The Firing Line Forums
Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Conference Center > S.W.A.T. Magazine

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old November 9, 2001, 11:47 AM   #1
Bartholomew Roberts
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 12, 2000
Location: Texas and Oklahoma area
Posts: 5,667
Question About December Issue

In the article discussing the Regional IDPA shoot, the author mentions that one of the shooters drew a SIG from concealment and hit a droping target 30 feet away in 0.121 seconds. He then repeated the feat from an exposed draw in 0.89 seconds.

Can I assume that the first time should be 1.21 seconds?
Bartholomew Roberts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 9, 2001, 11:56 AM   #2
Rich Lucibella
Staff
 
Join Date: October 6, 1998
Location: South Florida
Posts: 10,163
Good catch. You are coorect. 1.21 seconds.
Rich
__________________
S.W.A.T. Magazine
Weapons, Training and Tactics for the Real World
Join us at TFL or at AR15.com or on Facebook
Rich Lucibella is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 9, 2001, 07:24 PM   #3
Dennis
Staff Emeritus
 
Join Date: November 23, 1998
Location: a small forest in Texas
Posts: 7,075
oh-oh.
Dennis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 14, 2001, 12:05 PM   #4
Rob Pincus
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 9, 1998
Location: Hotels
Posts: 3,677
Yeah.. I noticed that myself....

Somewhere between Machester, TN and the final printing Robbie's shooting went from "worth mentioning" to Bionic.


The article reads ".124," but his actual time was 1.24 seconds.

A bunch of us went back to that stage after the event and shot it again both concealed and open. I think my best time was just about an even second. Only Robbie was able to bust solidly below the full second barrier with his .89 unconcealed.

There was another guy there who had two identical times in the 1 second range with two different pistols... he won the consistency award.


Thanks for paying attention!

Last edited by Rob Pincus; November 17, 2001 at 07:11 PM.
Rob Pincus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 17, 2001, 06:54 PM   #5
Fly320s
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 3, 2001
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 281
I just picked-up that issue today. Good article.

Whew, I'm glad that it's 1.21 seconds. I was feeling like a mere mortal. But at 1.2 secods, that's almost enough time for a sandwich.
Fly320s is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Page generated in 0.08065 seconds with 9 queries