November 8, 2010, 03:43 PM | #26 |
Staff in Memoriam
Join Date: November 13, 1998
Location: Terlingua, TX; Thomasville, GA
Posts: 24,798
|
therealdeal, if you can legally shoot at all on your own property, I doubt that a deer's location on that property matter at all. I know of more than one deer that's been shot from a farmer's/rancher's window.
SFAIK, the only controls for you would be license, season and legal hours for taking game. |
November 8, 2010, 04:46 PM | #27 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 11, 2009
Location: Hansen Idaho
Posts: 1,465
|
I have taken deer and other critters on private land like that, its all up to you and your state hunting regulations.
__________________
* (Swinging club) Whack! whack! whack! * Nope, the old nag's still dead . (Capt Charlie) |
November 8, 2010, 05:30 PM | #28 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 27, 2005
Location: Crescent Iowa
Posts: 2,971
|
Quote:
On I 80 I see lots of trucks and such have dead elk and so on in the back. |
|
November 9, 2010, 12:22 AM | #29 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 15, 2010
Posts: 627
|
ok thanx guyz. that should definately work then. I do need to check the laws to be sure of everything since I don't even know if its legal to fire weapons on the property. we do it, everybody else does it near here, so we think its ok- just never officially checked. sounds bad but it really isn't that much of an issue here but Definately needs to be checked out more thoroughly for the future. I did read the virginia laws a while back and after skimming a long while I am pretty confident the private property shooting isn't an issue legally
__________________
NRA Distinguished Life Member "Abraham Lincoln freed all men, but Sam Colt made them all equal." (post Civil War slogan) |
November 9, 2010, 08:45 AM | #30 |
Staff in Memoriam
Join Date: November 13, 1998
Location: Terlingua, TX; Thomasville, GA
Posts: 24,798
|
Shooting is rarely restricted outside of city limits, unless a state has enabled some regulation of small tracts. Such regulation is commonly for tracts of ten acres or less.
|
November 9, 2010, 09:53 AM | #31 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 19, 2007
Location: Montmorency Co, MI
Posts: 1,551
|
As noted there are way more deer than in the 40s...all because of hunters.
A bambi lover never helped any deer and there money goes??I suppose it stays in their pocket. There used to be Fund for Animals, Cleveland Amory etc.. Where have they all gone? Most donations to thjose groups went for a Lincoln for the 'director' and those kinds of things. |
November 9, 2010, 04:51 PM | #32 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 27, 2005
Location: Crescent Iowa
Posts: 2,971
|
Quote:
|
|
November 9, 2010, 06:26 PM | #33 |
Staff in Memoriam
Join Date: November 13, 1998
Location: Terlingua, TX; Thomasville, GA
Posts: 24,798
|
markj, that was a Cleveland Amory deal. The wildlife folks got pushed into netting and transporting via helicopter. What didn't make the newspapers much and certainly was not repeated by Amory was that the cost was $1,500 per deer, and the mortality rate from injury and stress was around 80%.
I still say that the worst enemies of rational wildlife management were Felix Salter (author of "Bambi") and Walt Disney/Marlin Perkins with the Disney shtick and "Wild Kingdom". |
November 9, 2010, 06:58 PM | #34 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 19, 2007
Posts: 2,663
|
...aw c'mon. I LIKED watching Jim wrestle the alligator.
|
November 9, 2010, 07:45 PM | #35 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 17, 2007
Location: SOUTHEAST, OHIO
Posts: 5,970
|
Quote:
|
|
November 11, 2010, 04:11 PM | #36 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 27, 2005
Location: Crescent Iowa
Posts: 2,971
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|