|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 18, 2012, 09:57 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 9, 1998
Location: Ohio USA
Posts: 8,563
|
Anyone care to share a response to a written letter to a Lawmaker?
My wife works in the MR/DD field.
Federal cuts removed access to physical therapy for one of her clients. She and the client wrote a "letter to a Lawmaker", pleading for some reconsideration on the cuts. The response was a form letter saying how nice it was to hear that the writer was in favor of cutting costs. IOW - just the opposite of what they'd written. Personally, I've never gotten any response from any letter I've written other than a form letter of some kind that says - thanks for writing.. Is it even worth the effort and cost of postage any more to write? Does anyone ever read the letters or do they just tag em, bag em and toss em and send a form letter response? |
December 18, 2012, 12:37 PM | #2 |
Staff
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 13,059
|
Don't get discouraged because one particular department ignored it. Send a copy to their supervisory agency, and to your lawmakers.
Written letters are rare in the age of email and SMS, and they generally get noticed and read more quickly. Writing a letter implies effort and commitment. Not every one will be effective, but some are.
__________________
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change. --Randall Munroe |
December 18, 2012, 03:52 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 6, 2012
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 1,057
|
I have not received a response from any of my legislators in a long time.
In my view, I have no representation at either the Sate or Federal level, it has been my experience that once they find out that I am opposed to their agenda, I never hear from them again. I continue to write professional, well thought out letters, which appear to all be ignored. I just sent out about 15 letters to govenment representative and departments, If I receive any response I'll post it.
__________________
NRA Lifetime Member Since 1999 "I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people except for a few public officials." George Mason |
December 18, 2012, 03:57 PM | #4 |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
|
I've written to my state senator by email on several occasions. He has always responded for real and personally. I've had back and forth conversations with him and he is cordial and responsive. Of course, he's also on "our" side so it's a lot easier.
I wrote to Hillary Clinton when she was our US Senator, got a generic form letter response saying how glad she was that I wrote and that she'd look into my points and respond accordingly, more or less. Never heard another word.
__________________
Nobody plans to screw up their lives... ...they just don't plan not to. -Andy Stanley |
December 19, 2012, 09:10 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 25, 2010
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 3,309
|
Many U.S. Congressmen and other high level officials really prefer e-mails these days. One of my Senators has said his paper mail is held up, sometimes for weeks, while it checked at a centeral location for possible contaminants. Meaning the "white powder" scare.
I am politically active and know letters to high level individuals are rarely seen by them. There are just too many. What the do receive are summaries of communications from constituents. The good, and caring, legislators have staff members who actually will look into your concern and try to handle to your satisfaction. Some just don't care. |
December 19, 2012, 10:18 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 29, 2007
Location: St. Louis, MO area
Posts: 4,040
|
I wrote both my senators (my US Representative is changing over, there's no real good way to contact the new one just yet)- Roy Blunt and Claire McCaskill of MO.
Roy Blunt responded with what looked to be a form letter about the Newtown shootings... guns are not mentioned even once, pro or con. That tells me that he's probably going to stand on our side (as he has before). McCaskill has not responded, nor do I expect one; ever since she got into office she's done whatever the left wing has asked her to do. |
December 19, 2012, 10:30 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 29, 2010
Location: The ATL (OTP)
Posts: 3,946
|
I’ve contacted my local Congressman in the past and even received a phone call from him to discuss the issue. I will admit I was a little surprised not just that he called, but that he seemed to have a genuine interest in my opinion.
I think you get better results contacting the members of the US House since they are elected by a much smaller portion of the electorate. Many of them may just represent one or two Counties in your state, so the opinions of a few voters really do matter to them.
__________________
A major source of objection to a free economy is precisely that it ... gives people what they want instead of what a particular group thinks they ought to want. Underlying most arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself. - Milton Friedman |
December 19, 2012, 10:45 AM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 19, 2007
Location: Lago Vista TX
Posts: 2,425
|
I've had the same experience as Mr. Pfleuger ... I don't write often, but when I do, my representatives in Washington have always replied specifically to the point I'm making -- I don't always agree with the reply, but I do appreciate the fact that somebody read my note and took the time to take me seriously ... politicians in general are scum, but there are a few good ones who deserve to be kept in office ...
__________________
"The welfare of humanity is always the alibi of tyrants." Albert Camus |
December 19, 2012, 11:27 AM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 9, 1998
Location: Ohio USA
Posts: 8,563
|
Sort of a bit of a surprise to see a couple of very positive comments about email responses.
Such wasn't the case all that long ago. |
December 19, 2012, 11:36 AM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 29, 2007
Location: St. Louis, MO area
Posts: 4,040
|
I think we have more support than we think. The antis have been dominating the microphones so they SEEM powerful, but they've always been happy to dance in the blood of the innocent. Once emotions cool down, I think we'll see that while stuff is closer than it would have been a few weeks ago, we still are not necessarily being sold down the river.
|
December 19, 2012, 11:51 AM | #11 | |
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,578
|
Quote:
My state reps are much better than Hillary's one chance. They have always responded personally and specifically. |
|
December 19, 2012, 12:21 PM | #12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 7, 2000
Location: AZ, WA
Posts: 1,466
|
I sent a rather detailed e-mail to my representative and both senators proposing that rifles and armored vests be strategically positioned in secure lockers throughout school campuses, with trained volunteer teachers and staff having keys. Here is the response I received from Sen. Hutchinson:
Quote:
__________________
Violence is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The decayed and degraded state of moral and valorous feeling which believes that nothing is worth violence is much worse. Those who have nothing for which they are willing to fight; nothing they care about more than their own craven apathy; are miserable creatures who have no chance of being free, unless made and kept so by the valor of those better than themselves. Gary L. Griffiths (Paraphrasing John Stuart Mill) |
|
December 20, 2012, 05:25 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 6, 2012
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 1,057
|
OK, I got a response to one of my emails, my original email was polite and on the stern side in which I reminded the Senator of how the people used to have the same weaponry as the government, and how the level of corruption within our government is ever increasing.
Resposne Follows December 20, 2012 Dear Ira, Thank you for contacting me regarding Second Amendment rights. I appreciate that you took the time to write on this important topic. Responsible gun ownership is an integral part of our Western heritage. The Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution provides for an individual right, and I am dedicated to protecting the rights of citizens to own firearms for personal protection, hunting, collecting or for other legal purposes. That said, I am saddened and deeply troubled by the tragic December 2012 shooting in Newtown, CT, particularly as this most recent tragedy reminds us of the horrific events that took place at the Aurora movie theater; Columbine High School; Virginia Tech and Tucson, AZ. These horrific events are national tragedies that should concern us all. As a nation, we must have an honest and open dialogue about how to prevent these tragedies in the future with all reasonable policy options on the table. I am committed to balancing the constitutional right to bear arms with common-sense policies aimed at keeping our communities safe. As legislation related to Second Amendment rights is debated, I will carefully examine its intentions and impacts and use your thoughts to help guide me. I will continue to listen closely to what you and other Coloradans have to say about matters before Congress, the concerns of our communities, and the issues facing Colorado and the nation. My job is not merely about supporting or opposing legislation, but also about bridging the divide that has paralyzed our nation's politics. For more information about my positions and to learn how my office can assist you, please visit my website at www.markudall.senate.gov. Warm regards, Mark Udall U.S. Senator, Colorado I am struck by the use of the terms "common sense" and "reasonable" in his response. looks like a copy and paste from the Brady Campaign website. I was also surprised that I even got a response, the first one in quite a long time.
__________________
NRA Lifetime Member Since 1999 "I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people except for a few public officials." George Mason Last edited by iraiam; December 20, 2012 at 05:37 PM. |
December 20, 2012, 06:41 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Location: In the valley above the plain
Posts: 13,424
|
This is a recent response from the my wonderful Senator, Orrin Hatch.
After email communications failed to get ANYTHING out of his office, other than the standard BS replies, I wrote a letter asking for precise, specific answers to why he was taking the action that he was on the "Sportsmen's Act of 2012". The modified form letter I received, in return, was a bigger insult that the previous filth his office tried to feed me. Nothing but, dodgy, ambiguous, aristocratic BS, even making improper assumptions about what I said... (I had to chop the header off, to get the file size small enough to upload here. It's dated November 29th, 2012, and is on letterhead from his DC office.) It's classic Orrin Hatch... "I don't need to tell you anything. I'm a Senator." There was a fairly good sized movement, to oust that elitist pig, (starting with the primary) this year. Obviously, we failed.
__________________
Don't even try it. It's even worse than the internet would lead you to believe. |
December 20, 2012, 08:34 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 6, 2012
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 1,057
|
It took some doing but i finally figured out how to respond and keep the conversation going. I complained to him about using the terms "common sense" and "reasonable", doing this sets me up for being viewed as unreasonable and lacking common sense just for disagreeing with him.
This is not how "honest" conversations start. I bet I don't get another response.
__________________
NRA Lifetime Member Since 1999 "I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people except for a few public officials." George Mason |
December 21, 2012, 05:38 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 9, 1998
Location: Ohio USA
Posts: 8,563
|
Gentlemen,,,thank you.
|
December 22, 2012, 11:45 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 24, 2010
Posts: 351
|
just fired off 3 e-mails and had one canned answer so far, following up with hand writen letters next week.
|
December 31, 2012, 05:33 PM | #18 | |
Staff
Join Date: July 28, 2010
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 8,821
|
I got more of a response than I had expected.
I emailed all of my congressfolk about a week or 10 days after the Sandy Hook shooting. Initially, all I got was a couple of boilerplate "thank you for contacting my office . . . your opinion is important . . . blah, blah, blah." I had resigned myself to the notion that I wasn't going to get anything more in-depth than that. I was wrong. I got this today:
Quote:
__________________
I'm a lawyer, but I'm not your lawyer. If you need some honest-to-goodness legal advice, go buy some. |
|
December 31, 2012, 08:25 PM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 3, 2011
Location: Vernon AZ
Posts: 1,195
|
I actively work with Congressman Gossar's Office on Veterans affairs. Specifically, PTSD claims from Vets whom i work with. His staff has all ways responded in a timely fashion.
I generally send my correspondence to a specific member of his staff with whom I have developed a relationship. If you can develop such a relationship with your Rep's staff, your views and comments will be addressed with other than a form letter. Unfortunately, Gossar will no longer be my rep thanks to redistricting. His replacement is a Democrat who was a favorite of the Minority Leader. We are already preparing a campaign reminding her that she lost her seat in the past because she failed to listen to her constituents. The assault weapons bill will be a flash point for her. Hopefully, she will realize that if she supports the bill she will not retain her job. My point is, you may get a nonsense form letter but her staff is counting the letters and will make a decision based on their ability to retain their seat if they go against the voters. Mobilize your friends and fellow shooters and start informing them of your opposition now rather than after it gets in the legislative process. |
January 4, 2013, 11:53 PM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 7, 2000
Location: AZ, WA
Posts: 1,466
|
From my Senator and Representative:
Dear Mr. Griffiths:
Thank you for contacting me about renewed interests in gun control following the events at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut. I appreciate hearing from you on this important matter. I, like many Americans, was saddened by the tragedy at Sandy Hook Elementary School, where 20 children and 6 adults were killed by a gunman who ultimately took his own life. As a father of two teachers, my thoughts and prayers go out to all who were affected by this unspeakable tragedy. Although the investigation is still ongoing, initial reports suggest that the gunman was deeply disturbed and intent on leaving a wake of destruction. As a physician, I believe that mental illness, which afflicts an estimated one in ten children and adolescents in the United States to the point of causing some impairment, is a serious health problem that cannot be ignored. The federal government has programs specifically designed to assist local schools to promoting mental health development in children and adolescents. Immediately following these events in Connecticut, I reached out to most of the superintendents of the area independent school districts to ensure proper safety measures are in place to protect our children in school to the extent possible. You may be interested to know, that one program that are available to schools are the School Resource Officers (SRO). SROs are individuals that directly improve the safety for students, teachers, and administrators in primary and secondary schools throughout our district. You may also be interested to know that over the past two decades, the 26th District of Texas has received over $40 million from the federal COPS grant program to assist local law enforcement agencies. COPS grant have funded 378 additional police officers and sheriff's deputies to engage in community policing activities, including crime prevention, in the 26th District. Within the COPS program, an additional $2 million has been provided to the SRO program An example of how the SRO program is specifically benefiting the 26th District is in Denton School District, the SRO program is a mutually beneficial partnership between the Denton Police Department and the Denton Independent School District. SROs perform a variety of law enforcement functions at Denton ISD schools. However, the primary purpose of school resource officers is to reduce and prevent crime by and against students, committed primarily in or in connection with area schools. There is no denying that this event is indeed tragic; however, this event has not changed my position on the issue of gun control. I am strongly opposed to any limitations on the United States Constitution's Second Amendment rights of law-abiding gun owners. While no one condones the purchase and use of guns by felons or other high-risk individuals to perpetrate any crime, we must not improperly hamper the right of law-abiding citizens to bear or purchase arms. If we are to honor and uphold our nation's Constitution, this right cannot be infringed. The key to curbing the unlawful use of firearms is the stricter enforcement of existing laws. There are about 20,000 firearms laws already on the books in this country. To prevent crime, we must fully enforce those laws already on the books. I am disappointed to see the proposals currently being discussed by Members of Congress are merely an attempt to make people feel more secure without providing any real security. Someone who is truly intent on using a gun to commit a crime will find a way to obtain one regardless of what laws are imposed. We cannot erode our constitutional rights in the name of crime prevention, and I will oppose any legislation that seeks to do so. Please be assured that I will continue to pay very close attention to the continuing debate on gun ownership rights and the mental health issues. As these developments continue, you may be assured that I will keep your views in mind should legislation relating to gun rights and mental health be considered by the full House. Again, thank you for taking the time to contact me. I appreciate having the opportunity to represent you in the U.S. House of Representatives. Please feel free to visit my website (www.house.gov/burgess) or contact me with any future concerns. Sincerely, Michael C. Burgess, M.D. Member of Congress Dear Mr. Griffiths: Thank you for contacting me regarding the horrific events in Newtown, Connecticut. I appreciate having the benefit of your comments on this tragedy. My thoughts and prayers are with the victims and their families as well as with all the citizens of Newtown who were affected by this tragedy. On December 17, 2012, I joined my Senate colleagues in cosponsoring Senate Resolution 621 to honor the victims and heroes of the shooting. It is a tragedy for the entire nation whenever a life is taken in an act of violence. I share your concern for the safety of our children in their schools, and you may be certain that I will keep your views in mind as policy changes are considered in the coming weeks. Now, we join with the families as they grieve the tragic loss of twenty children and their teachers, and we join together as a nation to honor their memories. I appreciate having the opportunity to represent Texas in the United States Senate. Thank you for taking the time to contact me. Sincerely, JOHN CORNYN United States Senator
__________________
Violence is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The decayed and degraded state of moral and valorous feeling which believes that nothing is worth violence is much worse. Those who have nothing for which they are willing to fight; nothing they care about more than their own craven apathy; are miserable creatures who have no chance of being free, unless made and kept so by the valor of those better than themselves. Gary L. Griffiths (Paraphrasing John Stuart Mill) |
January 5, 2013, 01:21 AM | #21 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 9, 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 784
|
Here is a reply I got from Pat Toomey (R-PA). He focuses on the mental health issue and doesn't mention guns.
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|