The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Conference Center > Law and Civil Rights

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old October 16, 2013, 03:39 PM   #26
Aguila Blanca
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 6,396
As far as it goes, this appears to be a good decision (for people who maintain vacation homes in New York state).

Quote:
In May 2009, Judge Bartlett denied Osterweil's application for a handgun license, relying on Penal Law ยง 400 (3)(a) and an Appellate Division decision, Mahoney v Lewis (199 AD2d734 [3d Dept 1993]), which held that "as used in this statute the term residence is equivalent to domicile" (id. at 735). Judge Bartlett further ruled that such a domicile requirement was constitutional, under Heller, as a lawful regulatory measure.
Apparently, the county judge took a statute that clearly says "residence" and interpreted it to require "domicile," thereby putting NY state at odds with BATFE guidance, which recognizes vacation residences as "residences" during whatever portion(s) of the year the owners live there. The NY state higher court has now read the law and determined that the law says what the law says, not what the county magistrate wants it to say.

I see that as a win, albeit a win of very limited application.
Aguila Blanca is online now  
Reply

Tags
nra , ny state , pro se , second amendment

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.06367 seconds with 10 queries