The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Conference Center > Law and Civil Rights

Closed Thread
Thread Tools
Old July 9, 2014, 09:44 PM   #151
Tom Servo
Join Date: September 27, 2008
Location: Foothills of the Appalachians
Posts: 10,626
When you read stuff like this it makes questions about whether or not the militarization of police is a good thing, kind of silly.
Actually, that situation doesn't really have anything to do with the "militarization" of police. Lopez pointed a weapon that looked like an AK-47 at the officer and refused orders to put it down. The officer responded with a pistol.
Sometimes it’s nice not to destroy the world for a change.
--Randall Munroe
Tom Servo is offline  
Old July 9, 2014, 09:54 PM   #152
Senior Member
Join Date: February 23, 2013
Location: Central Iowa
Posts: 572
Lopez pointed a weapon that looked like an AK-47 at the officer and refused orders to put it down. The officer responded with a pistol.
I missed the part that said he pointed it at the officer. That would change things a bit, but not enough to warrant those kinds of comments.

I think it has everything to do with the militarization of police. We are talking more about police attitude towards the public than we are equipment or training. If the police really feel that way about the people they are "protecting", how much worse would it be if they were given the idea that they are a military type force?
Ruger480 is offline  
Old July 9, 2014, 10:07 PM   #153
Senior Member
Join Date: February 23, 2013
Location: Central Iowa
Posts: 572
I read the article again and the way I read it, the kid was walking down the street, the officer saw him, pulled over and shot him. The trainee never fired a shot so that person obviously never felt threatened.

I don't believe it to be a crime to OC a pellet gun in any state. Obviously not a good idea given the attitude of the local PD, but at the end of the day the kid is gone and it looks as if the PD may not be held accountable.
Ruger480 is offline  
Old July 10, 2014, 06:54 AM   #154
Senior Member
Join Date: January 15, 2013
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 727
Ruger: "I don't believe it to be a crime to OC a pellet gun in any state."

Don't carry one in NJ. And I would think twice before carrying one in CA, NY, MD & DC.
2ndsojourn is offline  
Old July 10, 2014, 09:48 AM   #155
Senior Member
Join Date: August 13, 2009
Location: MN
Posts: 651
I read those comments and am not seeing what Ruger480 is talking about. Most of the comments appear to be of the "Gosh, that was an avoidable tragedy, why'd that kid's parents let him wander around in public with a pellet gun that looks exactly like a Kalashnikov?"

If by "prevailing attitude among LEOs" he means the general concurrence in the comments that "We should shoot people who point replica rifles at us," I am not sure why that's unreasonable.

Whether or not Lopez was pointing, in the process of pointing, or making a motion that one could reasonably believe was consistent with pointing the pellet gun at Gelhaus is a question of fact, not a question of opinion.

Personally I can think of at least one scenario where both Lopez's family and Gelhaus are both correct, but which still would have resulted in Lopez's being shot.

Suppose the following:

Lopez is walking down the street carrying his pellet gun, minding his own business.

Gelhaus sees Lopez, reports to his dispatcher that he is investigating a suspicious person, squawks his siren, and is stepping out of his car when Lopez, unaware of his surroundings and surprised by the sudden noise, turns toward Gelhaus's squad car, pellet gun in hand.

Gelhaus sees the muzzle of Lopez's pellet gun swinging toward him, believes he is about to come under fire, and shoots Lopez. His trainee does not fire, either because he does not see the threat or because he is still seated in the car and cannot draw as rapidly as Gelhaus, who has already exited the vehicle. By the time the trainee is out of the car, Lopez is already down on the ground, having been shot eight times.

I think when things like this happen, a lot of people seem unable to recognize that sometimes Tragic Things Happen despite a lack of nefarious intent by anyone involved. The need to Blame Someone so overwhelms rational thought that we conclude Someone Must Pay before having all the facts before us.

Last edited by Madcap_Magician; July 10, 2014 at 10:00 AM.
Madcap_Magician is offline  
Old July 10, 2014, 11:59 AM   #156
Senior Member
Join Date: January 8, 2006
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 1,212
If the officer in this incident is, whom I believe he is, this discussion is going to be biased here on TFL.
WITHOUT Freedom of Thought, there can be no such Thing as Wisdom; and no such Thing as public Liberty, without Freedom of Speech. Silence Dogood

Does not morality imply the last clear chance? - WildAlaska -
OuTcAsT is offline  
Old July 10, 2014, 12:08 PM   #157
Join Date: November 28, 2007
Location: Kommifornia
Posts: 79
Militarization of the police,,,
It's a BAD thing! VERY BAD THING. What could go wrong?
kostner is offline  
Old July 10, 2014, 02:27 PM   #158
Glenn E. Meyer
Join Date: November 17, 2000
Posts: 15,842
This is off the rails now - so closed.
NRA, TSRA, IDPA, NTI, Polite Soc.
Being an Academic Shooter
Being an Active Shooter
Glenn E. Meyer is online now  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:42 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent:
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.09513 seconds with 10 queries