The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > NFA Guns and Gear

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old May 11, 2002, 11:11 PM   #1
Bill Siegle
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 9, 2001
Location: Oregon
Posts: 214
Glocks and cans

I was wondering if Glock pistols(particularly 17s and 21s) are up to the challenges of suppressors. I have heard rumors that they don't mix so I am requesting some qualified opinions please.
Bill Siegle is offline  
Old May 12, 2002, 01:33 AM   #2
Badger Arms
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 2, 2000
Location: Harnett County, NC
Posts: 1,678
Glocks have a recoil operated tilting barrel operation. This method of operation is common and utilized by most pistols in 9mm and more powerful rounds. The problem with these systems is that they are sensative to the mass of the supressor. There is nothing different or special about the Glock as opposed to nearly every other Browning locking system guns on the market. You either need a light supressor or an inertia system that allows the slide and barrel to recoil separate the supressor. This is simpler than it sounds but does add to the cost and complexity of the system and reliability is therefore reduced slightly.

IMO, if you want to supress the gun, choose an in-line recoiling system like th Beretta M-9 or, beter yet, a fixed barrel gun like the HK P-7 or Makarov. Yeah, yeah, easier said than done but it is better to start from there than try to work around it.

One final note, for better suppression, there are systems that lock the slide so that the gun turns into a single shot. Much quieter.
__________________
We may or may not worship God, but John Moses Browning made sure we can choose.
Badger Arms is offline  
Old May 12, 2002, 02:41 AM   #3
Bill Siegle
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 9, 2001
Location: Oregon
Posts: 214
didn't even consider the HK. I wonder what a new barrel would run. I assume an older PSP P7 wouldn't have any problems. Thanks for the suggestion.
Bill Siegle is offline  
Old May 12, 2002, 01:00 PM   #4
Badger Arms
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 2, 2000
Location: Harnett County, NC
Posts: 1,678
Don't get me wrong, you end up paying more for the suppressed than you would have to for a proper supressor and Glock. I was just speaking academically. A great part of the equation is what use you plan on having for the device. Is it for more pleasant target practice, for occasional use on a duty weapon (indoors for instance), for the sake of having one, etc. If you have the extra money to spend and just want a suppressed pistol, go for it. Being in a Class III state, you might want to start with a really quiet gun like an integrally suppressed Ruger .22 rifle or pistol. Here are some manufacturers of Class III stuff:

AAC
AWC
Gemtech
__________________
We may or may not worship God, but John Moses Browning made sure we can choose.
Badger Arms is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.06599 seconds with 9 queries