The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Hide > The Art of the Rifle: Bolt, Lever, and Pump Action

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old February 15, 2013, 10:33 AM   #1
hhunter318
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 15, 2010
Posts: 149
.338 Lapua vs .338 Norma

Does anyone have enough experience with both of these cartridges to give some input as far as ballistics, affordability, and any other aspect go? The Norma looked like a cool alternative.
hhunter318 is offline  
Old February 16, 2013, 06:19 PM   #2
FALPhil
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 10, 2007
Location: Racoon City
Posts: 933
If you want affordable, the 338 RUM is the way to go. Personally, I went with the slightly larger capacity 338 Edge, which is the 300 RUM necked up to 338. I can get good quality brass for about half the price of 338 Lapua, and the rebated rim lets me use a standard magnum bolt face in my ZKK 602.
FALPhil is offline  
Old February 18, 2013, 02:27 AM   #3
math teacher
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 5, 2012
Location: Southwest WA Coast
Posts: 317
If you are going to use it to shoot critters, the 338 Win Mag will work just as well and the ammo is readily available. Brass is a lot cheaper too.
math teacher is offline  
Old February 18, 2013, 09:06 AM   #4
hhunter318
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 15, 2010
Posts: 149
No offense to anyone, but scratch affordability. I should have never included that. I know the 338 RUM and EDGE can do the same and more than the Lapua, but I'm really just interested in the performance between the Lapua and the Norma. Sorry for not being clear.
hhunter318 is offline  
Old February 18, 2013, 12:38 PM   #5
mapsjanhere
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 6, 2009
Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 2,356
Depending on the brass price, affordability might be the main difference. The 338 Norma will fit into a standard long action like the Rem 700 etc. The 338 LM is usually chambered into .50 system due to the length, with corresponding price increase. Ballistics wise, you can probably squeeze a tiny bit more from the LM, but quite frankly, once you start pouring 100 gr+ of powder into a case 5% more doesn't make all that much difference.
__________________
F 135 - the right choice
mapsjanhere is offline  
Old February 18, 2013, 01:42 PM   #6
Scorch
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 13, 2006
Location: Washington state
Posts: 11,476
Performance of the two is nearly identical. The 338 Norma is slightly shorter but fatter, case capacity is essentially identical. The biggest advantage of the Norma case is availability, and the Lapua has the takticool factor. They both go bang, both launch a heavy bullet at the same speed, go for whichever one floats your boat.
__________________
Never try to educate someone who resists knowledge at all costs.
But what do I know?
Summit Arms Services
Taylor Machine
Scorch is offline  
Old February 18, 2013, 02:53 PM   #7
hhunter318
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 15, 2010
Posts: 149
Thanks. I just heard that the Norma was doing the same with less, which always seems like a plus to me. I have too much going on for a new build at the moment, but dreaming and researching for the next one is always fun.
hhunter318 is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2014 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Contact Us
Page generated in 0.05718 seconds with 9 queries