|
Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
Register | FAQ | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
View Poll Results: Do you keep body armor as part of your "emergency gear"? | |||
Yes | 22 | 20.75% | |
No - but it's a good idea | 47 | 44.34% | |
No - there's no point. | 37 | 34.91% | |
Voters: 106. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 7, 2013, 11:53 AM | #51 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 9, 2011
Location: Land of the Free
Posts: 2,834
|
I don't know what everyone is talking about, but body armor does not slow you down that much, the benifits are worth it.
|
April 7, 2013, 12:28 PM | #52 |
Senior Member
Join Date: January 27, 2013
Posts: 988
|
The 5.7 cartridge itself is not necessarily armor penetrating, unless it is specifically the SS190. The SS190 does have heavy restrictions though, just like any other AP round. The ones you are sold are not the SS190 unless they have the black tip and are labeled as AP.
In other words, save your money if you only want it because you think that it will penetrate someone's body armor. It is a sweet gun if you want it for other purposes though.
__________________
Semper Fi Marine, NRA member, SAF Defender's Club member, and constitutionally protected keeper and bearer of firearms |
April 7, 2013, 05:28 PM | #53 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 6, 2013
Posts: 456
|
Trust me on this one. Most vests weigh at least 5 pounds if not more. They do not breathe and they generate the same heat as a winter jacket. Even if you are in great shape and well conditioned thats still 5 lbs to slow you down.
Plates weigh like bowling balls. One ball on the back and one on the front. They have actually been around forever and the military didnt use them until the last several years. They used them mainly because of the politics and media not because they felt it was a good idea. Study after study for the last 200 years say the same thing. Carry around more then 35 lbs and you become less effective as a foot soldier. That hasnt changed. Wearing 40 lbs of armor on top of your usual load is suicide. Would it make sense to carry two bowling balls through a battlefield? I guess it makes sense to those who believe two heavy plates covering up a small portion of your body will make you a better soldier or Marine. |
April 7, 2013, 05:50 PM | #54 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 18, 2004
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 2,568
|
When we were in RVN, . . . only time we had any "vest" was a flak jacket, . . . and for the most part, I only wore mine on convoy. I think I remember wearing it up in the MG tower, . . . but that was 45 years ago, . . .
I still have one here, . . . bought it for our veteran parades, . . . almost new looking. SHTF, . . . it's close enough to grab, . . . and for the protection it would afford, . . . I would wear it. Now body armor 24/7, . . . that's a different story. May God bless, Dwight
__________________
www.dwightsgunleather.com If you can breathe, . . . thank God! If you can read, . . . thank a teacher! If you are reading this in English, . . . thank a Veteran! |
April 7, 2013, 06:44 PM | #55 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: January 8, 2001
Location: Forestburg, Montague Cnty, TX
Posts: 12,717
|
Quote:
Quote:
Will the weight of a vest slow you down? Sure, so will the weight of your gun, shoes, and pants...and anything else weighing you down. So if you are after ultimate speed, then maybe going naked with some good lightweight running shoes (because tender feet will slow you down more than feet protected in lightweight running shoes) might be your best option, but then what protections do you have? There is a balance with all your choices. Choose wisely for what fits and suits your situation. I would rather be in body armor in a gunfight than not. One thing is certain. Even when I was in top shape, I could not outrun a bullet.
__________________
"If you look through your scope and see your shoe, aim higher." -- said to me by my 11 year old daughter before going out for hogs 8/13/2011 My Hunting Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/HornHillRange |
||
April 7, 2013, 07:43 PM | #56 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 6, 2013
Posts: 456
|
Well if you understand the disadvantages of armor then let us know what you are looking for.
When Im overseas I use a Point Blank Nato Front Opening. I prefer this style vest because it can be donned and doffed fast. Since its front opening I usually open the front to vent it out during off time. It has wrap around side protection and a collar. If you could only have one tactical vest thats what I would get. You wont be able to put on a side opening vest or that pig plate carrier with such speed. |
April 7, 2013, 08:16 PM | #57 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 21, 2010
Location: Rome, NY
Posts: 941
|
"Am I the only one who hates body armor? Every single piece of body armor I have worn has been uncomfortable and distracting from thin II-A setups made of Dyneema to the heavier III-A varieties. All of them slow you down. Before making a decision on body armor go to a range and test out your accuracy with and without. Run a 100 meter dash with and without.
I tend to think body armor has probably caused a few fatalities... " I'm willing to bet that the body armor is a lot more comfortable than a bullet in the chest!
__________________
Jim Page Cogito, ergo armatum sum |
April 8, 2013, 11:10 AM | #58 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 22, 2008
Location: las vegas, NV
Posts: 409
|
Quote:
|
|
April 8, 2013, 11:46 AM | #59 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 17, 2005
Location: Swamp dweller
Posts: 6,187
|
Quote:
Seems you are betting your life on that vest that will supposedly stop most anything. Sound of breaking/crashing glass, startling the ever lovin crap out of you, tossing on a vest, grab the light and grab the gun after opening the draw/door on the stand, really? Why only put it on when having to leave the room?
__________________
NRA Life Member, NRA Chief Range Safety Officer, NRA Certified Pistol Instructor,, USPSA & Steel Challange NROI Range Officer, ICORE Range Officer, ,MAG 40 Graduate As you are, I once was, As I am, You will be. |
|
April 8, 2013, 04:43 PM | #60 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 4, 1999
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 1,889
|
I am not interested in body armor. Considering the probability of an attack it is not worth the trouble and discomfort to me.
Jerry
__________________
Ecclesiastes 12:13 ¶Let us hear the conclusion of the whole matter: Fear God, and keep his commandments: for this is the whole duty of man. 14 For God shall bring every work into judgment, with every secret thing, whether it be good, or whether it be evil. |
April 9, 2013, 03:58 AM | #61 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 19, 2011
Posts: 235
|
Re: Body Armor
I have three onlu because we get them issued at work. Never wear any besides work but nice to have around.
I did shoot an old one I had got from work several years ago. It was at least 5 years out of date. Shot it 10 feet away with .40 s&w and .22 lr. Stopped both just fine. |
April 9, 2013, 04:15 AM | #62 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: April 18, 2011
Location: The Woods
Posts: 1,197
|
Quote:
Quote:
According to the tag it will stop a .44mag, so like I said, most anything out of a pistol. Quote:
__________________
si vis pacem para bellum Last edited by dayman; April 9, 2013 at 04:22 AM. |
|||
April 9, 2013, 07:46 AM | #63 |
Senior Member
Join Date: April 6, 2013
Posts: 456
|
The II-A, II and III-A will all probably "stop" most calibers up to the 44 magnum. There are various youtube videos which tests this assertion. However, the problem is the force behind the round. Even though there may not be a penetration, the force behind the round is enough to create a lot of pain and internal injury. So if you are wearing a II-A and get hit by the 44 Magnum there may not be any penetration, but its going to be like someone just hit you with a bat accompanied by a lot of pain.
If you are keeping a vest by the nightstand "just in case" it will probably be useless when the time comes because of the amount of time to put it on and adjust it. Your best bet is a front-opening vest like the older version of the Point Blank Interceptor or the Point Blank NATO. The vest you put on like a jacket is far superior in such cases where you need to throw something on quickly. However, that type of vest would not offer the greatest amount of protection as you want the openings on the side rather then the front where rounds are most likely to impact. I highly suggest training extensively with any body armor as it takes a while to get used to it. You might find the extra pounds slows you down or distracts you away from proper aim. Most people who aim and shoot at something miss the target. So if you are moving quicker you become a bad target. If you are slowed down by some armor then you will be a better target. Someone had stated "why not just go naked?". Well, in actual combat, the US Navy Seals in Vietnam did everything they could to lighten their load to include wearing light tennis shoes and no helmet in certain operations. There is some value to going into a situation light rather then loaded down with gear. There has been test after test which shows the greater poundage over 35 lbs for males the less effective you become. |
April 9, 2013, 04:26 PM | #64 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: January 8, 2001
Location: Forestburg, Montague Cnty, TX
Posts: 12,717
|
Quote:
http://thefiringline.com/forums/atta...9&d=1163605401 If you are wearing a vest and shot by a perp, consider yourself luck if he uses hollowpoints. They are less apt to penetrate than ball ammo. The nose tends to crush in and the sides accordion out with a single fold, causing a form of expansion than helps stop the bullet from penetrating. Quote:
Quote:
The nice thing about the over the top vest is that if you don't get it closed, it still provides frontal protection. If you don't close your jacket vest, it can come open during movement and expose your COM vitals. The nice thing about a jacket vest is that it holds hard armor plates much better and often has means by which you can attach things like a holster (such as the PB you mentioned).
__________________
"If you look through your scope and see your shoe, aim higher." -- said to me by my 11 year old daughter before going out for hogs 8/13/2011 My Hunting Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/HornHillRange |
|||
April 12, 2013, 10:15 AM | #65 |
Senior Member
Join Date: November 4, 1999
Location: Rebel South USA
Posts: 2,074
|
considering how unlikely it is that I will ever have to fire a weapon in SD to begin with, I don't really think that body armor has ever entered my mind.
I have a fire extinguisher sure... but I don't have a firemans (turnout) gear or airpack. I wear a seatbelt when I drive to work.. but I don't wear a helmet, have a roll cage or 6 point harness.
__________________
Life is a web woven by necessity and chance... |
|
|