The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > Handloading, Reloading, and Bullet Casting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old June 28, 2012, 11:34 AM   #1
chris in va
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 26, 2004
Location: Louisville KY
Posts: 13,806
.357 fmj in 9mm?

My LGS only has 100ct bags of 357 125gr. Can they safely be used in a 9mm?

I use 358 LRN but I know those are much softer. My bore slugs at 356.
chris in va is offline  
Old June 28, 2012, 11:56 AM   #2
vladan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 14, 2010
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 813
Just few minutes ago yet another post had me pull out my original experiment with .357 bullets in .357sig ( which is really 9mm - .355 diameter bullets)

http://thefiringline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=405689

I do not know how tapered case in 9mm would take the .357 bullets or how tight is your chamber, but I don't thing it would be problem. As always, start with minimum powder charge and work the load up.
vladan is offline  
Old June 28, 2012, 12:09 PM   #3
chris in va
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 26, 2004
Location: Louisville KY
Posts: 13,806
I'll just be using these for our matches every two weeks. My plinkers are still homebrew lead 125's.
chris in va is offline  
Old June 28, 2012, 12:27 PM   #4
moxie
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 17, 2006
Location: TX
Posts: 513
No. You might get away with it if they were cast but not with FMJ. FMJ are typically .001" smaller than bore dia. In your case, which is standard, jacketed should be .355 and cast/swaged .356. So in essence those .357 bullets are .002 too fat.
__________________
If you want to shoot...shoot...don't talk! Tuco

USAF Munitions 1969-1992
RVN 1972-1973
moxie is offline  
Old June 28, 2012, 12:45 PM   #5
marklyftogt
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 11, 2012
Location: Salinas, CA
Posts: 138
Don't do it unless you want to buy a new gun and/or new hands.
marklyftogt is offline  
Old June 28, 2012, 12:50 PM   #6
Brian Pfleuger
Moderator Emeritus
 
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
It's unlikely to cause any harm if approached correctly. It has been done before (as shown on the above link).

On the other hand, it is obviously far outside standard practice and as such cannot be recommended. It is, at the very least, a practice which should be left to those with considerable experience.
Brian Pfleuger is offline  
Old June 28, 2012, 05:35 PM   #7
Clark
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 4, 1999
Location: WA, the ever blue state
Posts: 4,678
I have shot a lot of 158 gr .358" bullets in 9mm.

They are so square on the front, that I have to throat the barrels to get the cartridges to drop in the chamber at 1.169" over all cartridge length.

So it depends on the shape of the bullet.
__________________
The word 'forum" does not mean "not criticizing books."
"Ad hominem fallacy" is not the same as point by point criticism of books. If you bought the book, and believe it all, it may FEEL like an ad hominem attack, but you might strive to accept other points of view may exist.
Are we a nation of competing ideas, or a nation of forced conformity of thought?
Clark is offline  
Old June 29, 2012, 07:45 AM   #8
Adamantium
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 6, 1999
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 1,021
I've shot hundreds of .357 jacketed bullets through my 9mm guns, all the way up to max published load with multiple powders and never once saw a sign of over pressure. It is my opinion that the biggest problem you face is the possibility that they aren't going to feed correctly. I've used 110/125 Remington SJHP and 125 Hornady XTP's and only had feeding problems with one gun out of three. Of course I don't blame the gun or the bullet, it's just not a one size fits all kind of thing.

If there is any laboratory pressure testing available comparing .355 bullets to .357 when shot in a 9mm barrel I'd love to see it. It seems like most (possibly all) people I've seen recommend against it are doing it out of their own unwillingness to experiment and not some documented safety problem. Years before I started reloading 45acp I bought a Ruger P90 with a barrel I would later slug at .450. So to me saying that you shouldn't shoot a .357 bullet down a .356 barrel is saying everyone should slug their bore to ensure that factory ammunition is safe to shoot in their gun.
__________________
New gun, same ol' shot.
Adamantium is offline  
Old June 29, 2012, 08:11 AM   #9
Jim Watson
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 25, 2001
Location: Alabama
Posts: 18,539
C.E. Harris did an American Rifleman article years ago about .38 bullets in 9mm guns. There were no problems in numerous loads. (It was not as simple to get 9mm bullets to run in .38 revolvers.)

The only real requirement is that the loaded rounds chamber freely to avoid what Clark calls "bullet pinch." If the case neck can't expand to release the bullet, that will raise pressure much more than a slightly oversize bullet will.
And it may not even be oversize, there are a lot of 9mm barrels with groove diameters over .355", up to .359" in some cases. Which is why it can be difficult to get .356" cast bullets to shoot well.
Jim Watson is offline  
Old June 29, 2012, 11:22 AM   #10
mikld
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 7, 2009
Location: Southern Oregon!
Posts: 2,891
In my opinion, a jacketed bullet .002" larger in diameter than the groove diameter will have no effect (or very little) on pressure.
__________________
My Anchor is holding fast!
I've learned how to stand on my own two knees...
mikld is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.05638 seconds with 8 queries