The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Skunkworks > The Harley Nolden Memorial Institute for Firearms Research

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old December 4, 2009, 07:45 PM   #1
jac
Junior Member
 
Join Date: December 4, 2009
Posts: 3
S&W Model 29-3

I'm in possession of a S&W Model 29-3 .41 Mag. Cannot find any background on this. I thought Model 29's were only .44 Mag. Help please.
jac is offline  
Old December 4, 2009, 08:13 PM   #2
gearchecker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 6, 2009
Location: North IDAHO, Big Bear Country
Posts: 466
.41 Mag, Model 29? Not so sure

Can you get me a few photos.
A close up of the model number stamp inside the crane. The serial number on the butt. The markings on the right and left sides of the barrel. One picture of each side of the gun complete.

With that I should be able to help nail it down.

According the the S&W catalog the Model 29 is and always has been .44 mag from what I read. I'll dig pretty deep to help you but pictures are much better than words, especially in this case.
__________________
When the time comes that I don't want a new gun, Call the undertaker!
My firearm is an investment on my life.
http://www.takdriver.com
http://www.corneredcat.com
gearchecker is offline  
Old December 4, 2009, 08:42 PM   #3
jac
Junior Member
 
Join Date: December 4, 2009
Posts: 3
S&W Model 29-3

It is stamped 29-3 on the crane. 41 Magnum on the right side of the 8 3/8" barrel. All numbers match N918xxx. Deep blued finish with Pachmayr grips. Will this help for now?
jac is offline  
Old December 4, 2009, 08:48 PM   #4
BruceM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 12, 2006
Location: SE Wisconsin
Posts: 285
Mismarked guns from Smith & Wesson are not all that uncommon such as Model 25-2's having barrels roll marked "1950 Target", etc. If both the barrel and cylinder are .41 caliber and you want a .44, Smith may rework the gun for you free of charge. If not, the gun may be of value to a collector. At any rate, this is not an unheard of situation.

Bruce
BruceM is offline  
Old December 4, 2009, 08:57 PM   #5
gearchecker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 6, 2009
Location: North IDAHO, Big Bear Country
Posts: 466
You have youself a .N-frame 41 Magnum. I was trying to dig deep and see if they ever made a M29 in .41 mag but nothing of it's listed in the catalogue. The .41 mag is built on an N-Frame so more than likely one of the gunsmiths needed to fill an order, and they grabbed the first N-frame within easy access.
The best way to check any deeper is to call S&W customer service and ask them to look it up for you.
__________________
When the time comes that I don't want a new gun, Call the undertaker!
My firearm is an investment on my life.
http://www.takdriver.com
http://www.corneredcat.com
gearchecker is offline  
Old December 4, 2009, 09:08 PM   #6
jac
Junior Member
 
Join Date: December 4, 2009
Posts: 3
S&W 29-3

Thanks for your help. I'll follow-up on your suggestions and recommendations...Jac
jac is offline  
Old December 5, 2009, 02:45 PM   #7
BruceM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 12, 2006
Location: SE Wisconsin
Posts: 285
"I was trying to dig deep and see if they ever made a M29 in .41 mag but nothing of it's listed in the catalogue."

Let me make this a little more clear. What you're dealing with is a mismarked Smith & Wesson M57. The Model 29 was never made in .41 Magnum because the Model 29 is Smith's designation for the N-frame carbon steel .44 Magnum. Similarly, the Model 57 was never made in .44 Magnum. Obviously, this is the reason you can find no information. Prior to 1957, all S&W's had Model names, not Model numbers. The Model 29 before 1957 was known as the .44 Magnum, NT430. The "N" designates the frame size, "T" designates target options and "430" is the nominal bore diameter.

This is not rocket science or brain surgery. There is a discussion of these types of thing in the Standard Catalog of Smith& Wesson.

B.
BruceM is offline  
Old December 5, 2009, 04:02 PM   #8
PetahW
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 19, 2008
Posts: 4,678
FWIW, the Model 29-3 dates ca. 1988, IIRC.

.
PetahW is offline  
Old December 5, 2009, 06:43 PM   #9
Sodbuster
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 26, 1999
Location: Wyo-Tana
Posts: 1,298
Rocket science isn't that difficult.
__________________
Remember, many times what we view as a curse in the present turns out to be a blessing in the future. Don't worry about it a lot. Things have a way of working out. Trust me on this one. - - Uncle Bill Martino
Sodbuster is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2021 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.06522 seconds with 8 queries