The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Art of the Rifle: Bolt, Lever, and Pump Action

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old August 25, 2013, 07:56 PM   #1
Tom2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 23, 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 5,648
Downloading surp guns?

This might belong in the reloading forum, but it does not address any specific loadings. My question is thus: There are alot of neat milsurp vintage guns that are lightweight carbines, not full sized rifles. But alot of them fire a full sized cart designed for a full length rifle application. In the carbines, or short guns, they develop alot of muzzle blast and recoil, and can sometimes be a pain to shoot very much. What I wondered is if anyone that handloads had tried reduced loads for their downsized carbine types to make them pleasant to shoot with good results for accuracy, etc.? Like maybe load some shorty to perhaps like 30-30 power levels or so. I understand that case capacity might make this trickier than it first appears unless you find a light powder charge or lighter weight bullet that works without creating problems.
__________________
Your gun is like your nose, it is just wrong for someone else to pick it for you!
Tom2 is offline  
Old August 25, 2013, 08:12 PM   #2
emcon5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 10, 1999
Location: High Desert NV
Posts: 1,611
Here is an option:

http://www.hodgdon.com/PDF/H4895%20R...le%20Loads.pdf
emcon5 is offline  
Old August 27, 2013, 05:30 PM   #3
Tom2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 23, 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 5,648
That is a good start or ideas. I was mulling over why I never reloaded for the Mosin, and eventually ditched all the short barrel MN's I ever had, after firing them not a great deal with full bore surp ammo. As an instance. I suppose I could have downloaded the round to a more enjoyable level for more shooting. And there are others that have a reputation from the short barrels and powerful government loadings. Heck, I even found a normal K98 not much fun to shoot with that cup steel buttplate.
__________________
Your gun is like your nose, it is just wrong for someone else to pick it for you!
Tom2 is offline  
Old August 27, 2013, 06:01 PM   #4
kraigwy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 16, 2008
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 9,409
Work up some loads using 5744, it makes nice mild, Accurate, rounds.

I use it in all my surplus rifles and a few others, including my 375 H&H.
__________________
Kraig Stuart
CPT USAR Ret
USAMU Sniper School Oct '78
Distinguished Rifle Badge 1071
kraigwy is offline  
Old August 27, 2013, 06:43 PM   #5
Old Stony
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 31, 2013
Location: East Texas
Posts: 632
If you check out the Lyman cast bullet book, they list a lot of reduced loads using inexpensive lead bullets. I've used a lot of .30 ca. cast in things like 30/30, 30/06 etc., and there are all kinds of possibilities for other dia. bullets as well.
Old Stony is offline  
Old August 28, 2013, 08:26 AM   #6
tahunua001
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 21, 2011
Location: Idaho
Posts: 5,982
my steyr is arriving today, I'll be expirimenting with trail boss and cast bullets to get a nice, light recoiling, low reporting load.
__________________
ignore my complete lack of capitalization. I still have no problem correcting your grammar.
I never said half the crap people said I did-Albert Einstein
You can't believe everything you read on the internet-Benjamin Franklin
Bean counters told me I couldn't fire a man for being in a wheelchair, did it anyway. Ramps are expensive.-Cave Johnson.
tahunua001 is online now  
Old August 28, 2013, 03:33 PM   #7
Paul B.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 28, 1999
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 2,619
Most of my lightweight loads for .308 Win. and 30-06 class rifles use cast bullets and 25.0 gr. of either IMR of H4895. My wife wanted a light load to practice with her Ruger M77 RSI in .308 but that rifle is extremely fussy about ammo and won't shoot cast bullets accurately at all. I tried an experiment using the 25.0 gr/4895 load with some 150 gr. Winchester Power Point bullets I had on hand and they worked reasonably well for her. If I were to try that with a 30-06 level cardtidge, I think I'd go 2.0 full grains higher.
Paul B.
__________________
COMPROMISE IS NOT AN OPTION!
Paul B. is offline  
Old August 29, 2013, 11:09 AM   #8
RC20
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 10, 2008
Location: Alaska
Posts: 2,017
There is always that balance in accuracy and velocity. I load down to save gun wear.

I am using TAC in the 30-06 and have done well with it though its not one of the normal recommended accuracy loads.

What works in one gun doesn't necessarily work in another, let alone across different mfgs.

Rifling differences are important in that equation.

My 1917 with original barrels likes the 175 gr with TAC.

The JA barrel one prefers the 4831 at a couple hundred fps faster.
RC20 is offline  
Old August 29, 2013, 10:15 PM   #9
tahoe2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 13, 2011
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 517
Having a couple of Spanish milsurps in 7x57mm mauser, I handload
to pressures of the carbines era (40,000-44,000 CUP) which gives
me a velocity of 2400 fps with a 160grn bullet, 2500 fps with a
150grn, and 2600 fps with a 140 these are plenty good deer killers
as well as black bear.
a standard 30-30 load with 150 grn runs about 2300 fps, so the mauser is
just slightly more powerful with the same recoil or less, depending on the rifle.
These mausers are a pleasure to shoot and plenty accurate, not scoped,
lightweight and easy to carry all day.
tahoe2 is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.08627 seconds with 9 queries