The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Art of the Rifle: Semi-automatics

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old April 3, 2013, 07:11 AM   #26
loose_holster_dan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 5, 2011
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 2,422
the tavor is priced around $2k right now. you can get an MSAR for cheaper.
__________________
Favorite range gun for the money - CZ 75B or STI Spartan V 9mm
Go-to carry setup - Walther PPS or PPQ in FIST kydex holster 1AK
Favorite semi-auto design - HK P7
"A Sig is like a lightsaber - not as clumsy or random as a Glock."
loose_holster_dan is offline  
Old April 3, 2013, 08:55 AM   #27
jason41987
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 19, 2012
Posts: 479
youre right.. i heard the MSRP of the tavor was $1800, but it is $2k... still though, tough choice
jason41987 is offline  
Old April 4, 2013, 12:13 AM   #28
LED
Junior member
 
Join Date: March 10, 2013
Location: The Heartland
Posts: 174
Rationally speaking: No. The bullpups are a necessity for combat troops. It is silly to pretend you have the same needs, especially at your own expense. Bullpups are designed for better control of automatic fire at close to mid distance. Take that away, whats left? They are loud, the triggers suck, the innards are complicated (before the tavor anyway), the accuracy is no better, and the premium is $500 and up for the same performance. Sure it is exciting when you first take it out to shoot. Then you will realize that the AR serves you just as well.
If you want a bullpup no matter what, and can afford it, go for it. Get it over with, and then decide for yourself. The resale values are very good.

Last edited by LED; April 4, 2013 at 06:18 AM.
LED is offline  
Old April 4, 2013, 09:09 AM   #29
SR420
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 12, 2005
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 2,859
LED nailed it.

I have owned a few different bullpup rifles and tried a high end kit.
They are cool and compact, but they don't serve a real purpose in
my reality. All of my bullpup weapons have been sold off & replaced.
__________________
facebook.com/M14EBR.US
SR420 is offline  
Old April 4, 2013, 01:33 PM   #30
jason41987
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 19, 2012
Posts: 479
i may just use the money to buy a couple other rifles on my list that might be going up in price... such as the M1 garand and M1 carbine.. and spend more to spruce up my AK-74 with a better, higher quality barrel, better iron sights and a good red dot
jason41987 is offline  
Old April 4, 2013, 02:14 PM   #31
SR420
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 12, 2005
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 2,859
Then again...
__________________
facebook.com/M14EBR.US
SR420 is offline  
Old April 4, 2013, 05:40 PM   #32
jason41987
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 19, 2012
Posts: 479
i wouldnt want a FAMAS, as a delayed-blowback theyll have similar issues as the HK rifles
jason41987 is offline  
Old April 4, 2013, 08:17 PM   #33
bdareg
Member
 
Join Date: December 3, 2012
Posts: 22
Comes down to personal preference. I have used regular rifles: i.e. Ruger mini 14, hk g36 and m4 carbine, and i have also used sa80a2 bullpup. Bullpups are great for cqb stuff, but if you are not used to them they just feel weird. Mag changes are especially strange at first. But after a While you would get used to it, i did, but i still personally prefer the conventional layout.
bdareg is offline  
Old April 4, 2013, 08:40 PM   #34
barnbwt
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 17, 2012
Posts: 704
Supposedly FAMAS carbines have a much smoother recoil impulse than the G3s, but we'll never know here in the States for less than 5K$ . All I know is they look even weirder (what is it with the French and their guns, anyway?) than the AUG. I'd love to hear a review from someone who doesn't sound like he's gonna go off the deep end, though (I can understand clowning for page-hits, but Jesus, acting around loaded firearms that way...)

TCB
__________________
"I don't believe that the men of the distant past were any wiser than we are today. But it does seem that their science and technology were able to accomplish much grander things."
-- Alex Rosewater
barnbwt is offline  
Old April 5, 2013, 01:10 AM   #35
5.56RifleGuy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 9, 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 1,135
5 K? more like 10k now.
__________________
Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus
5.56RifleGuy is offline  
Old April 5, 2013, 01:24 AM   #36
jason41987
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 19, 2012
Posts: 479
my point on the FAMAS is although i do like the pure simplicity of delayed blowback designs, the very nature of them being a blowback still mean the insides run on the dirty side, and fluted chambers tend to chew brass (not a problem for military who isnt going to be reloading the brass anyway, bad for me though)

Last edited by jason41987; April 5, 2013 at 10:23 AM.
jason41987 is offline  
Old April 5, 2013, 08:13 PM   #37
Famas
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 5, 2009
Location: French, currently living in US
Posts: 126
FAMAS for me. During my time in the service, I never did have a problem with it. Uses DI just like the AR, so I don't see what the problem is there. Sure, the rearward magazine well took a bit of getting used to, but after some training all was fine. The carrying handle was a bit odd, we called it the bugle (Clarion). The charging handle to be placed under the carrying handle was a bit cumbersome with winter gloves, but like everything else it was ok after training. I carried it in Bosnia and overall it was a fine weapon, it shot accurately and I remember I liked the 3-shot bursts. I can remember we had a couple of joint training sessions with German troops in Metkovic and they seemed to like it.

The one thing I did NOT like, it the ejection of spent casings was erratic and sometimes violent...they went everywhere. I think it had more to do with the ejector/extraction rather than the ammunition, but it did fire French made ammo better. Some casings has a nice scratch along the side.

A cousin of mine currently in the Army and having done 2 tours of Afghanistan, says that now few people like the upgraded FAMAS. The upgrade to G2 (I carried the F1) and modification for STANAG was very good, but adoption of FELIN has revealed limitations as to the gadgetry it can support, and unfortunately now everyone wants gadgets.

I've wanted one to add to my French collection, and I saw one on GB a few months ago, a Century Arms inport of the early 1980s...reserve was 10k.

Above retarded video reference is retarded. Let him volunteer to go to Mali, see how he does then mock us, after a few history lessons, preferably via boot to face.

Last edited by Famas; April 5, 2013 at 08:19 PM.
Famas is offline  
Old April 5, 2013, 10:51 PM   #38
kinoons
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 22, 2008
Location: las vegas, NV
Posts: 396
I owned a fs2000 -- got rid of it, the trigger just plain sucked. No way around it.

I do own a ps90. Trigger is better, and I love how compact it is.

If you're willing to go outside the 5.56 realm the ps90 is a winner.
kinoons is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.08631 seconds with 9 queries