![]() |
|
|||||||
| Forum Rules | Firearms Safety | Firearms Photos | Links | Library | Lost Password | Email Changes |
| Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 22, 2011
Posts: 2,515
|
45 ACP and Barrel Length
Hi all,
So I imagine a number of you are like me and watch some of the great YouTube videos out there. Recently tnoutdoors9 posted a video where he tested the 230 gr Speer Gold Dot out of the Springfield Armory XDs. The link is below: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4lV8wwCzsso Now there are some points to be made. He didn't use the Short Barrel version of that ammo that Speer makes, he notes he will try that later. This was more to compare expansion of the same ammo with the 5" 1911 he has used earlier to this 3.3" barrel. Also the round doesn't "fail" to expand, but doesn't expand as much (.64" as opposed to .72"). It also didn't penetrate as far (11.5" as opposed to 12.5") and was below the standard of 12". I bring this up because I am considering an XDm 3.8 compact in 45 ACP. Now that's another .5" in barrel length over the XDs, but still far short of say a 5" 1911. Should I have any concerns about a 45 ACP in this barrel length and do you folks out there that carry this gun, or the comparable Glock 30, have any concerns along these lines? Thanks, -TR
__________________
Guns don't kill people. Apes with guns kill people! - Robin Williams |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: December 17, 2005
Location: Paris, TX
Posts: 1,062
|
Any concerns?
The intended recipient in the dreaded situation I think you are speaking of will not be able to discern the difference in whatever type bullet/ammo you choose.
__________________
Bullseye is the skill, everything else is just games. |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 22, 2011
Posts: 2,515
|
Quote:
__________________
Guns don't kill people. Apes with guns kill people! - Robin Williams |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 15, 2008
Location: the object towards which the action of the sea is directed
Posts: 2,029
|
Quote:
I have 5" 1911s and carry them also. I do like being able to sit easily with a belt holstered gun; and the shorter barrel helps quite a bit with comfort in this regard. When I am truly serious, I go to a rifle. CC is compromise. As long as it is reliable, and you can hit the broad side of a barn with it consistently, why not a 3.8" barrel? Even with ball ammo a roughly 1/2" hole punch is, in my opinion, pretty effective.
__________________
The lowest paid college major/degree in this country after graduation... Elementary Education. Now, go figure... Last edited by AZAK; February 19, 2013 at 03:34 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: July 3, 2011
Posts: 1,232
|
TR,
I hate when people post replies that don't answer the question I'm asking, but I'm about to break my own rule. If I were you, I would get the Short Barrel Gold Dots and call it a day. Why worry about how the normal GDs perform when there is a better choice out there? In response to the actual question though, I believe a 4" barrel is what most manufacturers have in mind when designing the velocity envelope the bullet will expand in. I don't think .2" under that in the XDm 3.8 is going to make a significant difference. So I would be comfortable with either the Short Barrel or regular Gold Dots in the XDm 3.8. But that's me. If you can't source the SB version, but can find the normal version, I will trade you. I have two boxes of Short Barrel I bought for my HK45, and would prefer the normal version to prevent early expansion and reduced penetration. PM me if interested.
__________________
1. Mindset 2. Tactics 3. Skill 4. Equipment |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: October 22, 2010
Posts: 427
|
Yup alot of folks like the bullseye stuff and shot placement but i don't think so...not from what I have seen. I have seen a few bad guys shot in the chest with a 9mm 2x 3x and walk away. Human bone is pretty hard stuff. Paper targets and jello test mean nothing.
__________________
I'm hairbag and I approve this message. |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: July 3, 2011
Posts: 1,232
|
Quote:
If not shot placement, what do you suggest as a better idea?
__________________
1. Mindset 2. Tactics 3. Skill 4. Equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: June 7, 1999
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 952
|
At the same rate, if it expands more it will penetrate less. The short barreled version does use a different bullet than the standard 230gr gold dot (compared to the 9mm short barreled which uses the same bullet as the regular 124gr 9mm load). The 45acp doesn't lost much velocity in a 4 inch barrel compared to a 5 inch, I wouldn't worry about it myself.
I honestly think the best defensive ammo for 45acp is the Federal HST. It is in stock at Kyle gun shop right now. http://www.kylesgunshop.com/store.ph...733&pd=2829359
__________________
New gun, same ol' shot. |
|
|
|
|
#9 | ||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 22, 2011
Posts: 2,515
|
Quote:
Quote:
Thanks guys! You're probably right in that it isn't anything to really worry about, but I was curious what others thought.
__________________
Guns don't kill people. Apes with guns kill people! - Robin Williams |
||
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: December 17, 2005
Location: Paris, TX
Posts: 1,062
|
Shot placement is King, penetration is Queen........all the rest of it is virtually meaningless in a real world situation.
I think the super duper, rhino stopping, high dollar hyped up handgun bullet is just that.
__________________
Bullseye is the skill, everything else is just games. |
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: February 21, 2012
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 746
|
Quote:
__________________
This is who we are, what we do. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: June 6, 2007
Location: E. Oregon
Posts: 510
|
A .64" projectile penetrating 11.5" sound lethal to me.
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: November 1, 2011
Posts: 49
|
[QUOTE] Also the round doesn't "fail" to expand, but doesn't expand as much (.64" as opposed to .72"). It also didn't penetrate as far (11.5" as opposed to 12.5") and was below the standard of 12"./QUOTE]
[QUOTE]A .64" projectile penetrating 11.5" sound lethal to me./QUOTE] What he said. He won't feel the difference, even between similarly expanding and penetrating projectiles of similar weight. |
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: December 26, 2004
Location: Louisville KY
Posts: 11,723
|
I really feel there are three ways to stop a threat.
Pain, fear or a CNS hit. Most criminals seem to respond to fear and run off, judging by various SD accounts. After that it's the pain of being shot (and resulting fear), but if the perp is hopped up on drugs a CNS hit is ultimately what stops them immediately. If you (God forbid) have to shoot someone, the pain of getting shot should suffice to stop the attack. 2" less penetration in gel really doesn't mean much for the pain factor. IMO. |
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: December 5, 2010
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 4,090
|
Not at all brother. I have a Glock 30sf and I do not have that concern whatsoever.
I think you'll be set if you get that XD in .45 with the 3.8 barrel. You'll just have to post pics.
__________________
Sáncte Míchael Archángele, defénde nos in proélio, cóntra nequítiam et insídias diáboli ésto præsídium. Ímperet ílli Déus, súpplices deprecámur: tuque, prínceps milítiæ cæléstis, Sátanam aliósque spíritus malígnos, qui ad perditiónem animárum pervagántur in múndo, divína virtúte, in inférnum detrúde. Ámen |
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: July 26, 2005
Location: The Bluegrass
Posts: 6,608
|
A half inch short of the magic 12 inch penetration standard? I wouldn't lose sleep over that. Very unlikely to make a difference and the next five shots might all go 12 inches or more.
Expand to "only" .64 inches? If that was a 9mm, you'd be bragging about that. It's an acceptable defensive load, IMO, though perhaps not the best from a short barrel. I almost said "best available" but there's not a lot available right now.
__________________
Jim's Rules of Carry: 1. Any gun is better than no gun. 2. A gun that is reliable is better than a gun that is not. 3. A hole in the right place is better than a hole in the wrong place. 4. A bigger hole is a better hole. |
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 17, 2004
Location: Out back Ky
Posts: 3,358
|
I carry 185gr Corbon DPX plus P in my Defender, Officers and Commander
Works in all 3
__________________
Colt Defender ,Colt Mustang ,Dan Wesson CBOB, PPK/S, American Classic, Bersa Thunder 380 http://bersachat.comHome of Bersa American Classic new home www.americanclassic1911forum.com |
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: June 9, 2002
Location: northern CA for a little while longer
Posts: 1,369
|
As smaller compact/subcompact .45's have become popular for LE off-duty & plainclothes usage, some of the major American ammunition companies have been apparently working to make their hollowpoint loads offer improved "performance" (including expansion) when fired from these shorter barreled .45's.
This has benefited the private firearms owner, as well, although there are a few of the newer hollowpoint loads have been restricted (by company policies) to LE/Gov sales, granted. In earlier times not even a 5" barrel would "guarantee" expansion when used for older style JHP ammunition. The +P versions seemed to have offered some better potential, but this came with increased recoil & weapon wear ... and then we saw that when some bullet designs were pushed to higher velocities above their original velocity window, fragmentation and minimal penetration might result. Bullet designs were revised. You might find this info interesting & informative ... http://www.m4carbine.net/showthread.php?t=19887 Regarding some discussion on the G30's barrel length ... http://www.m4carbine.net/showthread.php?t=121874 Personally, I own .45's with barrel lengths including 3.25", 3.5", 3.75", 4.25", 4.5" & 5". While I've used older style JHP ammo in them (when that was all that was available for either issue or personally-purchased OTC ammo), I've also used many of the newer style hollowpoint loads, including Rem GS HPJ, Win SXT/T-Series (standard & +P versions) and Speer GDHP. Nowadays I prefer to use Win T-Series, Rem GS HPJ (non-bonded) or Speer's GDHP, not necessarily in any special order ... and I use the same ammo in ALL of my .45's. (I do prefer to limit the +P loads to the heavier and/or larger .45's, though, but that's me.) While I certainly prefer to use the best quality defensive ammo I can find (issued or purchased), I try not to lose focus of some arguably more important issues ... meaning I prefer to focus my attention on the skillset, tactics & mindset aspects of firearms usage.
__________________
Retired LE - firearms instructor & armorer |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|