The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: The Revolver Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old May 5, 2016, 09:16 PM   #26
Bayou
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 8, 2016
Location: SE Louisiana
Posts: 300
Hi, Sequins -

Thanks for the compliments on the Redhawk and Security Six. Very much appreciated.

You could very well be spot on relative to your comments on the weight of the additional being metal milled out from 357 to 44. I was basically just guessing.

I'll come across a decent scale that measures ounces and then get an accurate
weight of this bird.

Just can't wait to get her to the range, spread her wings, and let her fly!

Thanks again!

Bayou
__________________

Bayou
NRA Life Member
"Keep Calm and Reload"
Bayou is offline  
Old May 6, 2016, 07:18 AM   #27
45_auto
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 21, 2011
Location: Southern Louisiana
Posts: 1,399
I ran across a .357 Redhawk a few years ago, couldn't pass it up. Makes hot .357 loads feel like .38 Specials.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sequins
I feel like the bore size change would only be fractions of an ounce but that's just my feeling and very unscientific.
Takes about 30 seconds to figure it out in Excel.

Figuring a bore diameter of .431" on the .44, the volume of the .44 bore that's 7.5 inches long works out to 1.09 cubic inches.

Same calcs on a .357 bore give a bore volume of .75 cubic inches.

Subtract the volume of the .357 bore from the volume of the .44 bore, 1.09 - .75 = .34, means that the .357 has an extra .34 cubic inches of steel in the barrel.

Density of stainless is about .286 pounds/cubic inch, means that the .357 barrel weighs .286 x .34 = .10 pounds = 1.6 ounces more in the barrel.

Cylinder weight difference should be slightly more, we'll leave that as an exercise for the student!
45_auto is offline  
Old May 6, 2016, 01:59 PM   #28
Bayou
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 8, 2016
Location: SE Louisiana
Posts: 300
Thanks, 45 -

Nice calculation you made there.

Glad to hear those full-house magnums feel rather small out of the Redkawk.

Do you have the 5.5" or the 7.5" tube?

Just out of curiosity, what muzzle velocity do you tend to reload to? I will stick to middle of the road stuff for target shooting.

Bayou
__________________

Bayou
NRA Life Member
"Keep Calm and Reload"
Bayou is offline  
Old May 6, 2016, 04:15 PM   #29
Model12Win
Junior member
 
Join Date: October 20, 2012
Posts: 5,854
Unique and interesting, but even a GP100 is a bit overbuilt for the caliber. There was nothing wrong with the Six series guns in fact, at least for 99.99% of shooters.

The Redhawk in .357? It's just kind of silly. If I'm going to have to lug around all that steel, I'd make it a .44 magnum, especially since it's six shots either way.

Now if Ruger came out with an 8 shot .357 Redhawk...
Model12Win is offline  
Old May 6, 2016, 04:29 PM   #30
Bayou
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 8, 2016
Location: SE Louisiana
Posts: 300
Hi, Model12Win -

It's beef on the 357 RH that is the center of my attraction to it.

A tank? Yes!

Overbuilt? Yes!

Heavy? Yes!

I love it!

Thanks!

Bayou
__________________

Bayou
NRA Life Member
"Keep Calm and Reload"
Bayou is offline  
Old May 17, 2016, 07:54 PM   #31
Bayou
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 8, 2016
Location: SE Louisiana
Posts: 300
Hi, Gang -


Brought the 357 Redhawk to the range over the weekend. This thing makes full house magnums feel tame! Just a pleasure to shoot. I tuned the sights and got that bird flying straight! I was shooting at 25 yards to begin with, but then ran out of 357 mag ammo before I could put the target at 50 yards.

Well, for the next range trip, I'm going to cook up some nice loads using FMJ 158 grain projectiles. They'll be warm loads but within the specs listed in the Hornady manual for Win 296 powder. After warming the bird up on the pistol range, I've decided to bring it over to the rifle side of the range for 75 and 100 yard shots just for the hey of it! I've never shot paper with a pistol at those ranges before, but I think I've got the tool to do just that!

What a great bird, indeed! Pure recreational fun all the way............Couldn't be happier.............

Bayou
__________________

Bayou
NRA Life Member
"Keep Calm and Reload"
Bayou is offline  
Old May 18, 2016, 09:10 PM   #32
45_auto
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 21, 2011
Location: Southern Louisiana
Posts: 1,399
Sorry Bayou, just noticed your questions to me a couple of posts up.

I have the 7.5" barrel on my 357hawk, and I tend to stay away from the all-out loads in any caliber.

Don't know or care about the muzzle velocity, I don't own a chronograph. I tend to load about 3/4 of the way up between the "starting" and "do not exceed" loads in the manuals.

If I feel the need for more power than a 357, rather than loading super hot 357 loads I just bump up to the 44, then the 460, then the 500 if necessary!

I notice you're in SE Louisiana, I am also. We'll have to get together and exercise the Redhawks one day!

Quote:
Originally Posted by model12win
The Redhawk in .357? It's just kind of silly. If I'm going to have to lug around all that steel, I'd make it a .44 magnum, especially since it's six shots either way.
Not everyone is interested in maximizing every gun. The nice thing about all that steel is the way it soaks up the recoil. My 12 year old granddaughter loves shooting mildly hot 357's out of the Redhawk, and 45 Colts out of my 460 S&W, although admittedly she has to use a tripod to hold either of them up! Either one is great for blowing up cans. She has no interest in the 44 mag Redhawk even with mild 44 Special loads, claims it "kicks too much".
Attached Images
File Type: png IMG_2395.PNG (228.4 KB, 8 views)

Last edited by 45_auto; May 18, 2016 at 09:35 PM.
45_auto is offline  
Old May 18, 2016, 09:46 PM   #33
Deaf Smith
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 31, 2000
Location: Texican!
Posts: 4,453
Bayou,

Bet you can handload that Redhawk .357 WAY UP! I mean back to the true .357s of the 1930s.

Deaf
__________________
“To you who call yourselves ‘men of peace,’ I say, you are not safe without men of action by your side” Thucydides
Deaf Smith is offline  
Old May 19, 2016, 07:33 AM   #34
Bayou
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 8, 2016
Location: SE Louisiana
Posts: 300
"I notice you're in SE Louisiana, I am also. We'll have to get together and exercise the Redhawks one day!"

Hi, 45 -


Yep - I'm in the Slidell area and shoot at Honey Island. Maybe one weekend we just could shoot those Redhawks in tandem!

I think I'm going to do like you say - load for the medium level since I'm just shooting paper for fun and not hunting. I use the Hornady manual, which for 158 grain FMJ projectiles, indicates a medium load to be about 14.5 grains of Win 296. This should produce about 1100 FPS. The manual lists a max charge of 16.7 grains of 296 for this weight projectile.

I'm guessing that a medium load of about 1100 FPS should be adequate for paper at 75-100 yards. What do you think about this level of load for paper shooting at these distances?

I know there will be a bit of experimentation involved, but that's what makes it a fun hobby!

All the Best -

Bayou
__________________

Bayou
NRA Life Member
"Keep Calm and Reload"
Bayou is offline  
Old May 19, 2016, 10:50 AM   #35
SansSouci
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 13, 2013
Location: Heart of Reagan Country
Posts: 479
Ruder's missing the boat. I wish it'd come out with a Redhawk in .41 Rem Mag.
SansSouci is offline  
Old May 19, 2016, 08:12 PM   #36
45_auto
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 21, 2011
Location: Southern Louisiana
Posts: 1,399
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanssouci
Ruder's missing the boat. I wish it'd come out with a Redhawk in .41 Rem Mag.
Kind of like this one (I'm guessing you mean "Ruger"):

http://www.ruger.com/products/redhaw...eets/5031.html

Bayou - That's funny. I'm in Slidell also. I'll PM you.
45_auto is offline  
Old May 20, 2016, 10:36 AM   #37
SansSouci
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 13, 2013
Location: Heart of Reagan Country
Posts: 479
45_Auto,

Yeah, kinda like that one.
SansSouci is offline  
Old May 24, 2016, 09:54 PM   #38
WVMountaineer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 11, 2015
Posts: 330
The only thing I can say is I want it.

Congrats and God Bless
WVMountaineer is offline  
Old May 28, 2016, 08:08 PM   #39
DWFan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 25, 2008
Posts: 305
Bayou, you want some interesting loads for your .357 Redhawk? Look here: http://www.handloads.com/loaddata/de...Powder&Source=
By seating the bullets 3.5mm (.137") below the cannelure, you duplicate the .360 Dan Wesson using Magnum brass. The 180gr Hornady XTP has a lower cannelure that will do almost the same thing. You're looking for an overall length of 1.705" to 1.735".
DWFan is offline  
Old May 28, 2016, 08:19 PM   #40
Bayou
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 8, 2016
Location: SE Louisiana
Posts: 300
Great info, DWFan!

Thanks so much for sharing...

Bayou
__________________

Bayou
NRA Life Member
"Keep Calm and Reload"
Bayou is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.07451 seconds with 9 queries