The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Hunt

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old July 8, 2000, 08:07 AM   #1
Turk
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 30, 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 517
Any members use the Barnes X bullets to hunt deer,elk etc. Your thoughts please.

Turk
Turk is offline  
Old July 8, 2000, 08:47 AM   #2
REDMISTMD
Member
 
Join Date: May 17, 2000
Location: west jordan, utah U S A
Posts: 55
I've tried them on both and they seem to preform very well.I shot one deer with a 150 x bullet at about 100yds and it put it down with one shot to the vitals.What was weird is that it acted like a ballistic tip because it turned the chest cavity into one big bowl of jelly.I've only seen a ballictic tip do that.I was impressed that it hit a rib and didnt come apart. The bullets are made not to far from where I live and I went and toured the factory its a pretty neat little operation. I also shoot the 85XLC bullets in my 6-284 I use it for deer and antelope. I haven't taken anything with taht yet but the accuracy is pretty good.I also have several friend who swear by the Barnes X bullet.
REDMISTMD is offline  
Old July 9, 2001, 08:32 PM   #3
labgrade
Member In Memoriam
 
Join Date: November 29, 1999
Location: west of a small town, CO
Posts: 4,346
Got the hunting jones & checkin' up on some past posts ....

I use the Barnes XBT .30 cal, 165 gr in .308 Win & .309 JDJ. Both right at (only) 2400 fps.

Shot one spike elk (about 350+ lbs) that a member of my hunting party wounded. After a lengthy trailing, I jumped him at about 15 yds & since he was about to drop over into a canyon (& already lung-shot too boot) I took the only shot I had - right through the right ham. Broke throught the pelvis, richo'd off of & broke two ribs & exited through the sternum - complete penetration. He dropped on the spot.

Three-by mulie (about 130 lbs) broadside at about 35 yds. Just a tad high through both lungs. Complete penetration. Deer hunched up & ran. Tracked immediately (after a smoke) - found dead about 100 yds away.

The deer would've been DOA with anything .243 on up w/most any bullet. Just didn't matter for that shot, but the penetration on the elk was amazing. 15 yards, sure, but 5 FEET of elk & that after breaking through the pelvis ... I'm sold.

BTW, no bullet particles, etc. along wound channel which indicated any bullet separation whatsoever ...

I only use the Barnes for these two shooters (oh, & The Wife's 7-08) soley because of the somewhat "lower than standard velocity." Pricey bullets.
labgrade is offline  
Old July 10, 2001, 01:04 PM   #4
Keith Rogan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 11, 1999
Location: Kodiak, Alaska
Posts: 1,014
I haven't used them in several years but I think they're great - I'm shooting a .35 now and last time I looked they don't offer much in that caliber.
One detail that most people overlook is that since they're lighter than a traditional lead core bullet, they are long for their weight. In effect, you get a longer bearing surface and better aerodynamics - it's almost like you get to shoot a heavier bullet without any loss of velocity.
Sometimes there really is a free lunch!
__________________
Keith
Keith Rogan is offline  
Old July 10, 2001, 07:39 PM   #5
Cris
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 9, 2000
Location: Red River Valley
Posts: 127
Recenlty purchased a box of 120's for a long range deer round in my 7mag. I have read they have a tendency to foul a barrel, so my plan is to moly coat.
Cris is offline  
Old July 10, 2001, 08:58 PM   #6
Al Thompson
Staff Alumnus
 
Join Date: May 2, 1999
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 3,605
Chris - check the reloading book for the optimum seating depth. These bullets like a big (0.10) jump into the rifiling. Some of the sub .338 rifles like them, some don't. I had one that hated them (.30-06) and two that loved them.

Giz
__________________
http://www.scfirearms.org/
Al Thompson is offline  
Old July 10, 2001, 09:13 PM   #7
labgrade
Member In Memoriam
 
Join Date: November 29, 1999
Location: west of a small town, CO
Posts: 4,346
Part of that "free lunch" is a better BC (as mentioned) but a downside is since they are longer for any given weight (relative to lead-core bullets), for the heavier bullets, you may require a faster twist to stabilize 'em properly.

100 yds is fine for most load devlopment but it's always a good idea to shoot a few at longer ranges to make sure things are staying put ....
labgrade is offline  
Old July 11, 2001, 07:53 PM   #8
Dan Morris
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 7, 2001
Location: Littleton, Colorado
Posts: 342
Use the Barnes,,,moly....in a .338. The gun absolutely loves them.
While pricey, expansion has been a dream!
Dan
Dan Morris is offline  
Old July 11, 2001, 08:28 PM   #9
biganimal
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 5, 2001
Location: south carolina
Posts: 435
I shoot a 338/06 and reload useing only barnes bullets . it and they perform well on paper, I finally shot a whitetail with it last season and expansion was ideal .the buck walked 9 yards then folded up in a heap, heart lung shot at approx 95 yds
__________________
Other than That, Mrs Lincoln, How was the play?
biganimal is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.07254 seconds with 9 queries