|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 10, 2010, 08:36 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: January 2, 2010
Location: Louisville, Ky
Posts: 84
|
Fiance's Dad facing Felony Hunting Charge
This takes place in Inidana.
Okay so here is the scoop: My fiancé's dad was out hunting. He had tags for himself. He had seen a big deer earlier in the week. While out hunting, he spotted a smaller deer then the describe "Hulk Deer". He killed said smaller deer around 6am. Well, genius decided not to use a tag for the smaller deer he killed. He was "Saving the tag for the big deer he had seen and expected to see again". He has his wife go buy a deer tag at noon. He marks the kill down at 6am, which is obviously 6 hours PRIOR to the tag being bought. The game warden (who knows him on a friendly basis, being its a small town) shows up at his house and gets him to admit it was him. He expects a fine and a possible misdemeanor count. Today he went to court for what turned out to be a preliminary hearing. They told him they are going to go for a $1000 dollar fine and maybe even up 180 days in jail. They said it's a felony court case. My question is, what are they trying him as? Are they trying to nail him for poaching? I'm not excusing his actions because he was and idiot for doing it. but it's a little over the top to go for this kind of sentence for this in a town that my Desert Eagles range exceeds the city limits length lol. Anyone have any statutes/advice/answers regarding this? The lawyer they are getting is a complete putz and couldn't find a law to save his life. Any help would be great. Also I just felt like sharing this story because I find it pretty funny he got nabbed for doing this. Apparently, it's common in their town (I don't live there so I don't know). But either way if he's a felon I'll gladly buy/take his Dragoon and lever action 30-30 from him lol. Might as well keep the guns in the family, right?
__________________
Why do reloading books say "No Smoking"? Does someone actually think that's a safe practice? |
March 10, 2010, 08:46 PM | #2 |
Staff In Memoriam
Join Date: October 31, 2007
Location: Western Florida panhandle
Posts: 11,069
|
RE-write time... Poaching is the charge. or something very similar!
The guy goofed... What do you mean "marks kill down at 6am"? There are a slough of unwritten rules one must follow to break one written rule! Don't shoot the little buck if you plan to shoot the big bruiser! Let us know how this plays out... BTW, yer deagle isn't a fair indicator of city limits measure... Here we have towns with a post office that I could shoot from outskirts to outskirts with my pellet rifle and I won't even have to range compensate by raising the barrel... (under 40 yards) no more lenient than the "cities"... Brent |
March 10, 2010, 08:47 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 11, 2009
Location: Hansen Idaho
Posts: 1,465
|
Did not know Poaching deer was a felony.
__________________
* (Swinging club) Whack! whack! whack! * Nope, the old nag's still dead . (Capt Charlie) |
March 10, 2010, 08:53 PM | #4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 15, 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 3,746
|
Quote:
If he went to all the trouble to buy another tag, why didn't he write in 2 p.m. or 6 p.m.? I know hindsight is 20/20, but come on, put a little thought into what you are doing Pops.
__________________
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms."- Thomas Jefferson ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ (>_<) |
|
March 10, 2010, 08:57 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 20, 2007
Location: S.E. Minnesota
Posts: 4,720
|
I'm not a hunter. So maybe you can 'splain to me why he didn't put Baby Deer on the original tag and send Wife to buy a 2nd tag? Even after the fact, wouldn't he be OK if he marked the right tags? (and didn't shoot Daddy Deer until after the new tag was purchased)
If he'd kept his mouth shut, he might could have claimed he marked the wrong tag by accident -- of course that doesn't explain the 4 or 5 hour delay. (maybe he tracked it for 5 hours...) 180 days in jail doesn't sound like a felony to me. A year-and-a-day sounds like a felony.
__________________
"Everything they do is so dramatic and flamboyant. It just makes me want to set myself on fire!" —Lucille Bluth |
March 10, 2010, 08:58 PM | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 12, 2006
Location: NKY
Posts: 12,463
|
Poaching is a felony? I'm not sure about that one either. I've got no problem with him being charged to the full extent of the law, but I'm not buying that poaching is a felony.
A little quick google revealed this about two men who killed a Boone and Crocket class deer the day before gun season started in Kentucky and tagged it as if it were killed on opening day. Quote:
If the OP's soon to be father in law is being charged with a felony, there is more to the story.
__________________
"He who laughs last, laughs dead." Homer Simpson Last edited by Kreyzhorse; March 10, 2010 at 09:06 PM. |
|
March 10, 2010, 09:41 PM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: January 2, 2010
Location: Louisville, Ky
Posts: 84
|
Felony is what I was told. I dunno. Could be more to it haven't heard or he goofed again and told me charge wrong.
__________________
Why do reloading books say "No Smoking"? Does someone actually think that's a safe practice? |
March 10, 2010, 09:52 PM | #8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 12, 2006
Posts: 1,512
|
Quote:
|
|
March 10, 2010, 09:52 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 22, 2000
Location: Brandon FL USA
Posts: 527
|
Federal land perhaps?
__________________
Just face shoot the criminal was the advice I was given. Old tech new tech, face shooting will nearly always take the wrong doing out of a bad guy. |
March 10, 2010, 09:57 PM | #10 |
Member
Join Date: March 7, 2010
Location: Beeville Tx
Posts: 41
|
Hell, he screwed himself....***? Sorry, but one would think he would have more sense. Greed will get cha everytime
|
March 10, 2010, 11:00 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 23, 2006
Location: Indiana
Posts: 514
|
Classes of Offences and Penalties
Category Fixed term of Imprisonment Maximum Fine Murder 55 years 10,000 Class A Felony 30 years 10,000 Class B Felony 10 years 10,000 Class C Felony 4 years 10,000 Class D Felony 1 1/2 years 10,000 Class A Misdemeanor up to 1 year 5,000 Class B Misdemeanor up to 180 days 1,000 Class C Misdemeanor up to 60 days 500 This info is from the Indiana Criminal and Traffic Law Manual. It looks like he is charged with a Class B Misdemeanor, not a felony.
__________________
Il keep my freedom, my guns, and my money. You can keep the change. |
March 10, 2010, 11:26 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 10, 2002
Posts: 2,108
|
With city and state governments strapped for cash, he's viewed as a fresh revenue source.
For his actions he deserves to get financially dinged.....dumb & dumber. |
March 11, 2010, 01:48 AM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 13, 2006
Posts: 8,276
|
As he is caught,if he had a good atitude,and no priors,it may be possible to talk to the DA and arresting officer about a plea.
A deferred prosecution would be sweet,but that might be a path. I think in Colorado things get real serious.You are particularly in trouble if you poach a trophy class animal here.See Samson's Law.I'm not sure of jail time,but fine is 10,000 |
March 11, 2010, 02:02 AM | #14 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,403
|
He needs a lawyer.
He can probably plea down the charges. (Unless he already screwed himself in the hearing, somehow.) No matter what happens, he needs to understand he'll lose his hunting privileges for several years. (Up to ten, I believe.) I don't advocate this type of behavior, but... Again... he needs a lawyer. As for Brent's comment: Quote:
__________________
Don't even try it. It's even worse than the internet would lead you to believe. |
|
March 11, 2010, 07:43 AM | #15 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 21, 2009
Location: West Central Missouri
Posts: 2,592
|
Quote:
According to the OP the man admitted he was in the wrong. I get upset when people imply the only reason a certain law was enforced is because "We need the money." There is never any mention of the fact that the individual actually broke a law to begin with. Maybe if a few more game laws were enforced, we would see better results when we go hunting. If you were not implying that, then I apologize.
__________________
Inside Every Bright Idea Is The 50% Probability Of A Disaster Waiting To Happen. |
|
March 11, 2010, 08:50 AM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 20, 2009
Location: Lowcountry
Posts: 373
|
Times like these call for lawyers.
__________________
I say take off the warning labels and let them sort themselves out. |
March 11, 2010, 08:56 AM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 10, 2002
Posts: 2,108
|
Much enforcement is left to the discretion and judgment of the officer, that's why they issue warnings-vs-fines. LEO's and Game Officers I've known tell me from time to time they are instructed to write fines to improve the public appearance that they are doing their job. As a tax payer I have no problem with that and support it. What good is a law if there's no teeth in it? Seeing that the offender and officer knew each other informally, not sure we can rule out the possibility.
|
March 11, 2010, 09:05 AM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 24, 2007
Location: Rochester, MN
Posts: 347
|
Good! Poaching is poaching! It wrecks it for people like my daughter and I who hunt by the rules! Hope they throw the book at him!
|
March 11, 2010, 10:17 AM | #19 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 20, 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,084
|
Nydhog205,
You posted, Quote:
That kind illegal activity is rampant all over. One way MN has tried to stop this is any license purchased after the opening hours of the season is not valid until 24 hours later. In many areas there are bonus or intensive harvest tags that can be purchased at 1/2 price so if one is meat hungry and still wants to hold out for a wall hanger it can be done legally. Here is a link to one such incident in MN this past deer season. I do not see this charge in the court records yet so do not know what the actual charge is.
__________________
Gbro CGVS For the message of the Cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, But to us who are being saved, It Is The Power Of God. 1Corinthians 1-18 |
|
March 11, 2010, 04:52 PM | #20 |
Member
Join Date: January 2, 2010
Location: Louisville, Ky
Posts: 84
|
He never saw the Hulk Deer again actually.
__________________
Why do reloading books say "No Smoking"? Does someone actually think that's a safe practice? |
March 11, 2010, 05:00 PM | #21 |
Member
Join Date: January 3, 2010
Location: Carbondale
Posts: 60
|
First off, I'm sad your father in law got himself into this situation. I am a retired Illinois Conservation Police officer and have seen violations like this many times in my career. I am also an avid deer hunter and choose to hunt within the law. I doubt that the charges in Indiana are at the felony level but they could be. If your father in law is charged with a felony he should get a good lawyer. Felony charges will have a long term effect on his life.
As a sportsman I feel that by killing a deer outside the law, he has STOLEN that animal from the rest of us hunters that choose to obey the law. A quality hunt for a large buck may be valued at $5000 to $10,000. If a thief stole something valued at $5000 to $10,000 from your father in law I'm sure he would want the thief prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. Just an opinion from an old game warden. Dave |
March 11, 2010, 05:07 PM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 22, 2007
Location: Tombstone Az
Posts: 202
|
I am pretty sure you can add falsifying legal documents to the charge.
|
March 11, 2010, 05:49 PM | #23 |
Member
Join Date: January 2, 2010
Location: Louisville, Ky
Posts: 84
|
That is true. Technically it is falsifying legal documents. And I agree with you Dave. Believe me, I hate seeing it happen but I wanna see the law actually followed small town or not.
__________________
Why do reloading books say "No Smoking"? Does someone actually think that's a safe practice? |
March 11, 2010, 06:17 PM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 11, 2008
Posts: 2,350
|
From a legal standpoint, and based on the OP's description of what happened...
he didn't technically "poach" the deer. When he shot the deer, he had a legal tag in his pocket and the season was open. What he did was: 1. Fail to tag it immediately after the kill. 2. Bought and used a tag under fraudulent circumstances, since it was his wife's tag, and he himself killed the deer, and had killed it before his wife bought the tag. So he's likely charged with fraudulent use of a tag (or whatever that state calls it). I don't know if it's a felony or not, but it may fall along the lines of "perjury" or some such where his wife signed the tag, and he'd already filled it. And if he's not careful, he may bring his wife into it with some sort of conspiracy charge. He needs a good lawyer. Daryl Edited to add: Sorry, should have read the entire thread before posing. Looks like someone else already posted the same thoughts I had. |
March 11, 2010, 06:20 PM | #25 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 8, 2010
Posts: 169
|
I do not think it's a felony. I think they may be trying to make a felony. I heard PA is trying to make poaching a felony.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|