|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 1, 2007, 12:22 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 18, 2005
Location: Central Indiana
Posts: 1,981
|
List of owned NFA by state
A dealer I know from another board sent me the following list. It is a list of number of owned NFA items for each state. The list is current as of the last 5-10 years or so. I thought it was interesting, and thought some here would enjoy looking.
Alabama MG: 12,055 Suppressor: 4,905 SBR: 481 SBS: 1,669 AOW: 1,019 Alaska MG: 1,651 Suppressor: 913 SBR: 127 SBS: 912 AOW: 288 Arizona MG: 12,808 Suppressor: 7,124 SBR: 1,252 SBS: 1,255 AOW: 816 Arkansas MG: 3,991 Suppressor: 1,625 SBR: 215 SBS: 854 AOW: 470 California MG: 20,637 Suppressor: 3,630 SBR: 1,537 SBS: 7,364 AOW: 3,493 Colorado MG: 4,595 Suppressor: 1,804 SBR: 497 SBS: 1,125 AOW: 797 Connecticut MG: 21,136 Suppressor: 3,003 SBR: 315 SBS: 1,097 AOW: 634 D.C. MG: 2,531 Suppressor: 117 SBR: 170 SBS: 622 AOW: 65 Delaware MG: 261 Suppressor: 229 SBR: 38 SBS: 361 AOW: 31 Florida MG: 21,481 Suppressor: 11,016 SBR: 1,174 SBS: 3,342 AOW: 2,413 Georgia MG: 16,968 Suppressor: 14,878 SBR: 710 SBS: 7,710 AOW: 1,507 Hawaii MG: 365 Suppressor: 52 SBR: 43 SBS: 56 AOW: 34 Idaho MG: 3,133 Suppressor: 3,487 SBR: 332 SBS: 263 AOW: 521 Illinois MG: 12,419 Suppressor: 534 SBR: 656 SBS: 1,552 AOW: 942 Indiana MG: 12,707 Suppressor: 4,952 SBR: 650 SBS: 7,624 AOW: 1,084 Iowa MG: 1,613 Suppressor: 105 SBR: 232 SBS: 688 AOW: 853 Kansas MG: 2,033 Suppressor: 185 SBR: 313 SBS: 700 AOW: 645 Kentucky MG: 6,144 Suppressor: 2,650 SBR: 370 SBS: 1,321 AOW: 683 Louisiana MG: 4,569 Suppressor: 1,301 SBR: 360 SBS: 1,141 AOW: 476 Maine MG: 8,112 Suppressor: 494 SBR: 1,178 SBS: 322 AOW: 555 Maryland MG: 11,322 Suppressor: 3,619 SBR: 452 SBS: 6,076 AOW: 796 Massachusetts MG: 5,138 Suppressor: 406 SBR: 406 SBS: 678 AOW: 810 Michigan MG: 8,092 Suppressor: 856 SBR: 445 SBS: 965 AOW: 1,002 Minnesota MG: 5,941 Suppressor: 612 SBR: 523 SBS: 945 AOW: 1,847 Mississippi MG: 3,848 Suppressor: 676 SBR: 219 SBS: 427 AOW: 348 Missouri MG: 6,218 Suppressor: 1,228 SBR: 572 SBS: 1,752 AOW: 1,211 Montana MG: 1,690 Suppressor: 414 SBR: 164 SBS: 263 AOW: 353 Nebraska MG: 1,797 Suppressor: 583 SBR: 232 SBS: 651 AOW: 680 Nevada MG: 4,651 Suppressor: 2,598 SBR: 413 SBS: 389 AOW: 590 New Hampshire MG: 5,040 Suppressor: 1,292 SBR: 487 SBS: 261 AOW: 378 New Jersey MG: 5,375 Suppressor: 652 SBR: 297 SBS: 2,060 AOW: 413 New Mexico MG: 3,268 Suppressor: 1,104 SBR: 364 SBS: 447 AOW: 243 New York MG: 5,915 Suppressor: 389 SBR: 619 SBS: 4,127 AOW: 1,685 North Carolina MG: 8,566 Suppressor: 2,967 SBR: 560 SBS: 1,549 AOW: 731 North Dakota MG: 1,110 Suppressor: 1,059 SBR: 83 SBS: 140 AOW: 163 Ohio MG: 14,288 Suppressor: 4,206 SBR: 1,008 SBS: 3,170 AOW: 1,567 Oklahoma MG: 6,239 Suppressor: 2,295 SBR: 495 SBS: 1,058 AOW: 977 Oregon MG: 5,630 Suppressor: 4,322 SBR: 879 SBS: 1,001 AOW: 1,376 Pennsylvania MG: 16,112 Suppressor: 5,082 SBR: 1,274 SBS: 7,929 AOW: 1,516 Rhode Island MG: 519 Suppressor: 19 SBR: 72 SBS: 110 AOW: 42 South Carolina MG: 5,533 Suppressor: 1,187 SBR: 282 SBS: 1,587 AOW: 584 South Dakota MG: 1,180 Suppressor: 277 SBR: 103 SBS: 154 AOW: 333 Tennessee MG: 8,282 Suppressor: 3,819 SBR: 685 SBS: 3,974 AOW: 1,296 Texas MG: 21,980 Suppressor: 20,573 SBR: 2,033 SBS: 5,019 AOW: 3,413 Utah MG: 5,327 Suppressor: 1,272 SBR: 624 SBS: 541 AOW: 297 Vermont MG: 1,050 Suppressor: 50 SBR: 59 SBS: 68 AOW:
__________________
Silencers have NEVER been illegal ! |
November 1, 2007, 01:21 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 18, 2005
Location: Lumberton, Texas
Posts: 118
|
hooray
If i read right Texas won the MG and suppressor catagories! Good for us!
__________________
Clothes make the person. Naked people have little or no influence in society.- Mark Twain |
November 1, 2007, 02:11 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 9, 2004
Posts: 1,519
|
Interesting, but with non-NFA states like CA, NJ , and NY showing numbers into 4 and 5 digits, that list must include post samples in LE armories. I doubt any held by military are included in those numbers, but a whole heck of a lot of those accounted for are not transferable. Would be very interesting (though probably impossible) to get a breakdown of transferable/pre-samples/post-samples by state.
|
November 2, 2007, 01:47 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 16, 2004
Location: Grand Forks, ND
Posts: 5,333
|
Minnesota is a "No suppressor" state, that 600 some suppressors would have to be with LEOs.
Austin Cowart: If i read right Texas won the MG and suppressor catagories! Good for us! Not on a per capita basis. Texas: 1 suppressor per 1142 people North Dakota: 1 suppressor per 600 people. The machinegun numbers are similar. I'll forward this to my SOT and ask him if these numbers look right.
__________________
I don't carry a gun to go looking for trouble, I carry a gun in case trouble finds me. |
November 2, 2007, 02:22 AM | #5 |
Junior member
Join Date: September 27, 2006
Posts: 366
|
It can't be military. It says Michigan has about 400 SBRs. I know there are more than that in military possession. I helped clean about 200 14.5" M4s a few weeks ago, and that's just with one MP company.
|
November 2, 2007, 12:14 PM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: July 19, 2007
Posts: 16
|
California has so many NFA items because if you had them prior to the AW ban you could keep all the items and just register them, also Hollywood does help because the movie people can still get permits to bring in NFA items into the state to use in movies.
|
November 2, 2007, 12:18 PM | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 18, 2005
Location: Central Indiana
Posts: 1,981
|
Quote:
__________________
Silencers have NEVER been illegal ! |
|
November 2, 2007, 12:27 PM | #8 |
Member
Join Date: July 19, 2007
Posts: 16
|
Not the National AW ban, the California AW ban. and there is a form that you can send to the DOJ to get NFA items but they would never approve regular civies.
|
November 2, 2007, 12:34 PM | #9 |
Member
Join Date: July 19, 2007
Posts: 16
|
Heres the application, but like I said you probably will just get rejected.
http://ag.ca.gov/firearms/forms/pdf/FD030DWApp.pdf |
November 2, 2007, 12:54 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 14, 2007
Location: Indiana/Indpls Metro Area
Posts: 318
|
Where are all those registered MGs in D.C?
|
November 2, 2007, 02:46 PM | #11 |
Member
Join Date: January 24, 2005
Posts: 95
|
where are the rest of the states?
I know VA has at least a couple silencers & machine guns in it. |
November 2, 2007, 02:50 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 18, 2005
Location: Central Indiana
Posts: 1,981
|
That's the list exactly as it was sent to me. I'll ask about the remaining states.
__________________
Silencers have NEVER been illegal ! |
November 4, 2007, 01:50 AM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 26, 2000
Posts: 153
|
Note: these numbers reflect the totals from the beginning of NFA registration... and is in NO WAY accurate... in addition many of the weapons may have been registered PRIOR to a state ban... ie in CA and NY...
|
May 12, 2008, 11:56 AM | #14 |
Junior member
Join Date: January 23, 2008
Location: MI
Posts: 1,398
|
Seeing as how the forms required for manufacturing and transferring NFA weapons are tax documents I seriously doubt those are accurate numbers or even that they were distributed legally. The ATF cannot discuss the NFA stuff to anyone other than the tax payer.
|
May 12, 2008, 12:55 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 18, 2005
Location: Central Indiana
Posts: 1,981
|
Transfer forms are no more tax documets than are the packs of cigarettes you may or may not have bought today. Just because you are paying a 'tax' doesn't mean it is a tax document. In fact, all NFA information is available via the FOIA. Check out this thread for more accurate info http://www.thefiringline.com/forums/...d.php?t=292053
__________________
Silencers have NEVER been illegal ! |
May 12, 2008, 06:01 PM | #16 | |
Junior member
Join Date: January 23, 2008
Location: MI
Posts: 1,398
|
From: Title II.com's FAQ
Quote:
|
|
May 12, 2008, 07:02 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 18, 2005
Location: Central Indiana
Posts: 1,981
|
The key to that excerpt is the word "pending". After the transfer is complete, the information isn't as guarded. All of the categories of NFA items in the registry is in the public domain. You can ask for them yourself via a FOIA request, however, you cannot ask for information such as ownership stats on any given individual but yourself.
__________________
Silencers have NEVER been illegal ! |
May 12, 2008, 07:36 PM | #18 |
Junior member
Join Date: December 10, 2006
Location: MANNING SC
Posts: 837
|
no. of mgs
The list is total number of MGs presently licensed it does not include military as they have no access to the inventory.the small arms review has the list every yr.yhe magazine is published monthly.check their web site.
|
May 14, 2008, 09:38 AM | #19 |
Member
Join Date: December 18, 2007
Posts: 56
|
A civy can not legally own a NFA weapon in Illinois. All those MGs must be LE or the list is wrong.
|
May 14, 2008, 09:41 AM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 18, 2005
Location: Central Indiana
Posts: 1,981
|
Or they may have been registered before the Illinois state MG ban was in place... Not too many states regulated MG's in the first half of last century.
__________________
Silencers have NEVER been illegal ! |
May 14, 2008, 11:36 AM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 7, 2008
Location: Hampton Roads,VA / Wise Co. VA
Posts: 157
|
Would still like to know about VA any word?
|
May 23, 2008, 08:13 PM | #22 |
Member
Join Date: March 27, 2008
Location: Gods Country
Posts: 73
|
SBR's in AL???
|
May 23, 2008, 09:18 PM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 20, 2008
Posts: 442
|
Odd, it seems most states have more NFA than Colorado. I must know most people here with MGs, since I've seen quite a few.
|
May 28, 2008, 05:30 PM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 27, 2006
Location: Lane County Oregon
Posts: 2,547
|
Freakshow - The way I read your post is the way health records are private, that is medical information that contains individual identifying information is totally off-limits. If you strip off the identifying information, it is OK.
That is how they get wonderful numbers like "Oregon had 560 reported cases of flu". The information on the form is private, the fact that a form was filled out is not. The amount collected in taxes is public record, just not who it is collected from (in most cases). Just based on my experience with privacy laws (no, I'm not a lawyer).
__________________
U.S Army, Retired Ethics is knowing the difference between what you have a right to do and what is right to do. -Potter Stewart |
May 28, 2008, 06:16 PM | #25 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 2, 2001
Posts: 4,988
|
Dave,
Would you happen to have info on Washington? I've heard that private citizens can't own machine guns there but I went to a range near Seattle which rented them. Quote:
__________________
In a few years when the dust finally clears and people start counting their change there is a pretty good chance that President Obama may become known as The Great Absquatulator. You heard it first here on TFL. |
|
|
|