammo in .308 Win. can shoot near 1/2 MOA at 600 yards (under 1/3 MOA at 100 yards) from a well built match rifle with the following details about the load:

* Metered powder charges with a 3/10ths grain spread in weight.

* Bullet runout up to .003".

* Cases unprepped in any way, not weight sorted, brand new virgin brass.

...then isn't all that detailed case prep and sorting, powder charge weighing to a kernel, absolutely zero bullet runout and even sorting bullets by some means. . .a waste of time?

The best lots of arsenal match ammo will shoot under 6 inches at 600 yards and 1/3 inch at 100 yards from semiauto service rifles rebuilt right. That ammo ain't nearly as accurate as Federal's match ammo.

Sierra Bullets doesn't do any case prep on the ones used to test their bullets for accuracy. They use Redding full length standard or bushing sizing dies on all bottleneck cases, do no load workup at all when changing test barrels nor powder or primer lots, meter, not weigh, powder charges. Such methods shoots their best match bullets into 1/4 MOA groups at 200 yards.

My first choice of anything is to full length size fired cases properly setting shoulders back 1 to 2 thousandths.

Second is to have the bullet diameter at least .0005" larger than the barrel's groove diameter.

Third is to only use stick powder of the right burn rate; no ball powder's produced consistant best accuracy in any cartridge.

All the others are way, way down the list, if they're on it to start with.

How one tests their loads for accuracy is another thing completely.

Last edited by Bart B.; May 10, 2013 at 12:02 PM.
Bart B. is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.04520 seconds with 10 queries