|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
September 30, 2011, 09:08 PM | #1 |
Junior member
Join Date: May 1, 2010
Posts: 5,797
|
Bob Ward murder conviction; OrlandoSentinel.com...
I wanted to share an important point on TFL with a few of forum members who say things like; "hey, so what" or "the type of gun doesn't matter in a shooting incident".
Robert "Bob" Ward was convicted of 2nd degree murder in the shooting of his wife near Orlando Florida. Ward owned a newer model S&W Sc or Ti type revolver with a fiber optic front sight. This revolver fired the round that killed the woman in the incident. The jury members asked to review the S&W revolver when they had to decide Bob Ward's fate. A jury member told the local media source; www.OrlandoSentinel.com that the Smith & Wesson's 12lb trigger pull and the handgun design played factors in their conviction of Ward! These jury members looked directly at the handgun & used it as part of the verdict. This action should be clear to anyone who carrys a firearm or uses a loaded firearm for defense. Be ready & able to justify your actions or decisions in court. Better URL - GEM http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/...,7926447.story Last edited by Glenn E. Meyer; October 1, 2011 at 01:37 PM. Reason: Better link |
September 30, 2011, 09:13 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 24, 2011
Posts: 990
|
"the Smith & Wesson's 12lb trigger pull and the handgun design played factors in their conviction of Ward!"
defense said it went off accidentally. guess if he had a 2.5# pull 1911 it would have been more plausible. |
September 30, 2011, 11:29 PM | #3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 8, 2001
Location: Forestburg, Montague Cnty, TX
Posts: 12,717
|
Quote:
The reason the 12 lb. trigger pull was critical in the case was salient to Ward's claims that the gun "just went off." Apparently with such a heavy trigger, the jury didn't buy the claim at all. So it was a factor, but then again so were things like the distance of the shot, the fact that the wife was going to give a deposition a week later to an insurance company that was suing Ward for $20 million. Diane Ward was shot between the eyes from 18" away. The jury requested a yard stick to use to assess how Diane Ward could have made such a shot. While maybe not impossible for such a shot to be made during suicide, they apparently didn't think it would be likely either.
__________________
"If you look through your scope and see your shoe, aim higher." -- said to me by my 11 year old daughter before going out for hogs 8/13/2011 My Hunting Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/HornHillRange |
|
October 1, 2011, 01:09 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 13, 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,254
|
Ya... I'm with DNS on this one. I think you got a little confused.
|
October 1, 2011, 02:24 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 15, 2007
Location: Outside KC, MO
Posts: 10,128
|
I had thought, from previous Sentinel articles, that Ward's attorneys claimed he was trying to take the gun from his wife when it went off.
Hence, accidental shooting, with possible self-defense overtones. (Although I'd thought the story was he was trying to not let her shoot herself...) Edit: I just checked. Ward's defense team did indeed claim that he was trying to stop his wife from committing suicide, and struggling with her over the gun, when it went off. In addition to the jury's concerns over the distance from the victim's head, and the weight and length of pull of the revolver - and probably much more importantly - Ward OPTED NOT TO TESTIFY. We all have a right not to take the stand. However, for factually innocent people, this is not usually a good idea. Whether we have the right or not, juries do not tend to look favorably on those who won't speak to defend themselves. Common assumption is the defendant does indeed have something to hide, or something that he does not want brought up in cross-examination. In this case, there probably was reason for that, based on the evidence.... Last edited by MLeake; October 1, 2011 at 02:43 AM. |
October 1, 2011, 07:46 AM | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 20, 2007
Location: South Western OK
Posts: 3,112
|
Quote:
|
|
October 1, 2011, 08:49 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 4, 1999
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 1,889
|
Double Naught Spy has it right. The case has nothing to do with the OP premise.
Jerry
__________________
Ecclesiastes 12:13 ¶Let us hear the conclusion of the whole matter: Fear God, and keep his commandments: for this is the whole duty of man. 14 For God shall bring every work into judgment, with every secret thing, whether it be good, or whether it be evil. |
October 1, 2011, 01:21 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 15, 2007
Location: Outside KC, MO
Posts: 10,128
|
JerryM, DNS has it partially right.
While I don't believe Ward's defense team, the case they presented did explain Ward's 911 call. He was trying to take the gun away from his suicidal wife, and in the struggle, it went off, killing her. A grieving husband could very well feel at that point that he had shot his wife; after reflection, and objective inputs from outsiders, he could realize that he wasn't really guilty of that. However, based on other factors, I don't think that's what really happened. Apparently, neither did the jury. |
October 1, 2011, 01:24 PM | #9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 16, 2011
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,497
|
Quote:
Thus why you do not point a firearm at anything you do not intend to deatroy, even by accident.
__________________
"The best diplomat I know is a fully charged phaser bank" - Montgomery Scott |
|
October 1, 2011, 01:33 PM | #10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 8, 2001
Location: Forestburg, Montague Cnty, TX
Posts: 12,717
|
Quote:
Trigger pull weights are an issue when there are claims of the gun going off unintentionally. Unintentional discharges are not generally what occurs in self defense shootings when the dishcharges are intentional.
__________________
"If you look through your scope and see your shoe, aim higher." -- said to me by my 11 year old daughter before going out for hogs 8/13/2011 My Hunting Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/HornHillRange |
|
October 1, 2011, 01:40 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 17, 2000
Posts: 20,064
|
The general point is that jury do pay attention to gun issues - I suppose - if they are relevant.
__________________
NRA, TSRA, IDPA, NTI, Polite Soc. - Aux Armes, Citoyens |
October 1, 2011, 02:59 PM | #12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 29, 2004
Posts: 3,351
|
Quote:
It was either an accident or murder. It has no relevance to a justifiable shooting. |
|
October 1, 2011, 04:47 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 24, 2008
Location: Orange, TX
Posts: 3,078
|
I'd say the general point in this particular case is that the jury got it right and didn't allow red herrings to affect its decision. Occasionally juries make correct decisions too.
|
October 1, 2011, 10:31 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 15, 2007
Location: Outside KC, MO
Posts: 10,128
|
The funny thing is, I'm normally on the side that feels it's a bad idea to have a very sensitive trigger on a defense gun, because it makes accidental discharges that much easier to do under stress.
But there have been a few TFL members who've said, "But that longer, heavier pull could make it hard to make a case for accidental discharge, as opposed to homicide." To which those on my side responded, "Well, yes, if you are actually guilty of homicide, that longer and heavier pull could be a bad thing." And this case does seem to have borne that out. Since I don't think most of us plan to try to cover up a homicide (by which I mean a murder, as opposed to justifiable self-defense), I am not too worried about the results of this case, either. |
October 2, 2011, 10:18 AM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 20, 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 10,446
|
This is quite a different kettle of fish from the usual fears of being "crucified by the prosecutor" over one's choice of handgun/ammunition. In this particular case, Ward's choice of handgun was not used to attack his character (as was done in the Fish case), but rather to prove that the physical evidence of the case did not coroborate his story well. In an actual self-defense case, the weight of the trigger has very little bearing because, by the defendant's own admission, pulling the trigger was intentional. Ward's defense was not that he acted in self-defense, but rather that the shooting was a tragic accident, a defense which was not borne out by the physical evidence including the gun.
|
October 2, 2011, 12:14 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 23, 2009
Location: Ft. Collins, CO.
Posts: 398
|
For the S&W ignorant among us - is the model a DAO type?
|
October 2, 2011, 12:44 PM | #17 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,468
|
Quote:
Last edited by Aguila Blanca; October 3, 2011 at 11:40 AM. Reason: typo |
|
October 2, 2011, 12:48 PM | #18 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 20, 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 10,446
|
Quote:
|
|
October 2, 2011, 01:21 PM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 15, 2007
Location: Outside KC, MO
Posts: 10,128
|
I thought I'd seen one article that said a 642, which would be a DAO type... but I'll have to check later.
Edit: Found an article with picture. It's a hammerless, but a Scandium or Titanium - so not a 642 or 442. One of the 3 series hammerless, so yes, DAO. 12lb trigger pull was mentioned. http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/...ell-diane-ward |
October 2, 2011, 01:24 PM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 5, 2011
Posts: 801
|
What JerryM said....
|
October 2, 2011, 01:34 PM | #21 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 20, 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 10,446
|
Quote:
EDIT: after looking at S&W's website, the gun in the photo appears to be a Model 340PD. This is the only DAO scandium-frame revolver offered by S&W with a fiberoptic front sight. Last edited by Webleymkv; October 2, 2011 at 01:39 PM. Reason: Additional information |
|
October 2, 2011, 04:37 PM | #22 |
Junior member
Join Date: May 1, 2010
Posts: 5,797
|
Remarks from the "OP"...
I think my intended remarks & points were a bit off track here;
I DID NOT mean or claim that Bob Ward was firing the S&W revolver in self defense or that he was claiming it was a justified use of force as the state of Florida law is written: www.myfloridalegal.com www.mylicensesite.com . My main point was that some jurys or jury members MAY look at firearms, ammunition, holsters-gear, etc when involved in a deliberation or when they render a verdict in a civil/court trial. The 18" distance seemed a valid point too. That factor & the gunshot wound being almost directly between the victim's eyes showed how it looked more like a homicide than a suicide. I'd disagree with a few TFL members too that say you(as a CC license holder or armed citizen) wouldn't need to worry about criminal intent or having a homicide charge after a lethal force incident. Your statements & actions may allow you to avoid a criminal charge or be able to avoid civil/wrongful death claims BUT you must be able to explain/justify those actions to a LE investigator, prosecutor or even a jury of your "peers". Some or all of whom may know next to 0 about guns & ammunition too. ClydeFrog Last edited by ClydeFrog; October 2, 2011 at 04:43 PM. |
October 2, 2011, 04:48 PM | #23 |
Junior member
Join Date: May 1, 2010
Posts: 5,797
|
In the words of LAPD LT Columbo....
Just one more thing... ...
Thanks for the edits & details about the Smith & Wesson Sc revolver. S&W changes the product line so often(mostly in the early 2000s) I honestly wasn't sure which model Ward used in the event. CF |
October 3, 2011, 10:56 AM | #24 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 29, 2004
Posts: 3,351
|
Quote:
In a criminal case the state MUST make its case beyond a reasonable doubt. The only reason the trigger pull became an issue was when the 'it was an accident' BS appeared in court. I guess the jury was smart enough to realize it would be one hell of an accident to pull a 12 pound trigger. There was no question of justification in the case. It was either an accident or murder. |
|
October 3, 2011, 11:47 AM | #25 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,468
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|