The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > Hogan's Alley > Handguns: The Semi-automatic Forum

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old March 15, 2013, 07:25 AM   #26
cecILL
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 13, 2001
Location: central IL
Posts: 471
Hey Clark, what loads are you using and what are you firing them out of?
cecILL is offline  
Old March 15, 2013, 07:49 AM   #27
Winchester_73
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 20, 2008
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 2,859
It would be great if someone had enough insight to consider the intent of the 25 auto ctg, rather than how it stacks up against say a 9mm. Is it really that hard to understand?
__________________
Winchester 73, the TFL user that won the west
Winchester_73 is offline  
Old March 15, 2013, 08:39 AM   #28
PSP
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 2, 2006
Location: N. Virginia
Posts: 3,912
Sometimes people may find themselves in need of really tiny, ultra concealable guns. Until very recently, this meant using the minor calibers. The development of some very small guns, the .380 Seecamp and .380 Kahr for example, means folks may not have to resort to .22, .25 or .32 calibers.

There are people that may not be able to handle larger calibers, for what ever reason, and the minor calibers may be the only options

I carry a .32 often and have on occasion resorted to a .25 when the other was out of action. I'd never characterize the ability to lessen a threat worthless, whether using a .25 or larger.
PSP is offline  
Old March 15, 2013, 09:04 AM   #29
Winchester_73
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 20, 2008
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 2,859
Thank you PSP, someone is getting 02 to their head here, great.

For anyone else: remember in the 25 auto hey day (before WWII) you could have carried instead a 32 auto (generally much bigger), a 32 S&W revolver (less rounds, slower reload time), a 22 revolver (often the cal was 22 long or 22 short, which the 25 auto has a definite ballistic superiority), or perhaps a large knife (sticking to weapons which were very small, I know there were DA 38s and 1911s at the time). If those choices were what we still had, none of you would have anything to say. Its because of our advancements in firearms technology over the last 100 or so years that the 25 acp has been around that anyone can even criticize the cartridge. Did you ever look at anything else thats been around over 100 yrs and try to determine its present day usefulness?

If your point is "hey man, a 9mm (or anything else) is better" well thank you Columbo, for solving that one for us.

Am I a 25 auto fan? No, not really. I have many, but they are collector firearms. What do I carry? Usually a Colt Mustang 380, but sometimes a 9mm. My posts are intended to remind everyone of the facts and history. Today there are better options, but at its inception, the 25 auto was a great option. It is still useful today IMO. Ever see how small a Walther model 9 is?

If you want something that small, the 25 acp comes in a very small package, which was the goal all along; a small, ultra-compact semi auto pistol. The 25 acp and many of the pistols designed around it were very successful, because they achieved their intended goal.

I mean come on, it was good enough for 007 himself before he got the PPK. If its good enough for James Bond, its good enough for us
__________________
Winchester 73, the TFL user that won the west
Winchester_73 is offline  
Old March 15, 2013, 10:25 AM   #30
chewie146
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 25, 2010
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 853
It's overpriced, wimpy, and handloading it must be an exercise in patience and frustration. Those little pills are probably better handled with tweezers than with fingers. However, it's a little bullet for little guns. It would be worthless only if it was often chambered in guns the size of a 92 or 1911. Today, I'll take the .22 over the .25. Many feel my .38 standard pressure hard cast wadcutters are undergunning it. It depends on your situation. I carried an NAA for years when I ran. It was light enough for my gym/running shorts. Now I hike instead of run, so a bigger gun doesn't run the risk of hitting me in the junk or exposing my whitey tighties.
chewie146 is offline  
Old March 15, 2013, 11:29 AM   #31
aarondhgraham
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 1, 2009
Location: Stillwater, OKlahoma
Posts: 7,056
The real question is why is .25 auto still around,,,

Quote:
The real question is why is .25 auto still around,,,
The James Bond mythos with the Beretta .25 he preferred to carry.

Aarond

P.S. My Taurus 25-PLY is a rocking little pistol.

.
__________________
Caje: The coward dies a thousand times, the brave only once.
Kirby: That's about all it takes, ain't it?
Combat: "A Silent Cry"
Aarond is good,,, Aarond is wise,,, Always trust Aarond! (most of the time)
aarondhgraham is offline  
Old March 15, 2013, 01:00 PM   #32
Bill DeShivs
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 7, 2006
Posts: 7,043
How about "Most useless thread???"
__________________
Bill DeShivs
www.billdeshivs.com
Bill DeShivs is offline  
Old March 15, 2013, 01:15 PM   #33
Spats McGee
Staff
 
Join Date: July 28, 2010
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 5,011
How about "time to close it?"
__________________
A gunfight is not the time to learn new skills.

If you ever have a real need for more than a couple of magazines, your problem is not a shortage of magazines. It's a shortage of people on your side of the argument. -- Art Eatman
Spats McGee is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.08276 seconds with 9 queries