December 20, 2016, 10:35 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 17, 2011
Posts: 672
|
BBC Article
I wanted to share this BBC article. It's an interesting take on something that I think has been happening for a long time. I am heartened that as a community we are beginning to be recognized as welcoming, besides the more traditional view that we are intolerant. Not even sure if there is a "we" but any-who it is an interesting read and after this drivel, is now not a drive by.
BBC Article. Sorry I meant to put this in General... not in Rifle. |
December 20, 2016, 10:59 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 15, 2007
Posts: 1,215
|
They really packed a lot of stereotypes, cliches and misconceptions into one story.
__________________
To a much greater extent than most mechanical devices, firearms are terribly unforgiving of any overconfidence, complacency or negligence. |
December 20, 2016, 11:38 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 20, 2016
Posts: 223
|
The only Liberal they could find was a Trans gender women.
Sorry BBC try again. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
December 20, 2016, 03:17 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: September 12, 2015
Location: Issaquah WA. Its a dry rain.
Posts: 1,774
|
Wait wait...so your telling me not all gun owners are racist, sexist, xynophobes who drool over cheaper than dirt catalogs? Inconceivable!!
__________________
Just shoot the damn thing. |
December 20, 2016, 08:51 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: December 2, 2004
Location: Rocky Mountains
Posts: 649
|
Just thought it was funny they mention fears of a Trump administration "dismantling key constitutional rights".
What about the 2nd Amendment for the last 80 yrs? Welcome to real world pinkos.
__________________
"Love lost, fire at will Dum Dum bullets and shoot to kill I hear dive bombers, and Empire down." SOM |
December 20, 2016, 09:23 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 14, 2004
Location: NY State
Posts: 6,575
|
Maybe BBC was once a credible source but not recently !
The great big Global Warming scam was handled by the BBC by just refusing to cover any apposing viewpoints !!
__________________
And Watson , bring your revolver ! |
December 22, 2016, 08:00 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 13, 2006
Location: Washington state
Posts: 15,248
|
Most Europeans are shocked that Americans own so many guns. And then they are offended by the State Department issuing "do not travel"warnings for Great Britain after they disarmed their citizens and violent crime surged. Of course, they were also shocked when the Islamic terrorists attacked France this year. And last year. And the year before. And to think they tried to take all the guns away so this wouldn't happen!
What they refuse to accept is that guns are not the issue. Some issues are the narcissistic nature of society today and the gradual degradation of societal standards. Or not-so-gradual, depending on your point of view. They tried to depict Americans as a bunch of hicks and backwards alarmists, but they also expected us to bail them out several times when their socialist ideals backed up the social sewers several times in the past.
__________________
Never try to educate someone who resists knowledge at all costs. But what do I know? Summit Arms Services |
December 22, 2016, 08:44 PM | #8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 17, 2011
Posts: 672
|
Quote:
-SS- |
|
December 22, 2016, 08:56 PM | #9 |
Member
Join Date: September 2, 2015
Posts: 30
|
You are on a gun forum dude reading a post by a guy named "Scorch", did you really need a trigger alert?
|
December 22, 2016, 09:16 PM | #10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 17, 2011
Posts: 672
|
Quote:
|
|
December 22, 2016, 10:08 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 20, 2014
Posts: 2,084
|
So basically they are arming themselves to protect themselves from us...lol. Im just sitting here shaking my head. Whatever keeps them busy I guess..lol
|
December 22, 2016, 10:18 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: August 31, 2002
Location: Deep in the Heart of the Lone Star State (TX)
Posts: 2,169
|
|
December 22, 2016, 10:18 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: October 31, 2000
Location: Texican!
Posts: 4,453
|
Just wait till ISIS and the Muslims raise hell in the UK and a big war starts.
I ain't sending them any of my guns to defend their island like we did in WW2. To heck with them. They ain't ever gonna learn. Deaf
__________________
“To you who call yourselves ‘men of peace,’ I say, you are not safe without men of action by your side” Thucydides |
December 22, 2016, 10:35 PM | #14 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: June 17, 2011
Posts: 672
|
Quote:
In case you hadn't noticed there are terrorist problems here too. Our guys are fighting alongside your guys overseas, along with other forces from throughout Europe. And Britain fought WWII (with the rest of Europe) for years before it was brought to the U.S. via Pearl Harbor. Only then it got your attention. And for anyone old enough to have lived through WWII, you don't see how your remark is disrespectful to them? Where is your honor? -SS- Edit: I think this should be closed now. |
|
December 22, 2016, 11:33 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 25, 2016
Posts: 169
|
I don't think so. Discussion is good.
You are offended by negative comments towards a Brit who has made unfounded, biased and negative comments that basically offended the rank and file gun owner here on the forum. Personally I am offended by both sets of comments but I do understand where the anti-Brit comments originate. I'm not a redneck, right wing, neo-nazi, gay bashing extremist but according to the article I must be cause I am a long term firearm enthusiast and have\am prepared for unknown situations. The former due in fact that I have been seriously concerned about the future of our country and rights plus the fact that I have been through a few natural disasters that have tested my neighbors. These same neighbors (you know, the liberals that have the same negative perceptions of gun owners as the author of the article has as well as those he interviewed) were the first ones at my door asking to borrow "items" for self protection when they were without power, potable water, food, phone and, well let's call it "security" in the face of general lawlessness. I might feel different if the author had also interviewed a few of us for the article. He might have found out that we are the ones who openly welcome new gun owners and are willing to help them learn how to safely handle their new firearms. It is amusing to me that the liberals are now as concerned about the future of our country and the loss of their rights as I have been for the past 8 years. There's something to be said for Karma... Last edited by xcc_rider; December 22, 2016 at 11:40 PM. |
December 23, 2016, 12:00 AM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: March 20, 2008
Posts: 229
|
What rights have you lost over the last 8 years?
|
December 23, 2016, 12:35 AM | #17 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: October 31, 2000
Location: Texican!
Posts: 4,453
|
Quote:
Quote:
Deaf
__________________
“To you who call yourselves ‘men of peace,’ I say, you are not safe without men of action by your side” Thucydides |
||
December 23, 2016, 12:36 AM | #18 |
Member In Memoriam
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Posts: 24,383
|
So only gun owners want to take away the rights of others? Now what are we to think of the "liberal" newspaper editor who used HIS First Amendment to write that "... anyone who owns a gun should be arrested and executed without the nonsense of a trial... that is the only way we can have a free society without fear... "
Jim |
December 23, 2016, 01:03 AM | #19 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: June 17, 2011
Posts: 672
|
Quote:
Quote:
And further it is foolish to beat our chess and consider a nation weak, that it [disarmament] can't happen here. It happened in Germany, Turkey, China, Russia, Cambodia, Britain, Guatemala, Uganda. It has happened all over the world. The Brit's were taken advantage of by their government while they were busy enjoying not having our cities reduced to rubble, nightly. Walk a mile in those shoes. -SS- |
||
December 23, 2016, 01:42 AM | #20 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: February 13, 2006
Location: Washington state
Posts: 15,248
|
Sweet Shooter, sorry to have ruffled your feathers, but the article was written by a British writer working for BBC (which, unless I am mistaken, is a British entity), judging us by their standards and trying to generally vilify conservative gun-owners in the USA. Most people world-wide are pretty good at judging others who are not of their cultural group and pointing out how different they are. From our perspective, many of their cultural norms are abhorrent (trials in absentia, confiscation of firearms from law-abiding citizens, censorship, police keeping records on all citizens, etc) and they feel the need to point out that liberals in the USA are "feeling threatened". Well, waah! Babies feel threatened when the bogey man scares them, mature people do not feel threatened by imaginary fiends.
But after all, I suppose I might have been a bit off-target, so please overlook my back-woods, hillbilly-ish attitudes regarding those who judge us and want us to become just like them. Quote:
And in the FWIW slot regarding my post, you might also make a note that I too grew up in Europe.
__________________
Never try to educate someone who resists knowledge at all costs. But what do I know? Summit Arms Services |
|
December 23, 2016, 02:39 AM | #21 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: July 12, 2011
Location: Top of the Baltic stack
Posts: 6,079
|
Quote:
Quote:
I like this forum a great deal, but the frequent, general brit-o-phobia is one of the things I find disheartening. There is a misguided view on here that because the situation in the UK is what gun owners fear for the US, it (the UK) should be "attacked" at every opportunity when it has absolutely no bearing/influence on US domestic policy... Many also don't realise there are about 200 million firearms owners in the EU Talking of stereotypes, you'll read "liberals" bandied as a foul word on here whilst we all know that gun owners are as diverse a group as any, so glass houses....
__________________
When the right to effective self-defence is denied, that right to self-defence which remains is essentially symbolic. Freedom: Please enjoy responsibly.
|
||
December 23, 2016, 02:46 AM | #22 |
Staff
Join Date: March 11, 2006
Location: Upper US
Posts: 28,832
|
While there are, of course, bigots and fools on the pro gun side, generally my experience is that when shooters gather, all we look at is guns and shooting.
Now, anything coming from the BBC is going to get some anti-Brit sentiments, and not entirely without reason. Part of the resentment comes from the institutional memory of the "gun culture" from the desperate days of 1940, when Britain asked not only the US government for aid, but asked US citizens to send them arms to defend themselves with, against the expected Nazi invasion. Which we did. Willingly. It was the right thing to do, then. A small number of the guns we sent even came back, after the war. Today they are prized collectibles for their unique history. And then balance that with the recent decades of the US gun control faction touting Britain's restrictions as the model society for all of us. They, (and certain outspoken British citizens) have created a general association between Britain and gun prohibition in a lot of people's minds. This has done almost as great a disservice to the British public as it has to the US citizenry. I found some parts of the article interesting, it is also rife with suggestive "facts" without adequate additional information to make any conclusion other than their agenda unlikely. I found their attempt to link Trump with record sales on Black Friday to actually be amusing. But that's just me...
__________________
All else being equal (and it almost never is) bigger bullets tend to work better. |
December 23, 2016, 03:11 AM | #23 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 12, 2011
Location: Top of the Baltic stack
Posts: 6,079
|
Quote:
In this respect, the UK is pretty much entirely passive. Touting of its presumptive, idyllic gun-free living is, as you said, US home-grown. My mum used to point out how a boy we knew was so well-behaved as a role-model for me. I resented him for that. Yet, he had nothing to do with it, it was my mum that was the issue (and possibly me) and my ire was unjustified.
__________________
When the right to effective self-defence is denied, that right to self-defence which remains is essentially symbolic. Freedom: Please enjoy responsibly.
|
|
December 23, 2016, 03:13 AM | #24 | |
Staff
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 18,466
|
Quote:
|
|
December 23, 2016, 04:17 AM | #25 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: July 1, 2001
Posts: 6,331
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|