October 6, 2008, 11:25 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: October 2, 2008
Posts: 18
|
Sauer & Sohn model1913
I have inherited a Sauer & Sohn model 1913 6.35mm, (25 acp), serial # 99xx. On the left side of the slide it is stamped R.F.V. 31, both magazines are also marked with the 31 and roman numerals 1 and 2. The pistol is in quite nice condition. I'm curious as to its age and the RFV markings. Also the flap holster that came with the pistol is very dry almost brittle, any advice for how to restore some of the holsters flexibilty.
Last edited by Flatcat; October 7, 2008 at 12:14 AM. |
October 7, 2008, 12:52 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 13, 2006
Location: Washington state
Posts: 15,247
|
Flexibility of the leather can be enhanced by washing it with saddle soap, then rubbing a wax-based waterproofing like Sno-Seal into it. Do not use neatsfoot oil or mink oil as this will soften it too much and may rust the pistol.
__________________
Never try to educate someone who resists knowledge at all costs. But what do I know? Summit Arms Services |
October 7, 2008, 04:55 PM | #3 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
"RFV" stands for Reichsfinanzverwaltung, the Nazi German equivalent of the U.S. Treasury Department. Like its American counterpart, it had armed agents to enforce the law.
Jim |
October 7, 2008, 08:12 PM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: October 2, 2008
Posts: 18
|
Thanks for the info on both the holster and pistol. Not much chance of the holster causing the pistol to rust, I dont store it in the holster. Both are locked safely away in the safe. Thanks again.
|
October 10, 2008, 09:22 AM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: October 10, 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 51
|
Flatcat,
as already mentioned by Jim, RFV stands for Reichsfinanzverwaltung. To this authority also belonged the customs services (Zoll in German). To these officers your Sauer 1919 did belong. BTW: some collectors do use the term "model 1919" for the smaller version of the 1913. It is assumed, that the model 1919 in .25 cal. came out in 1919. It isn't easy to make a statement, when your pistol was made. Based on serial number studies I'd say approximately (!) in 1921. Your's is a first variation with an added "Zusatzsicherung" (additional safety), at least, I bet it has a Zusatzsicherung. All Sauers of the police and of the Zoll were amended in the twenties and in the thirties by adding the Zusatzsicherung. This is a small spring arranged oblique to the safety lever. Check out this photo, where I explained this: http://luger.gunboards.com/uploaded/...26_30600-3.jpg Normally, the first variation (SN 1 to 30,000 app.) don't have the Zusatzsicherung, except for the police and Zoll variations. Regularly, the Zusatzsicherung started with the second variation at SN 30,000. BTW: a friend of mine is currently writing a book about German police markings of the Weimar period. He also lists all known RFV pistols. For this purpose, the full SN would be helpful and I'd appreciate it, when you would tell me the SN. Best regards Martin |
October 10, 2008, 05:09 PM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: October 2, 2008
Posts: 18
|
Again thanks for the info. My pistol does not have the Zustzsicherung as shown in the photo. The complete serial # is 9991.
Maybe I can get one my kids to show my how to work a digital camera and post a photo. |
October 11, 2008, 04:35 AM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: October 10, 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 51
|
Hi Flatcat,
thank you very much for telling the full SN. As far as the missing “Zusatzsicherung” (ZS) is concerned: I’m confused, really I am. Are you sure? Please check the enclosed image showing a 1919 with and without the ZS. Well, of course there is no reason not to believe you, but it would be the first RFV marked Sauer 1919 not having the ZS. Seems, yours slipped through…. Best regards Martin |
October 11, 2008, 07:31 PM | #8 |
Member
Join Date: October 2, 2008
Posts: 18
|
Sauerfan,
I double checked and it does not have the ZS, (thanks for the abbreviation), as to why it had not been retrofitted I dont have a clue. Anyway here are a couple of photos. http://s96.photobucket.com/albums/l1...t=DSC00299.jpg http://s96.photobucket.com/albums/l1...t=DSC00300.jpg http://s96.photobucket.com/albums/l1...t=DSC00301.jpg |
October 12, 2008, 05:04 AM | #9 |
Member
Join Date: October 10, 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 51
|
Hi Flatcat,
thank you very much for posting photos of your Sauer 1919. Most interesting! It is definitely the first police/RFV Sauer 1919 (and 1913, respectively) I ever saw not having the ZS. Yours must have slipped through… Regards Martin |
October 12, 2008, 10:14 PM | #10 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
Hi, Sauerfan,
What was the purpose of the additional safety? It seems to be in the right place to be a magazine safety, maybe keeping the regular safety from being moved to the "fire" position unless the magazine was in place. (Of course, I recall the Parabellum pistols with the magazine safety. I have one with the safety disabled, and hope someday to find the complete unit.) Jim |
October 13, 2008, 02:22 AM | #11 |
Member
Join Date: October 10, 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 51
|
Jim,
no, this is no magazine safety. This safety is acting on the trigger bar. While the normal safety is acting only on the trigger, the "Zusatzsicherung" (additional safety) is blocking the trigger bar. This safety was introduced because of some accidents with pistols dropping on the ground and firing, although the safety has been activated. Good luck for finding a Luger with a Walther safety still in place! Rare birds. Regards Martin |
October 13, 2008, 01:23 PM | #12 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
Thanks, Martin. Sounds a bit like the various devices makers of M1911 type pistols now have to put on to keep the gun from firing if dropped on the muzzle.
Jim |
July 16, 2009, 04:36 AM | #13 |
Junior Member
Join Date: July 16, 2009
Posts: 2
|
Model 1919 (?) and the Zusatzsicherung
I've recently acquired what I take to be a Sauer & Sohn Model 1919 (SN 53055) which definitely does have the Zusatzsicherung.
I do not have a parts diagram, nor any stripping instructions, for this pistol; but it seems to me to be fairly straightforward. What I do think is unusual is that everyone who discusses the M1919 talks of it as though it is exactly a scaled-down version of the M1913, made to shoot ammunition in 6.35mm calibre (.25ACP). A big difference, as far as I can see, is that there is no slide release within the trigger guard as there is in the M1913. Instead (on my version, at least) there is a tab on top of the safety catch lever that, when pressed upwards (that is, away from the ZS), acts to hold the slide open. See attachment below. Incidentally, I do not see this tab in the two images posted above by Sauerfan. So how do your pistols work, Martin? Last edited by wordspace; July 16, 2009 at 11:15 AM. |
July 16, 2009, 11:00 AM | #14 | ||
Member
Join Date: October 10, 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 51
|
Hi wordspace,
these little buggers called „Sauer“ are confusing, aren’t they? The Sauers up to the model 38/H are like VW beetles: all do look the same but they aren’t. OK, well, I can understand your confusion: Quote:
First of all, a table of the equivalences: Variation of M. 1913 (.32 acp).…Variation of M. 1919 (.25 acp) 1913-I………………………………………..none 1913-II……………………………………….1919-I 1913-III (with ZS)……………………..1919-II 1926…………………………………………..1919-III OK, now….. what you have, is a 1919, third variation (1919-III) corresponding to the Sauer 1926, which sometimes is called a fourth variation of the 1913 (1913-IV). Historically, this is not correct, as Sauer in fact did name this 1926 a ….1926. Technically, this is correct: the 1926 is an improved 1913, but now looking quiet different. The appearance is something between a 1913 and a model 1930 and a Behördenmodell, respectively. Like the latter the 1926 (and the 1919-III) now did have an improved holdopen device. It is like you described it. For better understanding, I’m enclosing an image of one of my 1926s. You see? Your’s is a scaled down version of the same pistol. Well, except for the grips – but on the early variations of the 1926 the grips looked like the ones on yours (mine is a very late one). Regarding your question: Quote:
Best regards Martin |
||
July 16, 2009, 11:13 AM | #15 |
Junior Member
Join Date: July 16, 2009
Posts: 2
|
M1919-iii
Thank you very much, Sauerfan!
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|