The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Art of the Rifle: General

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old May 16, 2013, 10:39 AM   #1
cmdc
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 1, 2010
Location: kansas city, mo
Posts: 490
Need opinions on weatherby Accumark 300wby

Like, how's recoil compared to 30-06 or 300 win mag. What is it best suited for?

Thanks
cmdc is offline  
Old May 16, 2013, 11:01 AM   #2
leadbutt
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 17, 2002
Location: Tidewater,Virginia
Posts: 289
I had the MK-5, but the recoil is a step up from the 06 and Win -mag, I mean go fiqure more powder, I used mine for deer up to Moose and black bear, know several who have used it for Elk also, and has done well as a Plains Game round in Africa,
__________________
"I am always willing to learn,but not always willing to be taught"
Sir Winston Churchill
leadbutt is offline  
Old May 17, 2013, 02:09 AM   #3
natman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 24, 2008
Posts: 1,429
Recoil from a 300 Weatherby is fast and sharp. It's like getting punched in the jaw. Although there is unquestionably more recoil from a 458 Winchester, I actually prefer to shoot it because while the recoil is large, it's slow enough that you can sort of roll with it. Not so the Weatherby.

That said it's a formidable round, powerful and flat shooting. It would be great for elk, moose and similar. Ammo is expensive and premium bullets are a must. If the game gets really big, I'd personally prefer to trade some of that velocity for a bit more frontal area and bullet weight, but that's JMHO.
natman is offline  
Old May 17, 2013, 07:59 AM   #4
cvc944
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 17, 2013
Location: Lenhartsville, PA
Posts: 164
I have rifles chambered for all three cartridges you mentioned. Recoil-wise, the .300 Roy is a bit more than a .300 Win, and a lot more than an '06. It is fast and loud and it comes back at you with considerable force, but it is far nicer to shoot than the RUM and Lazzaroni's Warbird. Some people have even started calling it a 'middle magnum'. Ammo is costly, Even hand-loading a plain old cup'n'core bullet costs me almost a buck per round.
cvc944 is offline  
Old May 17, 2013, 09:41 AM   #5
cmdc
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 1, 2010
Location: kansas city, mo
Posts: 490
Hmm. Methinks I will pass on that rifle. Even though it is a beauty, it is too much rifle for my needs and purposes. I already have a 30-06 and 300 Win Mag that I don't shoot, not because of recoil, but because I don't hunt anything that requires that much horsepower. Thanks to all for the input.
cmdc is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.06156 seconds with 9 queries