|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
May 5, 2016, 09:16 PM | #26 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 8, 2016
Location: SE Louisiana
Posts: 300
|
Hi, Sequins -
Thanks for the compliments on the Redhawk and Security Six. Very much appreciated. You could very well be spot on relative to your comments on the weight of the additional being metal milled out from 357 to 44. I was basically just guessing. I'll come across a decent scale that measures ounces and then get an accurate weight of this bird. Just can't wait to get her to the range, spread her wings, and let her fly! Thanks again! Bayou
__________________
Bayou NRA Life Member "Keep Calm and Reload" |
May 6, 2016, 07:18 AM | #27 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 21, 2011
Location: Southern Louisiana
Posts: 1,399
|
I ran across a .357 Redhawk a few years ago, couldn't pass it up. Makes hot .357 loads feel like .38 Specials.
Quote:
Figuring a bore diameter of .431" on the .44, the volume of the .44 bore that's 7.5 inches long works out to 1.09 cubic inches. Same calcs on a .357 bore give a bore volume of .75 cubic inches. Subtract the volume of the .357 bore from the volume of the .44 bore, 1.09 - .75 = .34, means that the .357 has an extra .34 cubic inches of steel in the barrel. Density of stainless is about .286 pounds/cubic inch, means that the .357 barrel weighs .286 x .34 = .10 pounds = 1.6 ounces more in the barrel. Cylinder weight difference should be slightly more, we'll leave that as an exercise for the student! |
|
May 6, 2016, 01:59 PM | #28 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 8, 2016
Location: SE Louisiana
Posts: 300
|
Thanks, 45 -
Nice calculation you made there. Glad to hear those full-house magnums feel rather small out of the Redkawk. Do you have the 5.5" or the 7.5" tube? Just out of curiosity, what muzzle velocity do you tend to reload to? I will stick to middle of the road stuff for target shooting. Bayou
__________________
Bayou NRA Life Member "Keep Calm and Reload" |
May 6, 2016, 04:15 PM | #29 |
Junior member
Join Date: October 20, 2012
Posts: 5,854
|
Unique and interesting, but even a GP100 is a bit overbuilt for the caliber. There was nothing wrong with the Six series guns in fact, at least for 99.99% of shooters.
The Redhawk in .357? It's just kind of silly. If I'm going to have to lug around all that steel, I'd make it a .44 magnum, especially since it's six shots either way. Now if Ruger came out with an 8 shot .357 Redhawk... |
May 6, 2016, 04:29 PM | #30 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 8, 2016
Location: SE Louisiana
Posts: 300
|
Hi, Model12Win -
It's beef on the 357 RH that is the center of my attraction to it. A tank? Yes! Overbuilt? Yes! Heavy? Yes! I love it! Thanks! Bayou
__________________
Bayou NRA Life Member "Keep Calm and Reload" |
May 17, 2016, 07:54 PM | #31 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 8, 2016
Location: SE Louisiana
Posts: 300
|
Hi, Gang -
Brought the 357 Redhawk to the range over the weekend. This thing makes full house magnums feel tame! Just a pleasure to shoot. I tuned the sights and got that bird flying straight! I was shooting at 25 yards to begin with, but then ran out of 357 mag ammo before I could put the target at 50 yards. Well, for the next range trip, I'm going to cook up some nice loads using FMJ 158 grain projectiles. They'll be warm loads but within the specs listed in the Hornady manual for Win 296 powder. After warming the bird up on the pistol range, I've decided to bring it over to the rifle side of the range for 75 and 100 yard shots just for the hey of it! I've never shot paper with a pistol at those ranges before, but I think I've got the tool to do just that! What a great bird, indeed! Pure recreational fun all the way............Couldn't be happier............. Bayou
__________________
Bayou NRA Life Member "Keep Calm and Reload" |
May 18, 2016, 09:10 PM | #32 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 21, 2011
Location: Southern Louisiana
Posts: 1,399
|
Sorry Bayou, just noticed your questions to me a couple of posts up.
I have the 7.5" barrel on my 357hawk, and I tend to stay away from the all-out loads in any caliber. Don't know or care about the muzzle velocity, I don't own a chronograph. I tend to load about 3/4 of the way up between the "starting" and "do not exceed" loads in the manuals. If I feel the need for more power than a 357, rather than loading super hot 357 loads I just bump up to the 44, then the 460, then the 500 if necessary! I notice you're in SE Louisiana, I am also. We'll have to get together and exercise the Redhawks one day! Quote:
Last edited by 45_auto; May 18, 2016 at 09:35 PM. |
|
May 18, 2016, 09:46 PM | #33 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 31, 2000
Location: Texican!
Posts: 4,453
|
Bayou,
Bet you can handload that Redhawk .357 WAY UP! I mean back to the true .357s of the 1930s. Deaf
__________________
“To you who call yourselves ‘men of peace,’ I say, you are not safe without men of action by your side” Thucydides |
May 19, 2016, 07:33 AM | #34 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 8, 2016
Location: SE Louisiana
Posts: 300
|
"I notice you're in SE Louisiana, I am also. We'll have to get together and exercise the Redhawks one day!"
Hi, 45 - Yep - I'm in the Slidell area and shoot at Honey Island. Maybe one weekend we just could shoot those Redhawks in tandem! I think I'm going to do like you say - load for the medium level since I'm just shooting paper for fun and not hunting. I use the Hornady manual, which for 158 grain FMJ projectiles, indicates a medium load to be about 14.5 grains of Win 296. This should produce about 1100 FPS. The manual lists a max charge of 16.7 grains of 296 for this weight projectile. I'm guessing that a medium load of about 1100 FPS should be adequate for paper at 75-100 yards. What do you think about this level of load for paper shooting at these distances? I know there will be a bit of experimentation involved, but that's what makes it a fun hobby! All the Best - Bayou
__________________
Bayou NRA Life Member "Keep Calm and Reload" |
May 19, 2016, 10:50 AM | #35 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 13, 2013
Location: Heart of Reagan Country
Posts: 479
|
Ruder's missing the boat. I wish it'd come out with a Redhawk in .41 Rem Mag.
|
May 19, 2016, 08:12 PM | #36 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 21, 2011
Location: Southern Louisiana
Posts: 1,399
|
Quote:
http://www.ruger.com/products/redhaw...eets/5031.html Bayou - That's funny. I'm in Slidell also. I'll PM you. |
|
May 20, 2016, 10:36 AM | #37 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 13, 2013
Location: Heart of Reagan Country
Posts: 479
|
45_Auto,
Yeah, kinda like that one. |
May 24, 2016, 09:54 PM | #38 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 11, 2015
Posts: 330
|
The only thing I can say is I want it.
Congrats and God Bless |
May 28, 2016, 08:08 PM | #39 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 25, 2008
Posts: 305
|
Bayou, you want some interesting loads for your .357 Redhawk? Look here: http://www.handloads.com/loaddata/de...Powder&Source=
By seating the bullets 3.5mm (.137") below the cannelure, you duplicate the .360 Dan Wesson using Magnum brass. The 180gr Hornady XTP has a lower cannelure that will do almost the same thing. You're looking for an overall length of 1.705" to 1.735". |
May 28, 2016, 08:19 PM | #40 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 8, 2016
Location: SE Louisiana
Posts: 300
|
Great info, DWFan!
Thanks so much for sharing... Bayou
__________________
Bayou NRA Life Member "Keep Calm and Reload" |
|
|