The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: The Revolver Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old March 10, 2013, 12:35 PM   #1
marano
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 29, 2005
Posts: 237
Digging the LCR .22LR

When Ruger first introduced the LCR in .38 and .357 I was not impressed. I have since read good things about them but still would not really want one. However when they came out with it in .22 that was enough to peak my interest. I picked one up the other day and the more I shoot it the more I like it. Groups well and very close to point of aim. I am still not happy with the direction that Ruger has gone since the old man died and this gun is far from what I have come to expect from Ruger during my lifetime. I own more Rugers than any other brand of firearm and most of mine are dated fifteen years or so in the past. I like this gun and it will serve its purpose if it holds up. I only have about two hundred rounds thru it so we will see. I sure am glad that I came along at a time when Ruger was what it was when I started buying them, circa 1977.

marano is offline  
Old March 10, 2013, 12:41 PM   #2
9mm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 9, 2011
Location: Land of the Free
Posts: 2,698
The LCR-22 is great training with. I would never own the 38/357 after shootign the 22lr though. I have had the trigger failed to reset on me a few times during rapid fire. I just wish I could get those houge grips on my S&W642, I hate the metal backstrip on mine -.-
__________________
SHTF vs TEOTWAWKI you ask? SHTF, just some crap on the ceiling and walls, TEOTWAWKI end of the world as we know it. Orignally made by 9mm/®™©
9mm is offline  
Old March 10, 2013, 04:05 PM   #3
22-rimfire
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 19, 2005
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 4,555
I like my LCR-22.
22-rimfire is offline  
Old March 10, 2013, 04:38 PM   #4
x-five
Member
 
Join Date: January 30, 2013
Location: Custer county, Montana
Posts: 55
. 22 lr revolvers must have longer barrel than ruger lcr has. This gun was made for self defense use, so only 38 special and 357 mag. Are enough powerful. This gun isn't for plinking oe target shooting. Also the cylinder of the .22 looks afwul.

Last edited by Spats McGee; March 17, 2013 at 04:54 PM. Reason: Removed offensive material
x-five is offline  
Old March 10, 2013, 04:48 PM   #5
RJay
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 2, 2005
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,598
Why isn't it for pinking or short range target shooting, and why couldn't it be used for self defence. Seems to me to fit the criteria for a camp gun/ trail gun/ walkabout gun/snake gun/ tackle box gun or what ever. " Be a man and get a .357 b", Jeeze Louise
__________________
Ron James
RJay is offline  
Old March 10, 2013, 04:52 PM   #6
marano
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 29, 2005
Posts: 237
It is a FUN gun.

I got it just for shooting around the house. Goes well with my other four Ruger .22's. I got a MkII, a 22/45, a bearcat, and a Single-Six. As far as bigger calibers go, I have a speed six in .357, a Service Six in .357 and a Redhawk in .44 magnum. I like me some Rugers. Almost forgot the GP-100 and the Blackhawk .45. Yep like me some Rugers.
marano is offline  
Old March 10, 2013, 05:55 PM   #7
skidder
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 17, 2008
Location: Montana
Posts: 623
Mine went back to Ruger with a bad trigger and cylinder not closing properly. They said it could not be fixed so they are sending me a new one.

Three issues and I only took it out one time (button screw also backed out). I'm not taking anymore chances with these LCRs. The new one will be sold as new-in-box so my conscience will be clear as it is passed on.

I know some really like there's, but three totally different issues on a brand new revolver is the same as "three strikes" in my book. No way am I going to fire the new one. More value selling it "new-in-box".

I probably got a lemon, but I don't want to find out.
__________________
Gun permit?? A bread crumb tossed to a sleeping society awoken by the sound of complacency. "They are for your own good", and "you will understand when you see all the lives they save". Yes master, what else will you toss me from your bag of infringements?? Do you want me to roll over and play dead? I do that very well. --skidder

Last edited by skidder; March 10, 2013 at 06:10 PM.
skidder is offline  
Old March 11, 2013, 12:38 PM   #8
jstert
Junior Member
 
Join Date: March 7, 2013
Posts: 7
lcr followup

that is too bad about your lcr 22lr being a lemon. im happy with mine, and find its trigger smoother than my sw 317 22lr, but a tad less accurate, which stands to reason since the sw has a longer barrel: 3" vs 1 7/8". i had a taurus 94 22lr and happily sold it, the trigger was virtually impossible to pull double action. now im looking hard at a lcr 22mag but everything that i read says the 22mag loses too much power coming out of a snubbie, such as the lcr. i already have a ruger single six combo in 22lr and 22mag, so i stockedpiled some ammo. i prefer not to buy yet more, albeit new defensive, 22mag ammo, so will probably defer buying the lcr 22mag, but i could be convinced otherwise.
jstert is offline  
Old March 12, 2013, 07:53 AM   #9
Jayhawkhuntclub
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 13, 2007
Posts: 425
Marano: I would argue that Ruger is pretty much what they have always been: A company that builds rugged guns that are innovative and makes them so the common man can afford them. That LCR 22 should last you a lifetime. Times change. Ruger has made appropriate changes. Sometimes the more things change the more they stay the same: that's Ruger.

9mm: Usually the problems with trigger reset are operator error. I'm not saying yours was, as I obviously don't know.

RJay: Great post!

I have the 357, and it is amazing. It shoots sub 3" groups at 20 yards when I do my part. That's amazing for a gun with a 1.875" barrel. But the recoil is stout. I mostly shoot 38 spls in mine because of that.
Jayhawkhuntclub is offline  
Old March 14, 2013, 04:29 AM   #10
oldhunter
Member
 
Join Date: October 9, 2005
Location: Southwestern New York State
Posts: 36
I bought a LCR 22 in January, added a LaserMax laser to aid my poor eyesight and now have a very accurate, 8 shot revolver that can serve either as primary or BUG. All for a total investment of $500. Trigger takes getting used to but after a couple bricks, I believe Ruger does it right.
oldhunter is offline  
Old March 14, 2013, 05:51 PM   #11
5thShock
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 28, 2006
Posts: 227
For those here that will be carrying this nouveau tough snub, with what would you be loading her? Solids, Velocitors Stingers?
5thShock is offline  
Old March 15, 2013, 11:27 AM   #12
bedbugbilly
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 19, 2009
Posts: 1,964
I'm just the opposite . . . I have a .357 LCR for CCW and I like it for that - not the prettiest revolver but I like the lightweight of it and how it shoots. The 22 LCR doesn't really do much for me and I'll probably never own one. I have a number of Rugers . . . love them all but for myself, for shooting 22s, I much prefer my MK III Target or for general plinking, I have a vintage Super Bearcat. I just have never been that thriiled with DA revolvers and much prefer SA style revolvers. If I'm going to spend what they get for the 22 LCR - I'm going to spend it on something that isn't DA only - just my preference. On the other hand, for CCW (for myself and my preferences) I chose the 357 LCR because it ws DA only - primarily for safety reasons. And the trigger on mine is very nice. But . . . like anythng else - Chevy or Ford? It's different strokes for different folks.
__________________
If a pair of '51 Navies were good enough for Billy Hickok, then a single Navy on my right hip is good enough for me . . . besides . . . I'm probably only half as good as he was anyways. Hiram's Rangers Badge #63
bedbugbilly is offline  
Old March 15, 2013, 11:50 AM   #13
blackamos
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 19, 2000
Location: Michigan
Posts: 530
My dailey carry is a LCR in 38. It is an easy choice, light small and for the most part rust resistant. I am thinking about grabbing one in .22 for plinking. I did not care for the looks of any LCR at first but it had grown on me.
__________________
Know of that you speak,
Amos
blackamos is offline  
Old March 17, 2013, 02:36 PM   #14
tinkersdelight
Junior Member
 
Join Date: December 1, 2012
Location: Idaho
Posts: 6
like'n mine...

Have the LCR 357...amazing shooter, even tho I have other options to carry, the LCR is always handy and around....I reload and very cheap to shoot, lot's of lead available, I don't have to chase the brass.
__________________
"When civilized men can no longer stand the horrors of war, they will be conquered by uncivilized men who can." -unknown
tinkersdelight is offline  
Old March 17, 2013, 02:51 PM   #15
TennJed
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 26, 2010
Posts: 1,498
Digging the LCR .22LR

Quote:
Originally Posted by x-five View Post
. 22 lr revolvers must have longer barrel than ruger lcr has. This gun was made for self defense use, so only 38 special and 357 mag. Are enough powerful. This gun isn't for plinking oe target shooting. Also the cylinder of the .22 looks afwul.
This may be the most ridiculous post I have ever seen

Last edited by Spats McGee; March 17, 2013 at 04:55 PM. Reason: Removing offensive material from quoted (previous) post
TennJed is offline  
Old March 17, 2013, 07:59 PM   #16
22-rimfire
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 19, 2005
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 4,555
It might look "awful" to some, but it seems to work. The brass sticks in mine sometimes.
22-rimfire is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2013 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.09599 seconds with 9 queries